User talk:Czarking0

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinnacol Assurance Fund (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Czarking0! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinnacol Assurance Fund (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you with all my heart

Applause for you!

I am sending you a round of applause which you so richly deserve for all your efforts on Christianization of the Roman Empire as diffusion of innovation. I will never forget your great kindness and your tremendous skill. Thank you. Jenhawk777 (talk) 22:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dearheart, if you feel it is time, would you do the honors and close out the review? Jenhawk777 (talk) 03:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Than you for the high commendation! This is actually my first article review, and I really enjoyed it. I'd be happy to review more of your work in the feature as you were awesome to work with. I have a couple other things on my docket that are perhaps less in your wheelhouse. Do you by chance know any dutch speakers who would want to review Hugo Krabbe? Czarking0 (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinnacol Assurance Fund (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund

Hello, Czarking0. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund

Hello, Czarking0. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pinnacol Assurance Fund".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 20:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

VanossGaming GA

Hi @Czarking0, thank you so much for your GA review on the VanossGaming biography, I agreed with all your comments. I've made a load of changes and I've done my best to address your comments, I've made notes as to how I addressed each one on the talk page. I was wondering if I should renominate the article for GA status, that way we could have another go together at perfecting the biography? Also I was reading your talk page about your degree, I'm currently doing a BSc in math and physics, it is certainly loads of fun ahah. Thanks again for the article review, looking forward to your next suggestion :) Idiosincrático (talk) 08:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated the article for GA again, would appreciate your review. :) Idiosincrático (talk) 02:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Idiosincrático I have been busy with work. Thanks for your contribution in editting the article. Good luck with your studies. I will relook at the GA when I have some time Czarking0 (talk) 17:22, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Minor Barnstar
		Thank you for participating in the March 2024 backlog drive. Your contribution (3 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. —Ganesha811 (talk) 16:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 203.7.123.1 -- 203.7.123.1 (talk) 12:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Clearview AI

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clearview AI you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Clearview AI

The article Clearview AI you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Clearview AI for comments about the article, and Talk:Clearview AI/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 09:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! Congratulations! You did a great job. I liked the discussion about confidence intervals and accuracy. Y'all made a good compromise about how to convey that. Also, I missed the part about NIST (or maybe I glossed over it, I don't recall since it was back in September 2023). I made some edits tonight, nothing major. They were mostly things that Mike had mentioned. I did leave a comment in a transcluded place that I want to bring to your attention. Please see here. My comments are at the very end of that section. You and Mike don't need to reply unless you want to.--FeralOink (talk) 11:16, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk

The article Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk and Talk:Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk/GA3 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk

The article Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk for comments about the article, and Talk:Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk/GA3 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
2,124		First French Empire (talk)	Add sources
423		Rite Aid (talk)	Add sources
27		Educate Girls (talk)	Add sources
2,966		Green Party of the United States (talk)	Add sources
434		Economy of Qatar (talk)	Add sources
850		Chittagong Hill Tracts (talk)	Add sources
262		Global energy crisis (2021–2023) (talk)	Cleanup
61		History of Nagorno-Karabakh (talk)	Cleanup
7		5th National Congress of the Kuomintang (talk)	Cleanup
120		Petroleum industry in Iran (talk)	Expand
39		Energy policy of Russia (talk)	Expand
6		Regional effects of the 2021–2022 global energy crisis (talk)	Expand
75		Reformism (historical) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
35		Scraper site (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
79		Iskra Lawrence (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
178		China Petrochemical Corporation (talk)	Merge
398		Bolshoy Ussuriysky Island (talk)	Merge
71		Intersex and LGBT (talk)	Merge
72		Sibur (talk)	Wikify
238		Armenia–Azerbaijan border crisis (2021–present) (talk)	Wikify
145		History of serfdom (talk)	Wikify
2		National Satellite Test Facility (talk)	Orphan
15		SPARK Schools (talk)	Orphan
3		Vivian Rosenthal (talk)	Orphan
4		Beseda (talk)	Stub
12		Jordan Petroleum Refinery Company (talk)	Stub
18		Kakenya Ntaiya (talk)	Stub
4		Hasan Khan Shahseven (talk)	Stub
109		Cepsa (talk)	Stub
13		CGCOC Group (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fukushima nuclear accident

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fukushima nuclear accident you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 01:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fukushima nuclear accident

The article Fukushima nuclear accident you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fukushima nuclear accident and Talk:Fukushima nuclear accident/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fiona tile move request

Hi, I saw the comment you left on the Fiona talk page to add a parenthetical disambiguation to the article title. I've opened a title move request, I would appreciate your vote, thanks. The Blue Rider 22:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Original Barnstar
		For all of your hard work on Fukushima nuclear accident. I gave you A LOT of feedback and I worried it might have been too much but you handled it fantastically. Great work on that article, I couldn't imagine working on such an important and lengthy topic. I hope you consider nominating it for DYK. Keep up the great work! IntentionallyDense (talk) 23:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I have given it a DYK nomination at your suggestion. Also open to other ideas/hooks on what should be included Czarking0 (talk) 20:42, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fukushima nuclear accident

The article Fukushima nuclear accident you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fukushima nuclear accident for comments about the article, and Talk:Fukushima nuclear accident/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 23:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Zemstvo

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zemstvo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 13:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Zemstvo

The article Zemstvo you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Zemstvo for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 02:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fukushima nuclear accident

On 16 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fukushima nuclear accident, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an official investigation found the Fukushima nuclear accident was foreseeable and preventable? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fukushima nuclear accident. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fukushima nuclear accident), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arrëza oil field

We are both traveling for the holidays. I agreed with you on a couple of proposed deletions, but not this one. I'm deprodding it and we can discuss it at WP:AfD after the new year. Safe travels! Bearian (talk) 05:05, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good you too! Czarking0 (talk) 19:15, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur W. Murphy

Named professors at Ivy League Universities pass WP:PROF automatically. Bearian (talk) 05:26, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me what you are referring to? I think you mean WP:NACADEMIC point 5 but this is not a chair position? Czarking0 (talk) 19:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Pears

I'm sorry, but this is another one that I think is notable. See you online next year. Bearian (talk) 05:48, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the new sources. I agree with you here. Czarking0 (talk) 19:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested GOCE copy edit of Zemstvo

Hello, Czarking0. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Zemstvo at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Dhtwiki (talk) 11:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An apology

This haunts me at night and so I would like to apologize. For your nomination of Fukushima nuclear accident I made you change the citations to have a consistent format. I misinterpreted the GA criteria and have now learnt that this is not a part of the criteria. I'm sorry I made you do all of that as I would assume it was not very fun. This randomly pops in my mind every once and awhile and I hope it did not cause too much of a hassle for you at the time. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 04:03, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no worries! It was definitely not fun, but it made the article better regardless of the GAC. Plus that is my favorite article I have worked on. Also, I see your edits around WP and think highly of you! Czarking0 (talk) 04:50, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Glad I can finally sleep at night knowing I didn't completely ruin your experience with that article. That also happens to be my favourite review I've ever done. Thank you for your kind words. I often see your username pop up and think of all the hardwork you put into that article as it was amazing. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 04:52, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your review of Draft:Gary L. Comstock

Hi Czarking0 - thanks for reviewing Draft:Gary L. Comstock. You wrote that the draft doesn’t meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria to qualify for a Wikipedia article. I’m hoping you’ll take another look because according to Wikipedia:Notability (academics)#Specific criteria notes, he meets two of the criteria.

1. Comstock holds a distinguished professor appointment from North Carolina State University, the largest educational institution in the Carolinas with the highest possible Carnegie Classification (R1) for a research institution.

According to WP:NACADEMIC an academic is notable if The person has held a distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, a named chair appointment that indicates a comparable level of achievement, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.

From the draft: Gary Comstock is Alumni Association Distinguished Undergraduate Professor of Philosophy at North Carolina State University.

This fact is supported by Comstock's official bio published by North Carolina State University. Per WP:NACADEMIC For documenting that a person has held such an appointment (but not for a judgement of whether or not the institution is a major one), publications of the appointing institution are considered a reliable source.

Already, you can see that he qualifies under NACADEMIC. But he also satisfies a second criterion:

2. Comstock was a fellow at the National Humanities Center, a highly selective institute for advanced studies in the humanities founded by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

According to WP:NACADEMIC an academic is notable if The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers or Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Physics).

From the draft: From 2007-2009, Comstock was an ASC Fellow at the National Humanities Center, where he also served as Editor-in-Chief of the center’s On the Human project.

This fact is supported by a publication of the National Humanities Center. Per NACADEMIC: For documenting that a person has been elected member or fellow (but not for a judgement of whether or not that membership/fellowship is prestigious), publications of the electing institution are considered a reliable source.

So you can see that Comstock qualifies as notable under two criteria which are properly supported by sources per the policy.

NACADEMIC makes allowances for primary sources because unlike people like CEOs or celebrities, academics are less likely to be covered in secondary media sources. I’m sure you’re familiar with Good Articles, which are Wikipedia articles that meet a core set of editorial standards. I would invite you to look at any GA’s about academics for an example of how primary sources are used in these circumstances. Here are two in Comstock’s field: Gary Varner and John Hadley (philosopher).

I’ve made a slight change to the draft, moving Comstock’s Fellowship appointment into the Lead. Now both of the criteria that qualify him as notable are prominently placed. Would you like to look it over?

Thanks Roy Louis (talk) 19:38, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roy, I appreciate you coming to my talk page when you believe I have made a mistake. I take the matter seriously and I will review again Czarking0 (talk) 19:44, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing I agree with your first point here. You said you made a change to the lead but the draft says it has not been edited since I edited it. Do you need to publish your edits still? Czarking0 (talk) 19:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for agreeing to take a look! I've just published the update to the lead. Please review it and see what you think. Roy Louis (talk) 20:36, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Roy I am still seeing that my edit is the most recent edit. This is where I am looking Czarking0 (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry. You're quick on the draw! You must have checked it right before I published it. It should be updated now. Would you kindly check again? Thanks. Roy Louis (talk) 20:51, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, will you please click the Resubmit button at the bottom of the red block indicating my denial and fill out the form the same way you did last time you submitted it? Then I will approve Czarking0 (talk) 21:27, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in the January 2025 GAN backlog drive

		The Minor Barnstar
		Your noteworthy contribution (3 points total) helped reduce the backlog by 185 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 04:14, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mandy Gunasekara (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mandy Gunasekara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^Edits! Talk! 06:03, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Project 2025, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Miller. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]