User talk:Annamargarita0

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:38, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Annamargarita0, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Annamargarita0!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Classic Nursery Rhymes

The article Classic Nursery Rhymes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection. Title doesn't warrant itself to redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^Talk to me 00:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Classic Nursery Rhymes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Classic Nursery Rhymes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic Nursery Rhymes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^Talk to me 17:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hello. Please refrain from shouting as you appear to keep doing at Good Morning Britain. There is no reason to shout. If you don't like the a way a user is listing them, please discuss it on the article's talk page. Please stop the shouting. Thanks, 🍀 Corkythehornetfan 🍀 19:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Boohbah, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would look better this color format than the original common can it look normal like other countries Jomelandeer (talk) 09:19, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Annamargarita0! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 11:08, Friday, October 7, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Annamargarita0. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Boohbah, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I see that you have previously received a message about very similar removal of content from Boohbah without explanation. I also see a number of other occasions when you have removed content from articles without any explanation, such as these edits: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. You really do need to give a brief explanation in an edit summary when you remove content, as otherwise it is likely to look to other editors like vandalism, and sooner or alter you are likely to be blocked from editing by an administrator. In fact, you should give an edit summary for every edit, whether removing content or not, so that other editors can see what you are doing, but looking at your editing history I have not found any edits at all for which you have taken the small amount of trouble required to write an edit summary. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:08, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smooth London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Classic Nursery Rhymes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Classic Nursery Rhymes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 07:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Classic Nursery Rhymes, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "save page" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 07:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (UK TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 11:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Classic Nursery Rhymes

The article Classic Nursery Rhymes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no reason for notability of this particular undistinguished collection

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Classic Nursery Rhymes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Classic Nursery Rhymes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Greyjoy^talk 07:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Annamargarita0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Magic 105.4 FM, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SovalValtos (talk) 18:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeffrey Osborne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page On the Wings of Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Remotely Funny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BBC Breakfast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Mason (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Kamara, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:00, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on The Great British Bake Off (series 9). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hzh (talk) 11:50, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Got What It Takes? (series 3)

Hi, I'm Sam Sailor. Annamargarita0, thanks for creating Got What It Takes? (series 3)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This needs references to sources. If you need help, I'll gladly help you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Sam Sailor 16:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Annamargarita0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Annamargarita0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at MacDonald's Farm. Cabayi (talk) 10:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MacDonald's Farm moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, MacDonald's Farm, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cabayi (talk) 10:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Best of Friends. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. –Davey2010^Talk 13:02, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Best of Friends episodes. JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 13:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Voice UK (series 8), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Addicted to Love and Call Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 11:48, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on ITV News London. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SovalValtos (talk) 18:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MacDonald's Farm

Hello, Annamargarita0. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MacDonald's Farm".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cabayi (talk) 19:26, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not create premature articles as you have at Dancing on Ice (series 12). Per MOS:TV we do not create episode tables or season articles where the only sourced information is notice of a renewal. The article does not even include that. Season articles require, as a minimum, a sourced episode table or substantial other content that will normally include multiple sources. As it stands, Dancing on Ice (series 12) does not have enough content or sources to justify creation of a standalone article. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing on Ice (series 12) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dancing on Ice (series 12), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AussieLegend (✉) 14:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Dancing on Ice (series 12), you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 14:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is really no point submitting draft articles for review if they are undersourced. All articles require sources. This is the reason that Draft:Dancing on Ice (series 12) and was draftified. As there have been no attempts to improve the draft in the few minutes since it was draftified, submitting it for review serves no purpose as the article will not be moved to article space until the problem has been fixed. All you are doing by submitting it for review is editing disruptively and wasting the time of reviewers. If you persist you are likely to be blocked. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:29, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• There is absolutely no point linking to redlinked articles as you did here when the article that you're linking to no longer exists because it has been moved to draft space. Links can be added after the season article is moved from draft space to article space. You would be better off fixig the draft than making unnecessary links. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:02, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Dancing on Ice (series 12) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 08:53, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Do not recreate articles that have been draftified in article space. Instead, fix the identified problems in the draft article and when these are fixed, submit it for review so that it can be moved to article space. The version that you created at Dancing on Ice (series 12) exbits the same problems as the version that was draftified. In fact, the problems have been made worse because you have added unsourced content. --AussieLegend (✉) 08:57, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dancing on Ice. AussieLegend (✉) 09:00, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Regarding this edit summary, it does not matter if you think something is true, it must be verifiable, as you should be well aware of by now. In fact Wikipedia:Verifiability, which is a core policy, quite clearly states "Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." That you are adding content with {{citation needed}} tags already attached,[7][8][9] indicates that you cannot verify the claims. If you were able to, then you should have added a citation. Given your history of recent disruptive editing and your apparent failure to learn from the warnings that you have been given, I have had to report your actions at WP:AIV. --AussieLegend (✉) 08:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• If Lisa George has been confirmed as you claim in this edit then you need to include a citation confirming it. As explained in Wikipedia:Verifiability, which you have obviously NOT bothered to read, "Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." You cannot simply keep adding content to articles without ensuring that it is verifiable. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dancing on Ice; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 10:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^(talk) (contribs) 12:06, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really expect that you'll bother reading this but, for the record, I counted 11 reverts from you:

1. 08:06, 26 September 2019 (UTC) "They're not rumours, it's the truth!"
2. 10:06, 26 September 2019 (UTC) "Lisa George has been confirmed!"
3. 10:17, 26 September 2019 (UTC) No edit summary
4. 10:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC) "Lisa George has been confirmed according to Twitter!"
5. 10:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC) "Lisa George has been confirmed according to Twitter, also it's the truth & not a rumour!"
6. 11:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC) No edit summary
7. 11:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC) "Lisa George has been confirmed according to Twitter, also it's the truth & not a rumour!"
8. 11:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC) "Lisa George has been confirmed according to Twitter & it's NOT a rumour!"
9. 11:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC) "Digital Spy updated their page & she has been confirmed!"
10. 11:53, 26 September 2019 (UTC) No edit summary
11. 11:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC) No edit summary

Note that it only takes 4 reverts to violate WP:3RR. Eleven is completely unacceptable. I warned you earlier that you need to provide citations regardless of whether or not you think something is true. Look where it got you. --AussieLegend (✉)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annamargarita0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I haven't done anything wrong, I just want to confirm who's participating Dancing on Ice. Annamargarita0 (talk) 12:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You violated WP:3RR and WP:EW. It's very concerning that you think you did nothing wrong. Yamla (talk) 13:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dancing on Ice Series 12

Could someone put Lisa George between Kevin Kilbane & Lucrezia Millarini please? Annamargarita0 (talk) 12:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked for edit-warring over that because you didn't, or wouldn't, supply a source. Nobody is going to add unsourced content when another editor got blocked for doing it. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing on Ice Series 12

Another celebrity has been confirmed, can someone add Perri Kiely to the table please? Annamargarita0 (talk) 16:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. Do this again and I'll extend your block significantly. This is deeply inappropriate for you to make this request and you've already been warned for it. --Yamla (talk) 16:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dancing on Ice. Hzh (talk) 12:27, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• You've been warned repeatedly about adding unsourced content to the article and because you continued to do that you were blocked for edit-warring. For that reason, you only deserve one warning after adding unsourced content immediately after coming off your block! --AussieLegend (✉) 12:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Trapped! (TV series). If you wish to discuss this material, please comment at Talk:Trapped!_(TV_series)#Episode_list_repeatedly_added rather than repeatedly adding this unsourced material. LukeSurl^t c 11:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The X Factor (British series 15), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You need to begin using talk pages, and not edit summaries for your discussions. Edit-warring unsourced information is simply not acceptable, and knowing you've been here since 2015, you should be aware of this. Please begin re-consider your editing habits, as it appears this is not the only time you've been dealt these kind of warnings by other users. livelikemusic talk! 15:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, (List of The Story Makers episodes)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, (List of The Story Makers episodes). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of The Story Makers episodes. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of The Story Makers episodes. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Gonnym (talk) 09:03, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Junior Bake Off (series 5) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Junior Bake Off (series 5), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (British series 19) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (British series 19) has been moved to draft space due to the fact that it is WP:TOOSOON for an article. Feel free to move it back once it has some more content and sources. Kb03 (talk) 19:53, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The X Factor (British TV series), you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic talk! 14:48, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The X Factor: The Band. livelikemusic talk! 14:22, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got What It Takes? (series 5) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Got What It Takes? (series 5), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AussieLegend (✉) 13:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Voice UK, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic talk! 13:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Annamargarita0 reported by User:Livelikemusic (Result: ). Thank you. livelikemusic talk! 13:35, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dancing on Ice, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 05:38, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Dancing on Ice. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (✉) 19:45, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing on Ice

Hey – how come you reverted my edit on Dancing on Ice? All of the details in that section are covered in the separate articles and the series overview. – DarkGlow (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Britain's Got Talent, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic talk! 14:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wait For It..!

Hello, Annamargarita0. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wait For It..!".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:08, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Got What It Takes? (series 5), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 16:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Voice UK (series 9), you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 15:57, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• To clarify, it was clearly stated in this edit summary that "Per infobox instructions, date should not be added until after the first episode has aired." Therefore, this reversion should not have happened. If you have not done so already, and it appears from your edit that you have not, read the instructions for the infobox. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Voice UK (series 9), you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 06:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Voice UK, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic talk! 00:31, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Masked Singer (British TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please also keep in mind WP:NORUSH. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Masked Singer (British TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at [[:Magic Radio (London radio station)[]], without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SovalValtos (talk) 13:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 23:00, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to List of Ant & Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway episodes has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 15:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unconfirmed information to the article mentioned above. As you have received a number of warnings for doing this now, you may end up being blocked if you add any more unconfirmed information. Thank you. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 15:29, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Heart London, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SovalValtos (talk) 10:02, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at BBC Breakfast, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 10:48, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm SovalValtos. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Heart London, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SovalValtos (talk) 10:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Strictly Come Dancing (series 18), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You know this. You've been warned before. Launchballer 15:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DOI

Hello – I notice that you keep the Dancing on Ice article up to date; I was wondering if List of Dancing on Ice professional skaters is also up to date? I've never really checked the article and wouldn't know enough about the pros to do it well. – DarkGlow (talk) 08:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing on Ice Sonny and Angela

@Annamargarita0:

Why have you removed Angela Egan as Sonny’s partner when it was confirmed on the radio?

@Annamargarita0: This has never how it’s been in the past? If Angela has been confirmed as Sonny’s partner on the radio, the same way Strictly confirm the celebs, I don’t see why you’ve reverted your previous edit.

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Voice UK, you may be blocked from editing. HiwilmsTalk 19:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where have you got the information that Anne-Marie will be replacing Meghan Trainor?--Launchballer 18:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:43, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Dancing on Ice contestants

@Annamargarita0: Hi luv, can you update this page with the latest pairings please as the page is locked. Thanks - an IP address user

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. livelikemusic (TALK!) 20:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. Leaky caldron (talk) 20:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly Come Dancing (series 18)

Do not remove the data-sort-value from the table. This is there so when the scores are sorted in the table they are in leaderboard order. Messinwithbruce (talk) 19:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 07:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Hudson's key colour

Hello! I've seen that you are a regular contributor to The Voice UK's page and I would like to suggest you something. As you most likely know, JHud was also a coach in The Voice U.S. and her key colour ( ) used to match in both series. However, the American page is currently being (somewhat) reformed in terms of key colours, and now her new colour there is  , which is similar to Pixie Lott's colour in the British The Voice Kids. Do you think it would possible to swap Pixie's and Jennifer's colours? JHud would have   (matching with the American version), and Pixie would have  ? I ask you to please consider and show your opinion on the matter. Ping me when you can. Thank you. – MarcioRob24 (Talk!! :D) 20:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at The Voice UK (series 10), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. livelikemusic (TALK!) 20:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Masked Singer (British series 2). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 13:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of EastEnders characters, you may be blocked from editing. – DarkGlow (✉) 12:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DarkGlow. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of EastEnders characters, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 13:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at The Voice UK (series 10), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at The Voice UK (series 10). livelikemusic (TALK!) 03:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grace

Hello – please do not add the surname of Grace onto Wikipedia. You were most likely unaware, but there is a request to protect her privacy. – DarkGlow • 11:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rhys Stephenson

The article Rhys Stephenson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unlikely to be notable - all coverage I could find is routine for contestants on reality television shows and/or is in sources generally considered unreliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. firefly ( t · c ) 10:19, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rhys Stephenson

A tag has been placed on Rhys Stephenson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Page was written by User:MyraBrady, a sock of the infamous User:ZestyLemonz. See this diff for evidence.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – DarkGlow • 10:48, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing on Ice (series 14)

Hey @Annamargarita0: I think the Dancing on Ice (series 14) page should be created as celebrities will be revealed next month.

Dancing on Ice (series 14) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dancing on Ice (series 14), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – DarkGlow • 08:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dancing on Ice (series 14) (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dancing on Ice (series 14) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dancing on Ice (series 14), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Annamargarita0! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Ria Hebden. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. The article appears to be a copy of the draft, stripping attribution. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey Anna do you have Instagram? We have similar interests and think we should be friends. My Instagram is laura.walker1909 — Preceding unsigned comment added by LauraAshleyClosed (talk • contribs) 15:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing on Ice

Why are you removing links from Liberty Poole and Regan Gascoigne on Dancing on Ice if you don’t plan on creating the article?2A01:4C8:C8C:5693:7D33:1623:6F89:9FEB (talk) 21:30, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because just like for Strictly, all contestants NEEDS separate pages. --Annamargarita0 (talk) 04:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well then create the pages or re add the redirects please 2A01:4C8:C8C:5693:9DF5:94A4:8FBE:64BF (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But I do need help because I don't what to add on the pages & at least do some as well please? --Annamargarita0 (talk) 11:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such rule; contestants do not require a standalone article or even a redirect. Per WP:REDLINK, leaving their entries as a redlink is the best option since it encourages people to create their pages and expand the site. – DarkGlow • 15:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Liberty Poole

A tag has been placed on Liberty Poole requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Written by a suspected sock and created using a proxy editor (see diff).

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – DarkGlow • 18:51, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet

If you continue to obey orders from a sockpuppet, you risk getting blocked from editing indefinitely. I know this from experience as the same happened to me. They are using you to perform edits for them; if you get asked by a brand new user to perform an edit for them, use your head and do not obey. The best way to prevent this is to request that your talk page is protected so you cannot be asked in future. – DarkGlow • 18:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) DarkGlow is right. You need to stop interacting with and carrying out work on the behalf of sock puppets. Ignore them and/or report them to either WP:AVI or WP:SOCK. They are using you to get around their block, and likely do not care if you lose your editing privileges. - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to be more explicit here. You have created Liberty Poole, Regan Gascoigne, Dancing on Ice (series 14), and Rhys Stephenson, all of which were copy-pasted from text dropped on your user talk page by confirmed socks. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ZestyLemonz. At the very least, these examples are violations of attribution requirements as detailed in WP:COPYWITHIN, which is something we take very seriously. Please stop doing this. If you continue to create pages with copy-pasted content which is not properly attributed, you will be blocked from editing. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Liberty Poole

A tag has been placed on Liberty Poole requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Page was written by a blocked sockpuppet (see diff)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – DarkGlow • 22:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DOI redirects

Make sure we avoid red links by creating Tippy Packard a redirect page to List of Dancing on Ice professional skaters#Tippy Packard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:C87:6A1:646A:8908:E51D:505 (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anna, just another reminder not to take orders from mystery IPs. That's Zesty. Doing it again will risk getting you blocked, so stop. – DarkGlow • 13:12, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Magic (UK radio station), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Smooth Radio.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Masked singer

How did you immediately identify poodle when the unmasking barely begun? WikiFlame50 (talk) 20:24, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't me, it was someone else. --Annamargarita0 (talk) 20:25, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That’s so strange how they managed when the unmasking barely begun WikiFlame50 (talk) 20:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now I’ve seen who did it. Some user named themselves tomchaplinpoodle. It was a guess. That’s unconstructive isn’t it? WikiFlame50 (talk) 20:30, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Horrible Histories: Gory Games, you may be blocked from editing. Neverrainy (talk) 17:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Emmerdale characters, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – DarkGlow • 13:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing On Ice

Hello, Can I politely ask that you either 1. When your editing the page when I am do your edits all at once because it keeps creating edit conflicts or 2. stop editing the page for today episode. Thanks Peterrrroblox (talk) 18:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programmes broadcast by Nickelodeon (UK and Ireland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

doi series 14 vandalism

Dear Annamargarita0

Someone has vandilised the dancing on ice series 14 page can you please revert it?

Thanks Superman011

Archive your talk page

Hello! I just wanted to request that you archive your user talk page. While it may not be bothersome to you, many editors have slow connections, and having a very large talk page can hamper communication. If you need help, just check out the guide over at Help:Archiving a talk page. Thanks! – DarkGlow • 20:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Sahaib. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Teletubbies, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sahaib (talk) 14:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Tipping Point (game show), you may be blocked from editing. – DarkGlow • 13:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of EastEnders characters. – DarkGlow • 15:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove notes without explaining why either, you’ve been on Wikipedia long enough to know that. Thank you Blanchey (talk) 15:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:11, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annamargarita0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I haven't actually done anything wrong to this, I was only trying to help on here so please unblock me? Annamargarita0 (talk) 18:41, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is exactly what led to your block: Even when directly asked to respond to others' concerns, you don't address them at all. I suggest you read my message below and WP:GAB again. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:49, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annamargarita0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The reason why you should unblock me because not only I wanted to help but I do add reliable sources to pages and I promise I will follow the Wikipedia rules and I also do add the correct information to all pages. Examples I added a reliable source once to Tipping Point Series 11 end date & also the return of Freddie Slater in EastEnders. https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/tv-listings/?ts=1654095600000 & https://www.theoldhamtimes.co.uk/news/20296061.bbc-eastenders-cast-jade-goodys-son-bobby-brazier-new-freddie-slater-role/?ref=twtrec And some sources I couldn't find because they were unreliable.Annamargarita0 (talk) 18:54, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As ToBeFree said below, you will need to give more detail. Please read what they have wrote and understand what you need to do. Simply appealing again (here or via UTRS) with simple "I will follow the rules" type arguments won't get you very far unfortunately. firefly ( t · c ) 16:46, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annamargarita0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe that this was wrong to block me so the reason why you should unblock me because I always add the correct information to every single page as I never vandalised any page. I also keep pages updated regularly as well as adding the sources. Examples for sources like the Tipping Point Series 11 end date & the dances to the Strictly pages on the dance chart mainly from the BBC website. Examples of links I mentioned of the sources are these https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/tv-listings/?ts=1654095600000 & https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/strictlycomedancing/entries/ac29167f-e240-41a2-9785-214924a303d0. So that's why you should unblock me because I always keep pages updated because if they weren't, they will stay outdated forever and I won't be able to edit anymore. And I also do apologise for disruptive editing on biographies of living people & I will make sure it won't happen again in the future. Annamargarita0 (talk) 17:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've shown no understanding of why your edits have been inappropriate and continue to try to use others to evade your block, even after prior warnings. Yamla (talk) 13:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"I do add reliable sources to pages", where? Would you please have a look at your list of contributions, view the changes you have made, and provide some examples for edits where you have "added reliable sources" to a page? And if you manage to do so, please also explain why your recent contributions lack such source additions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added a reliable source once to Tipping Point Series 11 end date --Annamargarita0 (talk) 19:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plural statements need plural proof. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(moved from your edited comment above to fix the chronology ~ ToBeFree) & also the return of Freddie Slater in EastEnders.

https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/tv-listings/?ts=1654095600000 & https://www.theoldhamtimes.co.uk/news/20296061.bbc-eastenders-cast-jade-goodys-son-bobby-brazier-new-freddie-slater-role/?ref=twtrec And some sources I couldn't find because they were unreliable. --Annamargarita0 (talk) 19:16, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Okay, so we're talking about Special:Diff/1089432475 and Special:Diff/1099608758. Both times, you had provided sources after having been reverted for adding unsourced content to the same article ([10], [11] [12] [13]). In the second example, you had even initially ignored and removed a HTML comment asking for sources.

You may now see the problem, at least after having had to find some of the apparently few examples where you have actually provided a source... after having been asked to, after having been reverted.

Sadly, your current unblock request text does not yet demonstrate your understanding of the problem. Noone is questioning that you wanted to help. What you did is not vandalism; you edited with a genuine intention of improving the encyclopedia. I'm relatively certain that everyone is recognizing this. The promise to "follow the Wikipedia rules" (which "rules" are you talking about, even? Do you have specific policies or guidelines in mind?) seems to have been quickly made without an actual understanding of the problem. And while your intent to provide "correct information" is somehow commendable, Wikipedia is built on verifiability, not "correctness". Because everyone thinks they're correct, and many are wrong, the mere intention to provide "correct information" isn't worth an unblock by itself. You'll need to provide actual arguments: What led to the block, how can we be certain that it won't happen again, and which helpful edits are currently prevented by the block? Perhaps you could provide an example or two of a well-sourced contribution that you would like to make (where, what exactly?). This makes the decision to unblock much, much easier.

You're welcome to edit your unblock request, perhaps replacing its entire current text, to address these concerns. I recommend doing so, but someone else will review it. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:41, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important information

Hi Annamargarita0, you seem to have disruptively ignored community concerns voiced here on your talk page, for years. Any unblock request needs to address this issue.

Additionally, please note:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #61559

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:40, 5 August 2022 (UTC) Can you check my unblock request please & see if you agree with it? --Annamargarita0 (talk) 12:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Adavid299 & Strictly

Premiere is actually 24th September 2022 & finale date 17 December 2022 so fix it please? Annamargarita0 (talk) 13:18, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned about this in the past. I'm now revoking talk page access so you stop using your talk page to try to induce others to help you evade your block. --Yamla (talk) 13:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.