After reorganizing the list page earlier today, I decided to go through the whole play-by-mail games category (well, not the video games) and sort everything there into categories. I skipped everything that you started or already edited in any significant way. This way, if you want to think about what else you can work in, maybe this is a bit easier than just staring at a few dozen articles in a category? :)
Special
First of all, there is Nuclear War (play-by-mail game) which I started as a redirect in a similar way to the Illuminati PBM, in the thought that maybe one day an article can be created from that.
Galaxy II was an article that went to AFD and got redirected to the list (last good version of article:[1]) but I will say that one of my favorite things to achieve on Wikipedia is to get an article previously deleted for notability reasons to be restored once sources are found.
Battle of the Gods (play-by-mail game) was actually deleted at AFD as mentioned above, but the same principle applies here. You will not be able to see the deleted edits, but this game by Integral Games did have a Dragon review, so if more sources are ever located then it can be undeleted.
Duel2 (aka DuelMasters) was an article redirected to the publisher until I found one review and restored it. Could still use more work though, but one review is better than zero.
Very helpful @BOZ, thanks. I apparently have picked up the PBM bug and will keep after this for a few more months at least. I suspect I'll be able to get about 3-5 more articles in—while improving some of the ones I've started or modified—before real life picks back up and I'll have to pause for a while. Really appreciate your efforts and thoughts above though. Helpful in identifying which areas to focus on with limited time and resources! --Airborne84 (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BOZ, if agreeable, please just strikethrough articles when you're happy they're safe from an AfD or other. Will help me see what I've worked on as well as navigate to it later if needed, since for many I probably won't contribute sufficiently to feel like it's enough to list on my user page. And I'd hate to lose the well organized outline you've created here. :) Thanks! --Airborne84 (talk) 16:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, fair enough! I restored anything else that I removed previously, with a strikethrough on those as well. :) BOZ (talk) 18:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
&BOZ found one! :) There's probably one or two more floating around out there in Gaming Universal and/or Flagship, but my collection is incomplete. It's hard to get copies of a lot of those nowadays. Airborne84 (talk) 02:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BOZ, didn't come up with much on this one. It's listed in Paper Mayhem #15 (Nov/Dev 1985) in the PBM game listing (trivial mention), and two issues later in #17 in a section under Gemini Games with four paragraphs of "in-game" material which isn't suitable for a Wikipedia article. My next issue is #22, so it's possible there is more on this game in the other "between" issues I don't have. I also have an Aug/Sep 1987 Gaming Universal, with no mention of it, but no adjacent issues. Those are hard to find. I have most of the White Wolf Magazine issues, but they didn't run that many PBM articles other than their annual PBM issues (usually one article per issue) and I just recently ran through them and don't recall Infinite Conflict coming up. At this point, I don't know if this PBM game is notable enough and the sources exist but I just don't have them, or it was just an extremely short-lived game and it is one of the few that are just destined to fall below the threshold of notability for Wikipedia. Airborne84 (talk) 03:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BOZ, not that one either. I have a listing in a 1986 issue of Paper Mayhem of the PBM games they were tracking. Not a rating list—just a list of existing games. It's not listed. (Nor is Trajan's Treacherous Trap) I have a few 1984 Paper Mayhem's as well, but Talwaithe isn't anywhere in them that I could see. Airborne84 (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, I know you are busy at the moment, but if you find any time to add anything from Paper Mayhem to Crasimoff's World which I started today, that would be great. :) BOZ (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi BOZ. I don't recall seeing Realms of Sword and Thunder in Paper Mayhem. Might still be in there somewhere. I'll rummage through sometime later this week. My ability to do so will drop off next week for a while. I missed your note on Crasimoff's World. Will check that as well. Focused on Hyborian War's nomination right now as it's stalled, unfortunately. Airborne84 (talk) 18:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, and I hope all goes well with that. Another user found an article in Dragon that covered this game and several others briefly, and a few in more detail, so I added to the reception section of all which already had articles. :) BOZ (talk) 12:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nice find @BOZ! I think I can put that one to good use now. Side note: I found an advertisement in Flagship #4 for Crasimoff's World where the company (Adventures by Mail) noted that the editors of GAMES magazine chose one of their other games, BSE, as a top 100 game. Will have to look into GAMES magazine. Airborne84 (talk) 23:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! :) I'm still going through White Wolf periodically when taking a break from going through White Dwarf, and I am at issue #21 today. I don't have anything to request from you this time, but I figured I would share a couple of things with you. First of all, RPGnet does not always list the games by name (since they are not RPGs after all) but the review column for PBMs in this issue covered "a half-dozen": https://index.rpg.net/display-entry.phtml?articleid=33512 Also interesting, in the capsule reviews section the issue covers a publication called "The 1990-91 Who's Who Among Play-by-Mail Gamers": https://index.rpg.net/display-entry.phtml?articleid=33514 Now, I did not think it made much sense for me to start an article about that topic, but I figured maybe you could make use of it in the main PBM article or someplace? BOZ (talk) 17:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @BOZ. Unfortunately, I don't have White Wolf No. 21. Too bad. Will rummage around and see if there's one for sale in the next couple of weeks. Airborne84 (talk) 20:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Someone helped me find another good magazine source for games, Games International (which later became a video games magazine). They did run a PBM column for a while, see for example issue 1, issue 2, and issue 6. I am still going though the 16 issues that I have access to (that may be all there ever was) so I will let you know if I spot more in the second half of the run. :) BOZ (talk) 21:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if you have an idea on how to access it, or if it would even be worth looking at, but the French magazine Casus Belli did a review of a PBM called "En Garde!": [5]BOZ (talk) 05:23, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Imagine magazine did a profile on four PBM games over a span of I think three issues; I looked at the first of these issues today and added commentary to three articles and started a new one for Warboid World. :) BOZ (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to update you to say, that it looks like White Wolf magazine decreased its coverage of PBM games before it got to issue #30, so the ones that I noted having started here from August through October may be the only new PBM articles I start from this magazine. :) Regardless, these are here and you can build any of them up as you please when you get the time to work on PBM articles again! BOZ (talk) 23:16, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paper Mayhem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 01:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good deal, thanks. :) There are a ton of games reviews in White Wolf, but if you don't mind, could I trouble you do see what you can do about Monster Mythology which was reviewed in the same issue, and Black Flames which was reviewed a few issues later? BOZ (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sure BOZ, I can add the reviews from White Wolf 35 and 38. Will do it this week. Real life is re-emerging and I'll be around less and less, but no problem on this. I've got White Wolf #10 as well. Nothing spectacular in there as I recall. Possibly useful to add for WP:GNG for an article or two. Airborne84 (talk) 04:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent, whatever you can do here and there is great. :) I am still thrilled with how much good work you were able to do in a short amount of time. BOZ (talk) 15:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well done as always. I have one more thing for now, if you can find the time. I was going through the index of White Wolf at RPG.net to add a note about the review to existing articles and create new ones when there is no article. In most cases when creating a new one, I can find additional reviews to help make sure it meets the GNG. In the minority of cases where I don't find another review, I was wondering if you would be willing to add the White Wolf review to the articles? Right now, I am just talking about three articles for BattleTech from White Wolf #7: Tales of the Black Widow Company, BattleTech: Map Set 1, and Decision at Thunder Rift. I will probably add more later, but those are all I have right now. BOZ (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry BOZ, I have most of the White Wolf Magazines, but I don't have issue #7. For some reason, it's not available digitally, and I never got a hard copy. Airborne84 (talk) 04:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I actually don't have White Wolf #18. One of the few I don't have. But I had a rather strange article from a Paper Mayhem on Domination. It was written in a strange manner and would be hard to paraphrase from to detail gameplay (so I won't), but it helps for WP:GNG, I suppose.
I'll be slowing down on Wikipedia. Probably will pick one day of the week and edit. Feel free to list projects you're working on like you've been doing and I'll tinker with them as I get time. Airborne84 (talk) 01:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for tackling those - a user added PRODs and some AFDs to over 70 articles (more than a few of which did already clearly meet the GNG, while others like these just needed their sources added) so I appreciate the part you were able to do here. :) Even if some of them have to get merged later, at least now there is a source worth preserving and hopefully more sources will be found in time. BOZ (talk) 04:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was going through an index I had made of D&D books with White Wolf reviews, and I found that Ship of Horror and The Complete Book of Gnomes & Halflings had been previously redirected, so I went ahead and restored them and moved them to draft space; when you get a chance, would you please be able to add something from the review to each of those? Much appreciated, anything you can do for them. :) BOZ (talk) 22:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @BOZ. I added the Monopoly PBM info at the Monopoly article here a while back. I'll try to chip away at the other things over the next month or two, but it'll be a bit. Work has been picking back up. Happy editing! Airborne84 (talk) 05:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BOZ, I'll pass on this one. I don't have the module to read it, but from the tone of the review I think I'm not the person to address this one. Airborne84 (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That was it for those many bare skeletal articles with no real content... I've got some D&D articles that do have at least have some content but are in need of at least one independent review, so that's a bit less work if you don't mind continuing? If so, for starters a few of the articles that have no independent reviews in the reception section are Greyhawk Adventures (issue #13), The Complete Priest's Handbook and The Complete Wizard's Handbook (issue #23), and Greyhawk Ruins (issue #24). BOZ (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome work, and thank you for finishing these. :) That takes care of the D&D articles with the greatest need to get sources on them. BOZ (talk) 02:52, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, if you are willing to stick with me a bit longer, there is one more set of D&D articles needing White Wolf reviews, and this should be the smallest set yet. This set all has at least one independent review on the article already, but I figure we could always use one more. :) First of all, going through the rest of my list, the Second Edition Player's Handbook had a review in White Wolf #17, while The Complete Fighter's Handbook, The Complete Thief's Handbook, and the original Ravenloft Campaign Setting were all reviewed in White Wolf #23. BOZ (talk) 02:52, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, awesome, awesome, you've done amazing to get through nearly all of the D&D reviews from White Wolf. :) I know you had objections to doing the review for Slave Lords, and let me know if you ever get access to issues # 34 or 45, which are noted above, but that is finally it for D&D. :) BOZ (talk) 03:41, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @BOZ, but I'm going to take a break from Wikipedia for a while. A bit frustrated by some recent events here and I have a busy schedule in the months ahead anyway. Happy editing. Airborne84 (talk) 23:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so if you are still willing to hang with me on White Wolf, I was hoping we could go back and look at more reviews? So far, I went through all the D&D product reviews from the entire run of the magazine with you, as well as reviews for articles that I started up through issue #25. If you don't mind, I would like to go back and continue with the first 25 issues, focusing on the reviews that I skipped initially, one issue at a time. So for starters, Skyrealms of Jorune had a review on issue #3 page 3 per RPGnet, so would you mind adding that one if you have that issue? If not, you have given an awesomely amazing amount of help on these over the last few years and I appreciate that for what it is. :) BOZ (talk) 14:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you as always. :) Just so you know, it looks like every issue from here out does contain reviews, so let me know if you are missing any from your collection and I will skip those. I have access to a handful of later issues in the 40s and 50s I think. A few issues are completely done already, so I will skip those as well as any individual reviews that have already been added. More later! BOZ (talk) 14:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears, and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 14:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, keep it rolling. :) Is there a date you can tie it to, or are you banking that the uniqueness of the topic will put it over the criteria for support on TFA? I got Planescape: Torment on TFA for its 20th anniversary, for example. :) BOZ (talk) 06:16, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No date in mind. I could be wrong, but right now there are 11 requests for August 1–31, so unless a bunch of additional requests pour in during the next two weeks, they'll probably list some reruns in August. My guess is that as long as the blurb meets the standard, and it has enough support, it'll be OK, either in August or September. I could be wrong on that, of course. We'll see how it goes! Airborne84 (talk) 22:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like they have changed things since the long-ago last time I put something on the request page - you no longer have to aim for a specific day! You get extra points if you have an anniversary you can link it to. Cool, I will check in on that from time to time. BOZ (talk) 03:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Airborne, how are you doing? Any more goodies coming down the road in terms of GANs or FACs now that you have set the precedent? More importantly how busy are you? And how generous are you feeling? Do you fancy reviewing one of my unloved GANs? Perhaps Battle of the Trebia? Although I admit that it is a biggy at a little over 5,000 words? Being serious, if time or motivation don't permit, I entirely understand. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gog the Mild, I should be able to in the next week or so. Things IRL are picking back up, so I won't be on Wikipedia much for a while, but I've been checking here and there recently. You pinged me at a good time! Airborne84 (talk) 16:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your varied editing interests. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)
Airborne84 is a long time editor, typical of the backbone of Wikipedia. A contributor of broad interests: their two Featured Articles are Hyborian War - it features Conan, 'nuff said - and Sentence spacing! They are conscientious and thorough in their article creation; which largely consists of filling gaps in a much neglected area. Their approachability, helpfulness and civility are models of best practice. They seem to be in the midst of a surge of Wiki-activity and an EotW award would be a fitting way to recognise this.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
A long time veteran editor, typical of the backbone of Wikipedia. Broad interests: two Featured Articles are Hyborian War - it features Conan and Sentence spacing! Conscientious and thorough in their article creation; filling in gaps in a much neglected area. Their approachability, helpfulness and civility are models of best Wikipedia practice. Their level of Wiki-activity is commendable.
BOZ (talk) is wishing you a MerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 05:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! :) I have been building User:BOZ/Games deletions for the last few months, which does include a small section on deleted PBM articles. Looking over those, and all the redlinks above that I posted last year about articles I wanted to eventually start, I went ahead and started draft pages for a bunch of these - you know, in case you don't already have enough to work on. ;) They will be automatically deleted in 6 months if not edited by a human, but that is no big deal because they can always be restored; work on any of these that you feel like, and they can be moved (back) into article space whenever they are ready. :)
I just want to say great work again on Lords of the Earth and the others I removed from this list. Keeping the rest in draft space for now is no problem, and who knows you may discover quality sources for some or all of them in the future and we can restore them as well. :) BOZ (talk) 22:54, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BOZ (talk) is wishing you a MerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 20:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question, are Quest: World of Kharne and Quest (game) basically the same thing? I created the first one last year and you created the second one this year. If they're not the same game then there are a lot of coincidental similarities. :) If they are the same game, then they will need to be merged. Let me know what you think. BOZ (talk) 22:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It must be @BOZ. I wonder if World of Kharne went with the US edition? I'll rummage around. I'm fine with merging. Which way would you like to do it? Airborne84 (talk) 01:51, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On the one hand, my version (World of Kharne) came first. On the other hand your version is better written and got a DYK. I'm fine either way honestly, as long as we don't lose anything. Find out about the origin of the name and then we'll make a decision on which way to go. BOZ (talk) 05:33, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They are the same @BOZ. Kharne is the setting for the game. I can't find any article or listing using "World of Kharne" other than the Origins Award website. My recommendation is to merge into Quest (game) and use the other name as one of the listed alternative names. I have some time later today or tomorrow and can do it. Airborne84 (talk) 22:45, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BOZ (talk) is wishing you a MerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 23:02, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Thank you for writing the article! Hopefully you will write more articles. Have a good day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Thanks for the article! Hopefully you will write more articles. Have a good day! But please fix the orphan issue.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Good day! Thanks for creating this article. I encouraged and hope that you will write more articles! Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
It seems like you ought to get a template which has the content of 'list of play-by-mail games' in it and paste that into the articles (at the end) instead of the edit you made (and it looks like it might be in a few laces and possibly want to be undone ?).
I think a link in the 'see also' section suggests there is something in those articles that mentions the page the 'see also' was on (or at least expands the content of the page in a way that is related to what the person looking at the article would find useful)
So a 'see also' for 'JRRTolkien' might be a suitable entry for Middle-Earth_Play-By-Mail (or the text could be blue linked if it already there) but if I follow one of the links to say hyborian war I don't see any mention of Middle-Earth_Play-By-Mail, nor anything that expands the readers knowledge of Middle-Earth_Play-By-Mail - obviously it shows another pbm game - but that's already in the 'list of play-by-mail games' and would be in the template.
Hi EdwardLane. Thanks for the note. Frankly, this is the first effort I've taken to link play-by-mail (PBM) articles together in any meaningful way. So, I'm striking out in a new area to some degree.
The thread linking the articles together is that they are all fantasy wargame PBM games. I drew from the "Fantasy Wargames" category of awards published in Flagship magazine, so it comes from a PBM magazine source; it's not a self-generated list. If you think this isn't right, please advise. But I thought it would be useful for readers to see other games in the same PBM sub-genre (the "List of" article does not break out sub-genres). I had planned to do the same for science fiction PBM games, dueling PBM games, political PBM games, and crime PBM games, since Flagship uses those bins as well. Thoughts? Airborne84 (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I added short annotations to the See also links to identify their relevance. After rummaging around in the See also section, I saw it says "Editors should provide a brief annotation when a link's relevance is not immediately apparent". If you asked the question, others might as well. Thanks! Airborne84 (talk) 21:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
With how many PBM articles there are now, it would be super helpful to have one. You can section them off between sci-fi against fantasy, or which ones are RPGs or wargames or whatever seems best. BOZ (talk) 01:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Airborne84, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
References provided do not show notability and I cannot locate any outside of those which do. For the AfD, it is clear by the comments that a WP:BEFORE was conducted so saying it was deleted because it only had a single reference is not true. It was deleted because no references were found to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Infinite Conflict and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Airborne84!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 08:40, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Infinite Conflict, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
On 19 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mobius I, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that naming every character "Bob" was common in the play-by-mail game Mobius I? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mobius I (game). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mobius I), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The article Lords of the Earth you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lords of the Earth for comments about the article, and Talk:Lords of the Earth/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 14:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of the Nuts and Bolts of Gaming magazine, 1984 with cover art by Larry Brenza.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Cover of the Nuts and Bolts of Gaming magazine, 1984 with cover art by Larry Brenza.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources seem insufficient; all but one are by the same author. Would require more SIGCOV.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tactical Assault Group (game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
On 12 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Blood Pit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the play-by-email game Blood Pit was so complex that even its programmer had trouble winning? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Blood Pit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Blood Pit), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of out-of-print magazine Paper Mayhem, Issue 31, July-August 1988.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Cover of out-of-print magazine Paper Mayhem, Issue 31, July-August 1988.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, Airborne84. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tactical Assault Group (game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SunDawn was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tactical Assault Group (game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
No improvement since last decline. Do not re-submit without improving the article
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tactical Assault Group (game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
BOZ (talk) is wishing you a MerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 00:14, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. TON was designed as an open ended game. The intent was to computerize the moderation of PBM. The plan was to then grow it to play by computer with each turn run weekly with graphics.
The article was fun to read. Glad to talk if you have interest.
John McGee. SapioMaster (talk) 16:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks John! I fixed the article which was correct in the main body but said closed-ended in the lead. Lots of room for improvement in the article. Feel free to improve it if you'd like! Airborne84 (talk) 22:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for January 13
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Westworld (game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Indian.
Orphaned non-free image File:Screenshot of Bard's Tale III gameplay in wilderness setting.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of Bard's Tale III gameplay in wilderness setting.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
On 27 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Westworld (game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the play-by-mail game Westworld was run from prison? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Westworld (game). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Westworld (game)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
BOZ (talk) is wishing you a MerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 18:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
