User talk:BogdaNz

March 2011

Informational note: this is to let you know that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regards, Maimai009 11:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

See talk page.

Hi. Could you respond to an issue at German-occupied Europe that you are involved in here and refrain from edit warring behaviour. In case you are unfamiliar with the editing policy at wikipedia, please see: Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. Thank you. --Morgan Hauser (talk) 11:38, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic 2

What does the edit summary say? And do you have an actual source for the casualties being wrong? IMO, sources routinely disagree on specific figures. TREKphiler ^any time you're ready, Uhura 17:27, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the history, it looks adequatetly cited to me. If you've got a better source... TREKphiler ^any time you're ready, Uhura 17:58, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're free to add the cite, if you've got the source with a different number. I do wonder if the 30,000 is Brit sailors only, or American only. Could also be the 72000 is a simple typo for 32000. Without a copy of the cited source, IDK. I'd check that, first. TREKphiler ^any time you're ready, Uhura 07:39, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tirpitz

Hello BogdaNz. Please stop changing the images in the article; the lead image of an article is to illustrate and identify the topic. The recognition drawing of the ship is ideally suited to this purpose. Also, the image you uploaded needs to explain how it is suitable for use on Wikipedia. That means you need to provide evidence that the image is in the public domain in the United States (where the Wikipedia servers are located), or otherwise suitably licensed. Until you do that, the image cannot be used. Also, please stop changing the length, displacement, and speed figures for the ship - these are sourced to Erich Gröner's book; Gröner had access to the official Kriegsmarine documents. Parsecboy (talk) 21:19, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop this, and discuss your proposed changes on the article's talk page. Nick-D (talk) 11:44, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The illustration drawing is accurate, it doesn't matter who created it. There are several real photos of the ship throughout the article; the one you insist on inserting in the lead section does not adequately illustrate the ship. As for the figures, Erich Gröner, who (I repeat) had access to the Kriegsmarine documentation during the war states the figures as they are in the article. Those two websites are not reliable sources. Parsecboy (talk) 13:24, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have now violated the three-revert rule. You should undo your last revert, or you may be blocked. Parsecboy (talk) 14:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize that continuing to edit war over this issue will only result a block, right? I strongly suggest you stop edit-warring and undo your last reversion. Parsecboy (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am telling you this in no uncertain terms. If you do not stop edit-warring, you will be blocked again and again for increasing durations until it becomes indefinite. If you want to continue editing Wikipedia, you need to walk away now. Parsecboy (talk) 19:21, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a thread concerning you at WP:ANI here. Parsecboy (talk) 23:03, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And here we are again. Stop edit-warring and discuss the issue, or you will be blocked again. Parsecboy (talk) 15:30, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't you understand that edit-warring is prohibited? If you revert the article again, you will be blocked. Parsecboy (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to German battleship Tirpitz, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 14:26, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at German battleship Tirpitz. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 14:59, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:40, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not copy material from other websites

Your addition to Attack on Aruba has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 16:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent edit-warring, as you did at German battleship Tirpitz. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Sandstein  16:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Topedoaruba.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Topedoaruba.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:23, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!