User talk:F.BlaubigetWelcome to let me know your ideas and feedback.--F.Blaubiget (talk) 14:58, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
EntscheidungsvorlageHowdy, re your enquiry at the help desk (ich bleib jetzt mal im Englischen, weil die Umlaute mit QWERTY-Tastatur gehen mir ordentlich auf den Senkel...) - a recurring problem with porting articles from deWP to enWP is that the German articles tend to use way too few inline cites for our purposes. This is also the case with de:Entscheidungsvorlage. Only a small part of the text is sourced to clearly identified individual sources; as it is, this wouldn't stick here. You would have to find further sources, OR (may be easier) figure out which of the already present ones are applicable to individual paragraphs of the text. Apart from that - I'm sure there would be no difficulty sourcing such a universal management tool as this, so notability should not be a problem. Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageAugust 2021Hello, I'm FormalDude. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pensacola Beach, Florida have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 07:07, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageusanewscourt.com as a referenceHi F.Blaubiget. I noticed that you used usanewscourt.com [1][2] as a source in Roscoe Pound and Charlie Munger. I am unable to find any evidence or discussion indicating that it meets reliable sourcing criteria for such information, and the specific article uses Wikipedia as a reference. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 22:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |