User talk:B767-500

Welcome~!

Hello, B767-500! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dave1185 (talk) 07:43, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Talk:US Airways Flight 1549

Harmless joke entries are often left standing, but when a user deletes, it's best to leave it deleted, as it has nothing to do with improving the article. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 10:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add that section back again unless you're looking to get blocked for disruption. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 19:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Funning humor got delete it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by B767-500 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

You have made no other "contributions" to Wikipedia except posting and reposting this "joke" -- and then even creating a Wikipedia page for it. This is an encyclopedia site, not a comedy or personal one. If you want to post jokes, etc, find a site that supports that or register you own domain and create one on your own server. (Centpacrr (talk) 20:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to US Airways. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:50, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:HkCaGu, you will be blocked from editing. HkCaGu (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

my talk page

yeah. any particular reason? Thanks. 74.183.173.237 (talk) 02:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to UPS Airlines. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. HkCaGu (talk) 18:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I didn't make anything disruptive edits UPS Airlines. I based on fact and calculation. So, please remove your complaint due to incorrect. Thanks.
      • Accept that it was just simple misunderstandinged. Therefore, we write as "last".

Air France Flight 447

Your edit was nearly unintelligible and it was in the wrong place. If you wish to discuss potential changes, please use the article talk page. I've undone it for now. If you'd like to find a reliable source (Fox News isn't one) we can discuss whether it belongs in the article. Overautomation is a long-running theme in aerospace, going back at least to Chuck Yeager's comment that the Mercury astronauts would be "spam in a can". Since the 1950s (e.g. the Avro Arrow), designs increasingly accept computers in control in order to gain higher performance, better handling, and greater efficiency. Pilots want to be in control and employed, but not overworked. This creates a tradeoff that nobody is ever completely happy with. Different designers opt for different tradeoff points. The ADIRU article cites a number of sources on the subject if it interests you.LeadSongDog come howl 16:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alternate law

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alternate law, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Incoherent

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. PamD (talk) 23:14, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(ec):I have taken a look a look at the article, and yes, there are issues with grammar which I could clear up for you. However, I fear that PamD's concerns, which I currently share, are that there is basically little information given to the reader. It boils down to one sentence that when flight systems fail (what flight systems?) and there are multiple failures (what failures?), the rule of alternate law applies. The core of the article IMHO should be what alternate law is, but this is not addressed. If you can work on the issues that I have mentioned, then the article has potential on Wikipedia. Please note that whilst I was putting this message on the article's talk page, it was deleted and redirected. Regards, AlexandrDmitri (talk) 12:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Observations

  • Almost all of your edits get undone soon after you make them. This might be because:
  • There's no such thing as a Boeing 767-500.

You should take steps to remedy these issues. Otherwise, the effort that you put into your contributions may continue to be wasted. TheFeds 08:27, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

English grammar is not your biggest problem; relevance is. Most of your edits are reversed based on contents alone. You can save everyone's time but not making those edits. HkCaGu (talk) 02:20, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:26, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created have been considered disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Charmedaddict (talk) 20:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • You make inapproprite comment which you lying to me which different from accept my make mistake. Mistake very different then you blacklabel me editor as vandalister! --B767-500 (talk) 07:54, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create malicious redirects, as you did with Northwest Air. They are disruptive and are considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 08:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of US.Airways.Flight.1549

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article US.Airways.Flight.1549, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Implausible spelling error redirect.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 18:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Delta operated by Northwest

I have nominated Delta operated by Northwest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. ThaddeusB (talk) 03:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Nathraq (talk) 18:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contest update

Well, it's just 1 day until the contest begins, so I thought I'd check in with everyone and make sure you're all ready to go. First I'd like everyone to check out the main contest page and read over the rules and the scoring system. If you have any final questions or concerns, make them known on the talk page. Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/History/2009 is the scoreboard that will be updated, you can watchlist it. Check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/Submissions which shows how your submission page should look. Another example is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/Submissions Example, and your personal page should be listed at the footer of the page, which is also at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/Users. Again, take any questions to the contest talk page.

Good luck! - Trevor MacInnis contribs 20:55, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contest scoring change

I've realized there may be an issue with the scoring system, and I have a solution, which I've explained here. Feedback is requested. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 23:53, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akvinta

A tag has been placed on Akvinta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tad Lincoln (talk) 17:19, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to John Wayne Airport. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 19:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, B767-500. You have new messages at BilCat's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dave1185 (talk) 08:07, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

United Narita Focus City

You'll need to provide a source for Narita being a UA focus city....Also, United just have a couple of point to point flights at NRT. Snoozlepet (talk) 01:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Airports without United States border preclearance

Just curious about the category. The way it is right now means it would include all the airports in the world with the exception of the 14 (or maybe 15) that have the border preclearance. However, given the categories it was in I think the intention was to restrict it to Canadian airports. If that's the case then it would be best to create Category:Canadian airports without United States border preclearance. Also a header notice would be a good idea. There are about 1400 airports in Canada and I don't think that they all need to be in the category but it could be for international airports (or airports of entry) in Canada but that don't have preclearance. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 08:54, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've deleted the Category:Airports without United States border preclearance as it's not required now. The new one looks good. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 05:05, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

Hi B767-500! Just to let you know, when you are putting a link to a category on someones userpage, put a colon : before the word "Category". If you don't do that, then the userpage will be included in the category that you are trying to write, and the wikilink will not show up (like in this edit to CambridgeBayWeather's page. Notice how the last section doesn't have a title. Also Category:Canadian international airports without United States border preclearance doesn't show up either. In this case you would put [[:Canadian international airports without United States border preclearance]]. Hope this helps. I fixed it on that page, you can check the history to see what I did. Cheers. --kelapstick (talk) 22:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Did you trying to be nice or mean to User:64.252.124.238?

Presumably, you're referring to my comments at Talk:Northwest_Airlines_Flight_188. Re-read his comment immediately above "You clearly don't know what you're talking about ...". There was no call to refer to the NWA pilots as "goons". His general tone in all the posts in that section were wildly speculative and conspiratorial in nature, completely out of place for Wikipedia, and they certainly rubbed me the wrong way, but I tried to keep my comments civil and on-point. In turn, User:64.252.124.238's response was overt sarcasm. As I pointed out in my final comment, all that wild speculation could easily have been avoided with a little research of materials readily available on the Web, followed by some careful reasoning. I notice that you posed the same question to User 64.252.124.238; let's see if it produces a response.—QuicksilverT @ 21:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Northwest Airlines Flight 188. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Dave1185 talk 01:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finnair

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Duvin (talk)

Driverless taxis at Heathrow

Just to explain why I deleted your 'shuttle' information from Heathrow. In the UK, a 'taxi' is generally considered as a 'vehicle for hire' to any reasonable destination, whereas the driverless shuttles you referred to are very local to a small part of Heathrow and are free. Furthermore, these shuttles are already described in the (more appropriate) previous section. Murray Langton (talk) 09:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AA 331

While the aircraft did break up and will likey be written off... I have not found anywhere that says the aircraft has been written off and until it is officaly wirtten off, it is still part of the AA fleet. Spikydan1 (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also wanted to add while it is my personal opinion that the aircraft will be written off…It has not been confirmed by AA or another expert yet. AA will have to make a desion by the end of the year on what to do with this aircraft.Spikydan1 (talk) 18:57, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Firecracker incident listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Firecracker incident. Since you had some involvement with the Firecracker incident redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 70.29.211.9 (talk) 08:23, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Firecracker Incident listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Firecracker Incident. Since you had some involvement with the Firecracker Incident redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 70.29.211.9 (talk) 08:23, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DL/NW PDX and MEM at Amsterdam Airport

Since those routes are switching from DL to NW. Using "Ends" and "begins" is more appropriate and those routes are already listed under "Delta" and "Northwest". Thanks! Snoozlepet (talk) 05:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

I suggest you use article talk pages to propose modifications and then hopefully someone will help you with the grammar and wording. --NeilN talk to me 08:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on US Airways. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 08:31, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • My advice to you is to stop this re-introducing of the disputed edit on the article page again, since you've already did it 4 times on the 5th of this month. The possibility of you getting a block now for making such silly entries is very real and very strong. Therefore, I'd suggest that you take the hint of the opinion of the majority of editors on the aforementioned article page and drop this altogether. But if you still feel strongly about this and wants to discuss it further, you are welcome to bring it back to the discussion page of the article to gain a common consensus first before you re-introduce it again. Else, you risked getting BLOCKED. Take heed. --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 08:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, B767-500. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines.
Message added 17:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aviator006 (talk) 17:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 13:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Please take note that you are not welcome at my talk page which means that I do not appreciate you posting any questions/messages there, in short, you are BANNED~! And I'm not inclined to explain/reply you for any of my statement if you are not proficient in English, tough luck but that's the way it is between us now. Remember, stay away from me. Thank you. --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 09:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hubs and focus cities

You're absolutely right, I do think HkCaGu is a good editor, however I think there are different ways of handling situations rather than going straight to blocking people.ZHoover123 13:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please add your comments

I've started a discussion at Talk:Miracle fruit#Pop culture references to determine if the Future Foods episode in question is notable enough to be included in the Miracle Fruit article. Please comment there as to why you think the information should stay. – jaksmata 15:17, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding broken english edits

I find that every single edit you make on United Airlines is virtually unreadable and grammatically incorrect. While I understand and respect the fact that english is obviously your second.. (oops sorry just read your talk page post..) third language.. it really doesn't work well for for an ENGLISH LANGUAGE encyclopedia. It makes a ton more work for everyone else, makes the articles difficult to read and unfortunately does nothing to add to the value of the encyclopedia in such a fashion. Your posts should not need to be translated by another editor after every one you make. May I ask that you consider updating the version of wikipedia that is in your native language, as Im sure saying what you need to say in the language you actually speak and write in would help the encyclopedia of that language immensely. Please understand I am not trying to be rude or insensitive, however, I find that not one of your edits is free from spelling or grammar issues. If you do wish to continue updating the english version of wikipedia, may I suggest you take an english course, that is not just about speaking but includes writing in english. Again, please don't take my post the wrong way, Im just being practical here. -Tracer9999 (talk) 12:47, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I make inconvenience to you and sorry my poor English. I try to post edit to discussion page or ask roommate for helps. My roommate was former editor on Wikipedia, so he can able to helps me. Thanks you for understanding and point out some difficulty. --B767-500 (talk) 16:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So, basically, I can appricating your solutions, but reject to complying due to I have some difficult issues. I prefer to make edit on Wikipedia due to it is free tutoring for English. My income not enough to pay EXPENSIVE out-of-state tuition (this state have bad cost structure for education). And because sending money to overseas family for support. Also, I could not dealt with time issues, and if hired private tutor (which also EXPENSIVE), it can takes away time from jobs (which I currently working 2.5 jobs). So, I decide to use Wikipedia for free English lessons, because I can write some edits and other editor can teach me correctly English. Thanks for your understandings. --B767-500 (talk) 17:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thats not the way it works. wikipedia is not your personal free english instructor. If thats your intent. you'll quickly find you account suspended or banned. Go on the net and download some english software instead. Im sure there are a million programs out there made for that purpose...or play with google translate. To attempt to degrade every article you edit and inconvenience every other user so you can get a free english lesson is not only unethical but its extremely selfish, I mean seriously, try thinking about other people for once... people, who don't wish to work for you for free or read their articles in broken english. -Tracer9999 (talk) 14:09, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I change mind and can accepting solutions. I forgot to be mention something, I didn't just using Wikipedia for tutoring but I like to do some writings and I know most HTML codes and Wiki syntax, so I can improve those formatting issues. So, I do two methods for improve edit and making you happy. I ask roommate for help (which I mention before) and sometimes I can use it translate.google.com which can allows me to copy-paste translation, which can be big improvements. I didn't want to get suspend or banned due to I like Wiki communities. Thank you. --B767-500 (talk) 17:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again please stop making broken English edits like you did to American Airlines. Many editors have to go back and either revert or completely rewrite your information because of the horrible English. You are probably just trying to help but your not. Maybe you should create and edit articles for Wiki of your native language? 66.247.208.180 (talk) 17:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your horrible English was apparent again with the American Airlines article and your addition of the pilots union. I had to rewrite one of your sections once again because of the deplorable English. Please stop editing, you are NOT helping. 71.55.143.180 (talk) 20:09, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, B767-500. You have new messages at B767-500's talk page.
Message added 17:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

BROKEN ENGLISH

Sawasdee kup! I understand that you're from Thailand but due to your persistently bad standard of English, please stop all your editing on Wikipedia. While we welcome you helping us with the formats and edits, your poor standard/understanding of English grammar and syntax is not helping us at all, it has become our problem constantly to correct your broken English every time you edit. Please note that Wikipedia is not your personal English teacher, it is not the duty for everyone of us to come here to help you to learn and improve your poor standard of English... that's what schools, teachers and books are for! Note also that if you do not comply with this simple instruction required of you now, I will seek an Administrator to either BLOCK you, or WP:TOPICBAN you from editing on all the airline/aviation related article pages. Take heed. --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 03:59, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Regarding to your suggestions, okay, I just dealt with formatting issues for now, and I just post suggestion to talk page. When English became improved, I will do editing the real text of articles. You think Thai is native language, but am saying previously I am 'ETL' (English as Third Language), so maybe Thai is the second language?? ;-) Also, my roommate wanting to resuming as Wikipedia editor. We got interest in similar topics which became resulted in indef blocked (due to we share those DSL connection). So, if I quitted similar topics then he can able to returns, correct? --B767-500 (talk) 04:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually, my Thai writing is almost better than my poor English, due to I was refugee status in Thailand. Maybe you dislikes my Thai as much as my poor English. ;-) I notice those Singaporeans have many of high standard for good English. --B767-500 (talk) 05:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please identify the blocked accounts your roommate used? Please note that it is strongly in your interest to do so. Nick-D (talk) 10:37, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I ask roommate when he is finished work. I know some of accounts, but I ask him for list. --B767-500 (talk) 04:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delta Air Lines edits

When making changes to Delta Air Lines' article, please cite your sources. You have changed the number of destinations to 247 from 368 without citing a reliable source for your information. In addition, you stated that Delta Air Lines, Inc is a holding company, when it is not. Delta Air Lines, Inc is the full legal name of the airline. See page 6 of http://www.delta.com/StyleGuide/guide/DAL_Sec1_Basic_Brand_Elements_082707.pdf (Delta's Branding Guide) GDilemma (talk) 23:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Hello again, I noticed your meddling with my user page earlier on (what you did just now was against → this Wikipedia policy ←)... didn't I tell you to stay far, far away from me?? FWIW, you better make sure that it won't happen again or else I will take you to ANI for harassing me again and I don't want hear anymore excuses of accidental tinkling again. You have been warned before so stay out! Take heed. --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 11:27, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see other editor talkings about me, and he thought I was the Italian!! --B767-500 (talk) 05:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United Airlines, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HkCaGu (talk) 14:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:B767-500/

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 00:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About the indicent of Juneyao Airlines and Qatar Airways

Hello. I sent an inquiry to User:SempreVolando to ask about his/her deletion and claim for its notability. Also, article Qatar Airways also has been involved. In addition, this content has been contained in Chinese Wikipedia. Hitomi (talk) 07:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please can i point you in the direction of Talk:Qatar_Airways#Go-Around_Controversy. --JetBlast (talk) 10:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
B767-500 please dont keep adding the Juneyao Airlines incident to the Qatar Airways article while a discussion is taking place on the talk page it is seen as edit warring and you can be blocked for editing. You need to gain a consensus on the talk page for such addition. I appreciate you want to add the incident but in the discussion you quote a number of users as supporting the addition when three of them have never edited the article or talk page, please be take more care. I have been asked to look at the discussion so far and please see the Qatar Airways talk page for my comments, thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 16:51, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Virgin America‎ edit reverted

I have reverted this edit to the article Virgin America‎. Your English is very poor and is not the standard used on the English Wikipedia. Please do not put this information in again until the English has vastly improved. Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 22:37, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use of poor English on Wikipedia

Please can you get your English checked before you make edits. 99% of the posts you make are not good enough. Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 10:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Southwest Airlines

Hi. I have reverted your edits to Southwest Airlines. If you think it has some value please go to the talk page. Wikipedia rules say you must discuss this before putting it back. If you revert my edit again you will be breaking the rules and I will report you. Take this as a warning. --JetBlast (talk) 08:09, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AirTran Airways

It shows how bad your English is. The source DOES NOT say that the hub is closing it says its reducing the number of flights. --JetBlast (talk) 04:58, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also you do not revert the edits to what you put previously then go to the talk page like you did. You leave the page as it was before you started editing then go to the talk page and ask. You are doing this the wrong way around. --JetBlast (talk) 05:00, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You can further taught me the rules so I can follows it. I post on talk page because of roommate taught me to openness on Wikipedia, so I post on the talk page. --B767-500 (talk) 05:05, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please sign the posts on my talk page it make it easier to know who put them there. I dont know what you mean by the previous statement. --JetBlast (talk) 05:08, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think you should follow good example of civil editor (User:C.Fred), which he wrote civil response, which he is not give a nasty reponse. Thanks --B767-500 (talk) 05:09, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You wonder why when you get so personal in the title, other people even picked it up. --JetBlast (talk) 07:50, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, B767-500. You have new messages at JetBlast's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

London-Gatwick (LGW)

Due to JetBlast wants to dump my comments on his own talk page, I post on my own. --B767-500 (talk) 03:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I post on JetBlast talk page

Media reference is almost always use “London-Gatwick” or “London Gatwick”, which you can see the evidences:

Problem due to most of readers does not understand anything without word “London” next to Gatwick. You can see many of examples which have similar situation:

  • Chicago-O’Hare
  • Chicago-Midway
  • New York-JFK
  • New York-LaGuardia
  • Houston-Hobby
  • Houston-Bush
  • Washington-Dulles
  • Washington-National
  • Tokyo-Narita
  • Tokyo-Haneda
  • Paris-Orly
  • Paris-CDG
  • and etc.

--B767-500 (talk) 06:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

if that is the case why ist the article called that? You are wrong. It me so get your facts right next time. Also calling me names is against the rules and you will be reported for that.--123.98.135.2 (talk) 06:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I fix with using the polite words. I make mistakes earlier and used some very aggresive text in last edit, which I am apologize. --B767-500 (talk) 03:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The reason i am avoiding you is that you are not polite. On 2 occasions you have been rude towards me. So i dont want to get into any discussion with you. --JetBlast (talk) 10:58, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I read the article below which mentioned by Dave. My roommate suggest to read WP:Civility to improve politeness, so I reading again too. Thank you.--B767-500 (talk) 18:29, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Dave1185‎. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 10:07, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedbacks. I read WP:AGF before, but I reading again and learning the new things. --B767-500 (talk) 18:29, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category talk:Airports with discontinue of commerical air service

The category name is unfortunately not really grammatical English -- and "commercial" is misspelled! AnonMoos (talk) 11:04, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of airports in Foo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of airports in Foo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Bushranger One ping only 07:17, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, B767-500. You have new messages at JetBlast's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Poor English

The majority of edits you make get reverted because of very poo(t)r english. Would you please get them checked before you post? Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 06:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • You comment is makes nothing sense as relates to this situation. So, why did you undo the "perfect English" (due to other editor corrected) edit but you blames me for rubbishes! Can we discuss? Thanks you. --B767-500 (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • With regards to the above comments i am have no idea what you mean. The above sentence is a good example of the poor English i am referring to. The point is you have made many edits to wikipedia where the english is bad. I do not want you to stop editing, please can you have the edit proof read first? Here are some examples of your bad english 1 2 3 4 5 6. I am not the only user to speak to you regarding this matter, just read this talk page. If you like i can help you with your english and proof read them first? --JetBlast (talk) 12:12, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zimmer vs Zimmerman

Hi. I reverted your edit.[1] Sorry about that but it didn't seem to be worth the space and has been reverted several times before. Please get consensus on Talk page before restoring it again. Regards, --Bob K31416 (talk) 16:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message

G'day from Oz; please do not use exclamation marks in your edit summaries, it is rude to use one, let alone the four that you did use. Also it wasn't an 'excuse', it was a reason, and it wasn't an 'incorrect' reason - 1,000 million is not always the same as a billion, as you yourself have acknowledged. The December 2002 article is not about the Exxon disaster per se, it is dealing with events around the world and is thus not USA-specific, so I feel justified in changing a non-universal term back to one that is universal. However I am not going to bother with undoing your revert. YSSYguy (talk) 06:51, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012 - Poor English & nowrap

I appreciate your recent edit to William P. Hobby Airport but your choice of wording was poor. I have noticed this is not your first time so I would recommend doing one of two things, get your edits read by a fluent english reader or you should go to an English class. I also want to take this time to tell you that you can not remove nowrap as you did to American Airlines just because you "don't think it looks good." It was fluently discussed in a wiki aviation thread recently and is not a choice. It is for the readers convenience that nowrap is on each airline page. Kairportflier (talk) 00:14, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon

Hi! So glad to see you sign up. Of course you can come! If you see the talk page it states: "Everyone is welcome to come edit Wikipedia with us at this event. Women, men, new editors, archivists and librarians who have resources to share about much needed coverage areas in Wikipedia..." Looking forward to it! Sarah (talk) 06:06, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday - and we need your help!

San Francisco WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon 2! See you there
The San Francisco WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon 2 is this Saturday at the Wikimedia Foundation! We look forward to hosting you! If you'd like to bring a family member or friend, please sign them up on the event page or Eventbrite! Also, don't forget to bring your laptop! And we also need your help! Check out the Etherpad to learn more! Please arrive as close 1 PM as you can. We'll see you Saturday!

Removed Italics

Hi B767-500. I removed your italics on the Trayvon Martin page because they're not needed. The only time they're really used is when talking about a source, like The New York Times. If you have any more questions about it, just ask me or ask on the article's Talk page. Psalm84 (talk) 06:21, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback (re: Dana Air Flight 992)

Hello, B767-500. You have new messages at 166.197.72.51's talk page.
Message added 17:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Iron Man (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tesla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

English

Hi. Before you edit pages on wikipedia i am happy to help with your English if you like? Most of it is ok, but some mistakes make it hard to read. If you want i can proof read things for you? --JetBlast (talk) 23:40, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are friendly editor and I can accept of your assistants. Welcome back from retirements. --B767-500 (talk) 23:47, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, B767-500. You have new messages at JetBlast's talk page.
Message added 16:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JetBlast (talk) 16:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, B767-500. You have new messages at Compdude123's talk page.
Message added 18:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Compdude123 18:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, B767-500. You have new messages at JetBlast's talk page.
Message added 23:05, 8 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JetBlast (talk) 23:05, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Taipei-Taoyuan and Taizhou (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! - Wiki Loves Monuments - San Francisco Events

Palace of Fine Arts in San Francisco

Hi! As part of Wiki Loves Monuments, we're organizing two photo events in the San Francisco Bay Area and one in Yosemite National Park. We hope you can come out and participate! Feel free to contact User:Almonroth with questions or concerns.

There are three events planned:

We look forward to seeing you there!

You are receiving this message because you signed up on the SF Bay Area event listing, or have attended an event in the Bay Area. To remove yourself, please go here. EdwardsBot (talk) 00:40, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! Ada Lovelace Day San Francisco

You're invited! Ada Lovelace Day San Francisco

October 16 - Ada Lovelace Day Celebration - You are invited!
Come celebrate Ada Lovelace Day at the Wikimedia Foundation offices in San Francisco on October 16! This event, hosted by the Ada Initiative, the Mozilla Foundation, and the Wikimedia Foundation. It'll be a meet up style event, though you are welcome to bring a laptop and edit about women in STEM if you wish. Come mix, mingle and celebrate the legacy of the world's first computer programmer.

The event is October 16, 5:00 pm - 8:00 pm, everyone is welcome!

You must RSVP here - see you there!
SarahStierch (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Language ability

Please see Wikipedia:Babel if you want to see how to indicate your language ability on your user page. The Babel userboxes also put editors into suitable categories. – Fayenatic London 09:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You could also use Category:User en-1. It is for users with a basic understanding of English. Gsingh (talk) 04:44, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is an ANI thread which concerns you, see here Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#English_language_proficiency_of_User:B767-500. IRWolfie- (talk) 23:21, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for lack of English competence. A community discussion reached agreement that your English proficiency is so lacking that it renders you unable to edit collaboratively. Sorry, but that's the way it is--it is not a statement against you as a person. Writing is the single most important thing we do here. Your good will is not questioned, and I thank you for your contributions.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 03:18, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I am sorry to see you have been blocked. I did offer to help with your English. You should have sent me a message. --JetBlast (talk) 20:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiknic 2013

Wiknic 2013
Sunday, June 23rd · 12:34pm · Lake Merritt, Oakland
Theme: Hyperlocal list-making
Lake Merritt Wild Duck Refuge (Oakland, CA)

This year's 2013 SF Wiknik will be held at Lake Merritt, next to Children's Fairyland in Oakland. This event will be co-attended by people from the hyperlocal Oakland Wiki. May crosspollination of ideas and merriment abound!

Location and Directions

  • Location: The grassy area due south of Children's Fairyland (here) (Oakland Wiki)
    • Nearest BART: 19th Street
    • Nearest bus lines: NL/12/72
    • Street parking abounds

Request to review unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

B767-500 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have studied online English courses and I request to edit tables and discussion pages. I would like to join anti-vandal patrol.

Decline reason:

It is easy to claim you understand something better, a bit harder to actually prove it. Given that this was a problem that went on for several years despite repeated attempts to speak to you about it I think before we let you back in an actual demonstration that you are able to edit coherently would be helpful. Please follow the directions below. This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
     • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.
  • Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:07, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


I would be more sympathetic if you would first add Babel boxes on your user page to indicate your language skills, as I suggested above. – Fayenatic London 09:09, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Putting aside the fact that a blocked user can't edit their userpage, I don't believe that a user's self-assessment of their own language skills is really going to be helpful as far as them actually being able to contribute constructively, as opposed to making messes that others need to clean up. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:10, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They can edit their talkpage, and have.[2] Self-assessment is only marginally helpful, but demonstrated capacity to understand Fayenatic's request, and read the babel-transclude-helpdocs, and put the box on their talkpage is an encouraging sign. Rather than speculate, I suggest we try the empirical test of live conversation. If their ESL has improved somewhat, perhaps they can be unblocked on the condition that they stick to article-talkpages, and stay out of mainspace. Or maybe B767 will surprise everyone with their new linguistic prowess. One way to find out. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 20:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

howdy

Hello B767, you can call me 74. Would you like to have a conversation with me, and show everybody here how much your English has improved? Thanks. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 19:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing Airlines listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Boeing Airlines. Since you had some involvement with the Boeing Airlines redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 23:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mumbia Airport listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mumbia Airport. Since you had some involvement with the Mumbia Airport redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Trinidade (talk) 09:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Untied Airline listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untied Airline. Since you had some involvement with the Untied Airline redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 07:30, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 

Index: pl ar de en es fr it arz nl ja pt ceb sv uk vi war zh ru af ast az bg zh-min-nan bn be ca cs cy da et el eo eu fa gl ko hi hr id he ka la lv lt hu mk ms min no nn ce uz kk ro simple sk sl sr sh fi ta tt th tg azb tr ur zh-yue hy my ace als am an hyw ban bjn map-bms ba be-tarask bcl bpy bar bs br cv nv eml hif fo fy ga gd gu hak ha hsb io ig ilo ia ie os is jv kn ht ku ckb ky mrj lb lij li lmo mai mg ml zh-classical mr xmf mzn cdo mn nap new ne frr oc mhr or as pa pnb ps pms nds crh qu sa sah sco sq scn si sd szl su sw tl shn te bug vec vo wa wuu yi yo diq bat-smg zu lad kbd ang smn ab roa-rup frp arc gn av ay bh bi bo bxr cbk-zam co za dag ary se pdc dv dsb myv ext fur gv gag inh ki glk gan guw xal haw rw kbp pam csb kw km kv koi kg gom ks gcr lo lbe ltg lez nia ln jbo lg mt mi tw mwl mdf mnw nqo fj nah na nds-nl nrm nov om pi pag pap pfl pcd krc kaa ksh rm rue sm sat sc trv stq nso sn cu so srn kab roa-tara tet tpi to chr tum tk tyv udm ug vep fiu-vro vls wo xh zea ty ak bm ch ny ee ff got iu ik kl mad cr pih ami pwn pnt dz rmy rn sg st tn ss ti din chy ts kcg ve
Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Portal : Agama
Agama
Portal : Bahasa
Bahasa
Portal : Biografi
Biografi
Portal : Budaya
Budaya
Portal : Ekonomi
Ekonomi
Portal : Elektronika
Elektronika
Portal : Film
Film
Portal : Filsafat
Filsafat
Portal : Geografi
Geografi
Portal : Indonesia
Indonesia
Portal : Ilmu
Ilmu
Portal : Lingkungan
Lingkungan
Portal : Masyarakat
Masyarakat
Portal : Matematika
Matematika
Portal : Militer
Militer
Portal : Mitologi
Mitologi
Portal : Musik
Musik
Portal : Olahraga
Olahraga
Portal : Pendidikan
Pendidikan
Portal : Politik
Politik
Portal : Sastra
Sastra
Portal : Sejarah
Sejarah
Portal : Seni
Seni
Portal : Teknologi
Teknologi