|
User talk:Chris0693Hello Chris0693, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Need help?
How you can help:
Additional tips...
Travel adviceThank you for your contributions to articles about Dutch public transport. I've noticed that you've added travel advices to several articles. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is neither a how to guide nor a travel guide. Aecis·(away) talk 14:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC) Thank youJust a note to thank you for your excellent work on Dutch railway stations. Keep up the good work! Aecis·(away) talk 23:07, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Help requestOn Template talk:Railway stations in North Holland, you asked for help with the template. How can I help you? What exactly do you want to do with it, where do you want to put it and what have you tried so far? Aecis·(away) talk 16:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC) Proposed deletion of "Groningen railway station"The deletion of an article you created, Groningen railway station, has been proposed for the following reason:
You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so. Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC) CartersI hate tagging new articles which have been extensively worked on by someone who knows much more about the subject than I do. There are a couple of things about Carters Coach Services that I thought I would bring to your attention:
What did you mean by tagging? I did mean Carters and have changed it Could you make this website a reference please: http://www.suffolkonboard.com/ I will think about the question marks The text logo is greast, how did you make that? If you can make it yellow go for it Chris0693 (talk) 08:30, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Apeldoorn Osseveld railway station A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Apeldoorn Osseveld railway station, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Unionsoap (talk) 12:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Hoorn Kersenboogerd railway stationDit klopt niet helemaal, hoor. Op 8 mei rijdt 3300 eens per uur wel door naar hnk, en op 12 mei (willekeurig geprikt) gewoon weer 2 x per uur (beide volgens ns.nl). - Erik Baas (talk) 23:03, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
AutoreviewerHi Chris, I just came across one of your articles at newpage patrol, and was surprised to see that an editor who has contributed as many articles as you hadn't already been approved as an wp:Autoreviewer. So I've taken the liberty of rectifying that. ϢereSpielChequers 12:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Huge handbook for creating previous/next templates!Hi Chris, I just wrote you a small guideline for creating preceding/following station templates. Except that it is not small anymore, but ah well... If you've got any more questions: feel free to ask, although I don't think my knowledge on this subject extends beyond what I wrote here. :-) The templates with preceding/following station information are based on lines. So, each line needs a seperate template. If we take as an example the template for line E which you can find on the page Nootdorp RandstadRail station, you see the following text which 'loads' the template: { {s-rail-start}}
{ {s-rail|title=RandstadRail}}
{ {s-line|system=RandstadRail|line=E|previous=Pijnacker Centrum|next=Leidschenveen}}
{ {end}}
(Obviously, you should remove the space between the first and second "{" for this to work). The second line contains information about the entire 'box', so "title=RandstadRail" does not really do anything except place that title in the table heading and turn it into a link. Boring. ;-) The third line is more interesing. The phrase after "system" defines in which category all templates should be placed, in this case Category:RandstadRail templates (because "system=RandstadRail"). Another example is Category:Thalys templates for when "system=Thalys". If you have decided on the name, then make that category (Category:****NAME**** templates). Each template you are going to create should be placed in this new category by using "noinclude" as follows: < noinclude>Category:****NAME**** templates< /noinclude> Now, create these three templates:
{ {#switch:{{{station}}}
| #default=[[{{{station}}} RandstadRail station|{{{station}}}]]
} }
} }
The last templates you have to create are "left" and "right" templates for EACH line. Call those "Template:S-line/****NAME**** left/1234567" and "Template:S-line/****NAME**** right/1234567", where you include the proper name, and replace "1234567" by the correct line number or the line letter. These templates are easy, as you only include the left and right terminuses of the lines, in plain and simple text (so no links, because the station template you've just created will do that for you). The final step is to include the text as you see above in each station article. Of course, replace the "title=RandstadRail" with some nice title, replace the "system=RandstadRail" with the category name you have come up with, replace "line=E" with the proper line letter, and include the correct previous and next stations. Finally, you can multiple the third line (starting with "s-line") so multiple lines are displayed in one box (see for example Forepark RandstadRail station). Also browse around how templates for other rail systems have been created, for example in Category:Thalys templates or Category:London Underground templates. They just might give you some nice ideas! As you can see with the London Underground templates, the category name (London Underground) and template names (LUL) are different; apparently this is possible, but I would get confused. :-) Cheers and good luck with 'em! Bicycle bell 16:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
And the only other problem I see me encountering when the trains split somewhere. Thanks for your help, if you could just start me off I hope then I can do it. Thanks Chris0693 (talk) 21:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC) Started off :-)Hi, I've just created some templates to begin with, and made it work for the 1600 and 3500 Intercities and the 5700 Stoptrein. I split the whole story into two parts: one part for the Intercity trains, and another part for Sprinter trains (also with Stoptrein and Sneltrein templates, but those are mainly redirecting to Sprinter and Intercity templates). This makes maintenance a bit more difficult, but I like the result better, since we can now give Intercities and Sprinters different colors and captions! If we take Amsterdam Zuid station as an example with series 1600, 3500 and 5700, the following code: { {s-rail-start}}
{ {s-rail|title=Nederlandse Spoorwegen}}
{ {s-line|system=NS Intercity|line=1600|previous=Schiphol|next=Duivendrecht}}
{ {s-line|system=NS Intercity|line=3500|previous=Schiphol|next=Amsterdam Bijlmer ArenA}}
{ {s-line|system=NS Stoptrein|line=5700|previous=Schiphol|next=Amsterdam RAI}}
{ {end}}
now generates, when you remove the spaces of course, the following beautiful box:
For this to work, I've created several templates in the newly created category Category:Nederlandse Spoorwegen templates (take a look!). As you can see, for each train type (Intercity/Sneltrein/Stoptrein/Sprinter) there are THREE templates to begin with: "color", "lines", and "stations". If you like what you see above, then you don't have to ever touch those again. ;-) If not, read this:
| #default=[[NS Intercity {{{1}}}]]
The final step, when you have created enough templates for a station, is to put the box on the Wiki page of that station. To do so, you simply have to paste the code to make those boxes into the station article, and change four things for each line: "system=" (for the train type), "line=" (for the number), and obviously "previous=" and "next=". That is all! I hope I've given you a decent head start, but feel free to ask if you still have some trouble!! I'm not going to create templates for all train series, but if you want for example to change a color or to make the train series into a link and you don't get it, just ask. :-) Have fun! Bicycle bell (talk) Bicycle bell 10:45, 29 May 2010 (UTC) BranchesHi Chris, You seem to have gotten the hang of it, it's looking good. :-) Your question about trains which go different places is a good one, I forgot about that. Luckily I've used them in the past, so I've created the templates for the 700 Intercity for you. First of all let me tell you that some difficulties arise because the "stations" template automatically creates a link to a Wiki article about that station. Therefore, an input such as "Groningen/Leeuwarden" would've resulted in a link to the non-existing article "Groningen/Leeuwarden railway station". To deal with this issue, I had to create some exceptions in the stations template, which you can see for yourself if you edit the Template:Nederlandse Spoorwegen stations template, so take a look! I already included some other combinations of stations you might need, such as Den Haag C/Rotterdam C. It is important that you use the exact same notation as I did when writing the template, if you don't it won't work!! I think it is easy enough to add more exceptions if that might be necessary: just copy and paste one of the lines and type in the stations. Then, how does it work? Well, on the combined section of the train (between Schiphol and Zwolle), there is no difference at all. Just enter "line=700" and everything else you'd normally enter, and then "Groningen/Leeuwarden" will appear as destination. For all stations after Zwolle, you have to add "|branch=???????" directly after "line=700". I've chosen to use the train number as branch number, so the train to Groningen will be "|branch=700", while the train to Leeuwarden will be "|branch=10700". For the station of Assen (with branch=700), this code: { {s-rail-start}}
{ {s-rail|title=Nederlandse Spoorwegen}}
{ {s-line|system=NS Intercity|line=700|branch=700|previous=Beilen|next=Haren}}
{ {end}}
now generates:
For the station of Heerenveen (with branch=10700), this code: { {s-rail-start}}
{ {s-rail|title=Nederlandse Spoorwegen}}
{ {s-line|system=NS Intercity|line=700|branch=10700|previous=Wolvega|next=Akkrum}}
{ {end}}
now generates:
And for the station of Hilversum (with no branch code at all), this code: { {s-rail-start}}
{ {s-rail|title=Nederlandse Spoorwegen}}
{ {s-line|system=NS Intercity|line=700|previous=Duivendrecht|next=Amersfoort}}
{ {end}}
now generates:
Since there is only one "left" terminus for this train (which is Schiphol), you will understand that the "left/700" template is completely normal. But now take a look in the "right/700" template, so click edit. Since we have two branches and one shared section, the template will have to distinguish between those three options. See how if you have entered "branch=700" it will give Groningen as output, if you have entered "branch=10700" it will say Leeuwarden, and if you have entered anything else or nothing at all, it will result in Groningen/Leeuwarden. Now you can just copy and paste the code of that template to use for other trains which split somewhere. If something goes wrong, do remember to check whether the stations template already has an exception to deal with the combination of two stations. On a final note I have to say that the software includes the possibility to add some text below "NS Intercity 700" when a branch has been entered. However, I found it a bit confusing and also redundant, because the terminus already distinguishes between the branches. Besides, if it says "NS Intercity 700, branch 700" I doubt whether that is useful. If you think otherwise then let me know, because I can include it (any text is possible for each different branch, so it is not necessarily the number). Good luck again! :-) Bicycle bell (talk) Bicycle bell 08:46, 30 May 2010 (UTC) Branches part 2 and NS HispeedHi, I see you already got the 700 working at several stations. I redid Zwolle railway station for you, and also added the template for Steenwijk railway station (which is in the branch=10700 area of course). Furthermore, I added the train type "NS Hispeed". It has a dirty pinkish color (copied that from the NS Hispeed logo), and to use it you have to replace "system=NS Intercity" or whatever with "system=NS Hispeed". I created the templates for the 1000 series (Fyra between Amsterdam C and Rotterdam C), and implemented it at the Schiphol railway station page. Cheers. :-) Bicycle bell (talk) Bicycle bell 09:27, 30 May 2010 (UTC) SchipholHi, Of course you can show "Schiphol (Amsterdam Airport)", that's no problem. You have two options:
#REDIRECT[ [Schiphol railway station]]
| Schiphol=[ [Schiphol railway station|Schiphol (Amsterdam Airport)]] That's all again. ;-) Bicycle bell (talk) Bicycle bell 20:00, 31 May 2010 (UTC) German railway task forceHi Chris, first of all thank you for all your work on German railway articles. May I invite you to join our Rail transport in Germany task force - no specific commitment is necessary other than taking an interest in the subject! If you'd like to do this please add your name to the list of contributors - you already deserve to be recognised - and add any new articles you create to the What's New section. Just a small point; the convention is that we name station articles as "XXX station" rather than "XXX railway station". If you feel strongly about that you may wish to start a discussion, but you should avoid moving any articles until a new convention is agreed. BTW if you are you a translator or are interested in other aspects of Germany, there is also a WikiProject Germany. Gruß. --Bermicourt (talk) 05:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC) Chris, there is no universal convention for naming stations on Wiki. French articles use "Gare de XXX"; US ones "XXX (Amtrak)". The reason for just using "station" is a) that's how the International Union of Railways translates Bahnhof. It's also appears to be the norm in dictionaries where the primary meaning of "station" is "railway station". German station articles at least have a convention which we should follow unless we collectively agree to change. More illogical, but also more contentious is the de facto practice of not translating Hauptbahnhof. This is odd when we translate Bahnhof, but folk couldn't agree on whether it should be rendered "main station" or "central station". My own view is that "central station" is normal in English-speaking countries, but if a given station was obviously not central, we could translate it, by exception, as "main station". It is not uncommon for a German word to have more than English equivalent depending on context e.g. a Schloss may be a castle, palace or [manor] house. The joys of translation! Regards. --Bermicourt (talk) 18:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC) You are now a Reviewer Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
French railwaysHi Chris, I suppose you figured out yourself how to do the Narbonne junction, it was correct when I checked. I added the minor railway to Bize-Minervois. I will check for missing stations etc. later, when I write the article about the railway (unless you want to do it yourself). About links to stations, I'm a bit in doubt there. I think you're doing a nice job creating articles about railway stations, but I don't think every station is notable. I have created quite a few station articles myself, but only for large towns or otherwise important stations (junctions, intercity stops), and I've received some comments on that (none of them was deleted though). See also Wikipedia:Notability (Railway lines and stations)#Stations suggestion. Anyway, I won't change your links for now. Regards, Markussep Talk 18:24, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
French Railways - Train ServicesHi Chris, Some questions ref the detailed services info.
Thanks, Boatman (talk) 18:42, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
I hope this helps, I'm not sure I've explained it that well, so don't hesitate to ask questions! Chris0693 (talk) 09:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Boatman (talk) 22:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC) S-line templatesHi Chris, I saw you didn't use the line number functionality at your recent article creations in Bourgogne. You even removed it at your edit to Nevers station. If you're not sure how to use it, or which numbers and termini apply, just ask me. Markussep Talk 09:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Paris REREhm, some comments about your Gare Aéroport Charles de Gaulle 1 RER edits: it's not a good idea to create a new article when there is already an article about the same subject. The naming convention for RER stations is "X (Paris RER)", except when the station is also used by regular trains (Transilien, TER or other), then we use "Gare de X". I just saw that you moved nearly all of the RER stations. Better discuss it before you introduce a new standard name. If you're sure that no trains from Charles de Gaulle take the branch line to Robinson, you can change the "type2" field into "B4" instead of "both". But I checked it on the RATP website, and they do. I don't think it's very useful to show all the different options for the RER lines, some trains skip a few stations, or serve only part of the line. I think for the B line alone there are more than 20 variants. Markussep Talk 09:24, 24 March 2011 (UTC) Gare du NordChris, your recent move of Gare du Nord to Gare de Paris-Nord was not the proper way to do that. If you can't move an article to a title that's already occupied, you should follow the instructions at WP:RM. What you did is a cut-and-paste move. A quote from that page: "When a cut-and-paste move is done, the page history of an article or talk page can be split among two or more different pages. This is highly undesirable, because we need to keep the history with the content for copyright reasons." I reverted it, fortunately there haven't been many edits to it since your move. Markussep Talk 07:36, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Any article that needs doing, as I am not sure what to write next? Chris0693 (talk) 13:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Succesion TemplatesIn the Netherlands railway station articles (and elsewhere) you seem to be struggling to understand the use of succession templates. You have created several unnecessary left and right templates, when the specific ones existed. See Category:Nederlandse Spoorwegen templates (don't forget to add a category to everything). The most recent example is at Enkhuizen railway station where the templates you inserted appear to create duplicate line information, when the previous ones were correct. Sw2nd (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Chris0693 (talk) 13:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Here you go againThere is no need for the new general templates you have recently created, because specific ones already exist for each line. Look into Oberhausen Hauptbahnhof and you will see s-line templates being used for both RE 5 and RB 35 toward Emmerich where you have used your own custom versions. Sw2nd (talk) 22:33, 26 April 2011 (UTC) Line informationI have copied your table from Essen-Gerschede railway station detailing the route of line S9 (Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn) to that article. That table does not need to be entered in every station article because that information can be found by the link from the s-rail succession template to the S9 line article. You should update other line articles, which are missing this kind of information, rather than stuffing station articles. Sw2nd (talk) 16:48, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Infobox NS-stationHi Chris, I changed the {{Infobox NS-station}} into a wrapper for {{Infobox station}}. It has more or less the same functionality it had, but it looks like the other station infoboxes now. If you like you can check the Dutch railway station articles for missing information in the infoboxes, for instance the line(s) the station is on (see List of railway lines in the Netherlands for the names of the railway lines). And there's still a few stations without an article. Let me know if you need any help or explanation on the templates. Markussep Talk 14:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
Hi Chris0693, Just wanted to let you know that I saw that you created the new article Wyhlen railway station--The content seems well-organized. However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the article currently does not contain any references. As a new article, the most important thing is to find reliable references for all existing information. Have a good day! Jipinghe (talk) 03:58, 26 October 2011 (UTC) Train service detailsHi Chris, I saw you're adding train service details to station articles again, like for instance at Amsterdam Centraal railway station. There was a discussion about that earlier, which you may have missed. It's at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains/Archive: 2011, 2#Representation of service details in station articles. The conclusion was that it's better to put that information in a page like Dutch railway services, and link to that page from the succession templates. I created similar tables for France in the TER regional articles, I'm not sure whether something similar already exists for German railways. Markussep Talk 14:22, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Let me explain station articles againTake for example Rathmannsdorf railway station:-
Thank youThank you for taking some guidance. Your railway station articles are now referenced, laid out properly and not overstuffed. The External links lead readers to information which is directly related to the subject. These articles now show that they have been properly researched. I will continue to support your efforts. Sw2nd (talk) 22:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC) Railways in PolandThere is a Category:Poland rail transport templates which might be of some help to you. I don't know if any of the lines there are what you might be looking for. Sw2nd (talk) 16:50, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Norden railway stationHi. Are you planning to create the article Norden (Germany) railway station? The disambiguation page you created is pointless otherwise. These pages are for when there is more than one existing Wikipedia article for the topic name. If an article for the German station was created then a hatnote at the top of the English station article would be more appropriate. Barret (talk) 18:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
MerwedeLingelijnIk heb een nieuw artikel aangemaakt over de MerwedeLingelijn, de naam die Arriva hanteert voor de lijn Dordrecht-Geldermalsen. Ik ben ook bezig de stations te verfraaien, mijn Engels gaat (...), maar is niet al te best. De MerwedeLingelijn is in handen van Arriva dat betekent dat de NS is verdwenen van de stations. Ik krijg dat helaas zelf niet aangepast. Graag hulp. --Bezeh.nl (talk) 14:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC)  The article Dutch train services withdrawn from 14th December 2008 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing PhotosHello, I was wondering if it would be possible to use some of your photos of Ferries on Wikipedia for my website http://doverferryinfo.wix.com/doverferryinfo#!prideofcalais/cjs7 I would of-course state you as the copyright holder. Many Thanks 2013harry 18:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2013harry (talk • contribs)
Hi, I 've seen that you added the lines for Leipzig Markt station and further stations. Please check at S-Bahn Mitteldeutschland, there are 6 lines altogether, which serve this station. S5X is something different than S5. Thus the template Template:S-line/MDSB left/S5 needs to be fixed, another template for S5X needs to be created (Unfortunately I didn't understand those very templates yet, so I couldn't do it.) Secondly I would prefer the same colours for the individual lines as to be seen at S-Bahn Mitteldeutschland. I don't really care which ones, but they should be the same. Nevertheless thanks for your efforts so far! Regards, Kleeblatt187 (talk) 16:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Infobox Italy stationTemplate:Infobox Italy station is currently being deleted. Please do not use it on any additional pages. Sw2nd (talk) 21:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 16Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NS Class 186, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electric brake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 19Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NordWestBahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bombardier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Proposed deletion of NS Intercity 2000The article NS Intercity 2000 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Hi, Disambiguation link notification for January 18Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cervignano-Aquileia-Grado railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grado. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 18 January 2016 (UTC) Request for commentYour attention is called to Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Lead section#Request_for_comment: Identification of train or railway stations in the lead. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Amsterdam Metro Line 50
Nomination for deletion of Template:Amsterdam Tram Line 26
Nomination for deletion of Template:Direct destinations from Ede-Wageningen
Nomination for deletion of Template:Direct destinations from Lelystad Centrum
Disambiguation link notification for October 13Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pszczółki railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pszczółki. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC) WikiProject assessment tags for talk pagesThank you for your recent articles, including Poznań–Piła railway, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Chris0693. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 10Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Winterswijk–Zevenaar railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ede. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Chris0693. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Chris0693. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:CrossCountry stations
Nomination for deletion of Template:Venice–Udine railway diagram
Nomination for deletion of Template:Capdenac - Rodez railway diagram
Nomination for deletion of Template:Nevers-Chagny railway diagram
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Polregio left/
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Polregio right/
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/TER Bourgogne-Franche-Comté left/PL
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Intercités left/
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Intercités right/
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/TER Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes left/40
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/TER PACA left/21
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/TER PACA right/21
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/TER Pays de la Loire left/10
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/TER Pays de la Loire left/11
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/TER Bretagne left/32
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/TER Bretagne right/32
Nomination of Lamotte-Beuvron station for deletion The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamotte-Beuvron station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paradoxsociety 01:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Arriva Stoptrein left/36800
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Arriva Stoptrein left/8000
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Arriva Stoptrein right/31000
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MDSB left/S1
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Arriva Sneltrein left/3800
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/NS Hispeed left/9300
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/NS Hispeed right/9300
Nomination for deletion of Template:BE-L lines
Nomination for deletion of Template:BE-S color
Nomination for deletion of Template:BE-Regional lines
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-SA left/35
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-SA left/40
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-SA right/35
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-SA right/40
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/45
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-Hesse left/25
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-Hesse right/25
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/DB-ICE left/47
Nomination of Voorweg RandstadRail station for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voorweg RandstadRail station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.JMWt (talk) 16:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC) The article La Cave station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Spui RandstadRail station moved to draftspaceThanks for your contributions to Spui RandstadRail station. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 16:37, 26 March 2024 (UTC) The article Spui RandstadRail station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, Chris0693. Thank you for your work on Spui RandstadRail station. Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with Boleyn (talk) 06:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
