Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
None of the sources in this draft represent independent coverage of the topic.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nom.tam.fits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Attipaci!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!!20:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:
Entire History section is unsourced. External links should be removed from body of article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nom.tam.fits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
I've added a paragraph to the top of the 'History' section, describing and referencing the sources that provide the information presented there. I hope this satisfies your requirement.
I have also expanded on the list of notable applications that use the library, providing references for these also.
PS. I have also removed all external references from the body, and instead added them as references when appropriate (or else dropped the external links if there was a publication reference already).
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- Removed external links from body (they are now listed in the references instead, when appropriate).
- Add Further references
- Cleaned up references
- Various corrections
- Language editing and typos
- Minor additions to content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OhHaiMark were:
Still has promotional issues. Additionally, for the author, claiming that other articles are like it is null as just because many articles are promotional, doesn't mean that this one should. Also, some portions have no sources supporting them.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nom.tam.fits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Yes, that was my doing. I have put a slightly modified version of the proposed Wikipedia content onto the mentioned site, since the Wikipedia article was not coming online, and I thought the content should be public regardless of the Wikipedia review process. I can easily remedy this either (a) by removing the duplicated content from the github.io site, or (b) by removing the copright statement on the github.io site. Let me know if you have a preference for one over the other.
OK, I took down the copyright from the github.io page. It now simply says 'nom.tam.fits documentation' in the footer instead. Let me know if there is anything else to be done.
Dear @Tavantius. I apologize that this lands on you, since you have been fair and responsive -- and helpful. I cannot say the same of some of the other editors I have ancountered. It looks like @CactusWriter simply decided to delete the draft article, before I could respond to the copyright issue, which was no more than an unfortunate accident. I simply tried to make the draft Wikipedia article available while it was under review for 6 months, not realizing that the tool I used automatically added a copyright to it. That copyright was never intentional, and the Wikipedia article I wrote preceded its pblishing anyway. It's frustrating to spend something like 100 hours writing an article, jumping through dozens of semi-arbitrary hoops, only to have ones work discarded by an overzealous editor. I'm a scientist who is used to peer review, but I never had someone simply erase my work without having a chance to respond. I hope you can restore the article, because I spent a ridiculous amount of time crafting it to the whim of other editors, who don't really seem to care the slightest bit about the work one puts into the creation of draft articles... Given that the reason for deletion was silly, and that the copyright issue has been remedied, I really hope you can restore the article with all the references that have now been lost... Thanks in advance. -- Attila Attipaci (talk) 01:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
Hi @Attipaci. Thank you for your comments. It would really help if we just had one or two sources that discuss, analyse, comment on the Library. Surely there has to be something in tech magazines, books, journals? Something that covers the Library in-depth maybe discussing its features and history.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nom.tam.fits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
