Your edit to Montgomery High School (San Diego) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. You cannot make unattributed, verbatim copies of material from the web.Meters (talk) 20:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would be the upmost thankful if you could help in regards where I could better fix my formatting to applied with Wikipedia, Such as articles that I would be able to see. Issac I Navarro (talk) 03:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Montgomery High School (San Diego), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please reference things properly. References go after the claim and the punctuation. Don't use non-reliable sources such as individuals' online posts, and don't use sources which don't actually support your claims. I'm getting tired of going over your edits. There are many problems aside from the referencing issues and the copyright issues. This is an encyclopedia, so write things neutrally. A school article is written to inform general readers about the school, it is not there to contain non-encyclopedic information.Meters (talk) 07:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For future reference, what may include non-encyclopedic information? For example, would information about how the school hosted an art festival fall under non-encyclopedic content, or would this apply to other matters such as graduation? I assume that if they were videos, they would be considered unreliable sources. Additionally, for information that is not publicly available, such as events covered in a yearbook, I would also assume that it would be considered self-published, thus making that information too biased to use, as it has not been verified by other sources.
I have not included details about how the school was the primary location for the 2023 Southern California VEX IQ Middle School State Championship or how it has been held where schools from far up North of San Diego has traveled down to Chula Vista to have it. I am wondering how this information might be sourced. Or if it would fall under non-encyclopedic?
Also, there is no information regarding the high school's logo. Sorry if this is a bit of a tangent, however. I did find information in regards to the logo. As it is commonly know the school's logo uses SDSU,.logo however do to controversy the collage has distance them self from that logo.. As seen here: https://www.cbs8.com/article/sports/ncaa/ncaab/where-is-san-diego-states-mascot/509-dd1bc44e-776f-463a-b99f-9b7f996044f5#:~:text=SDSU%20had%20a%20mascot%2C%20but,would%20no%20longer%20be%20used Also here https://president.sdsu.edu/priorities/aztec-identity/history#:~:text=For%20the%20first%20time%2C%20a,to%20become%20more%20historically%20accurate" For the first time, a student portrays an Aztec in a football game skit. The character becomes known as “Monty Montezuma.” Over time, the character's apparel is adjusted to become more historically accurate. May 12, 2023" When I started to look back at old message boards( that could be found here:https://aztecmesa.proboards.com/post/1132417/quote/38588) I found information from an admin saying that "Post by aron off on Jan 28, 2020 at 10:25am Classic Monty design - developed by Angelus Pacific Co in Fullerton and designed by Arthur Evans, their mascot designer - created specifically for Aztec Shops. Evans also drew the tough USC Trojan, Purdue Boilermaker, Oklahoma State cowboy, SEC schools, Oregon State beaver, and others all for college bookstores My copy of the artwork is dated 6/21/1940 as the date received by Aztec Shops" Thus it lead me to the https://www.sportsfevercal.com/ I went to a location in person and say that they did still sell the logo being used on the hat. I couldn't find any more information in regards to that logo, However going to an old revision on the Wikipedia article It mentioned that "Mike Brindle, 1975 - Artist who drew "Monty the Aztec" logo" however I couldn't find anything to verify that. The logo there may be the old high schools' logo witch could be found only at the high school it self; in classrooms, on the original basketball gym(the school has two) and could be found on yearbooks. That logo is more colorful. There is also another logo that the high school ASB used for the header of documents and check request forms. I am not sure the time period in witch this would of been however it seems around the 80s. Yet I can't find any information that it was ever used the only proof that the logo even exist is at the school in on those old papers. Because I have not found any information in who created the original logo, the one used by the ASB I have not added any information as I can't find any sources in regards to that.
So to end this rather long rant, I suppose that be that as it may, it seems that it may be easier if you provided some quick examples of what would be considered non-encyclopedic, such as what that may entail so I don't make that mistake again, as I am not completely sure what that may look like. Issac I Navarro (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions to Palomar High School. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 12 Monkeys (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I would like to clarify that the edits I made were primarily focused on a few specific lines. For instance, in line 44, there appears to be a discrepancy in the phrase, “He is interrogated by the scientists.” in the "He" as there is a space. However, upon reviewing my revisions, I see now that I inadvertently altered a quotation, in line 88. I apologize for this oversight, as I was utilizing the source editing during my editing process. Thank you. Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You also changed parts of the plot from present tense to past tense; I'm not sure why you did that, but if you intend to reinstate your edits, please be mindful of WP:PLOTTENSE. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 17:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pie charts
It isn't necessary to add pie charts to stub articles about schools. The charts are decorative, and too big to fit in the article. Just add the numbers. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you
I have seen quite few being used on school related articles, that use the pie chart would it be acceptable to delete them? I was trying to find what Wikipedia's standards may be on the matter, however, I can't seem to find a clear standard could you refer me to a talk page or somewhere that outlines this policy? Regarding the use of pie charts in school-related articles; while pie charts are not explicitly prohibited or required by Wikipedia's standards, their inclusion must adhere to Wikipedia's general content guidelines: they should be relevant, neutral, and supported by verifiable sources. Thus, I was not sure where to look, Template:Pie chart but I could not find anything super clear in regards to school pages. Issac I Navarro (talk) 19:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Charlotte Mayorkas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Issac I Navarro! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madds Buckley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Issac I Navarro!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ibjaja055 (talk) 17:20, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for January 21
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
Except for career, all other sections are unsourced. Please add more reliable sources with significant coverage especially for each awards to consider the filmmaker notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fernando A. Fisher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fernando A. Fisher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Jenna Daniels, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
