|
User talk:DHN
Happy New Year!
Image archivesHi, you seem to be a knowledgeable person about Wiki stuff that relates to Vietnam. Do you know any good online archives that house high resolution public domain images of Vietnamese history and culture? Looking for 2MB minimum, ideally 10-20MB or more in uncompressed .tif format. Thinking of potential material for featured picture candidacy, would be glad to restore if the technical specs are up to par. Best wishes, DurovaCharge! 06:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC) RenamingI have to "copy paste" because the article with the new name has already existed and redirected to the old one. Please show me how to delete the page then i'll move the article to it. I think the article is still at its early age. So, be flexible to what we do. Mr Vinx (talk) 10:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Sockpuppet is attempting to have the Joseph Cao picture removedApparently, there is a sockpuppet that goes by the various names of Admitaside342 on Wikimedia Commons and Showwould40q on Wikipedia. In both places, Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, Admitaside342 and his sockpuppet Showwould40q is arguing that there is an undefined copyright violation. Showwould40q attempted to begin a 3RR fight that I refused to participate in--even though he had already wrote me for the 3RR after merely placing the picture back in the article ONE. Both Admitaside342 and Showwould40q have ONLY edited three things in both of their entire editing careers with Wiki--Joseph Cao and Joseph Cao's picture. They both started their wiki careers in the last couple of days and they both seem to know how to complain to the Admin Notice Board and to have pictures taken down--specifically the Joseph Cao portrait that was specifically released by the Congressman's office. A Wikipedia admin has stated that he believes Showwould40q is a sockpuppet. I quote, "S's edit history is suspiciously short, presumably someone's sock." William M. Connolley (talk) 19:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)No Violation Decision. As to the substance of the claim, the picture has been specifically released by the Congressman's office. There is paperwork on file with the Wikipedia Foundation to refute the sockpuppet's claim. I just wish that the sockpuppet would come forward and explain who he is.--InaMaka (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Vietnam photosI noticed that the original image on the Viet Wiki has been deleted, and I shamefully can't really read that much Vietnamese to be of much help. It looks like it was deleted on request of a non-member or something, and as the person who uploaded it to this side, and knowing more Vietnamese, maybe you're able to figure it out? Also, somewhat unrelated, I was thinking of snapping some useful shots of the local Tet Festival tonight at Inala but ended up having camera problems. The usefulness of the camera's pretty dubious, since it's a bit old, but I'd take suggestions of something that may be considered useful, so I can try getting it tomorrow evening. I don't really know much about Tet and what's usually there, besides food, fireworks and lions, so I'd appreciate anything. - Zero1328 Talk? 14:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Well, I just came home and reviewed my photos, and realised that I actually did fairly terrible. It was only on a whim but I ended up trying to prep for the second day, but I still had camera problems. I ended up taking photos at 1024x768 and my (quality) batteries kept dying after 10-15 shots, without flash or the active display. I also forgot about personality rights and forgot to make it very clear that I intended to publish the photos. Except for maybe the battery problem, it's been an interesting experience, taking photos in this type of environment, so I'll probably try to learn more about my camera when I find the next interesting photo op. Out of the 102 photos, I think only 5 or so are usable, but I won't place them on Commons, since I could do better next year. Nonetheless, I'm still grateful for your tips. - Zero1328 Talk? 14:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Finally had a chance to do a lot of personal stuff, but only because I got ill and resting at home right now. Thanks for the suggestions again; I've been thinking that you might be doubting me or something, since I haven't shown anything, so I grabbed a sample and stuck it on megaupload: [1] My hands have been shaky lately, for some reason, and most of these photos were taken from inside the car, whilst driving. We've mostly been going around the areas close to the house. I stuck them on megaupload instead of commons because I've only glanced at them so far and I want to be personally sure of the licensing and blurring of the sensitive things like faces, and I can probably only do that when this is all done. - Zero1328 Talk? 14:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC) I forgot to describe each photo; here's a quick summary in order of the photo numbers:
A quick file count says 244 photos in my camera so far, and I'll leave the settings as you see the vietnam photos as. I still need to further study my phone's abilities to take better photos. My sister also has a camera and I might use some of the ones she took, but I'd prefer to have her properly aware of the licensing available, which I also haven't properly studied. - Zero1328 Talk? 14:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC) After you and YellowMonkey download it I'll probably delete it just in case, next time I'm free, or after a few days, since this isn't really ready for presentation. I have fruit in the fridge and some dried lychee thing, a bit like raisins, which i might take photos of if I grab a plate to properly present it. I've taken alot of street photos, since I've been trying to find a photo of the explicit danger involved, particularly one with a turning group overtaking someone going straight, or someone crossing a road. It's all from the car though, so there should be a slight window reflection, and right now I can't tak photos at night due to light blurs, I need to work that out. - Zero1328 Talk? 15:01, 15 February 2009 (UTC) I think that was taken from the car, actually. I guess I'll try to take some new pics of it. But what do you think of the photo quality/usability? Those were the non blurry ones; I tried to take multiples for redundancy when I could, so generally, out of the several hundred photos I'll take, I guess half would be usable while a quarter would be informative enough for inclusion. - Zero1328 Talk? 02:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Province and DistrictThese don't need to be at the end of the names do they? eg Guangdong Province, California State etc, except for Quan 1, Saigon etc. I asked this at WT:VIET. They're everywhere here. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 02:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC) Vietnamese wikiHi. Yes its doesn't happen all of the time as I've managed to retrieve some data from it but especially the last few days when I click the Vietnamese wiki link my whole Internet browser just freezes. It doesn't even work if I try to ctrl alt and delete, I have to end up rebooting my PC. What details would you like to know? Dr. Blofeld White cat 19:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC) Oh, I'm afraid I have no idea but the codes are. I['m using a Dell Dimension 3000 and I use Mozilla Firefox as far as I'm aware and am located in the Cardiff Wales area. The crash occurred on several different pages which I can't recall. Hope the problem diesn't persist as I want to get the communes of Vietnam up and running in the next few weeks. I could sure use some help though translating some articles in Category:Articles needing translation from Vietnamese Wikipedia. Hopefully I can obtain some reliable sources for population and area data on communes. I know it must exist as I've seen 2004 data on Vietnamese wiki (when I managed to get through) but can't find the government census details. Dr. Blofeld White cat 19:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC) I use XP. I've tried searching but nothing is showing up. I haven't a standard task bar as I've opted for this slim bar which maximises the extent of the page. Dr. Blofeld White cat 19:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC) Request for photosHi DHN, As far as I'm concerned, the image is already licensed under Creative Commons Attribute-Noncommercial-ShareAlike. I'm not really good at this Wikimedia Commons uploading procedure, so I'll look into uploading it into Wikimedia Commons when I have some time later in the week. yellowtailshark (talk) 09:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC) Joseph DinhYes it is hopeless. Also can you help chip in with the districts of Vietnam translationg drive please? YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 03:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Pringels000I feel like you have a weird bias towards vietnamese people, i just get the feeling... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pringels000 (talk • contribs) 06:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC) could you check this out?It looks like this anon has placed several mistranslations in vietnamese food articles. Could you check their edits and fix them? Sorry for not getting back to you on those photos; I have a lot but haven't gotten around to even touching them yet. - Zero1328 Talk? 04:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, can you help the anon at Talk:Bánh mì, and also at Talk:Bánh bò? Badagnani (talk) 06:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Banh itHi, can you tell which subtype of banh it this one is? It's not the "naked" kind and it wasn't wrapped in a ramie leaf (it was wrapped in what appeared to be a banana leaf, with a darker green leaf wrapping inside that was more like the bamboo leaf used to wrap Chinese zongzi. Badagnani (talk) 04:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC) Thanks, that was quick. I was just going by the label (they're often wrong). This search does pull up a lot of the bright green pyramid dumplings, which my photo was. Badagnani (talk) 04:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC) What can you glean from this article? Badagnani (talk) 04:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC) Regarding the photos you showed me, the one I had had a filling that was a very fine, soft-ish white paste made from sticky rice flour, filled with smashed mung beans, rather than whole sticky rice grains. Also, the inner leaf looked dark green and dull like the ones you showed me, but the outer leaf wrapping was very bright green, a banana leaf like in the above article's photo. Badagnani (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC) It seems to be the same one I got here in Ohio. Perhaps makers in the U.S. are imitating the one you mention. There are other articles calling this bright green pyramid "banh it," such as this one. Badagnani (talk) 05:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC) N & SCan you find sources for:
I think there were a couple of other things that got lost in the shuffle as well. Badagnani (talk) 23:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC) There has been an editing dispute about what the name of these cakes mean. Can you offer an expert opinion that might help resolve it? Thanks. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Hi, can you tell me if gạo rượu is another term for com ruou? I just found this term online referring to the Chinese jiuniang, which I just tasted for the first time yesterday and which appears to be almost exactly the same thing.[2] Badagnani (talk) 15:45, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Here's the search: [3]. Badagnani (talk) 18:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Thanks very much; I've just created an article on Jiuniang, which is very similar to com ruou. Badagnani (talk) 18:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Misleading claimI was going thorough an archives and came across an issue. I do not like how you handled it as feel your change did not address the issues I had raised and instead continued to introduce highly misleading claims in the article, that we not supported by the sources used. I have therefore modified the articles accordingly and further explained that here Talk:Cultural and political image of John McCain#Support for McCain vs support for him using the term 'gook'. Your comments are welcome. I understand given your background you may have your experience of the matter, but remember that we can only go by what the sources. The sources do not say that the majority of Vietnamese Americans were supportive of his use of the term gook, simply that they were generally supportive of McCain himself. This is quite a different thing and the two should not be conflated even if it is fine to mention both. As I've said, unless a poll was done on the specific issue, it seems unlikely anyone knows whether the majority of Vietnamese-Americans were supportive of his usage of the term. P.S. Just to be clear, I'm not saying that the majority of Vietnamese Americans were not supportive of McCain's usage of the term. I have no idea but would guess it's possible although would also guess a more subtle general opinion is possible e.g. are not necessarily offended by it but feel it would be best if he didn't use it even if they understand why he uses. Ultimately however, without reliable sources it's not something we should comment on (Nil Einne (talk) 21:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Check these pictures
I took them as your suggestion but don't know where I can put them into.--AM (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC) I am going to create a page named Propaganda in Vietnam. The pics you took are very useful. Best! --Trananh1980 (talk) 03:58, 26 March 2011 (UTC) Has this fellow Major Lien Thanh, the former head of police in Hue come round to your area to speak about his new book "Bien Dong Mien Trung" about the Buddhist crisis in 1966, the Tet Offensive and Hue Massacre in 1968 and the 1972 communist offensive? I presume he went around the US before Australia. Apparently 1000+ people turned up in Melbourne. About 300 people here came out of maybe 12,000 Viets in the city, although only about 1% were under 45. He made some quite sensational claims about Thich Tri Quang etc [which violated BLP so I won't repeat it here], and all these people he claimed to be communists. The crowd, as far as I can tell, was more like an organised Diemist demonstration. Actually more like any Asian country where teh govt cadres tell the villagers to applaud at the end. There were a stack of people who all started clapping and cheering in a raucous way each time he bagged Thich Tri Quang, and their way of doing it didn't appear surprised as though they were taking new info, it seemed feigned. Most of them were well known Catholic activists lol. YellowMonkey (cricket photo poll!) paid editing=POV 03:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC) Locking it YellowMonkey (cricket photo poll!) paid editing=POV 08:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC) East Asian CalligraphyUser DHN, I'm currently engaged in a discussion with user Asoer on whether East Asian Calligraphy is "calligraphy" or not. You've contributed to discussions on East Asian Calligraphy before, so I wonder if you could have a look in. [4] Bathrobe (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2009 (UTC) Facebook in VN
Need some update in Facebook#Banned by governments.--AM (talk) 12:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Translantion You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Grenouille vert (talk) 21:47, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Re:Gratuitous use of Chinese in Vietnamese languageActually, many Vietnamese-related articles are annotated with Chu Han in Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean and other Wikipedias regardless of whether the same Chu Han annotations are used in Vietnam Wikipedia or not. Besides, for readers who from East Asian Cultural Sphere or who are familiar with Chu Han, it will be a good help for them to understand the original meaning of the certain terms if Chu Han annotations were used. Moreover, Chu Han is still used in some special cases in Vietnam, such as traditional ceremonies, history studies, traditional literature or Han Nom studies. By the way, I insist that people should not forget their own history and cultures.--서공·Tây Cống·セイコゥ? ★委ủy班ban復phục活hoạt漢hán喃nôm越việt南nam★ 13:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC) Fair use rationale for File:10000pt.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:10000pt.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 07:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:10000t.jpgThanks for uploading or contributing to File:10000t.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 07:35, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:20000ps.jpgThanks for uploading or contributing to File:20000ps.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 08:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC) Fair use rationale for File:20000pt.jpgThanks for uploading or contributing to File:20000pt.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 08:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC) Happy New Lunar YearChúc bạn năm mới an lành, an khang, và thịnh vượng.--AM (talk) 10:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)  Em chúc anh và gia đình một năm mới được nhiều sức khỏe, an lạc, và vạn sự như ý. YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars photo poll) 06:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC) Re:JRThank for you help. But here in Vietnam, I could not access to most of Google books material and your suggested book is one of these blocked contents :(.--AM (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC) Fair use rationale for File:500000t.jpgThanks for uploading or contributing to File:500000t.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC) On a Han tu rampage YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 07:05, 29 April 2010 (UTC) Trường Sa, Khánh HòaHello, I am an administrator of the Tagalog Wikipedia and can I ask for your help? I encountered an anonymous user who is attempting to create an article about Trường Sa but he/she is inserting it to the following pages: Kalayaan, Spratly Islands, and Palawan. The problem is, his/her contributions is incomprehensible probably created by Google Translate. This Vietnamese-language article does not have an English equivalent that is why I can't polish the translation. Can you help translate it to English so that I can also create a Tagalog translation? Thank you very much. --Bluemask (talk) 18:10, 5 June 2010 (UTC) Help for TranslationHi ! We are looking for someone who could translate into Vietnamese (and upload on Vietnamese WP) a page re an artistic movement founded by the daughter of the poet Dylan Thomas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMMAGINE%26POESIA Could you please help us or suggest what to do ? Thanks! --Aeron10 (talk) 16:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Diacritics in Vietnam-related articlesThere is a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Vietnam#Diacritics that you may wish to to contribute to. Colonies Chris (talk) 09:07, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
pictures of Tinh Xa Trung TamHi, can you ask someone in Vi.wiki to get someone for the GA if possible please? Thanks YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:06, 8 July 2010 (UTC) I removed the speedy delete template from this article as this is not really a vanity page. It concerns a Vietnamese royal. The article is also duly referenced. I hope you agree. JoJan (talk) 18:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Translating an article to VietnameseHello, I wanted to ask you if you can help translating this article to English and Vietnamese: de:Viên Giác Pagode. This is the biggest German (and of the biggest ones in Europe) Vietnamese Buddhist temples. --Maturion (talk) 14:33, 23 August 2010 (UTC) Can you see the bit about VC Army news at the bottom? YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 02:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC) Hi, DHN. I added the Vietnamese name to infobox. Please add other names to infobox freely because I don't know other name like "Vietnamese in Quoc Ngu script", "Vietnamese Chu Nom" or "Vietnamese Han Tu". By the way, I recommend to move the infobox to the top of the article. Thank you. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC) Direct-controlled municipalityHán tự is not used by vietnamese people anymore? Whatever, but I thought this is a concept in the Sinosphere, so I add Hán tự.--WWbread （Open Your Mouth?） 05:24, 31 December 2010 (UTC) Please helpHi, how are you doing? I would like to ask you for help. My account has been locked for a month by sysop Dung005. The reason he did that, according to him, is that I reverted his warning more than 3 times. And I actually did that. However, the reason I did that is because he, I strongly believe, issued an illigimate warning. I ll go into more detail. At first, we talked about the reason and the way he locked a new user who just made an edit for the first time in the article Nhan Quyen tai Vietnam. I argued with him about the ligitimacy and the process by which he did that. (You can read our discussion on the page Tin nhan cho bao quan vien in the section called Ve viec cam thanh vien Modesldale-and don't forget to look at the history page.) While discussing, he used insulting words to me, resulting in my deleting his insulting words (i used <s></s>). That's the reason he issued the first warning. I didn't accept that. And I reverted it. To conclude, please look for the way Sysop Dung005 locked the new user, and the way he issued various warnings to me. I believe that all of what he did is illegitimate and shows signs of abusing the sysop tools. While waiting for the expiry of the locking, I will be active in English. I use a permanent IP address, so i have no way to give any feedback on my Vietnamese page. Thank you.--Trananh1980 (talk) 03:55, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Invitation to take part in a studyI am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 01:24, 24 April 2011 (UTC) Giup xóa lịch sử trang thành viênPhiền anh xóa giúp tôi lịch sử trang cá nhân của tôi bên vi. và đổi tên của tôi thành TDA? Tôi không muốn nhờ anh bên vi. vì không muốn các thành viên khác để ý. Có lẽ có rất nhiều thành viên đang theo dõi hoạt động sửa đổi của tôi. Cảm ơn anh--Trananh1980 (talk) 02:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:10000pt.jpg Thanks for uploading File:10000pt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:37, 15 June 2011 (UTC) Help with source in Vietnamese?Hi! I've been helping with the FAC for S&M (song) and found a source about what countries the song was banned in, but it's in Vietnamese... I did Google Translate, but just wanted to confirm that the machine translation was accurate. Based on the source would it be fair to say the following? "The video was banned in eleven countries, including China, Malaysia, and Indonesia." And for the source I intended to do: Tuấn Thảo (February 24, 2011). "Video clip của Rihanna bị 11 nước kiểm duyệt" (in Vietnamese). RFI Vietnamese. Retrieved July 24, 2011. (Machine translation via Google.) Thoughts? Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC) Chinese CharactersOkay, no more Chu Nom from now on. Calvin Marquess (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC) Hi DHN, Calvin Marquess keep changing his accounts (Earth Wikipedia; Heavenly Dragon) to add Han Tu to Vietnam-related articles. I have removed some of them before and he now re-added them. I think it isn't legal. Can you do something, as an experienced editor?--AM (talk) 18:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC) There has been persistent edit warring on these articles recently. See this post on my talk for details. Kauffner (talk) 16:53, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Woody Island, Sth China Sea listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Woody Island, Sth China Sea. Since you had some involvement with the Woody Island, Sth China Sea redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). – hysteria18 (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC) Hán-nôm Are you sure that Hán tự and chữ nôm are not being used in Việt Nam anymore? 梁棚元 (talk) 17:28, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
RfC on the spelling of Vietnamese namesRfC: Should the spelling of Vietnamese names follow the general usage of English-language reliable sources? Examples: Ngo Dinh Diem, Ho Chi Minh, and Saigon, or Ngô Đình Diệm, Hồ Chí Minh, and Sài Gòn. The RfC is here. Kauffner (talk) 14:54, 20 July 2012 (UTC) AudioCan you record the pronunciation of the word cà rốt please ? Fête —Preceding undated comment added 17:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC) I want that you record the pronunciation of cà rốt in Wikimedia Commons. Fête —Preceding undated comment added 17:44, 15 August 2012 (UTC) audioCan you record the pronunciation of the word cà rốt in Wikimedia Commons please ? Fête (talk) 16:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC) Re: TranslationThanks for the reply, yes I'm looking for a professional translation. I've run it through Google Translate and you're right, I get the gist but it's pretty useless really. Regards, --Viennese Waltz 22:13, 8 October 2012 (UTC) FYISaboche (talk · contribs) has been talking about a block you made at Vietnamese here. --Rschen7754 07:03, 21 October 2012 (UTC) Use of HTML/CSS for Stylistic FormattingI'm a little bummed at your reversion of the infobox portraits of Vietnamese Americans. But since style is secondary to content, it's not too big a deal. Although, in order to be a more effective editor, I'm wondering if there were any guidelines that point to the use of HTML/CSS as something to avoid. The best I could find was WP:USE, which is neither a Wikipedia policy nor guideline, but rather a project goal, and their recommendation for HTML/CSS is to avoid its use (because it makes editing harder) unless it is absolutely necessary (as in to stylize things like notice boxes). yellowtailshark (talk) 07:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC) Pham DuyIf you (1) make sure the article is updated, so all the verbs are in the past tense, and (2) make sure a few more comments related to reaction to his death are added, we should be able to get this article listed on Recent Deaths. μηδείς (talk) 20:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Article move request for Nan Yue to Nam VietHi DHN, can you please move the article "Nan Yue" to Nam Viet? From my experience the name Nam Viet is a much more common name for the kingdom than the name "Nan Yue", so, changing the article's main title to "Nam Viet" would make this article more recognizable to fellow readers. The name "Nan Yue" also implies that this was a "Chinese" kingdom when it's not, as the Chinese (original Han, Mandarin-speaking) nation only spanned over current-day northern and central China at that time, what's now southern China had several indigenous kingdoms, including Nam Viet. As well, even though Nam Viet did have some ethnic Han Chinese immigrants living there and the kingdom was gradually "Sinocized" in culture, the people, the main language, and overall culture was still Yue/Viet. The western and southern Yue/Viet would (along with the Lac peoples) form today's Vietnamese people. Northern and eastern Yue/Viet will become assimilated and intermarry with Han Chinese to form today's Cantonese Han Chinese. Given that Nam Viet helped to give rise to an entire nation and people, the Vietnamese, rather than just form a small region of another (China), the article's main title should be changed to Nam Viet, given its cultural and historical importance to Vietnam. Just because Nam Viet was somewhat Sinocized throughout it's existance, not assimilated during its existence, it cannot be classified as a "Chinese" nation, as other countries in the Sinosphere (Vietnam, Korea) were also to a degree Sinocized themselves, yet with their independence, separate distinct culture, separate distinct language, separate distinct ethnicity, and separate distinct identity, they cannot be called a "Chinese" nation. Northern Vietnam and northern Korea, and Mongolia, were a part of the Chinese empire at some time in it's history, but they cannot be called a "Chinese" nation. As well, just because Han Chinese from the north immigrated to Nam Viet and settled there, just as how Han Chinese have immigrated to other nations like Vietnam, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore (even forming the majority in Singapore), does it justify in calling all these countries "Chinese"? The name Nan Yue should stay, like in the first line in the first paragraph for example, but the main article's name and title should be changed to Nam Viet. Brewing edit war on Spratly Islands disputeHi DHN, there's a brewing editwar on this Truong Sa article, where a user named "Freedom of Navigation" is deleting sourced material and denying the US' apparently indirect and implicit involvement in the dispute there, implicitly siding with VN and the Philippines, and is accusing me of having a vested interest in this, when i don't. Can you please look into it please? Thanks Nguyen1310 (talk) 04:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Help needed on Flag of VietnamHi DHN. Can you help improving the article Flag of Vietnam? Besides bad organization and lack of reliable references, an important issue is that a user insists on adding Chinese flags as "influences" of the Vietnamese flag. I tried to discuss with him but it seems to be fruitless. I saw that the same problem existed on the Vietnamese version and was sorted out, so maybe you can help?Thachx (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Han-VietYou can look at Hán Việt Từ Điển. Put in a Chinese character, and it gives you a transliteration into Vietnamese. The character dictionaries typically abbreviate Han-Viet as "Hv.", which is always followed by a transliteration. Here is one that's online. What the "synthesis"? That this system of transliteration is notable enough to write an article about? Or that it is called "Han-Viet"? Kauffner (talk) 12:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC) DYK for My Best Gay Friends
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC) Edit warring discussionFYI Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ejordens reported by User:Logical Cowboy (Result: ). Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:35, 1 August 2013 (UTC) Hi DHN, I know you are not keen on this subject, but where do you stand now? Are you in favour of restoring Kauffner's 1400 undiscussed page moves? In ictu oculi (talk) 05:09, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
HCPUNXKID edit-warring and 3RR violation on South Vietnam...Hi DHN, could you please intervene on the South Vietnam article and page-protect the article? The user HCPUNXKID changed the status of VNCH in the article's infobox from "Sovereign republic" to "Client state of the United States" 3 times now, and reverted 4 edits on this. HCPUNXKID's edit is controversial and is disputed even in academic circles, and it is clearly POV. Sources he used includes one from the Peace Pledge Union (which clearly lacks a neutral POV and even got the date for the Fall of Saigon wrong), another from a poetry site (also lacking NPOV), and one from a bookstore review... In the past, there were edit wars over the U.S. client state status, at least 2 i can recall since 2010, and it was consistently rejected. Nguyen1310 (talk) 19:13, 4 October 2013 (UTC) Enquiry regarding about sourcesHi, user MiG29VN keeps on removing sources that links to WGBH (PBS Boston) and SBTN video interviews, which are credible references, simply because they were uploaded on Youtube. I would like to ask, can video interviews/documentaries produced by a credible source (like popular news outlets, eg those listed above), that are simply uploaded on Youtube or a popular video site, be used as references? MiGVN has also made the ridiculous declaration that "In wikipedia's law, and we agreed History.net and xxx.edu are the reliable sources". An online criminal can create a malware site, or any fake "educational" institution can create an .edu website, and those will still be considered "reliable sources"?? I Love He! --Mario0214 (talk) 06:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Johnny Nguyen (footballer)
A tag has been placed on Johnny Nguyen (footballer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:40, 26 September 2014 (UTC) Revert on Carlos Hathcock article.re: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carlos_Hathcock&oldid=639965371&diff=prev Someone (you?) added a "who?" tag, seeking the name of the NVA General that Hathcock assassinated. I removed the tag, for the name has not been published in any sources, reliable or otherwise. You might as well go and add the same tag to the articles on Jack the Ripper or the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. No one knows. The tag is silly and pointless, so remove it. - theWOLFchild 19:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)Seasons Greetings, This is in reference to a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named Ceremonial pole. Ceremonial pole is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west. Ceremonial poles are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures. Through article Ceremonial pole we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations around Ceremonial pole as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part. While Ceremonial poles have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about Ceremonial poles from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same. Since other contributors to the article are insisting for reliable sources and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on Talk:Ceremonial pole page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia. This particular request is being made to you since your user name is listed in Wikipedia:Translators available list. Thanking you with warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 06:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC) Hi, HiHappy 2016. If you're around or know of other WP:VN editors around can you take a look at Vietnamese mythology and see if recent large deletions are justified. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:08, 2 January 2016 (UTC) --Jack Chen Wan Xiong (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC) HCMXin chào DHN, I´m not experienced in the English or Vietnamese Wikipedia but I noticed by chance that you are. Maybe you can have a look to my first English article about a new guilding in HCM: Deutsches Haus Ho Chi Minh Stadt. I´m contributioning mostly in the German Wikipedia. Thank you and kind regards--F.Blaubiget (talk) 12:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, DHN. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, DHN. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) You are invited to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge |
|
Hello. You have been invited to join WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Asia-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the participants.
Thanks, |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, DHN. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, DHN. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, DHN. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hathcock
16 years, 13,000 edits, a clearly worded request at the top of my page (that is fairly standard practice across the project), plus you claim to be a bureaucrat and an admin on vi.WP, with whatever numbers of years and edits there, so... really? With all that experience, do you not know by now that article content issues are discussed on the article talk page? In the future, if have a question or comment regarding an article, then please post it on the article talk page, not mine . Thank you - wolf 07:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Thewolfchild: You didn't bother to read the article's talk page when you made that change. If you already did that, you would have noticed why it was worded that way, and I wouldn't have needed to nicely remind you of that. DHN (talk) 07:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Translation help?
I found you from the list of translators, so I hope you can help me. I am working on Draft:Longan witches broom-associated virus and I have used google translate to get me most of the way, but it seems that the Vietnamese terms for the disease do not use the word 'witch'. The terms I found are chổi rồng trên nhãn,[1] chổi rồng hại nhãn, bệnh chùn ngọn, bệnh chổi sể, and bệnh hủi nhãn.[2] Google lends me to believe that these terms refer to dragons and not witches, which seems plausible given the idiom 'witches broom' doesn't necessarily mean anything in Vietnam. I am hoping you can provide a good literal translation, and hopefully I can use it as a DYK hook for halloween or something. Let me know if I'm close or not. Thanks! --Nessie (talk) 02:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ Viện Cây ăn Quả Miền Nam. "HỘI CHỨNG CHỔI RỒNG TRÊN NHÃN VÀ BIỆN PHÁP QUẢN LÝ" (ppt). Integrated Pest Management Innovation Lab (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 12 September 2019.
- ^ "Chổi rồng hại nhãn" (html). Cấm nang Cây Trồng (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 12 September 2019.
- @NessieVL: It's plausible. Chổi rồng literally means "dragon's broom" and it seems to be only used in the context of this disease. DHN (talk) 19:41, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
DYK for Ho Chi Minh Monument
On 3 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ho Chi Minh Monument, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a monument in Moscow honoring North Vietnamese communist leader Ho Chi Minh has been nicknamed the "flying saucer monument" by locals? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ho Chi Minh Monument), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe Vietnam 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vietnamese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Gin people don't speak Vietnamese?? Vietnamese don't use Chu Nom??
Hello DHK
You reverted with reason Gin people do not speak Vietnamese.
Why in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-hEWdMh5G0
Gin people can talk with the Vietnamese interviewer from VTV. A Gin kid can sing a Vietnamese traditional song?
As you said, that's mean Vietnamese interviewer speak Cantonese?
You base the source from the book of non-Vietnamese author, are you sure that author understand Vietnamese??
And you said that Vietnamese not written in chu Nom. Do you know thu phap??
And you said chu Nom is Chinese-derived? That's mean chu Nom is Chinese language??
(Sorry for my bad English)
07 September 2020
- @Cocacolakogas: The news segment is sensationalistic since they want to promote the language. Even the name of the segment is sensationalistic ("Days of returning to our beloved roots"). If you notice, the people speaking Vietnamese are old. The Vietnamese teachers are actually trained in Vietnam, and as you see in the classroom they actually teach quốc ngữ and not chu Nom. If you read the Chinese characters on the whiteboard, they're actually Chinese and not chu Nom. For example, màu đỏ (red) and màu vàng (yellow) have the corresponding characters 红色 (hồng sắc) and 黄色 (hoàng sắc), which are decidedly not Vietnamese. DHN (talk) 07:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Áo dài là của Việt Nam, ko phải của tàu. Aodai is Vietnamese, not China.
Áo dài là trang phục truyền thống của nước Việt Nam chứ đeo phải của china! Stop adding hoaxes! Trương guy (talk) 06:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Revisionist history
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1025106370
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1025133128 (this was actually fixed).
- Suspiciously similar.
This revisionist history you pointed out at the "Kingdom of Vietnam" article isn't an isolated incident, it is systemic and has been going on for quite some time. Unfortunately nobody has actually stood up to it except for "Vif12vf" in that one edit. But this user really doesn't seem to like the mainstream historiography, please see my comments in the AfD for more details. It really isn't an isolated case. --Donald Trung (talk) 19:36, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Feedback requested
Not sure if you have the time, but could you take a look at "Talk:Đại Việt" and its corresponding article? Is this something that has now become commonplace in Vietnamese historiography to group all pre-Nguyễn periods together as the "Kingdom of Đại-Việt"?
BTW, maybe you should set up an archive for your talk page as it's really long. --Donald Trung (talk) 12:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung: Thanks for flagging. I'm currently quite busy but I'll take a look when I get a chance. DHN (talk) 01:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Translation help?
I usually work in French->English translation and keep encountering a series of articles about the Franco-Prussian War whose only other versions are in Vietnamese. Somebody ran them through Google Translate and the results are of course uneven. I am working with that editor since he is apparently interested in the topic, but wondered if you might be interested/available to clarify some of the more mysterious passages? If your interest is limited I could make the questions really specific, as I suspect the problem in places is a word-for-word translation of a sentence that *does* parse in Vietnamese. Please let me know at your convenient Elinruby (talk) 05:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Elinruby: Are you saying that the Vietnamese-language articles have been machine-translated from English or the other way around? We have some issues with those at the Vietnamese Wikipedia. If it's the other way around, let me know which passages are machine-translated and I might be able to help. DHN (talk) 06:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- They’ve been machine translated from Vietnamese. I understand the issue, as these are an example of why. I myself spend a lot of time cleaning up machine-translation from French to English. However, they do represent information about given battles that is not elsewhere in Wikipedia, and while I don’t see an urgent need to expand our coverage of the Franco-Prussian War — the fr and de Wikipedias haven’t done so — it *was* however the reason for the abolition of the Bourbon Empire, and the Third Republic, so if we can get the articles to a certain standard, I am in favor of keeping them. Let me know how you would like to proceed. If certain problems are also in the original, that would tell us something. If names have been translated, you can let us know. Ideally you would proofread them against the originals, but that may be more than you are willing to do. But while there are several, each of them is fairly short, and since their importance is mainly to 19th century European history, as far as I am concerned at least, there is no urgency and this could be a long-term side project, pro bono, as it were. WP:PNT pages don’t usually get deleted once we list them, unless we do it ourselves. On the other hand, if your interest is limited, I could ask you specific questions when I get stuck. So far I have been identifying and wikilinking names of people, places and military units. I do speak French very well, and can read German a little, took it in school. Let me know. If you want to look at one, am currently working on Battle of Buchy and have linked some of the references, which look quite good. Battle of Gray is much worse, but I have brought it to the attention of the original translator, and it seems only fair that he improve it as much as he can before somebody else goes to heroic measures over it. If you like, I can tag you on others as I encounter them. He said he did these for the redlinks in the nav box for the war. Elinruby (talk) 18:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- PS
- I am l learning from this exercise that this war was also pivotal in the creation of the German Empire Elinruby (talk) 18:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Elinruby: I have limited interest in this topic but feel free to ask me any specific question regarding translation. Typically names from French or German will be left as-is in Vietnamese, so if you see a difference it might just be a transcription error. DHN (talk) 06:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Two specific translation questions
1) could the place name “Zalmay” become “Talmay” in Vietnamese somehow? I am trying to determine if this is the same village, and the change doesn’t seem like something that came from French. Neither one has a wiki page, as best I can tell.
2) In the Vietnamese text “Trong cuộc giao chiến ở Essertenne và Talmay gần Gray, lữ đoàn của Hoàng thân Wilhelm xứ Baden thuộc Quân đoàn số 14 thuộc quân đội Đức - Phổ dưới quyền chỉ huy của tướng Karl August Werder của Phổ đã nhanh chóng đánh bại một lực lượng Garde Mobile được phái đến phòng ngự suối Vingeanne thuộc Binh đoàn Côte d'Or của quân đội Pháp dưới sự chỉ huy của Đại tá Laval, buộc đạo quân Pháp này phải rút chạy tiến hành khỏi Gray” google is doing something ambiguous with the relationship between the Garde mobile and the Côte d’Or army, can you clarify perhaps? Côte d’Or is the region where the battle took place, so I think that army is a local regiment, but it isn’t clear what they are doing in that sentence. The Garde mobile was holding a line on the banks of the Vingeanne, right?
thanks for any brainpower you apply to these questions ; ) Elinruby (talk) 04:37, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Elinruby: This passage seems to be partly sourced from here (p. 483), so 1) Talmay seems to be the correct name; and 2) you can see the relationship between the Garde mobile and the Côte d’Or army described in the book (the Garde mobile was designated the Armée de la Côte d’Or). DHN (talk) 06:53, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- aha. I hate it when they call the same thing by different names. Thank you much. I will definitely check that out Elinruby (talk) 06:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Elinruby: Talmay does have a Wikipedia article. DHN (talk) 07:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- aha. I hate it when they call the same thing by different names. Thank you much. I will definitely check that out Elinruby (talk) 06:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- was just looking at that. Senior moment? Anyway, thanks, I am convinced now that it should be Talmay, going in to fix that now Elinruby (talk) 07:22, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
See:
--Ju Gau-jeng (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
OK! --Ju Gau-jeng (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Already done. DHN (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Xe Đò Hoàng
On 1 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Xe Đò Hoàng, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the owner of the bus service connecting the two largest Vietnamese-American communities in the United States was the target of an assassination plot by a competitor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Xe Đò Hoàng. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Xe Đò Hoàng), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Asian Garden Mall
On 6 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Asian Garden Mall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a proposed footbridge connecting the Asian Garden Mall to another Vietnamese-American shopping center met opposition because it was deemed "too Chinese"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Asian Garden Mall. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Asian Garden Mall), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
See:
OK? --Chiang Wan-an (talk) 20:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Chiang Wan-an: Seems like a notable person. You can write a draft and I can help edit. DHN (talk) 20:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Arnold's Christmas
On 29 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arnold's Christmas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Arnold's Christmas", now considered one of the most memorable episodes from the animated series Hey Arnold!, was almost rejected by network executives because it depicted the Vietnam War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arnold's Christmas. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Arnold's Christmas), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 6,571 views (547.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Boat People (film)
I noticed that you removed the paragraph. You may think it's irrelevant. Actually, The book Women Film Directors: An International Bio-critical Dictionary mentions that the movie was banned, and probably unbanned in 2008 (with a DVD importation from Hong Kong). That's why I added that release content. Though, I don't intend to restore the revising, just to remind that the film used to be banned in China.--Beta Lohman※Office box 06:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Beta Lohman The assertion that the film was "banned" in China seems illogical, since it was filmed in Hainan with the permission of the PRC government (who reviewed the script and requested that the director change some details). It might not have been screened in China but I don't see any logical reason why the PRC government would actively oppose it given its apparent subject matter. Hui was pretty optimistic that "it will be distributed in Mainland China as well as in the usual movie markets for Hong Kong films.". In fact, much of the controversies about the film is about whether it's PRC propaganda. Perhaps they confused the PRC with the ROC government, which did in fact ban it. In any case, I think a DVD release in 2008, more than 25 years after it was in theaters, is hardly worth mentioning. DHN (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for response. I would like to respond to one more thing. For example, Summer Palace was not submitted to the State Administration of Radio, Film, and Television (SARFT) for review in the beginning, and then participated in a French film festival, and is still banned in China. The Chinese government can ban a film for any reason, and political issues are illogical in the first place.
- As for whether Boat People was banned in the 1980s or not. I don't intend to pursue this issue, because the book says it was banned, so it's a banned (and unbanned) movie.--Beta Lohman※Office box 07:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vietnamese language in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tiền Phong and John Balaban.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Vietnamese language in the United States
On 28 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vietnamese language in the United States, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when students spoke Vietnamese in a graduation speech in Louisiana, the school district proposed banning all non-English languages? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vietnamese language in the United States. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Vietnamese language in the United States), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you!
Just dropping by to say that I just read the article about the Vietnamese language in the United States and that I loved it. I found the section about some Vietnamese Americans' distrust of or distaste for some words in the Vietnamese language for their communist connotation especially interesting. I am a white American, and Vietnamese American culture has always been a minor but intriguing influence in my life. But aside aside from having a few Vietnamese classmates growing up and eating at Vietnamese restaurants once in a while, I have never had much contact with that culture or language. Thank you for enlightening me a little, and thank you for all your hard work. :) Bobnorwal (talk) 14:22, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Bobnorwal: Thanks for reading! I hope it was informative. I've got to thank Mxn for the tidbits that you found interesting in the article, as he added them after I wrote the original article in the Vietnamese Wikipedia. DHN (talk) 14:41, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Ah, well, thanks to Mxn as well! :) Bobnorwal (talk) 16:21, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Vietnamese ranking
Languages of the United States ranks Vietnamese as fifth. please, we already have enough articles that contradict each other. Great Mercian (talk) 01:32, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
The sources used by that article are already outdated and contradict its claim. The ranking depends on whether you consider French and French patois to be the same language. The source used here does. DHN (talk) 04:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Used where? Great Mercian (talk) 19:08, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Also to add on, the article above doesn't even show French in the top 10, so it's an irrelevant topic. Great Mercian (talk) 19:09, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
5* my mistake. Great Mercian (talk) 19:10, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Great Mercian: It's Ref #9 in Languages of the United States. In Vietnamese language in the United States I used this source. DHN (talk) 20:09, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi-Tek incident and Vietnamese-language sourcing
Wow, it's been a while - time really flies. If you have time, I would like to discuss the inclusion of Vietnamese-language sourcing in the article, partially in consideration of a FAC run. I think I have been able to consider and incorporate most English-language material about the incident, but there are few Vietnamese-language references (both from US publications covering the event, often anti-Trường, and Vietnamese state media which seems to have taken him up as an "overseas patriot" through the years - based on the original article on viwiki that you created) currently used. Do you think this significantly impacts the article, or is the current use of sourcing enough? Thanks. MSG17 (talk) 22:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- @MSG17 Hi, thanks again for creating the English version of the article! I was mostly using the Vietnamese-language sources for the exact quotes (instead of back-translating from English-language sources). However, I didn't have much luck finding contemporary sources online - most Vietnamese-language sources I found were written years after the fact, and some of those sources published in Vietnam got some facts wrong to fit their narrative. I wouldn't use them as factual sources, but more of "reaction" sources. I think the inclusion of the BBC source is enough, or if you'd like you can add Vietnamese government views of the events years later but I don't consider it essential. There's a couple of contemporary RFA articles I found that you might want to consider incorporating, but again only for the "reactions" section. DHN (talk) 23:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was definitely thinking about reactions/perspectives. I had earlier hoped to include something about the Vietnamese government's perspective, but since I couldn't find a secondary source I am hesitant to cobble together the "primary sources" (state media) in what would seem to be original research (especially if they "modified the facts"). I also don't think the RFA sources give a lot of relevant info that isn't already in English sources (esp. Ha 2002). This article from Saigon Nhỏ seems interesting with regards to the developments with Trường and the community, but I don't know how reliable or well-known this publication is (I didn't link the first part as it seems to mostly be a summary of the event which I suspect was strongly influenced by the Wiki articles). MSG17 (talk) 01:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @MSG17 Yeah, I found that article recently, and a lot of text from it (the description of the events) was taken verbatim from vi.wiki. However, they did have some new information, particularly some behind-the-scenes perspective of someone directly involved (Van Tran). DHN (talk) 01:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @MSG17 FWIW, this article from Nhan Dan also liberally lifted passages from the vi.wiki article (the negative mainstream American reaction). I also found this contemporary article that will give you a view of the events from the local Vietnamese-American perspective. DHN (talk) 02:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was definitely thinking about reactions/perspectives. I had earlier hoped to include something about the Vietnamese government's perspective, but since I couldn't find a secondary source I am hesitant to cobble together the "primary sources" (state media) in what would seem to be original research (especially if they "modified the facts"). I also don't think the RFA sources give a lot of relevant info that isn't already in English sources (esp. Ha 2002). This article from Saigon Nhỏ seems interesting with regards to the developments with Trường and the community, but I don't know how reliable or well-known this publication is (I didn't link the first part as it seems to mostly be a summary of the event which I suspect was strongly influenced by the Wiki articles). MSG17 (talk) 01:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Category:Russian amputees has been nominated for deletion
Category:Russian amputees has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Edward-Woodrow • talk 22:35, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)