I do not edit regularly anymore. I changed my major and am in my junior year of college, so I'm becoming busier by the day. I'm sorry if I don't get back to you right away. Please know I will respond eventually.
If I reverted your edit in error, let me say ahead of time that I'm sincerely sorry. I patrol edits using the Recent Changes page and, using this method, it can sometimes be easy to mistake constructive edits for vandalism if they are left unsourced or no edit summary is provided.
Similarly, if I have edited a page incorrectly according to Wikipedia's standards, please tell me! I want to know when I'm wrong so I don't continue to edit incorrectly.
Please start a new section at the bottom of the page by clicking the [+] above, sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~), and respect talk page guidelines.
I will respond both here and on your talk page unless you specify otherwise. Thanks!
Hermione Granger
Hi! Just saw your edit and I thought I'd let you know that you're right, philosopher's is what we use. The general rule is go with the spelling variant of the country that the article is best associated with and if there is no particular association, e.g. Blue, just leave it as you find it. Happy editing! asyndetontalk01:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be more than happy to help you out in any way you'd like! Just let me know if you have any questions. You can message me on my talk page, or email me (my address is on my user page). Sorry it's taken me so long to get back to you; it's been kind of a wild week. :-) Good to have you! =David(talk)(contribs)02:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While, in theory, I have no objection to your doing this, there has been an attempt by the Wiki Opera Group to create a standard of consistantacy across the board for all arricle (e.g. no boxes, layout of first performance casts, layout of selected recordings box, etc.
So, allowing your changes to stand, might mean that every opera article would need to be changed to match. I won't change anything now, but let's see what happens. Viva-Verdi (talk) 19:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry if I messed up the page or violated any standards that were being set concerning these articles. I looked up this operetta when I heard my university's choral department was putting on a show, and it seemed like an appropriate change to make.
I totally support your effort toward consistency and it will totally not hurt my feelings if my changes are reverted. You all know better than I do! (: Ashleyscripter 02:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Can you tell me why did you reverted the text to previous version without explaining what you were doing ? Though I admit I neglected to put in an edit summary for my revision, I had explained what I was doing on the discussion page (and my change was endorsed by zzuuuzz who also knows about UK censuses). Regards.
Jonesey
I only reverted the edit because you did not post an edit summary; I am sorry if what looked like vandalism (since the information was not explicitly sourced in the article) was truly a constructive edit. Also, please do not forget to sign your posts, especially on talk pages. AshleyScripter[talkback|contribs]21:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Your Note on my talk page
Please refrain from advising me on how to edit on Wikipedia unless you are an administrator or can provide evidence that your rule is more than an opinion. I am well aware of the differences between British English and American English. As I don't see a rule instructing me otherwise, I will continue to edit as I see fit. If, however, you are an official administrator or can provide evidence that your advice is Wikipedia standard, then I will of course submit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sblachly (talk • contribs) 17:45, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The British English standard for articles like Harry Potter
Where can I find a special Wikipedia page which explains what you told me a few days ago about how language differences (such as those between British and American English) should be kept in line with the country the article's subject is most closely affiliated with? (I need to share it with someone who thinks this is just my opinion.) (: Thanks! AshleyScripter[talkback|contribs]20:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have made changes to the article. If you would like to look it over I would appreciate it. If I still have something that is not correct please edit it. Thank you Bill James TTCops —Preceding unsigned comment added by TTCops (talk • contribs) 19:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I changed LU's page back to including the Liberty Way. If sports, entertainment, and extracurricular activities can be listed on the page, so can the policies. I am an LU alumni and feel that it is important for people to know the schools policies. ~
As far as I remember, I only removed information which was word-for-one listed from the Liberty Way handbook, such as the number of fines for each individual offense. This is NOT RELEVANT to an encyclopedia; if a reader is curious, he can go to the document online and see for himself. Also, please don't forget to sign your posts; this topic should also have been put under its own heading as it is not relevant to LUO. AshleyScripter{talkback}03:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The February 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:23, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re: to the note on my IP
Thanks a lot AshleyScripter for your encouragement you sent on my IP on 21:34, 6 March 2008. I have created an id here with which I am responding now. I'm fan of the series myself (I was actually trying editing on Deatheaters page when I saw the message) and I'll try my best in the future also to make any contribution which I might feel helpful and reasonable. Thanks again.September88 (talk) 23:42, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(: Glad to see you made the move to a username! I thought you might be interested in the Harry Potter WikiProject. It's a good place to go looking for ways you can help the series' articles. The project is part of the Harry Potter portal. You can follow this link to sign up to make contributions to the project, and from there you can add a Potter-related userbox to start your userpage!
Hi, at first I thought you were a bot thinking I was a vandal – but now I see you reverted me on a deletion of a bunch of text from MY OWN TALK PAGE. Unless it violates policy, we can edit our user & talk pages the way we see fit. I understand you might have done it error, but I ask that you please look at what you're about to delete before you hit that UNDO button. Thanks. Cyberia23 (talk) 06:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for reverting your edits. As soon as I did it, I realized it probably wasn't legitimate, but figured it would be silly to revert my own edit; I decided to leave it up to you. Sorry again. Ashley{talkback}14:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi and thanks for fixing it. I did a google search and "an unanimous" is quite common occurance on Wikipedia. In case you want something to do, there's a task for you.
That account went inactive because it was blocked indefinitely as a role account, dedicated to publicizing the Santa Fe International Folk Art Market. --Orange Mike | Talk20:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In reguards to my removal from the adoption list.
Hello, my name is Kyle Hardin and this message is in reference to your removal of my name form the adoption list. I am an active user (or, rather, would like to learn how to be) and I've been watching my name on the adoption list for some time now. I requested adoption because I'm very new at editing web content, such as Wikipedia, and need instruction on how to do so, before I attempt anything. Quite honestly, I don't even know where to begin. I had hoped to be adopted by an experienced user, so that I may learn the basics of how to edit and maintain the Wikipedia content. I realize you meant well, and I hope that I haven't done anything faux pas in putting my name on the adoption list to begin with. I would appreciate any instruction as to what to do in this situation, and any help you can give would be appreciated. Thank you for your time Specter (talk) 18:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kyle! I'm sorry if I caused you any grief in removing your name. I did a sweep of the list that day and removed any username which didn't appear to be "active" (there was no specification in the header on what qualified as such). I removed about a dozen names linked to accounts which had very few edits or hadn't edited for more than three months.
The adoption project certainly appears to be ideal for you and for me, although we are obviously at different stages of experience. I am glad to see your account is still active on some level and I'm proud of you for wanting to learn more!! I'm pretty eager to be adopted as well, but in the meantime, if you have any questions about the basics of editing, I will answer them to the best of my ability, or find an answer for you. I'm also willing to re-add your name to the list myself. (It will take a bit of tweaking of the numbers because the list is organized according to how long the userbox has been on a userpage). Let me know what you think! (: Ashley{talkback}18:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for understanding :D I just want to be helpful to the site, and do something with my free time that is productive. I don't feel nearly qualified to edit large articles, but I'm most interested in doing little "clean-up" or maintenance projects that other people would find mundane. Thanks for your time Specter (talk) 17:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again. I just wanted to let you know I re-added the adoption userbox to your userpage. I also tweaked the numbers so that you would regain your position on the list of adoptees. (: Hopefully, adopters will come by soon and pick you up. Don't forget, though, that I'm willing to help you in the meantime. Happy editing! [Ashleyy|osaurus] 18:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much :D the gesture is very much appreciated. I have a simple question about editing for you: am I formatting my talk messages correctly? Because I know that I'm doing at least a few things wrong, so don't be too shy to tell me what I should be doing differently. Thanks again, and I hope you're having a wonderful day! :D Specter (talk) 21:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Good Morning
Thank you for leaving me a message. I am pretty new to editing Wikipedia, but I have been reading it for several years. I "stole" two of your userboxes that I thought were funny. Hope you don't mind! --Andrew from NC (talk) 00:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, you're welcome! And of course I don't mind your "thievery" of my userboxes; I was considering snagging one or two of yours myself. (: [Ashleyy|osaurus] 01:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I read your user page a little closer and wanted to let you know that my aim is lovelynepenthe. That's generally a good way to get a hold of me and can be nicer than talk page communication. We're pretty close in time zone, thank goodness. One of my other adoptees is a Kiwi!--Gimme danger (talk) 20:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay! (: I don't normally load AIM because I rarely talk to anyone on it anymore, but I've logged back on and I will probably get on at least anytime I need to talk to you about something. (: And I'm glad you specified what you meant by "a Kiwi," because I wouldn't have known otherwise. [Ashleyy|osaurus] 21:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry that I didn't catch you when you messaged me. I'm not sure why my computer refuses to put up my away messages. I don't know if you were being facetious in that last sentence; in any case, I didn't mean to insult your intelligence. --Gimme danger (talk) 02:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Message Response
I did not know how else to respond to your message; with that said, I apologize, in advance, if I am not using this page by its correct guidelines.
Honestly, I do not know how it is "vandalism" when anyone is able to legally change anything they want on this website. I also did not write anything that was even remotely untrue, nor did I intend for it to be anything more than a simple joke. It is pretty sad that you spend so much time on Wikipedia- an untrustworthy site which is not even considered to be a proper educational source- don't you have a few better things to do? Honestly?!
Jekaufman, none of your continuous edits (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) on 28 March to the article about Liberty University were constructive or beneficial to this encyclopedia. You repeatedly vandalized a page to which many users have taken the time and patience to contribute. You say your edits were intended to be "a simple joke," but Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia and "joke edits" are not tolerated. All edits should be constructive, factual, and neutral. In addition, part of your response could be considered a personal attack, which is not tolerated on this website. If you do not agree with any of these policies or you continue to feel that Wikipedia is an "untrustworthy site," there are many other informational sources on the World Wide Web. Finally, please do not forget to sign your talk page messages with four tildes (~~~~). [Ashleyy|osaurus] 21:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, quick fyi on date formatting. Only wikilink complete dates (day month and year) and not individual years. The purpose of linking dates is not for cross-reference, but rather so that readers can view dates according to their preferences. For more info, see MOS:UNLINKYEARS. (Arg, I'm not even supposed to be here, but I wanted to see how you are doing. Great anti-vandal work and bravo for wading into regional English styles messes.) --Gimme danger (talk) 05:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
I changed the link because the article exists as Neighbour Rosicky; nothing exists under the title Neighbor Rosicky. I'm not sure why, but every literature book and anthology in which I have referenced this story has spelled it according to British English. Maybe a move is necessary regarding the article; it's probably a good discussion to be made. Ashleyy osaurus (talk) 03:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently both spellings were used, so there should be a redirect. The story was first published in 1930 and the checklist for the Collected Short Fiction 1892-1912, page 598, says 'The spelling Neighbour used in collected versions.'.Zigzig20s (talk) 03:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No ego to bruise. But, [sic] my ability to edit was interrupted:
Hi (: I just thought I would let you know that I am removing the adoption template from your userpage. The category's requirements suggest that someone deletes the userbox from the page of an inactive contributor. Your contributions page indicates that your few edits were made two months ago. The category exists to organize users seeking adoption and lists them in the order that they have been waiting to be adopted. It is more beneficial for the project to keep active users at the top of the list. Feel free to re-add the template if you choose to become active in the encyclopedia again. Thank you and happy editing! Ashley {talkback} 20:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Therefore, I figured I'd task you with the little problems I see on Wiki' pages.
No no, I only removed you from the Adopt-a-User list because your account appeared inactive. You can re-add yourself at any time, and you are, of course, free to edit as you see fit. Did that clear anything up? Ashleyy osaurus (talk) 17:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I will fix the "crystals", but how do I put myself up for adoption again? Will you kindergarten [sic] me through the process? Sponsion (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can re-add the adoptme template by typing this code on your userpage: {{subst:dated adoptme}}. Your username should appear on C:ADOPT. If you have any more questions, I'm more than happy to answer them. Ashleyy osaurus (talk) 20:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know.
I saw the warnings you placed on the talk page of 204.69.139.16. It seems that the edits you refer to are restructuring, rather than vandalism. I really lack the expertise to judge whether it's better before or after. If it is your considered opinion that the edits in question are unconstructive, then please discuss in more detail. In any case I agree with you that it's really important to get this article right, because of this.
69.140.152.55 (talk) 00:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was having a very hard time judging 204.69.139.16's edits to Suicide when they came in such close succession. I reverted some edits because 1) they only appeared to be removing content, not relocating it, 2) the editor didn't provide an edit summary clarifying his motives, and 3) articles on such a sensitive topic are highly susceptible to vandalism and other forms of unconstructive edits. These edits could have appeared less confusing if the user had made one bulk edit rearranging content and entered reasoning in the edit summary field. Thanks, and happy editing! (Also, may I suggest creating an account? Wikipedia appreciates concerned and involved editors.) Ashleyy osaurus (talk) 02:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... I see now 204.69.139.16's "response" on his talk page. You can see what I added; I hope it's okay that I also referred him to you with further questions (haha). I think my message may help. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Ashleyy osaurus (talk) 02:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
May I please remove "Please remember as well to be civil to users; I am aware of the 'rules of Wikipedia'" from your reply to their reply? And also I'd like to suggest removing one of your two mentions of my IP – although I thank you for your favorable mention of me, my involvement in Wikipedia is intermittent; even though one month I may write 2 whole new articles, another month I may not edit at all. [And I am not the best user to ask for advice on edit summaries. (You ideally want somebody with no visible red on this page).] Anyway, thanks again for the compliment, but for assistance with editing a sensitive subject it might be best to just put one's questions on the article talk page. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 03:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wondered whether I needed to mention civility or not; however, I don't think it hurts anything in that message. I removed your IP though. Have a nice day... Ashleyy osaurus (talk) 13:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Look over the recent changes list for recent improvements to articles, other changes and vandalism.
WikiProject Christianity Coordinators : The project coordinators are generally responsible for maintaining all of the procedural and administrative aspects of the project, and serve as the designated points-of-contact for procedural issues. They are not, however, endowed with any special executive powers, nor with any authority over article content or editor conduct.The Lead Coordinator bears overall responsibility for coordinating the project; the Assistant Coordinators aid the Lead Coordinator and focus on specific areas that require special attention.
The following Coordinators were elected after Elections 2008
There is also a discussion regarding whether any new subportals dealing with Christianity should be created here. All inputs are welcome.
Bot Assisted Assessment was used for the unassessed project articles. Should you need any manual reassessment , kindly request it here.
Member News
Our membership continues to expand. It is currently at 223 users. 39 new users have joined the WikiProject in the month of April 2008. Please make them feel welcomed!
Christianity Articles by Quality
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
Archives of previous newsletters can be found here. To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, add your name here. If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, let ~The Newsletter Editors know. This newsletter is automatically delivered by Addbot (talk) 15:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC) .[reply]
The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I didn't notice your Wikibreak; was busy not failing (barely!) out of college. Just wanted to wish you a great summer in NYC. You're supposed to stay cool when the editing gets hot, but in the case of New York in the summer, just stay cool. :-) Drop me a line when you get back, k? Happy trails. --Gimme danger (talk) 00:33, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you help?
I see you were listed as a participant in the League of Copy-Editors so it seems likely. The thing is the Military history wikiproject urgently needs prose pros to help with our best articles. Milhist covers a broad range of interesting and varied subjects from film to biography, battles to weaponry, and Roman emperors to twentieth-century dictators. In Milhist, A-Class has become the last port of call before FAC and we are looking for people to help identify prose and MoS issues at A-Class A-Class Reviews and help fix them prior to featured article candidacy. We also have a copy-editing section in our Logistics Dept and that can always use experienced copy-editors. For most of our articles, you don't need to be a specialist in the subject matter, just good with words.
The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections
Roll call and Coordinator nominations
It's that time of year again – we're wiping everyone's name off of the active members list and doing a project roll call. Your username is listed on the WikiProject Filmsparticipants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. You can also add your name to any of our many task forces!
It's also time to start the WikiProject Films coordinator selection process! We are aiming to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!
Roll call and Coordinator nominations
The September 2008 WikiProject Films coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of candidates. Additionally, we are keeping nominations open during the voting period, in case any additional editors wish to nominate themselves. Please vote here by September 28!
The September 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also note that after the roll call for active members, we've cleared the specialized delivery lists. Feel free to sign-up in the relevant sections again! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The October 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have suggestions or comments related to the newsletter, please leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you and happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The November 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. My apologies for the late delivery, and thanks go to both Wildroot and Erik for writing the newsletter. Remember that anyone can edit the newsletter, so feel free to help out! Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The December 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WP:FILMS Questionnaire
As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WP:FILMS Questionnaire
As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject Films newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The February 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The WikiProject Films coordinator voting process has recently begun! We are aiming to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are still interested in running, please sign up here. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by March 28. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 17:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Films March 2009 Newsletter
The March 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Films April 2009 Newsletter
The April 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Films May 2009 Newsletter
The May 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Films June 2009 Newsletter
The June 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The July 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Films August 2009 Newsletter
The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:25, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WP:FILMS October Newsletter
The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive and Roll Call
The project's Tag & Assess drive has begun. We will be assessing over 50,000 articles during the drive and we need your help! 200-article ranges can be adopted and completed at any pace. A variety of awards are available based on the number of articles assessed. Please help review whatever you are comfortable with, and if you have any questions, leave a message on the talk page of the drive. In addition, please add your name to the active member list if you have not already. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:55, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Aeswithpostsecret.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out)11:29, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
