User talk:Bogdan Nagachop

Welcome, Bogdan Nagachop!                                                                                                                                                                                                Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,474,466 Users

Hello, Bogdan Nagachop, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Magister Scienta, one of the many editors here, and I hope you decide to stay here and help contribute to Wikipedia.

Here are some links to get you started:

  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  How to edit a page
  Editing tutorial
  Help pages
  Manual of Style
  How to write a great article
  What Wikipedia is not
  The Basics of Wikicode

And here are some Do's and Don'ts:

  DO be bold
  DO assume good faith
  DO be civil
  DO keep cool!
  DO maintain a neutral point of view
  DON'T spam
  DON'T infringe copyright
  DON'T get blocked
  DON'T vandalize

If you need further help, you can:

  Ask a question

Or even:

  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, drop a note on my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

If you enjoy being here, there are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:

  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
  Perform maintenance tasks
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates

Remember to always sign your name on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post; this will automatically insert your username, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.

As always though, the best way to learn about something is to experience it. Go and explore Wikipedia, the more time you spend on it, the more you'll know, and don't forget to have some fun!

        Sincerely, Magister Scienta (talk) December 29, 2024.

Blagoveshchensky

That's a typo; I've fixed it. Thanks for catching it!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 1, 2011; 17:50 (UTC)

So, how come...

...I didn't get an invitation? Canvassing is a sin, you know...—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 5, 2011; 18:49 (UTC) replied at the related thread, pointing to the invitation that I gave to Ezhiki like to others on WP:NCGN Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 19:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, apologies. I replied to the second part of it but must have missed the first.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 5, 2011; 19:31 (UTC)

Amini Island

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Amini Island, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://lakshadweep.nic.in/ISLAND_web/AMINI/index.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:33, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Amini Island, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  22:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Begar, India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Begar, India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ... discospinster talk 04:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Please ease up on the page moves, quite a few of the moves you are making are incorrect as you're moving primary topics to disambiguated titles. I see that you've started a discussion at WT:IN, please wait for people to respond before continuing with these moves. —SpacemanSpiff 15:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SIA pages

Also, please do not create disambiguation pages like Kallur, India when the existing one at Kallur is perfectly acceptable. —SpacemanSpiff 16:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's a SIA page, see WP:SIA. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 16:13, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note that per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, articles should be at their primary topics regardless of whether there are alternative meanings for that title. You shouldn't be disambiguating primary topics. --rgpk (comment) 16:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

This & this constitute canvassing. You are not allowed to attempt to skew the outcome of a discussion by notifying users who you suspect might share your opinion of specific discussions. Especially when you use non-neutral language. Consider yourself warned. Please don't do this again. Spartaz Humbug! 03:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All involved have been informed: "On the talk pages of concerned editors. Examples include editors who have participated in previous discussions on the same topic (or closely related topics), who are known for expertise in the field, or who have asked to be kept informed. The audience must not be selected on the basis of their opinions—for example, if notices are sent to editors who previously supported deleting an article, then identical notices should be sent to those who supported keeping it. Do not send notices to too many users, and do not send messages to users who have asked not to receive them." Opposing party Ezhiki was aware of the discussion. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 09:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join the WikiProject Indian Roads

- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Indian Roads - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hi, Bogdan Nagachop, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Indian Roads ! The WikiProject Indian Roads is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, road portal and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Indian Roads.

As you have shown an interest in article related to Indian roads we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

naveenpf (talk) 04:55, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten to cheer you up!

Since we now have this stupid kittens feature, might as well use it, eh? :) Maybe it'll even cheer you up a little or restore your motivation. Best,

—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 19, 2011; 14:17 (UTC)

Aheri, Papua New Guinea

Comment moved to project: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Papua New Guinea#Stubs for populated places DAB links addressed at: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (India)#Fixing dab links in Karnataka templates Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 12:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

I've seen your works on wiki.your efforts to reunite different places of same name are appreciable!Good luck. RohG ??· 12:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot :-) Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 12:46, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

Forgive if the question is too stupid, please explain what this template stuff is all about.Yogesh Khandke (talk) 19:36, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You mean Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(India)#Fixing_dab_links_in_Karnataka_templates? Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 23:07, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No I want to know what the whole issue is?? S l o w l y.Yogesh Khandke (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You mean not specifically templates but maybe the whole issue that I have, which is disambiguation? Maybe this helps: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (India)#Disambiguation by state or district compared with dab in other countries. I think the system for India is not as good as the system for Ireland, the UK, the Philippines, the US. And I think it can be easily improved by using the district level as default. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 16:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied

Your contributed article, Sub-districts of India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Sub-districts of India. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Tehsil. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Tehsil - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Rymatz (talk) 11:43, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talukas of Gujarat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talukas of Gujarat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Quiggers1P talk - contribs 12:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Talukas of Gujarat

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Talukas of Gujarat, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 12:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

See Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Please_stop Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 13:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uppal, India

Would be best to merge into Uppal or at least link it there. Unless there are hundreds there is no reason for being on a separate dab page. Editors would search for Uppal not Uppal, India anyway..♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kotturu, India should be listed at Kotturu

On a WP:SIA page there can be more detailed information. Best would be to convert these to table and add population info so one can estimate the importance. But this can done later. For listing at the dab pages, I agree. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 17:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#On_going_accusations_by_SpacemanSpiff Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 10:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.—SpacemanSpiff 19:31, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (India)

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (India), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (India) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (India) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 00:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bogdan Nagachop. You have new messages at CycloneGU's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

In case you didn't watchlist, template applies again. Also, per that message, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Reopening. CycloneGU (talk) 15:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Bahara, India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Bahara, India. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Bahara. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Bahara - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Rainbow Dash (WikiBrony!) 13:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 August 8

See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 August 8 - people have no clue of the topic. One thing is an article of the town Bahara in Bihar - no sources given. The other is a list of villages named Bihara - source given. And what is deleted under CDS#A10? - the list. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 18:07, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peridon speedy deletions at ANI

Reported but no one does anything to stop him: [1]. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 18:09, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pallava/Pallavas

Hello, Bogdan. When you moved Pallava and created a disambiguation page at the old title, I see that you started to fix some of the redirects and templates that linked to the disambiguation page so that they now link to the correct article instead, as encouraged by WP:FIXDABLINKS. I found several other redirects and templates that were affected by this move, and also some links that could easily be fixed by bot. However, there are still a couple of hundred incoming links to the disambiguation page that need to be addressed, and your continued assistance in cleaning this up would be most welcome. Thanks! --R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I am working on writing systems currently. Note that Pallava script and Pallava Script redirect to different articles. But I have no clue what is correct. And I came to the dynasty page from a writing system article. I did not find any more template, how did you find them? I thought I fixed all templates. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 15:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&target=Pallava&namespace=10 - There aren't any now, so this will show you an empty list; but if you change it to namespace=0, it will show you the article links. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I did use your link before. But adding the s to make it Pallavas shows more templates. I'll fix them. Hopefully number of links goes down then. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 15:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed Pallavas earlier, so it is no longer a redirect to the disambiguation page. Links pointing to Pallavas do not need to be changed. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 16:13, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see, but I did it already. Maybe in future the string "Pallavas" gets a dab too, so less work then. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 16:19, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ISO 15924

Yes I can tqake a look into that (Maybe tomorrow).
Btw, I am also working to make this effect work:

Yes, it works. You could take a look at the Template:ISO 15924/article name, I've written some documentation there. Might come handy for the ISO-Unicode table you are editing. -DePiep (talk) 02:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About the numeric code: is that code not present at all, now? -DePiep (talk) 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rendered irrelevant. -DePiep (talk) 23:14, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move

Template_talk:ISO_15924_script_codes_and_Unicode

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tobias Conradi for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. JaGatalk 15:18, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bogdan Nagachop, have you ever edited (seriously) on this Wikipedia under another identification? -DePiep (talk) 00:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously: NO. And I don't know what weird thing JaGa makes up, because I moved some pages under consensus!!! Then there is this comparison report - what does that mean? Because another account edited some pages that I edit - so what? I think JaGa wants to kick me out, because he disagrees with something I did, look here: [2], [3] [4], [5]. Often he only claims "undiscussed move" - if that is the only reason, then why are there move buttons at all? There is not need to discuss every change. Sarati script now is under an ambiguous name again, since Sarati can also mean other things. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 01:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Stalking by JaGa and his stalking tools reported at ANI [6] Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 18:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Admins will not consider unblock requests for sockpuppets, Tobias, and they especially will not review Checkuser-induced blocks. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am not asking for unblocking a sockpuppet or unblocking any Tobias. I am asking for unblocking my account. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 18:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah right, Tobias. Go away. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:20, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you want any Tobias to go away talk to him. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 18:26, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for it appears you are banned - please follow WP:UNBAN on your main account.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Errant (chat!) 15:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bogdan Nagachop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want a proper review of the ban. What do you mean by "main account"? There is no such thing for me. It claims "It's Likely that Bogdan Nagachop (talk · contribs) and HawaiiLibre (talk · contribs) are the same as Chaldias (talk · contribs)" - What does my account have to do with HawaiiLibre and Chaldias? Please see that ErrantX was in a dispute with me calling me "Don't be silly" [7]. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 15:23, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on a review of the edits, the style, the grammar, I see a strong similarity to User:Tobias Conradi - and the person behind that account is community banned from Wikipedia. All accounts can be blocked - and indeed any edits by an evasion account can be reverted on sight, even without fear of violating WP:3RR. If you believe you can provide significant evidence that you are not User:Tobias Conradi, then contact WP:ARBCOM, as admins here will be unable to review a community ban (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bogdan Nagachop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You did not answer the question what the relation to HawaiiLibre and Chaldias is. Now you say "Based on a review of the edits, the style, the grammar, I see a strong similarity to User:Tobias Conradi - and the person behind that account is community banned from Wikipedia." - But what actually is the similarity that you see? Citation needed. -- Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 18:14, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Here's how this works. Chaldias and HawaiiLibre were found to be Tobias Conradi. You were found to be identical to Chaldias and HawaiiLibre. Therefore, you're just Tobias Conradi up to your old tricks again. We have no patience for your games, so please move on. We've found you out countless times and we'll do it every time. -- Atama頭 18:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bogdan Nagachop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You still did not say how my relation is to Chaldias and HawaiiLibre. About the relation between Chaldias and HawaiiLibre to each other or any other account I can say nothing. But I want a proper review of the ban which very strongly looks politically: I had several disagreements with some admins on content and on deletions namely SpacemanSpiff, JaGa, ErrantX, Peridon - and then one of them makes up a story at the SPI page and another one blocks me. Also there are no proper reviews. It seems all like a fake show - there is no objectivity, no NPOV, no sources for the allegations of similarity or equality are given. The CU process seems like a black box.

Decline reason:

That's quite enough. If you wish to appeal this block further you will need to directly email the Arbitration Committee as described at WP:BASC. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser came back positive. ("Likely" and "Confirmed" almost always result in a block; "Possible" less so.) You cannot challenge a Checkuser-induced block, Tobias, especially if community-banned. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Positive? Is it positive to tell that an account is "likely" related to another? "You cannot challenge a Checkuser-induced block" - of course I can. I did so above. Are you a sockpuppet of SpacemanSpiff, JaGa or ErrantX? They all had disputes on content with me. And after JaGa disagreed with content he made up the Sockpuppet story. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 18:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Likely" means that some technical evidence (Browser/OS configuration or IP data) matches a known sockpuppet of Tobias. Based on that I compared the language used by all of the accounts and the activity they undertook and it became clear that you are the same individual - so I implemented the block as Tobias account is banned by the community. --Errant (chat!) 18:33, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know my OS? - I use Windows 7. Windows 7 was in retail in 2009 - Special:Contributions/Tobias_Conradi - has the last edit in July 2009. How can there be a OS match? Do you really store all OS data from all accounts? Regarding IPs - I am using different IPs so it is easy that this Tobias was in the same range or even had some same IPs. Regarding language - What do you mean by "compared the language" - it's all English, maybe not the best native, but all English. What do you mean by activity? Because I am involved in geography and writing systems? You give no examples at all. You blocked me because you disagreed with me on content and I revealed at that you are from the UK and maybe are biased regarding Iran-related geography topics. You said to me "Don't be silly"[8] because you disagreed with my statement. And then you block me. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 19:06, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yadur, India

The article Yadur, India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A rather silly quasi-dab page created by a banned editor - has no use

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC) Other articles with similar issues:[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adagoor, India

The article Adagoor, India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicates a dab page Adagoor, bit of nonsense by a sockpuppet

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:01, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agar, India

The article Agar, India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Agar is covered by a dab page; this is superfluous

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:38, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Ramapuram, India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Ramapuram, India. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Rampur. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Rampur - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cind.amuse (Cindy) 03:46, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Cheer up, dude! :)

MaRAno FAN 07:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]