Hello, Raulkul! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horsesIf you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Chasewc91:I just did that because no one answered me. I've listed many sources on Born This Way (album)'s talk page, if you want to see. Sorry for any mistake, I'm new in Wiki and I'm just trying to improve Gaga's articles with good edits.
Cheek to Cheek Tour
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Cheek to Cheek Tour, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please understand this is a community of editors. If you disagree with another editor's contribution to an article, I suggest you strike up a conversation with them. This way, you clear the air of any confusion and you both can work together to come to a consensus. Granted, my addition to the article was adding the poster, I do not disagree with the previous editor's additions, that is why I am adding them back into the article. I will not play tit or tat with you as you've been warned of similar behavior before. The way you are choosing to handle the situation is not the best. You have to be a team player. Itsbydesign (talk) 05:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Itsbydesign: oh, great! You come to my talk page and call my edits as non constructive? First, thank u for adding the poster and improving the "set list". Now let's face the facts. All Gaga's articles about her tours have the same structure. The way you edited looks very misplaced and confusing. Some of those jazz festivals are unknown, so keeping the name of the festival instead of the venue it happens, is better for people who come to read the article. I think our conversation is very unnecessary, I mean, this is something so little, we should remain some of your edits with some of the previous. And no, I'm not playing anything, I'm just seeing what is better for the article.Raulkul (talk) 06:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@IndianBio: I didn't know that images from "Fan Sites" aren't acceptable. Whatever, I really give my best here on Wiki. Of course sometimes I make mistakes, because I'm new and I know just the basic. Sorry for anything. And thanks IndianBio for coming here and explaining and put things right!Raulkul (talk) 06:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding this edit just wanted to let you know "never ever" update that list without discussing first in the talk page. It follows strict guidelines and norms which has to be followed. Please refer the talk page and try to understand what it says regarding how the list is compiled. —Indian:BIO[ ChitChat ]05:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@IndianBio: thanks for letting me know about that. I would do the "talk page thing", but I tought how I had a very reliable source, it wouldn't be a problem if I updated Gaga's numbers!
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar
Hello Little Monster (you are the one, right?)! I have seen your work on Lady Gaga videography and I must say it's quite nice. Some time is all you need (to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines and polices and also WP:FLC and how it works). And then you'll turn it to FL in no time. That's what I think. Paws up bitch. -- Frankietalk17:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, thank you so much for this, I never tought I would get one. I've been working and giving my best on Gaga's articles, mainly on her awards, videography and tours. It means a lot you are recognizing my "job" (may I call this way). And yes, I'm a Little Monster :) Paws up Frankie!!! GagaNutella (talk) 18:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You're a Little Monster, so am I and I want to see all of her sub-articles FL. If you need some help or assistance, I'm all yours. :) -- Frankietalk18:18, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello GagaNutella! My name is Musicpoplover12, and I would like to thank you for you contributions on The 1989 World Tour page. I also want to say, "You're welcome!" because I work so hard trying to find the correct references for the page, especially the special guests section. I would like to talk to you about what's been happening the page when we aren't around when we edit. It seems that we are the only two accounts that always put correct information while other accounts are either vandalizing for no reason by putting information that is not true or they are people who think they have correct information, but don't have a source for it. The question I would like to ask you is, do you know if there is a way that we become admins of the page? I would like to work with you to stop anyone that keep breaking the rules. Thank you, and happy peaceful editing!!! Musicpoplover12 (talk) 22:45, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Musicpoplover12: Hi, I also would like to thank you for your effort to keep that article with correct and reliable sources. I've noticed those vandalisms and unnecessary edits, mainly by IPs. The best for us is ask someone to protect the article. You can ask it on the talk page. I suggest you to read this article first, Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. I'm sure you're gonna learn more about "protection page". Thank you again!!! GagaNutellatalk23:31, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@GagaNutella: Hi again! I'm getting really irritated with the vandalism that has been happening, but this time, it's from accounts. The IPs aren't a problem. It has come to the point where trying to protect the page won't work. I'm not sure why these accounts keeps vandalizing, and I just edited to where I had to fix the cities, venues, attendance, and gross revenue all to the correct information. We have to try and find a way for us two to become admins of the 1989 World Tour page. I found this, Wikipedia:Administrators, so if you are in, let me know! Thanks! Musicpoplover12 (talk) 03:04, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Musicpoplover12: I was traveling, that's why it took me some days to reply you. I don't think is that easy to become an administrator. The article is already protected and you've been doing a great job. Keep doing it and if an account insists in vandalizing, you can read this and learn some ways to respond to vandalism. Remember, I'm here to help. Bye! GagaNutellatalk04:00, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. I will try to find more sources for this case and archive them. I've changed and added many sources there recently. I still need to work at the "Guinness" section too. Thank you for asking me. GagaNutellatalk15:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've just edited more things and I realized there is still a lot to do. Also, there are some awards we won't be able to find reliable sources. For this case, is better leave with the "[citation needed]". GagaNutellatalk04:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No! Don't delete the notable awards, just because ya' can't find sources. I have watchlisted the page and will soon begin working on it. -- Frankietalk16:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: We didn't delete! Instead, we improved the whole article with new and better sources, tables and more. I mean, we know what we're doing! We've already worked A LOT on it and I'm very happy with the final results. It still needs some minor fixes, specially on the Guinness section, which I will be working really soon! Thank u GagaNutellatalk16:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why you gotta be so rude! I haven't seen what you have done and what not. As I saw above, I said not to delete any notable award. That's all! -- Frankietalk16:56, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: Don't you know I'm human, too?, Why you gotta be so rude?, I'm gonna marry her anyway... Hahaha I wasn't rude darling, I just explained to you. Anyway, be free to join us and improve the article even more! GagaNutellatalk17:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Lady Gaga
Like you, I have been planning to expand [improve] her lists since a long time. But, I have not been able to do that, because of my commitment to other projects. And now after Brad Pitt filmography, I am taking her lists for WP:FL, but I have been working on her lists these days. I have come across you during work on the lists, and we have not been quite good to each other. Thus, I would like to let the bygones be bygones, start anew, and should focus on her lists to turn them into FL. I have forgotten and forgiven everything happened between the two of us, and I am hoping the same from you. Yours truly, Frankietalk19:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: As long as we respect each other, I'm totally in to keep working with you. I've already apologized you. Both of us made mistakes, and that's fine, because that's human all about. But the most important, we learned something with it. I'm also working very very very hard on Gaga's article and I really wanna see them FL/FA. Now, it's time to forget the past and keep forward. Again, my apologies to you. GagaNutellatalk19:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Zen of Bennett
Hi IndianBio and SNUGGUMS. I want to ask you one thing. I would like to know if you want to create an article about Bennett's film The Zen of Bennett? Gaga is in it, so I thought very interesting to make it happen. I've found MANY sources we could use:
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Completely reverting a major and accurate edit (especially by much more experienced editor) and saying "not needed" is disruptive and not how to edit, interacting and collaborating with other editors. (Also see WP:ROWN & WP:REVEXP) I could have removed all the unsourced that you added (which would have been according to MOS), but I was trying to be nice by waiting for you to add them. What is "not needed" are descriptions of the awards, but I don't revert them, because that is not how editors are to treat each other.Musdan77 (talk) 02:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Musdan77 Dude, do whatever you want, I was just trying to improve the article, which I did. I don't want to keep a conversation with you, I'm sorry, but very unnecessary you come to my talk page and say things like this. See my edits and compare the before/after. I reverted your edit because you changed the tables, and that was "not needed". Anyway, I finished my work there. Bye GagaNutellatalk02:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate you wanting to improve (and then improving) the article - I really do. And you should appreciate my efforts as well. What you did was unnecessary and just wrong. I said those things to help you - so that hopefully you'll know better about how to properly edit in the future. Let's all work together, all right? --Musdan77 (talk) 02:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That happened once, and I had my reasons. Anyway, I've seen some people, with experience on Wiki doing the same. But believe me, it won't happen again. GagaNutellatalk19:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Taylor Swift 1989 World Tour box office
Why is it no plausible for one to add grosses at the top section? I mean c'mon look at movie box office. Don't say tours and movies are different here, we're talking specifically of box office content. Take for example, Jurassic World which is still in theaters and is still earning revenues yet the box office grosses are displayed at the top nevertheless. Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation, Minions and hundred more films are playing across the globe and they're box office grosses are still displayed at the top despite not closing in theaters. So why is it not possible to add revenue grosses for a tour till it finishes a leg? Is there a rule laid down in Wikipedia that refrains contributors to do so? Or its just an arbitrary decision? If its laid down in Wikipedia guides and rules than your revert is justified. However, if not so than don't give minor excuses such as "its already written below" or "don't add the gross here". Please support you revert.
@Josephlalrinhlua786: Hello. Thank you for coming here and ask very gently. Wikipedia and experienced editors recommend to wait the tour finishes and then add the total gross. I don't know if you know, but the biggest difference between tours and movies is that the gross of the movies is updated daily, while the former is provided by Billboard, in which not every update there is the boxscore of that tour. Cheek to Cheek Tour is a great example, because it has already finished but Billboad still didn't provide the total gross. I mean, it doesn't make sense to add it, when the tour is already happening. GagaNutellatalk14:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No actually box office are not reported daily for every movies. Especially for movies released overseas. Let's take the current example of Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials. Since no site really maintains a daily tabulation for films outside of North America, only numbers are in from its opening weekend. Other than that, the next figure you'll hear from the film is next weekend only when it opens in 41 markets (from Monday - Thursday you won't be getting any box office news from it). However, any films released in the US (Box Office Mojo) maintains a daily tabulation. So on a consensus it would be ridiculous to say that "movies" are being tabulated daily. One will sound steriotypical by saying so. And this applies also to thousands of films released outside of North America. They may be tabulated daily but it is implausible for over 100 countries to report daily grosses fro hundreds or movies everyday and they usually NEVER display it on the internet so it's equivalent to not being tabulated digitally (but maybe on papers for records).
Josephlalrinhlua786 I've seen you have some experience with articles about films, and that's amazing. I'm sorry, but I'm not very interested movie gross, or tabulation, Box Office Mojo... If you really want to add the 1989's total gross, I would suggest you to go here and talk about it. A big discussion on my talk page won't lead us anywhere. Good bye and keep improving Wikipedia. GagaNutellatalk15:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say you were being blocked, I said you could be if the reverting continues. There are three of you edit-warring back and forth about different things on the same page and it's disruptive.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Could you perhaps invite a few (maybe three) reviewers to comment on Lady Gaga songs list FLC. It's been ten days and I am afraid (if this continues) it will go into waste. -- Frankietalk18:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@IndianBio: sorry for the delay, I've just edited the article again. What do you think now? I think it's good because "Chutes" is a 73 minutes episode, which is a very long one. GagaNutellatalk02:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Cirt: I'm a huge fan of LG, and I know she loves Nutella. Actually, when I attended the BTWBALL I gave her a t shirt, which she was with a dress made by Nutellas lmao oh, just for you to know, my next step is take her awards page to FLC. I hope to see your review. GagaNutellatalk04:45, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Eh nevermind, I was working on an awards list for that TV show, was gonna ask for your help with referencing. The Walking Dead is pretty good, seen the first 2 seasons. No worries, — Cirt (talk) 05:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
At the moment I'm working on it, here. I'm using IMDB as a ref for now as a temporary measure, but I'd like to replace any refs cited to IMDB with other refs, if possible. Also going to add more to table Daytime Emmy Awards, a lot more. What do you think? — Cirt (talk) 10:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Cirt: It looks good. I have some experience with sources, actually my last FL was all about it. I can help you with that asap. When I have a free time, can I edit the article without worries? GagaNutellatalk10:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please, just take a look at how I've used WP:CIT templates for the referencing, already, and let me know what you think. I'll add more to the tables soon so you can have more to source. Basically, I modeled it after a prior WP:FL I recently did, so once the tables are filled out, and all sourced, it will pretty much be FL ready with nothing else needed to do. — Cirt (talk) 10:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Cirt: It needs some fixes and I personally don't like books sources. The tables are correct, the only thing I think is not necessary is explain them. Anyway, when you finished to add the awards please let me know that I would like to help you to improve this list. GagaNutellatalk12:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Cirt: Not a problem. I don't know how to explain but I usually don't use book sources, it's something personal. But for example my FL Lady Gaga videography there are many book sources and I didn't complain with the pet her contributors, I just prefer to use cite web. At me moment, I think your list is fine. GagaNutellatalk12:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, how about we hold off on modifications until I'll let you know once all the tables are all done and ready for better sources? — Cirt (talk) 12:59, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done, page is all filled in, at link. All that's needed is to phase out all the IMDB citations with better cites, and then it'll be ready for FLC. Can you help me with that research? — Cirt (talk) 16:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay yeah, the only cite that should be changed is that IMDB cite (number 9 at the moment). All the other ones are good. :) — Cirt (talk) 17:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Cirt: I've already fixed some things. I tried to find sources for the Emmy Awards and I have to say it's gonna be difficult. I'm gonna try again asap, but at the moment, the article looks great and I think it's ready. GagaNutellatalk01:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I know it's ready otherwise, and thank you for the kind words !!! But I think the main thing for improvement is replacing those IMDB cites with better ones. Let me know if you find better referencing. If not, I'll work on it some more myself over the weekend. :) — Cirt (talk) 01:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Don't you think your edit of this was a little bit rude? I think the IP removed the images in good faith and I believe you could have made an explanation in the summary. It's okay, however, to revert with a neutrally worded summary. -- Frankietalk22:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hey GagaNutella, My twitter is @EmoJoshy1, I don't know if you have twitter or not but I saw that you edited the Lady Gaga Awards page and I've been making a list of all the awards she has and it's at almost 300 while the wiki itself is missing a lot of them. You're really good at editing and understand all this (It took me forever to even get to this page) I really hope you see it and contact me so I can give you the list and help you find sources so you can add <3 Please contact me on Twitter or if not, my kik is EmoJoshy6
I recently saw that you capped a reviewer's comments in Gaga songs FLC. Please note that per talk page guidance, "nominators should not cap, alter, strike, break up, or add graphics to comments from other editors". I know it is made in good faith but it is discouraged in FAC/FLCs. -- Frankietalk12:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So, what next, Gaga's awards list? Wow! In a career spanning less than ten years, she is the recipient of six Grammys and thirteen Guinness. -- Frankietalk10:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: I've just seen! Thank you for archiving some sources and rephrasing the lead. I don't know if someone else will join me in this FL. IndianBio has contributed a lot too. Thoughts? GagaNutellatalk12:25, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: It was lmao I really don't care to have many nominators. I will nominate it and then if you or IB, SNUGGUMS and Calvin999 want to join, just add your name in there. Is that ok? GagaNutellatalk12:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I wish I could join you but having made only 32 edits, I don't think I can. -- Frankietalk 12:45, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Could you, er, maybe hold on for a while? I find some instances of questionable sources, which I/you should replace. -- Frankietalk12:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"I need to fix some wikilinks" – I have already beaten you to that ;). Also, my work on references is done. Guess I can join you now at the FLC. -- Frankietalk11:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please explain how is it helpful not to point out which show she's getting the award for? It'd be like not saying at the Grammys for which album she got the award, or which single. --Lluvia Roja (talk) 04:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Lady Gaga awards
Hi! I was thinking that once Gaga's awards list is promoted, we can request it for the Main Page for February 15. It's the day when 58th Grammy Awards will be held, and as she has been nominated for "Til It Happens to You" (I hope she wins), it will be a pretty relevant day (one can request it at WP:TFLS). I was pretty upset when it didn't receive nomination for Best Original Song at Golden Globe although I am happy that she has been nominated for Best Actress for Hotel. I didn't watch American Horror Story before but after starting to watch Hotel I watch all of the previous four seasons of AHS. I must say all (especially Asylum, my favorite season) are very creepy. -- Frankietalk20:13, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: Hey, I'm with you, let's do it! I also hope she wins, this song is amazing and has a beautiful message. About the Golden Globe, it wasn't nominated because "TIHTY" is from a documentary, so it's not eligible. And yes, she is killing in AHS and deserves all these nominations. Asylum is my favorite too, but I love all seasons, even Freak Show. GagaNutellatalk16:57, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations! I remember the day when we both were talking about turning her lists to featured and we did it! I was thinking to nominate Lady Gaga for featured topic. What do you think - should we wait until we turn her biography to FA or nominate it now. Either way is okay for me. -- Frankietalk12:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there! Wouldn't it be unfair for Katy Perry when her contemporaries like Lady Gaga and Taylor Swift's awards are FL but not hers? Well, I and SNUGGUMS have nominated her awards page for FL. Can you review it? -- Frankietalk21:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There are things that are sometimes left undone and there are things that can be left sometimes unsaid. There are things that can be sometimes left unsaid, but wishing someone like you can’t ever be left, so I take this moment to wish you and your loved ones a joyous and wonderful New Year. Cartoon network freak (talk) 15:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, Gaga won the Golden Globe Award for AHS Hotel. 2015 was a very good year for her. I hope she recaptures her past glory with LG5. -- Frankietalk10:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delay, I forgot to answer. Shame on me, FrB.TG. So, I read she hit him because he was laughing about her for being nominated as best actress. I don't know if it is true, but that's what people are saying. I don't think so. I also read that he and Gaga hugged backstage and partied together. Difficult to understand what actually happened lol GagaNutellatalk01:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I seriously doubt he did what the press seems to think he did (it's at least exaggerated), but I was pumped either way myself when finding out she won. Very well deserved and 2015 indeed was quite a year for her. Not sure if either of you saw The Revanent, but DiCaprio very much deserved to win at the Globes as well for that performance. I also do hope they both win at the Oscars. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Snuggs, here in Brazil his movie still didn't release, but I'm gonna watch it for sure. I can't understand why he laughed and what happened but their vine became viral, it's the 4th or 5th most watched vine with 100 million loop. About 2015, it was a big year, but 2016 has everything to be even better! I can't wait for LG5, new tour, possibly season 6 of AHS and much more. GagaNutellatalk05:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The film just might be his best work to date. One thing I will warn you about is that it is very intense, though I still found it very fascinating. I'm also well aware of how quickly that event spread, but there's no way things were as bad as the press suggests. Very likely misinterpreted. I'm also looking forward to LG5 and we'll see whether your girlfriend returns for more AHS :P. She's back to the spotlight :D! Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wikia
I understand that Wikipedia users have edited the plot a little but it does not mean it is wikipedia's. Atleast sourcing Wikia would be appropriate but it still doesn't work out. As you can see here: http://americanhorrorstory.wikia.com/index.php?title=Be_Our_Guest&diff=96239&oldid=96238 FishTank step by step added in the plot and it is their OWN work. I though Wikipedia takes plagiarism seriously and what, copying the whole plot off another website is totally fine? That's why wikia and Wikipedia always conflict. Wikipedia will always be more popular but they take info from Wikia and copy and paste it. Just like Black Beauty (song) how they copied everything and I had to delete it because it is plagiarism and so on. :/
Hey GagaNutella! I am very grateful for all of your edits on Wikipedia, especially edits for music articles! Personally, I am very passionate about all things Gwen Stefani and No Doubt. A WikiProject Gwen Stefani has recently been started and is currently on the hunt for new members! Even if you're not familiar with their work, your substantially HIGH level of expertise is very welcome here! WP would appreciate your membership if it works for you, and we look forward to seeing you there! Thanks so much for your time! Cheers! Carbrera (talk) 23:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@IndianBio: I'm disgusted! Gaga and Warren had everything to win this Oscar. All critics were prediciting, Spotilght, a film about abuse, won best picture and best original screenplay, and The Academy invited the VP to present Gaga. I won't say Sam's song is bad, but it's not even close to "TIHTY". Again, I'm disgusted. I hope she gets another nom soon and win it!!! PS: Diane is the Katy of the Oscars lol GagaNutellatalk11:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's a point, but not a reason, Frankie. Anyway, this is just her first nom and there are more to come. I believe Gaga will be EGOT one day, or at least will win the Oscar and Emmy. GagaNutellatalk13:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"What happened with the song Oscar: most people voted without seeing all the nominees and the singer/songwriters names weren't on the ballot." - a reporter and columnist expert from THR said about Gaga losing the Oscars. I knew there was something wrong! In history, just 5 songs from documentaries were nominated, 2 won. I mean, they don't give a damn about documentaries, 007 is a big franchise and will give them profit. At the end of the day, that's what matter! GagaNutellatalk15:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
GagaN, did you address the concerns raised by that IP user? If so can I request to add the missing performances in the article? You can refer to each and every song article and maybe tally it up. The song articles seem pretty succinct and complete. —IB[ Poke ]09:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@IndianBio: hey, I'm really busy during these days. I still didn't have time to add more performances, but I will anytime soon. I also would like to ask you what do you think to include her "festivals" concerts? Like Glastonbury, iTunes, etc. Maybe we could create a new section "festival concert" and add them in there. GagaNutellatalk17:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
GagaN, would be possible for you to add those remaining entries in Gaga's performance list? IMO it's close to promotion just that is what it awaits. FrB.TG (talk) 05:46, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
We made it!!! It's FL now :) GagaNutellatalk02:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Someone just added something about her performance on American Horror Story receiving "mixed reviews" without adding a source that actually included the term "mixed reviews". Just wanted to let you know as I'm sure you'd want to revert that. Reece Leonard (talk) 22:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for June 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by Amy Winehouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Green. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hey GagaNutella! I know you are likely busy doing something important as always, but if you had the time, could you check this out and perhaps leave some comments? It would be much appreciated. Thank you so much! Carbrera (talk) 02:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!
Hello, GagaNutella. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, GagaNutella. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Greetings! It's been a while since we last spoke. I see you also haven't been very active these days. This notice is to let you know that I've added your name to the list linked above. Please remember to remove yourself if you return to Wikipedia. Best regards, Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nice to see you come back! I thankfully have been managing to stay safe and healthy with COVID-19 still thriving. Still active on Wikipedia and have (among other things) been helping keep Gaga's main article in good shape. Unfortunately, our friend IndianBio seems to have disappeared after May 2019 aside from one final edit last October where he shared plans to become active again, but hasn't been around since. Chances are his offline life took even more precedence than expected. Regardless, I hope to see more contributions from you soon. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@SNUGGUMS: Good to know you're safe. This COVID-19 is driving everybody crazy, but we're gonna survive! About IndianBio, that's sad, he was one of the best editors out there, I hope he comes backs ASAP. I confess I'm a very rusty, so please correct me if I make a mistake while editing Gaga's articles hahaha bye xx --GagaNutellatalk03:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've blocked them for disruptive editing. If this happens in the future just report them at WP:AN3. I keep an eye on those pages so will look out as well. FYI lived in Sao Paulo until last year and loved it! Obrigado! Glen (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just thought I'd let you know that Hits is indeed a reliable source. They're a 35 year old music industry trade publication with direct ties to Neilsen SoundScan and Broadcast Data Systems, which track sales and airplay data. I won't revert because I don't really mind, but just thought I should let you know. ;) Happy editing. BTW, I really don't like your username. You have me sitting here right craving that smooth, delicious chocolatey hazelnut-y velvet loveliness. =(
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Can we start a conversation about Gaga, kindness punks and wikiKind?
I just came looking at the article history for Lady Gaga, wanting to find who within wikipedia has been helping make her article so beautiful and here you are! I would really like to connect. I’ve been working on bringing more inclusivity and kindness into the free knowledge movement and, as part of that, launching wikiKind - something we want to invite all kindness punks to be part of! I would love to include you in the fun.
I LOVE Gaga. This past year Chromatica has been the most inspiring collection of genius and I lost count of how many times I’ve listened and watched every song.
So... I have a feeling we’ll have a great time connecting! And I want to commend your work on making all Gaga related wikipages as high quality as possible! Have you had the opportunity to connect directly with Gaga yet? I’m sure she’s very grateful for your work too!
Made this especially for you. Happy Valentine’s Day, my friend!
It’s a maze of twisty passages all around here. Sometimes it’s hard to feel appreciated. This Heart-shaped Labyrinth is to say Thank YOU, Wikipedian, for all your hard work!!! from Me to YOU, GagaNutella. I appreciate your work. I really do.
Olá, sei que você é brasileiro e controla 90% das páginas da Gaga aqui na Wikipédia. Vim te dar parabéns por todo esse trabalho duro e lindo que você vem fazendo durante esses anos. Mas também vim te recomendar uma reforma em um artigo em específico: o dos prêmios.
Tenho uma lista com todos os prêmios da Gaga, e deram 460 no total... estou aqui com o objetivo de melhorar o artigo, não sou um fã com ego inflado. Ficaria feliz caso você aceitasse dar uma olhadinha nessa lista.
@Barbrastreisandworld: Oi, tudo bem? Obrigado pelo reconhecimento! Sobre a lista, vou reverter o que você editou, pois aqui na Wikipédia tudo baseia-se em referência, não se pode mudar algo sem adicionar uma referência confiável. Onde posso encontrar sua lista para dar uma olhada? GagaNutellatalk01:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Que bom receber sua resposta! Eu não deveria ter editado a página logo de cara sem falar com o administrador, mas é minha primeira vez na Wikipédia e não estava conseguindo entrar em contato. Barbrastreisandworld (talk) 01:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Recomendo que você abra a lista no pc, pois assim verá a contagem certinha até o 460. É normal que haja divergências, mas a gente resolve sem problemas... uma questão bastante polêmica é o certificado da VEVO, contei apenas até 2016 quando eles entregavam prêmio físico. Muita gente conta em 2021, mas acho desespero kk. Espero que goste da lista, e se não concordar com alguma coisa, só me avisar! Diálogo é tudo. Barbrastreisandworld (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Barbrastreisandworld: Pode deixar, vou olhar com calma e acrescentar todos os prêmios que forem considerados "reliable" pela Wikepédia, como por exemplo o Gold Derby Award não deve ser inserido. Agradeço a colaboração desde já. GagaNutellatalk19:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
E ai? Nenhum prêmio foi relevante de acordo com seus critérios? Há vários prêmios faltando. Vou contar alguns aqui sem nem olhar a lista: 12 prêmios da VEVO que tem até vídeo dela agradacendo, Queerty Awards, M6 Music Awards... todos prêmios físicos. Me ajude a te ajudar! sei que infelizmente há uma hierarquia nesse site e não posso colocar os números reais. Barbrastreisandworld (talk) 03:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Barbrastreisandworld: Então, o Guinness não é exatamente um prêmio e sim um recorde, então ele foi pra uma nova seção. Eu ainda estou olhando a lista que você fez e adicionando aos poucos porque não tenho muito tempo. Vai dar boa. GagaNutellatalk01:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Barbrastreisandworld: Oi, terminei de adicionar todos os prêmios possíveis na lista. Agradeço sua colaboração, ajudou muito! Muitos do que não consegui porque não eram notáveis, enquetes online, certificados ou a Gaga não é creditada (principalmente os da BTWF), enfim, mas eu adicionei todos que deu. GagaNutellatalk00:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tudo bem amigo, aumentou muito o número dos prêmios. Obrigado! Tem alguns ali que realmente nao aconselho colocar, tipo o Omega Hitz kkk. Você está certíssimo em não colocar algumas enquetes. Só fico com uma pergunta: pq não coloca os prêmios da Vevo que ela ganhou? Barbrastreisandworld (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Barbrastreisandworld: Porque o VEVO, Official Charts, RIAA Diamante, etc, não são bem prêmios e sim certificados ou uma placa de comemoração por atingir o #1. Levando isso em consideração, não se deve adicionar ali e sim em sua discografia. GagaNutellatalk20:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lady Gaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 500 Greatest Albums of All Time. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hi! I noticed that you added the Dawn of Chromatica remixes to the original song pages' Release history sections. In the future, please refrain from doing this. #Release history is supposed to be how we detail independent releases of a song. If a song is released to radio, we include that. If a song is released independently on streaming services, we include that. However, we don't include it when a song/remix is just part of an album, like the Dawn of Chromatica remixes, because that is not an independent release. I saw that someone already reverted your edits, so you don't need to worry this time around, but just for the future, please keep this in mind. I hope that this makes sense. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321(let's chat!)14:16, 31 August 2021 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi you reverted the recent edit regarding the languages, but per Template:Infobox album states — “This field should identify what language(s) are used in the lyrics of the album.” Doesn’t state anywhere that just because the whole song isn’t in another language that it can’t be included. I will include Spanish as well, but what song contains French lyrics?? Pillowdelight (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I added a source stating that Bloody Mary includes French lyrics. But I was unable to find anything regarding Born This Way having any Italian lyrics but I’ll keep looking. I’ve opened up a discussion on its talk page regarding the languages in the infobox, another user has also reverted it. Pillowdelight (talk) 16:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Could you please do the Bloody Mary English page please? It exists in other languages but not English yet and I can't do it since it won't translate as I rarely make English wikis. JulienSorel1965 (talk) 16:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, is there anyway you could tell me the code you used to get your name split into 2 colors in your sig? I've been trying to figure out how to best do it with my name and then I saw your signature.
The article Joanne (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joanne (album) for comments about the article, and Talk:Joanne (album)/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 01:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
There are so many straggots prevent me from editing the mistakes on Lady Gaga's article. They said "eighth studio album" on Disease announcement. Could you fix it? Gaga only has 5 studio album so far. -GogoLion (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
