User talk:Morgan Hauser

Welcome

Hello, Morgan Hauser! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 16:09, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Zwites Buch

In regards to your question, one can reference to that claim on page 50 of Germany and the Two World Wars by Andreas Hillgruber, who in his turn according to his endnotes based those statements on page 130 of the German edition of Zwites Buch. Give a few more days, and I'll believe I found some more historians. Thank you for your good work, and have a wonderful day!--A.S. Brown (talk) 00:35, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! A prominent historian like Hillgruber presumably wouldn't make an assertion like that without good grounds, but unfortunately I don't have a German-language copy of Zweites Buch readily available. Based on the page number you provided, he appears to be referencing either the chapter "Hopelessness of an Economic Solution" or "Nececessity for an Active Foreign Policy", neither of which seem to contain the cited information - unless the rough English version is missing vital pieces, which seems exceptionally sloppy. I hope you can find those other historians, because I can't confirm it until I have the german one at least.--Morgan Hauser (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Auschwitz Unesco title

Hello, Morgan Hauser. You have new messages at Volunteer Marek's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

My apologies for not responding earlier. Volunteer Marek  19:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Nazi architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dacian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming history of "Ukrainian-German collaboration during World War II"

Why has this page been moved? Why a clear title has been replaced with a very unclear title? Has this been discussed somewhere? What are "the Axis powers"?

Why has it been named "Ukrainian-Nazi collaboration during World War II"?

Oxy20 (talk) 21:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, that seems to have been done some time ago. In response to your questions:

Back then, I performed the title move to create consistency with the other articles on Soviet populations collaborating with the German and other Axis invaders of the USSR. See for instance Russian collaborationism with the Axis powers, Belarusian collaborationism with the Axis powers Turkic, Caucasian, Cossack, and Crimean collaborationism with the Axis powers. All three of those articles still need to be expanded significantly, but that is a matter for a different discussion. If you feel these titles are somehow unclear or incorrect, by all means, open up a discussion on these pages associated talk pages.

I'm not quite sure whether your question on what the Axis powers were was meant to be rhetorical or serious. Please state your point clearly rather than using sarcasm.

As far as I'm aware, this article has never been called "Ukrainian-Nazi collaboration during World War II".

I hope that was helpful to your queries.--Morgan Hauser (talk) 10:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Reichskommissariat Kaukasus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme Leader at WP:RFD

Hello, I've asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supreme Leader. Since you have had some involvement with the redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion. All the best, France3470 (talk) 11:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Denmark 'nominally unoccupied' in World War 2 ?

Your work File:Europe under Nazi domination.png categorizes Denmark as 'nominally unoccupied' in World War 2. This contradicts a number of WP:RS on Denmark in World War II as well as the two illustrations that you cite as source for your work, File:Second world war europe 1943-1945 map en.png and File:Second world war europe 1941-1942 map en.png. The opening paragraph of Denmark in World War II currently reads:

"During much of World War II, Denmark was occupied by Nazi Germany. The occupation began with Operation Weserübung on 9 April 1940, and lasted until German forces withdrew at the end of World War II following their surrender to the Allies on 5 May 1945."

Please modify your illustration to reflect this.

See also Talk:Sweden_during_World_War_II#Denmark_in_illustration_as_.22German_allies.2C_co-belligerents_and_puppet_states.22_.3F for a discussion regarding illustrations derived for your work.

Thanks. Lklundin (talk) 10:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:German administrative territories

Template:German administrative territories has been nominated for merging with Template:States of Nazi Germany. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 11:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Resttschechei for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Resttschechei is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resttschechei until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. buidhe 12:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Order-State of Burgundy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Order-State of Burgundy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Order-State of Burgundy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Myotus (talk) 19:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]