User talk:GobsPint

GobsPint, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi GobsPint! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs

Hello GobsPint,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 21:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs

Hello, GobsPint,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Britishfinance and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 22:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hackback

Hello, GobsPint. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hackback".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 12:26, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 12:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from DannyS712

Hello, GobsPint. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Trilogy Education Services.
Message added 23:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DannyS712 (talk) 23:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Data factory

The article Data factory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this is an encyclopedic term. WP:NOTDICTIONARY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of YSI 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose and Lactate Analyzer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YSI 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose and Lactate Analyzer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YSI 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose and Lactate Analyzer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mike1901 (talk) 20:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Toilet talk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toilet talk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toilet talk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Pig butchering" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Pig butchering and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Pig butchering until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 02:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:43, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pathologists' assistant, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York and CLIA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should Medical laboratory credentials and certifications in the United States be merged?

Hello. I noticed that the article you recently created, Medical laboratory credentials and certifications in the United States, seems to be very similar in content to the existing article List_of_professional_designations_in_the_United_States#Medicine_and_Health_Care. I wonder if the two articles should be merged, or is there a reason for them to both exist; do they somehow cover different material? Gronk Oz (talk) 07:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No,I would oppose a merge. It it comparable to Nursing credentials and certifications, which has its own article. There is also a standalone List of chiropractic credentials. A number of the laboratory designations are shared amongst the various certification boards. The list is incomplete, as it needs the list from American Society for Clinical Pathology#Certifications merged in as well. I've noticed a lack of articles on clinical laboratory topics here.GobsPint (talk) 15:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Medical laboratory credentials and certifications in the United States moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Medical laboratory credentials and certifications in the United States. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of American Medical Technologists

The article American Medical Technologists has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After a good faith search, I do not think that suitable sources exist for this topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BeauregardTA (talk) 10:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, GobsPint. Thank you for your work on American Certification Agency for Healthcare Professionals. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This page is so short that it's best discussed in the context of the wider body.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 08:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: - Thanks for the feedback. There are some starter pages about organizations that certify tens of thousands of people that are inherently notable, but there is just limited material. Sometimes short pages are appropriate.

I'm concerned the merger into Institute for Credentialing Excellence (ICE) makes that article unbalanced as it certifies dozens of organizations. GobsPint (talk) 03:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. However, there's plenty of space on Institute for Credentialing Excellence to merge the others in, or to create new content. Two sentences of prose and a short table (which may be better formatted as a short list) doesn't seem to wait heavily on the page to my eyes. Klbrain (talk) 06:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, GobsPint. Thank you for your work on Generative biology. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

There's so little text here that this material is better placed with the context of the broader, more widely accepted field of Developmental biology.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 12:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Public health laboratory

added links pointing to KY, CA, IN, IL and CO

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Not a topic that I want to think about but thanks for making Meat diaper. It is quality content for the subject. Bluerasberry (talk) 22:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!GobsPint (talk) 23:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on Sunlight before signing. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Clearly written and sufficiently referenced. Some of the points show over-citations, such as the end of the lede. This means that readers don't know which reference to turn to find the most substantive pieces of evidence to support the claim. There is also no lede, distinct from sections within the body of the article; the lede is a helpful summary or abstract of a more well-developed article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 19:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Association of State Boards of Accountancy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Washington, New York and Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Labcorp

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Labcorp, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge tags

As you did here, you added the merge tags without initiating a discussion first, as highlighted in this page. Next time if you want to propose an article to be merged, you should start a discussion before adding the tags. Hope that helps! Toadette^Edit! 10:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on Howell-Jolly body-like inclusions. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Concise but clear; using just enough sources! I'd considered whether a merge to a broader topic might be warranted, but as they're been described in several different cell types, keeping it separate seems reasonable. Perhaps a merge to Howell–Jolly body, as a separate section, for better context might be considered if the page proves difficult to develop further.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 17:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: - They should remain seperate pages. Howell–Jolly body are specifically for red blood cells, whereas Howell-Jolly body-like inclusions are for white blood cells and have a different mechanism. I do appreciate the feedback though! GobsPint (talk) 05:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

A concise page, supported by appropriate references, although some of them are from associated entities (the FDA). While some editors prefer prose, I think that the table in the history section is clear. While it may be obvious to US readers, including the legistature passing the bill would be helpful. The page also discusses two topics: the act and the programme. That's fine, but a clearer distinction between them might be helpful.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 09:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Meat diaper

Hello! Your submission of Meat diaper at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Luiysia (talk) 17:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on Doctor of Clinical Laboratory Science. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

A clear and simple stub for a relatively new degree. It would be helpful to add further references that reflect on the impact of the degree to the profession.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Professional certification in quality management

A tag has been placed on Category:Professional certification in quality management indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^Read! Talk! 04:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inspector shopping moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Inspector shopping. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hitro talk 15:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the article. The reason listed in your move "more sources needed" is not a valid WP:DRAFTREASON. I have added an additional source. If you believe the topic does not meet WP:N, please take it to AFD.GobsPint (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, "more sources needed" is one of the seven options listed in the tool used to draftify the article. If I intended to take it to AfD, I would have done so without hesitation. But it is not an AfD material. Draftifying serves as an alternative to deletion, providing an opportunity to incubate the article. Despite this, you moved the article to the mainspace with a significant portion lacking proper references. Our goal is to build a reliable encyclopedia, not to promote unsourced material that appears to be original research. Regards Hitro talk 23:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. I created the article to correct a red link in another article I am writing. I moved in back to the mainspace as I'm not personally interested in expanding the topic, but as a sourced stub, perhaps others are. The topic is self-explanatory and would pass WP:N. The lack of sourcing may make {{Original research}} appropriate. Thanks.GobsPint (talk) 18:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on Goal ambiguity. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

A stub, primarily a dictionary definition, but one that holds useful information. It's either a helpful starting-point for an article, or a helpful contribution that could be merged elsewhere, such as to Strategic management#Concepts and frameworks. I also wonder whether it might have been written as a coat rack for have a dig at Higher education in the United States; perhaps that's a worthy objective though! I wouldn't limit the scope to the US though ...

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 07:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Donald Von ShitzInPantz

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Donald Von ShitzInPantz, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
• It is an "attack page" or an unsourced biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
  Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity, or articles about living people that are entirely negative and unsourced. Attack pages, attack files and negative unreferenced BLPs are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted my CSD nomination. I didn't realize this was an actual potential search term. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on Ben Meiselas. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 00:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prosecution of Donald Trump in New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page District judge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Donald Von ShitzInPantz" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Donald Von ShitzInPantz has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 30 § Donald Von ShitzInPantz until a consensus is reached. Liz ^Read! Talk! 06:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sunlight before signing

On 31 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sunlight before signing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Barack Obama made an election promise to make non-emergency bills freely available online for a five-day public consultation period under "sunlight before signing"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sunlight before signing. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sunlight before signing), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of festivals in California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of festivals in California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of festivals in California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 02:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salem Radio Network, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Columbus and Greenville.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sunday scaries

Hello, GobsPint,

Thank you for creating Sunday scaries.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Be careful about making medical claims - WP:MEDRS, WP:WIKIVOICE, WP:SYNTH. Statements like "the feeling contributes to the blue Mondays and that Monday's have the highest suicide rates" are not supported by the Guardian article you link.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BrigadierG}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BrigadierG (talk) 22:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Albert Henry Krehbiel has been nominated for deletion

Category:Albert Henry Krehbiel has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Meat diaper

Hello! Your submission of Meat diaper at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Meat diaper

On 6 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Meat diaper, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that putting pre-moistened meat diapers in pre-packaged meat is a form of weight fraud? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Meat diaper. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Meat diaper), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on HHS Proficiency Examination. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

It seems reasonable to cover this separately to the well-developed CLIA page; thanks for adding this new content on a former examination/qualification.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 23:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on Individualized Quality Control Plan. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:28, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nicknames of Donald Trump has been nominated for deletion

Category:Nicknames of Donald Trump has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. FeralOink (talk) 09:13, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Medical laboratory credentials and certifications in the United States

Hello, GobsPint. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Medical laboratory credentials and certifications in the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perceptual vigilance has been accepted

Perceptual vigilance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^Edits! Talk! 18:03, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Zelensky: The Unlikely Ukrainian Hero Who Defied Putin and United the World" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Zelensky: The Unlikely Ukrainian Hero Who Defied Putin and United the World has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 5 § Zelensky: The Unlikely Ukrainian Hero Who Defied Putin and United the World until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lamar University Literary Press moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lamar University Literary Press. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Association of Genetic Technologists

Hello GobsPint, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Association of Genetic Technologists, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Genetic Technologists.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Conyo14}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Conyo14 (talk) 04:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Patient population

Hello, GobsPint

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Patient population, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 28 § Patient population.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

A redirect or redirects you have created has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9 § Redirects to Regnery Publishing until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

A redirect or redirects you have created has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9 § Redirects to Regnery Publishing until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hire-Train-Deploy

The article Hire-Train-Deploy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Might be WP:TOOSOON, there seems to be some mentions outside Craig as the coiner of the term and the companies self-promoting their services under this model, but there doesn't seem to be anything other than trivial mentions in RS. Might be enough for a WP:DICDEF but I don't think we have enough for an encyclopedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:15, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Donald the Caveman

A tag has been placed on Category:Donald the Caveman indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:54, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Inspector shopping

Hello, GobsPint. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Inspector shopping, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on National Society for Histotechnology. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

IMO and edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking as reviewed. Need independent sources which discuss it. I added a couple possible refs but they are weak in this respect. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:54, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on American Association of Pathologists' Assistants. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Smoothstack

The article Smoothstack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG, may also be WP:ATTACK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TimJohn67 (talk) 20:05, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of online language tutoring platforms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of online language tutoring platforms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of online language tutoring platforms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Joe (talk) 15:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on Phlebotomy licensure. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

IMO the title should probably be changed to licensure & certifications. The topic says "licensure" and the content currently says "there is no licensure" Also needs much expansion because most of the article is just duplication of the US licensure article. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Freak off" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Freak off has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 30 § Freak off until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outing

Hi GobsPint, just as a reminder our harassment policy prohibits linking to other editors profiles on other websites unless they have explicitly disclosed such a link themselves already. As such, I've suppressed the link you added to a LinkedIn profile in your recent request for undeletion, and I'd appreciate it if you're careful about this sort of thing in the future. Thanks! stwalkerster (talk) 13:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GobsPint. Thank you for your work on Repair monopoly. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start. At first I was concerned that it might be a neologism but I checked and the terms is in widespread use. Suggest expanding the articles and sources to solidify this. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]