User talk:JSFarman

Caution
  • Click New section on the top right to start a new topic.
  • If your message is regarding an article I reviewed, please include links to pertinent page(s).
  • I'll respond as quickly as I can to your message, but sometimes I'm busy in real life.
  • If you're gonna be a dick, you need to outdick this guy: "JSFarman you F*ing A*hole. Choke on your own vomit JSFarman!" SwishGuy

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, JSFarman. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Shearonink (talk) 21:10, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April editathons at Women in Red

January 2020 at Women in Red

January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153


Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Carianne Marshall moved to draftspace

Draftifying my own article, not ready

Carianne Marshall moved to draftspace

Draftifying my own article, not ready

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello JSFarman,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello JSFarman,

New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello JSFarman,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

22:05:59, 4 October 2017 review of submission by Rpsavory

{{Lafc|username=Rpsavory|ts=22:05:59, 4 October 2017|declined=Draft:Rhea_Scott

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Thank you so much for accepting my article.

Hi @JSFarman/Julie.

Thank you so much for accepting my article. Not to discredit the other fine Wikipedians on here, but I worked really hard on it and tried to be as scholarly as possible. Thank you for considering it. It was my first one ever. Historyguy1138 (talk) 16:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Historyguy1138! You did a fantastic job with the article. Thanks for writing it. Your hard work shows! JSFarman (talk) 16:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

The Invisible Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to JSFarman for accumulating at least 5 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2024

Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Rick Beerhorst

I appreciate your input regards reviewing the content of the draft of Rick Beerhorst. I would like to make it known that I took over a week reviewing all the sources on this painter on the internet, ensuring strictly to Wikipedia guidelines, that the sources were wholly independent. I am also adding additional Art critic quotations pertaining to Rick Beerhorst, that remain again impartial and independent of any advertising or promotion of the painter. Thenfactor (talk) 12:31, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thenfactor. Thanks for the message and thanks for your effort.
Please read the articles linked in the decline notices. The majority are not independent or reliable or do not provide extensive coverage of Rick Beerhorst. Hyperallergic is a solid reference; Christianity Today would be but the link goes to a page that no longer exists. I did not go through all of the sources, however: Mutual Art is a commercial site and not independent or reliable and it provides no coverage beyond a listing and an image. Same goes for Saachi. The Rapidian publishes articles by community contributors and as such is not reliable. Literary Hub is OK but it does not carry the article. I combined the refs but there are still 44 and I am unable to go through all of them. For an artist, I personally look for Art in America, Art Forum, Artmet, Art News, coverage in major dailies, books written by subject matter experts, in addition to magazines such as The New Yorker and (inedpendent) media that has the green light on list of perennial sources. I did a quick search and could not find additional references.
There is content that is not supported by valid citations, and editorializing, which, since it is not cited, which is then considered original research. The inclusion of so many quotes (many by the same critic) reads promotional.
I am a fan of his work, and thank you for introducing me to it. But I suggest that you pull the draft out of the AfC queue until you are able to add valid sources that will show that he meets the inclusioon criteria. Four reviewers have left specific guidance on the article and the issues raised have not been sufficiently addressed. JSFarman (talk) 16:58, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reopening deletion for Gnarls Narwhal

Hello, I see you previously nominated Gnarls Narwhal for speedy deletion. I am renominating it for AfD, since it is still not notable. Your input on how the article is currently would be appreciated. Best, Ornov Ganguly TALK 03:39, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will weigh in there. Thanks for the heads up. JSFarman (talk) 04:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

resubmission of draft

Hi! Thank you for reviewing my draft. I just re-submitted it :) I hope you find it improved

Draft:David R. Walt

DP917 (talk) 23:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DP917. Thanks for the message. You are speedy! It is definitely improved but it's hard to follow. I tried to edit the first paragraph for clarity but failed; I find it difficult to make grammatical sense of academic titles, particularly when there are concurrent roles.
I can't rereview the article -- I don't know enough about his field to do so competently -- but I am happy to help with basic editing. He is very accomplished. JSFarman (talk) 23:50, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks so much for taking a look! much appreciated. His research is very specific :)
You not editing means someone else will or that it is declined again? DP917 (talk) 23:52, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't decline it again -- I just didn't review it. Someone else will. JSFarman (talk) 23:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you. Fingers crossed DP917 (talk) 23:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
JSFarman, I did some additional copyediting, and I am convinced that he easily meets WP:ACADEMIC. I consider the risk of deletion at AfD to be zero. A plus for me is that he was born in Detroit, as was I. DP917, I am going to accept your draft. Cullen328 (talk) 00:21, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
THANK YOU DP917 (talk) 00:22, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome, DP917, and I hope that you will keep contributing excellent content to Wikipedia. Cullen328 (talk) 00:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cullen328 to the rescue! Thanks to you both. JSFarman (talk) 00:37, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks both, have a great rest of your weekend DP917 (talk) 01:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Julie, you had me when I read that he worked for Mitch Ryder. I simply loved his band Detroit (band), the successor to the Detroit Wheels.

There was a wikilink to Bobby Rush who is a former Black Panther leader, congressman and the only politician ever to defeat Barack Obama in an election. I changed that to Bobby Rush (musician). I removed mention of the upcoming Elvin Bishop book, which can be added back once it is published. I did general copyediting and typo correction, and moved it to mainspace. A fascinating career! Cullen328 (talk) 04:24, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are a superstar! I just looked at the edit history, and I was asking you to do much more work than I thought I was. (Proof once again that the best Wikipedia articles are collaborative.) It was a little heartbreaking to see the article sitting unreviewed for almost six months. Thank you x 10000000. I am going to go listen to Mitch Ryder in your honor! JSFarman (talk) 04:39, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Try to find stuff from that specific album. They did a fantastic cover of Rock & Roll (The Velvet Underground song). Coincidentally, I listened to the Velvet Underground earlier today, including that song. A 72 year old listening to music he loved at age 17. Hope that isn't too creepy. Fortunately for me, I never became an addict like Lou Reed. Cullen328 (talk) 04:59, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is how my rabbithole mind works: Debra and I had lunch at the best (my opinion) of our three local Chinese restaurants today, and since it is chilly and rainy, we ordered a pot of Oolong tea. That led me to the Wikipedia article which did not mention US Chinese restaurants. That led me to a 1920 magazine article describing increasing interest in Chinese food back then, including a detailed description of the tea. That led me back to my previous interest in the influence that a Chinese chef had on the childhood of James Beard, resulting in a significant expansion of the History section of American Chinese cuisine, tying all that together. Cullen328 (talk) 05:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good morning, Cullen328! We have the Velvet Underground in common. Also rabbithole minds! I am forever creating sandboxes for articles I plan to write. I think last week there were four or five, and they were all related to influential AI artists. Of course, you actually write the articles whereas my ADD kicks in pretty much after I create the sandbox. (The Ooolong article is great.)
If you ever feel like working on a random article, please choose User:JSFarman/sandbox/Pat Kingsley! I started writing it in 2017. I am overwhelmed by her/her career and the amount of source material available. Neutrality is hard to come by; most everyone who wrote about her was on an entertainment beat and there's a lot of coverage motivated by either asskissing or revenge. (I tried to get a perseverating new editor to work on this article, as opposed to the bizarre one she was writing; that's why there are so many strange notes (and anecdotes).
Oh LOOK. I got so distracted by Pat that I forgot I have a 10:15 call. (I thought "time to make the donuts", followed by "Is there an article about "Time to make the donuts?", followed by "I gotta write the article I never wrote about the Sarah McLachlin ASPCA ad, which was referred to as "the ad" in fundraising circles.)(Is there an article about Kars for Kids?) Oh my god. HELP. JSFarman (talk) 18:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your wish has come true. In my humble opinion, the Kars4Kids TV ad is the most irritating ad ever shown on national TV, but I could be wrong. Not until I read that article did I know that it is a Jewish operation. I will get back to you later on the other stuff. By the way, I too, have lots of unfinished sandbox drafts, so don't feel bad. Cullen328 (talk) 18:20, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I read the Pat Kingsley sandbox with growing horror about the Cruise stuff, and then got a good laugh with She worked with Frank Sinatra, she helped Marilyn Monroe's cat give birth. That sentence proves that she is notable but that project needs a LOT of work, as you well know. Cullen328 (talk) 18:32, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2025

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]