User talk:Allypap81

Welcome

Hello Allypap81, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Naming conventions

Manual of Style

As a contributor to Formula One articles, you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Formula One.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up!

-- DH85868993 (talk) 03:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Championship standings tables

Hi Allypap81. Thanks for the good work you have done adding Championship points tables to those F1 race report articles. A couple of minor points to note:

• Jean Behra was French, not Italian, and
• "Peter Collins" should be linked to Peter Collins (racing driver), like this: [[Peter Collins (racing driver)|Peter Collins]]

But apart from that, keep up the great work! DH85868993 (talk) 03:31, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to say well done, great work :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:34, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Championship position change

Hi Allypap81. As you go through and add the "Championship position change" columns to the F1 race reports, can you please also check that the championship table section headings are correct? I'm pretty sure that the heading for all the race reports from 1950-57 is "Drivers' Championship standings after the race" and all the ones from 1958 onwards say "Standings after the race" but there might still be the odd one that says "Standings after the Grand Prix". Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 01:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Personally, my preference would be for the post-1957 races to say "Championship standings after the race" instead of just "Standings after the race" - what do you think? If you agree, I might raise the topic at WP:F1 to see if there's consensus to make the change. DH85868993 (talk) 01:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right, OK, I'll keep my eye out for them. I agree with you on that change, it does make it a bit clearer I think. Allypap81 (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've just done a search for "standings after the Grand Prix", using quotation marks, and it found no results. Just to check I searched for "standings after the race", which turned up the expected 800-odd results, so I suspect there aren't any including the words "Grand Prix" any more. I'll keep my eye out though Allypap81 (talk) 14:33, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion at WP:F1 about the preferred section heading. I've also started another discussion about the best way to indicate "no position change" in the tables. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 02:04, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about centring the "Pos" column, so the Pos value isn't hard up against the flagicon in the Driver column? If you think it's a good idea, I don't mind updating the articles you have already updated with the icons. DH85868993 (talk) 02:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It would probably be a slight improvement. I'm now on 1958 Indianapolis 500 so from then on I'll do this. Also while I'm doing this I'm adding infoboxes to articles that don't have them, as some of the articles looked very bare with just a sentence in the header and then the classification table Allypap81 (talk) 11:18, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Thanks! DH85868993 (talk) 11:41, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that in the last few articles you have updated you have left the points columns right-aligned. Was that deliberate? DH85868993 (talk) 13:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, basically before I was left-aligning that column when I copy-pasted the new column data in to make it slighly quicker to do, but now because the column is first rather than last I've not been doing it. I shall do that on all subsequent ones, and as far as I know it's only 1959 that this applies to so far, so I'll change those too. Allypap81 (talk) 13:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all the great work you're doing adding the position change columns and infoboxes to the F1 race reports. When you add an infobox, if you could also remove the pole position and fastest lap details from the Notes section, that would be great. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 02:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cooper Grand Prix results

First of all well done on filling out (and continuing to add in more) the privately entered Cooper Cars Grand Prix results. It's a rather hard job reading other tables and making sure the right result gets attributed to the right driver, team, car etc, and all the while trying to work with the befuddling Wiki tables. I did it last year for privateer Ferrari results and have worked on many other tables, so I know how much effort actually goes into it!

Now secondly, and why I really came here, do you think it may be right to move the results to a Cooper Grand Prix results? The page is becoming increasingly large now and the tables have gone past the stage at which they are normally broken out onto a separate page. See for example any of the existing pages. Any thoughts? Thanks QueenCake (talk) 20:12, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd certainly say it would be a good idea, it's bigger than some of those on that list. How do we go about it though? It's probably best to get a consensus on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Formula One I guess. I'll post it there. Allypap81 (talk) 21:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012–13 Belgian Cup

Thanks for creating it! Lots of work there I assume! :) --Pelotas^talk^|^contribs 19:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 A-Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A-Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1951 British Grand Prix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page André Simon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2012 Bhutan national football team results

The article 2012 Bhutan national football team results has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page duplicates entirely content here. As the team only appear to have played one match in the year, it does not seem appropriate that an individual page is dedicated to the season.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 09:01, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for 2012 Bangladesh national football team results

An article that you have been involved in editing—2012 Bangladesh national football team results —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 17:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Allypap81. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Allypap81. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Allypap81. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]