User talk:Dnllnd
I'm a little late...Looks like I may be a little late to the party here but I just noticed that you had a lot to do with the superb FA on residential schools. I was pleasantly surprised a few years ago when I saw that not only was the article not a complete mess (unlike a lot of Canadian history articles...) it was also one of the better articles I've read. I refer to it often and send it along to people when I can. It's still something to be proud of. Cheers. Tkbrett (✉) 12:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC) Women in RedHi there, Dnllnd, and welcome to Women in Red. I see that without being a member of the project until now, you have written quite a number of well-presented, informative biographies of women. We look forward to many more. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:26, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Allison J. DoupeHi Dnllnd: An article on Allison J. Doupe that you wrote back in 2015 has just been listed on the WP:BIRDS cleanup list as having a dead link. I investigated and found the link is, indeed, gone. The Klingenstein Philanthropies site, which you'd listed as a ref for her fellowship there, only now lists fellowships from 1998 onwards. She received hers in 1993. I've stuck an {{cn}} tag on the award for now. Do you have access to another source showing her receipt of this fellowship? MeegsC (talk) 08:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging June 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging ITN recognition for Kamloops Indian Residential School & Canadian Indian residential school systemOn 29 May 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the articles Kamloops Indian Residential School and Canadian Indian residential school system, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 13:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC) IntegrateThe word is meaningless. It might mean an organizational chart reshuffle. If the intended meaning is that they wanted the kids at residential schools not day schools -- and I do get that -- then let's just say so without ten-dollar words. I realize that I am doing a lot of tagging but I figure you are a professional who can take it, and I anticipate a lot of page views in the coming days. I have done a lot of these readability edits; bear with me and I think we can get this into GA status. Btw I guess the review for that is in the archives? ps, I see some of my tags from last night have already been addressed, thanks for that Elinruby (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
First of all, I do not question your good faith, nor do I think you are racist or anything but well-meaning. I do think you are allowing your ego to interfere with your editing. I submit that sometimes on Wikipedia awards are given to recognize difficult work on important topics. For example, I have gotten barnstars for articles like Operation Car Wash that are still a mess and probably always will be. But at least that one is there now, and some Brazilian editors know that they cannot rely on machine translation. Dealing with you reminds me a lot of that process, actually. How would I like to proceed? Well, I am not going to go away, as you seem to be asking me to do. Here is what I propose:
Thanks. Elinruby (talk) 15:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
""Christopher Desloges"" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect "Christopher Desloges". The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 13#"Christopher Desloges" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~ Nomination of Christopher Desloges for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Desloges, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted. The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Desloges until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 June 2021 (UTC) July 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging August Editathons at Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging September 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging Hi archivist!Hi Dnnllnd--I was perusing Category:Wikipedian archivists. There isn't a great number of you around, categorized and all, and you were the most recently active one I came across. If it all works out, I'm doing a presentation for the Society of Alabamian Archivists in a few months, about what Wikipedia can do for archivists. If you don't mind I'm going to pull up your user page, to sort of show them what a user page is but also because you address your professional relationship very concisely. I'm about to follow some of the links you put on your user page, but I also wanted to ask you if you think there are specific things that are interesting, useful, or unexpected that I might point them to--anything from articles to categories to WikiProjects. And I am going to talk about Wikisource a bit--but please tell me about what's there that I might now know about. In case it wasn't clear, I'm NOT an archivist, haha, though some of my best friends are. Thanks so much for whatever you have to share. (If you want to share things off-wiki, or if there are negative things you don't want out in the open, please feel free to use the email function.) Kind regards, Drmies (talk) 17:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
""Elaine M. Catley"" listed at Redirects for discussionA discussion is taking place to address the redirect "Elaine M. Catley". The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 21#"Elaine M. Catley" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC) October 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging November 2021 at Women in Red
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging ArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageDecember 2021 at Women in Red
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging DYK for Virginia AliOn 18 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Virginia Ali, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1958, Virginia Ali and her husband Ben Ali founded Ben's Chili Bowl, a landmark Washington, D.C. restaurant where Martin Luther King Jr., Jesse Jackson, and Stokely Carmichael would often eat? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Virginia Ali. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Virginia Ali), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC) April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Hello Dnllnd -- Thanks for contributing this article. I removed the name of the male professor that she accused, as (as far as I can see) no allegations were proven. I'm aware that he is named in the sources but Wikipedia Googles much higher than newspaper articles and it greatly increases the search engine prominence of the allegation. I have to admit I'm also a little worried about notability; while you mention three collections there's only one review, and that's published in a blog not formally in a newspaper/magazine. Are you aware of any other reviews or award nominations? I looked quickly in the Wikipedia Library top-level search but it's being drowned by the other writer of the same name. It would be nice not to feel that Healey's main claim to notability is to do with the sexual misconduct case. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 00:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Nomination of Kelly Goldsmith for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelly Goldsmith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Goldsmith (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Bgsu98 (talk) 03:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Women in Red in August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging A barnstar for you!
Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge sixth anniversary
Speedy deletion nomination of Daljeet Kaur
A tag has been placed on Daljeet Kaur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daljeet Kaur. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:54, 15 December 2022 (UTC) Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your submission at Articles for creation: Albert Lin has been accepted Albert Lin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! Jessamyn (my talk page) 22:06, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging September 2023 at Women In Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge seventh anniversary
Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Women in Red January 2024
Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging ITN recognition for Anne Innis DaggOn 8 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Anne Innis Dagg, which you had edited back in 2021. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 11:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC) Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red July 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Wiki Loves Sport 2024
SophieWMCA (talk) 15:47, 17 July 2024 (UTC) Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging September 2024 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red October 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red November 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Women in Red December 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC) Women in Red January 2025
--Lajmmoore (talk 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red February 2025
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia