User talk:Bangabandhu

Welcome

Welcome...

Hello, Bangabandhu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Epeefleche

Again, welcome! Epeefleche (talk) 09:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I've been contributing for over a year, but the links are helpful. Bangabandhu (talk) 20:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leonsis edits

Hi there, I'm hoping we can iron out the issues of the Controversies section on the Ted Leonsis article. I started a discussion on the Talk page about the back and forth the editors seem to be having regarding the 2004 Hammer incident, and about the section in general, so I'd love to get your views there so we can get some resolution. Best-- Patrick, oѺ∞ 03:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Andrew Rannells, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marymount College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Invisible Children, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fast Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Howard Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ronan Farrow

Hi - I noticed you recently had some of your edits to Ronan Farrow undone by a IP editor. I used to attempt to edit that entry but gave up because it was so overrun by sockpuppets trying to massage the bio. I wanted to let you know I've filed a sockpuppet investigation request for the editor who undid your edits (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/AsadR#15_January_2014). If you are interested in continuing to contribute to Ronan Farrow, or opening a point for discussion on the Talk page about reinserting your contributions, I would be happy to lend my 0.02. I thought your contributions were appropriate and reasonable. BlueSalix (talk) 10:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Leonsis

Just wanted to touch bases. I've removed content added to the Ted Leonsis article. While we cannot use this extraneous material based on the nature alone, the content is only sourced to blogs and unreliable sources. You may wish to review the guidelines for reliable sources and verifiability. If you have questions, please feel free to drop me a line. Best regards, Cindy(talk) 23:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sting (musician) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • their necks", and stating that "there won't be much money left because we are spending it."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/jun/22/sting-six-children-not-inherit-180m-
  • £180m fortune |accessdate=4 July 2014|last=Press Association|date=October 1996|work=[{The Guardian]]}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Boycott of Maryland's 1st District
added a link pointing to Vincent Gray
List of boycotts
added a link pointing to Eastern Shore

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Truck art in Pakistan

An article that you have been involved in editing, Truck art in Pakistan, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. wia (talk) 00:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bangabandhu, I'm waiting for a reply from you at Merger proposal with Truck art in Pakistan. — Sebastian 21:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I just replied. Sorry about that. Bangabandhu (talk) 00:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
NP. I'm done with the merge now. — Sebastian 04:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan H. Gardner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frederick County Public Schools. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

small notes

Hi there. I twice wrote out a longer note here only to find my browser crashed and my unsaved edit was lost. Can you please just read my mind, instead? Thanks, --doncram 17:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I guess not. Mainly I was hoping you might choose to fix up Draft:Bud Otis and move it to Harold F. Otis or Bud Otis, but no problem if not, i would submit it to articles for creation sometime.
And FYI, since I drafted that by modifying from a copy of Jessica Fitzwater, i noticed miniscule suggestions maybe:
  • when naming a reference to be able to re-use it, you don't need to use quotes if it is a single word. E.g. ref name=fnpprofile and ref name=fnpprofile/ rather than ref name="fnpprofile"/ saves a few electrons.
  • using {{cite news}}, the newspaper would be the "publisher=", is the usage I see. A "work=" might be part of describing an item as something unusual, different than a newspaper article, but i am not sure what. Maybe the work= field is more useful with {{cite book}}. (never mind, i was wrong per {{cite news}})
  • and Frederick News-Post has an article so can be wikilinked (and is hyphenated)
  • date of the newspaper article is more important than the accessdate,
So i'd revise from Jessica[1]
to Fitzwater[2]
(Oops, I have accessed the FNP too many times so it won't let me see the article and get the correct author and publication date here, so I just put in the ones that were correct for Bud Otis's profile, instead).

References

  1. ^ "County Council District 4 candidate Jessica Fitzwater". Frederick News Post. Retrieved April 14, 2015.
  2. ^ Bethany Rogers (May 3, 2014). "County Council District 4 candidate Jessica Fitzwater". Frederick News-Post. Retrieved April 14, 2015.
Oh, and please do edit freely whatever i put into the Delauter article or anywhere related. This is really not my interest area by the way. I was only ever interested because I saw Cunard making legitimate points at wp:AN or wp:ANI and I thought Cunard deserved support. cheers, --doncram 03:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons cat.

I proposed moving the commons category for the Council in the same way.Naraht (talk) 13:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alvin Toffler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 93ad-0000779e2340.html Lunch with the FT: He has seen the future], August 18, 2006. Financial Times]</ref> In 2006 the ''[[People's Daily]]'' classed him among the 50 foreigners who shaped modern

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hirshhorn

Hi, I just wanted to let you know I've been in contact with User:Artmaven77 and other folks at the Hirshhorn museum about the recent policy violations that happened on Melissa Chiu's article. First of all, thank you for your work defending the Wiki from undisclosed COI, self-promotion, and sockpuppetry. I really wish that her husband hadn't decided to take matters into his own hands, but it is too late now I suppose. He is far from the first to get tripped up in this fashion. Anyway, I'm talking with other Smithsonian and Hirshhorn staff to try and increase their awareness of about how to edit ethically and avoid COI. I hope that, in the end, the result will be a better, more useful encyclopedia around art-related topics and biographies. Cheers, Sarasays (talk) 02:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note and for your involvement. Its great that the Smithsonian has someone on staff who is familiar with acceptable Wikipedia policy and discourse. Bangabandhu (talk) 06:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Evans and DC Council

Hi, I do mostly agree with your opinions that the Jack Evans page is poorly organized and contains some random, piecemeal information. As I mentioned, I am trying to improve the pages for dc government officials and information generally. Some of those pages are in need some serious attention and it seems like you have the interest and research knowledge of local sources to provide excellent content. Phil Mendelson is my first, major endeavor, as he is Chairman of the Council and his page contains very little information, but [Yvette Alexander]'s page also lacks rich detail.Anonymouse202 (talk) 20:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. You write Phil Mendelson is my first, major endeavor. It looks like you've deleted more text than you've added. Good luck. Bangabandhu (talk) 20:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. removed out of date information from multiple councilmember pages and tried to create common formatting. Beginning the process of adding new, detailed information, but seem to have gone down the wormhole on this jack evans page.Anonymouse202 (talk) 21:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits to Wikipedia will be more accurate than your characterization of them, I hope. Bangabandhu (talk) 23:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salala District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Columbarium may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • have housed cremated ashes. In [[Buddhism]], ashes of the deceased may be placed in a columbarium (in [[Chinese language|Chinese]], a ''naguta'' ("bone-receiving pagoda"); in [[Japanese language|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franklin School (Washington, D.C.), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vincent Grey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Hut tax has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- Diannaa (talk) 01:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thom Andersen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rudolf Schindler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Daniel Burnham may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Richmond Railroad Station Historic District Pennsylvania Railroad Station], [[Richmond, Indiana]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adolf Loos may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '. Princeton Architectural Press, 1994 and Edward Chaney, Inigo Jones's 'Roman Sketchbook, 2006) page 361 </ref> which is reflected in his writings and his entry to the [[Tribune Tower#Design

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

break up?

Didn't he break up with nina? Dimitraver (talk) 23:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. If he did, you should find a reliable source and add that. Bangabandhu (talk)

It Wasn't Me - LOL

Dear Bangabandhu,

Thank you for your message. I quickly wanted to let you know that it wasn't me. I just simply created my first account and haven't had a chance to contribute to any articles yet.

Best Regards, Natasha — Preceding unsigned comment added by BoochNYC (talk • contribs) 14:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comilla Page Error

Hi, You have wrote on page Comilla that it makes you confuse with the page Comilla District. Can you please elaborate?--Bangla1234 (talk) 08:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC) Bangla1234 (talk) 8:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote on the talk page that the entry for Comilla city is confused with Comilla District as a lot of the content on the city page is about subjects outside of the city and really belongs on the district page. My note was written about 7 years ago. It looks like the page has changed a lot but hasn't improved very much. It appears that you've added a lot to the page but haven't provided any references. Sources are very important. You really should add a source for something like the names of metro neighborhoods. If you don't have a source and are just listing neighborhoods based on your memory, you should remove those contributions. Bangabandhu (talk)

Merrick Garland

Your edit has been undone by this diff. A discussion on the talk page to return the information to the article is taking place. Perhaps you would like to participate. Buster Seven Talk 06:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Waddy Butler Woods

Hi. Yeah, that was the first article I wrote, and it was a long time ago. I didn't really know what I was doing and didn't cite anything. Much of it, I recall, came from a history of him by the Smithsonian Institute.

http://siarchives.si.edu/collections/siris_sic_2571

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leon Andrews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Allen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Resource Request follow up

Hi Bangabandhu,

Last month a Resource Request volunteer reported sending you a copy of:

  • Demetri Porphyrios, "Classicism is not a Style," in "Architectural Design" vol. 52, no. 5/6, 1982

to complete your request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request#New Classical Architecture. They didn't make it clear whether you had also acknowledged receipt. We've all experienced cases where a wrong file is attached or anti-spam software filters it out, so we like to close the loop on requests by hearing from the requester that they actually received the article they wanted. You can do this by marking the request {{resolved}}, or simply reply, and I'll mark it for you. Worldbruce (talk) 16:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'll reply there as well, but I haven't received the article. A link was posted to it for downloading, but I don't have account at OCLC to access. Not sure how to send a wikimail, as suggested. Thanks for the follow up. Bangabandhu (talk) 17:20, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Classicism is not a Style pdf

I have obtained, and can send you a full text pdf of:

  • Porphyrios, Demetri (1982). "Classicism is not a Style". Architectural Design. 52 (5/6): 50–57.

to complete your request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request#New Classical Architecture. Please use Special:EmailUser to email me so that I can reply with the pdf as an attachment. Regards, Worldbruce (talk) 02:09, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just sent. Looking forward to checking it out. Thanks! Bangabandhu (talk) 05:22, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jus soli

Hi! I was going to update the map but I don't think I can overwrite the file because I'm a new user. Could you do it for me? Here is the updated svg file: http://www103.zippyshare.com/v/zpZg9Znx/file.html

You can overwrite the file here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jus_soli_world.svg

The Colour in Anything (talk) 00:05, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just uploaded and restored. Thanks for that. Bangabandhu (talk) 05:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Best way to cover DC cannabis topic? Your input requested

Please see here: Talk:Initiative_71#Rename_to_Cannabis_in_Washington.2C_D._C..2C_split_off.2C_or_what.3F

Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 23:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Catenary arch and weighted catenary

Agreed, the two are quite similar. However, there is a distinct difference:

Catenary arches only support their own weight, are of uniform thickness and
Weighted catenaries may not be not of uniform thickness, or, support more than their own weight.

This is why I feel there should be two articles. Certainly they should be cross-linked.

dino (talk) 16:16, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure that a requirement of a catenary arch is that has uniform thickness? It's my impression that weighted catenaries are a subset of catenary arches. Also, there's not enough content for weighted cateneries to merit a separate entry. Bangabandhu (talk) 20:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bangabandhu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability criteria in Deaths in 2016 list

Hi. There is provision for notability to be proven over a period of 30 days in the article Deaths in 2016. This is agreed by past consensus of interested editors: if a link to a person listed and properly referenced (which Tudor Braga certainly is currently) remains a redlink thirty days after the date of death, it must be removed. The reason why this is not done earlier is to allow creation of an article if notability can be proven. In the case of Braga, notability remains a possibility, despite what any of us might think. On the 4th January 2017, Braga may well stay on the list (if blue), or disappear if still red. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 22:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 11 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

reversals

OK, it is time we discuss. We tend to chose only one official website. Since there is no 'subject.com' official website (controlled by the subject) we tend to chose from one of the social networking sites controlled by the subject, and preferably the one that is most informative regarding the subject. In this case we should chose only the facebook or only the twitter, except if there are compelling reasons to link both. In my experience, generally facebook pages tell more about the subject than the twitter, but I am willing to be convinced otherwise. What would be your suggestion? --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think the purpose of the guideline is to prevent traffic from being diverted to commercial or self-promoting sites. That's not the case here. Readers, like me, want to know about all the official accounts of our elected officials. It just isn't helpful for you to choose between Twitter or Facebook as which one is official. I appreciate what you're doing, but I think your efforts would be most useful to the projectif they were directed at external links in the text body, not external links that are already in the external links section. External (not as reference) links in the body really disrupt the flow of the text and far more likely to divert traffic than something in the external links section. Bangabandhu (talk) 00:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, you are thinking about WP:SPAM. Our policies and guidelines suggest to minimize links. And that is also reflected in the template documentation of many of the templates that are in use for social networking sites.
While doing this, I also take out inline external links, and sometimes clear out improper referencing, tag articles that are unreferenced, etc. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Right, I understand how you're interpreting the guidelines. I don't think deleting elected official's Twitter accounts makes a stronger entry, especially when you're arbitrarily deciding between Facebook and Twitter and the guidelines discourage Facebook links. Why not just leave well enough alone and make less questionable edits, which is the case with inline external links? Bangabandhu (talk) 14:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

A page you started (RCR Arquitectes) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating RCR Arquitectes, Bangabandhu!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 06:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bangabandhu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jessica Fitzwater for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Fitzwater is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Fitzwater until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 04:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Have you sent the same notification to the other editors of the page? Bangabandhu (talk) 05:37, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You and I seem to be talking well past one another and I think we're spending too much time at it. I've put up a posting asking for some additional eyes. I've said really nothing about the substance, figuring a review of the article and its Talk page will do, and I tried to be evenhanded in describing our general disagreement. I hope you agree. Sorry for the template - I'd have told you about this anyhow - but the page said I needed to do it. JohnInDC (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jan H. Gardner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jan H. Gardner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan H. Gardner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 18:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Biography Barnstar
For your awesome contributions to politician articles including Jan Gardner, Jack Evans (D.C. politician), and many more! gidonb (talk) 06:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this and thanks for saving that Gardner article in your talkspace. Someday, I hope. Bangabandhu (talk) 23:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Evans (D.C. politician)

Hi. Regarding Jack Evans (D.C. politician), providing a citation for cases like this can be problematic and tricky. Sometimes people complain about this "primary" source rule. If you have any thoughts about how to balance these competing interests, I'd be interested.

Also, unrelated, there are occasionally D.C. meetups if you're into that kind of thing. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:25, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd never seen him mentioned as John, so without the sourcing I thought it was vandalism. I don't understand how anyone could seriously argue that no source is better than a primary source.
Thanks for the word on the meetup! You should definitely invite Jack Evans, too. Bangabandhu (talk) 11:33, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

DCist has quoted you in what appears to be clear evidence of a COI. Having directed personal animosity towards an article subject arguably makes your involvement with that article a BLP violation, and I would advise you to refrain from editing the article. Should you continue to edit the article, tread carefully, because you will be subject to the aforementioned discretionary sanctions going forward. Swarm ♠ 05:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bangabandhu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


== A page you started (Fort Myer Construction) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Fort Myer Construction.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article's content itself is well-written and neutral, but the section titles for "Contracting practices", "Other awards", and "Staffing" are misleading and give a biased impression of the company's history to a reader skimming the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 00:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback, I'll revise the section titles. Bangabandhu (talk) 14:52, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kiev Archive Museum of Transitional Period

Thank you for your suggestion to improve the page. I added a couple of links, and I am removing the template. The foundation of the museum was quite a noteworthy event in the history of the Nazi occupation in Ukraine, and is cited in numerous sources, including those of Ukraine's governmental agencies, which can be retrieved by simple googling. --Dmitri Lytov (talk) 22:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

United States Park Police

Hello Bangabandhu, Several years ago I stumbled across a large number of articles on federal judges. Most of them were direct copies of pages from Federal Judicial Center biography pages. That bothered me but I couldn't find any Wikipedia policy or guideline that argued against it. The United States Park Police article is on my watch list so I noticed the talk page section you started. I've done what I can to clear up a misunderstanding regarding public domain sources. I'll leave the debate regarding the article's content to others. Gab4gab (talk) 19:59, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Myer Construction Company edits

I tried to add more information about Fort Myer from a Court Case alleging that the Fort Myer family of companies are a RICO enterprise. (Racketeers)

I did not know how to insert a foot note. Could you help with this. There is much more to say about this company and its alleged criminal activities and mysterious deaths. Are you interested?

Thanks Contento1941 (talk) 02:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're not putting a space in ref name - wikipidia doesn't know how to read refname, so it came out all mangled. I reverted the addition because the significance of that case isn't clear, or the quote that you added. I'm sure there's pages of pages of testimony in most court cases involving the company, so why pick that one? I prefer to stick with secondary sources - if the issue is significant enough to merit mention in the Washington Post or the Washington Business Journal, its a good indication of its notability. Did any media write about that testimony/case? I suggest adding it back in, citing that source. Bangabandhu (talk) 14:08, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

International Relief and Development Inc.

I wanted to give you a heads up that I will be making some edits to the IRD page. If you want to make changes after me, please lets first discuss in the Talk page. Knoxinbox (talk) 13:54, 29 August 2019 (UTC)knoxinbox[reply]

@Bangabandhu: Your latest addition to the page including the "Beltway Bandit" comment is subjective opinion from questionable source material.WP:BIASEDSOURCES

Please respond to discussion on Talk page. Knoxinbox (talk) 18:22, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Original Text of the "Thinking" Poem

please see my comment here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Thinking_(poem)
Faterson (talk) 13:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice - Discretionary Sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SPECIFICO talk 02:45, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Janeese Lewis George

Notice

The article Janeese Lewis George has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability guidelines for politicians. Google searches not finding anything to support WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 16:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Janeese Lewis George for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janeese Lewis George is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janeese Lewis George until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jmertel23 (talk) 13:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overturned!

Thanks for letting me know about the deletion review for Madison Cawthorn. The article was reinstated, and I feel satisfied that the more inclusionist point of view was validated in this case. Moncrief (talk) 04:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Now if someone could just straighten out NPOL so that editors don't misinterpret NPOL to exclude major party candidates in high profile races who have already won a primary. I'd start the process but don't know how. Bangabandhu (talk) 12:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Haider Ali (artist)

Regarding [1], see WP:BANREVERT. Home Lander (talk) 19:15, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CORE

Hi Bangabandhu, thank you for keeping an eye on the CORE page. I have been trying to edit it to update the info given that the company has changed since 2019. There is a new co-founder in Ann Lee, per their website. I understand you are trying to make sure the edits are accurate, but please check the sources on the article to verify the info. All the info is verified. If you have any direct questions, I'm happy to provide info. (For example: Jenkins was the co-founder of J/p hro, not CORE). Please review the edits before you undo them. Thanks for your help in keeping an eye on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KNWLEDGEISPWR (talk • contribs) 02:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, you haven't resolved the sourcing. See RS-SELF. Self-published sources are largely not acceptable. There are a slew of other issues. We can take it up on the talk page so that other editors can contribute and it will be documented there. Bangabandhu (talk) 01:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

United States Park Police

Donot turn this page into your personal views page, Wikipedia is not place for propaganda. We have structure for all articles about Law enforcement, this article is not any different. Just compare. I have to inform administratotors about your actions. Once again, this is not a propaganda place. M.Karelin (talk) 10:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What "structure" are you referring to? All contributions to the page are well-sourced and relevant. I wish the same were true for your comments. Bangabandhu (talk) 12:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Shearonink

Hello, Bangabandhu. You have new messages at Talk:Shooting of Bijan Ghaisar.
Message added 15:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shearonink (talk) 15:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brovar logo.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brovar logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brovar logo.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brovar logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to US Housing Edit-a-thon

Please join us on 13 December 2020, 12:00-14:00 EST, as we update and improve articles in Wikipedia related to housing in the United States of America. Sign up here. -- M2545 (talk) 17:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oye Owolewa page

Greetings, this is Oye Owolewa himself. There's an article about me that recently published that went into detail about my life. I've included information that is very important for the general public to know. The entire biography is factual and was referenced. A lot of time was spent putting that together. I noticed that you changed it and referred it back to the previous content that had a lot of issues and did not tell a full story about me. I'd like for you to either restore the page to the contents previously published. Or allow me to do so and leave my page alone. Thanks in advanced.

- Dr. Oye Owolewa US Representative of Washington, DC Ajnvoxo (talk) 19:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's a lot of issues here. First, Wikipedia is not a place for you to write your autobiography, or share a version of yourself you want the world to see. Wikipedia specifically discourages users writing about themselves, see WP:BLPEDIT. Most of the edits were made by SMBraund, a sole purpose account that has only edited that page. The comment above suggests that's actually you. It is important you familiarize yourself with guidelines against multiple accounts, WP:MULTIPLE.
The biggest problem with your edits was that nothing you added was actually corroborated by the sources you provided. For example,

While in high school Owolewa dedicated himself to community service. In 2006, he joined the Boston Student Advisory Council, a citywide body of elected school leaders representing Boston's public schools. He went on to serve as vice president, and later president. Owolewa also partnered with both Boston University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s National Society of Black Engineers to create a Boston Latin School Pre-College Initiative, serving as the group’s president from 2006 to 2008. Between 2007 and 2008, Owolewa served on the Boston Public School Committee as the alternative student representative. In 2008, he was one of a hundred students nationwide chosen to visit Washington D.C. and meet Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer. It proved a momentous occasion. Overwhelmed by the cultural and historical significance of the nation's capital, Owolewa decided it would one day be his home.

Apart from the tone, which is self-aggrandizing and unencyclopedic, none of the sources support any of the content. Providing a link to a URL of subject is much different from providing an independent, verified source. The same is true for all of the additions to the article. It is especially important that you not change content that is factual and supported by references. You seem to want to change that you were born in Nigeria, as multiple sources state, and write that you were born in Boston. Bangabandhu (talk) 21:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Faith COI edit requests

Hi! Reaching out because I saw you've been involved in updating Bob Faith in the past. I've posted some COI edit requests on the talk page there. If you have time, would love your feedback. Thank you! Mary Gaulke (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Brown Rudnick"

Hello, there's been disagreement about whether to include the name of the lawfirm in the Camille Vasquez article. I've removed it several times now, and per WP:BLPUNDEL, consensus needs to be reached before we add it to the article. I see that you've added it back to the article while the discussion is still ongoing. I kindly ask you to remove it until consensus is reached. Thank you for considering. Throast (talk | contribs) 19:36, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on that talk page. Bangabandhu (talk) 19:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Throast (talk | contribs) 01:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]