If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Karthik muniraman, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 19:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm Elfabet.
I wanted to thank you for your contributions to List of Earthdawn books, they were genuinely helpful and improved our encyclopedia. Keep up the great work!
Please do not just add the name of a magazine and issue number. Wikipedia is not an index. If you do not have access to the actual issue to summarize the review, do not add it at all. oknazevad (talk) 12:23, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Character's last appearances
First thing: Can you stop undo the works of that user please? When you said that it must be their death to be their final appearance, then that is the most awkward argument I've ever heard. When the story is come to an end, logically, the characters that didn't die we will see them for the last time and it's on every story. The characters didn't have to die to make their final appearances. For example, Rick Grimes in the television series, he didn't die, but it's his final appearance. Or Robinson Crusoe, he was alive at the end of the story, but it's the last time we see him.
And the second thing: I don't understand your logic, you undo the characters' last appearances and arguing that the characters must die to make it as their final appearances, although you don't even realize that for example, on Maggie Greene page, on the last appearance section, you don't even undo the last television appearance and you certainly know that when we last time saw her, she was alive. So yeah, make sure first, what do you want to argue, cause what you write back there, doesn't make any sense. Thanks. --Tobi999tomas (talk) 18:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Golden gorger has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Golden gorger was changed by 8.37.179.254(u)(t) ANN scored at 0.854077 on 2019-10-03T17:32:41+00:00
I forgot which issues, but I remember that after Norman returned, he visited Harry's grave, telling his deceased son that Liz and Normie are doing well, before telling him that this will be the only time he will visit his grave and won't be coming back.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 00:49, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel0wellby, that is not at all how WP:PROD works. If you leave the deletion notice there until November 9, the page will be deleted. If you are going to insist on keeping the page the way it is, then that is what will happen. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 18:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not actually vandalism, and if you check the edit history you haven't edited the articles. But since you want to bother me with this nonsense instead, I'll pause for now. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if this is harsh, but that's also because I have no idea what you're doing and what the purpose is. So for now I'm happy with the block. Drmies (talk) 03:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've blocked Special:Contributions/2601:249:8a00:2500::/64 for continuing to screw around with redirected articles. Since this is obviously the same person as this IP, I've blocked this IP, too. I shouldn't have to keep telling you stop screwing around with redirected articles. If more IPs start doing this, they'll be blocked, too, and your block will be extended even longer. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The film adaptation has nothing to do with how the characters are depicted in the comics, unless the writers decide to change the character to match the film version. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 22:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
May 2020
Hello, I'm Amkgp. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ares (Marvel Comics) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Amkgp✉18:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've noticed that you once again have tried to undo my edit. You triggered the bot and it was undone. You were previously warned for this behavior for the Red Skull article under 98.32.192.121, another IP that has your same initials. {Citation needed} is a template used to identify claims in articles, particularly if questionable, that need a citation to a reliable source. Thanks! Rickyar (talk) 18:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Materialscientist, I'm not sure why you think my revert was not constructive. In that context, was the original text not appropriate to say something would "mar" the surface as opposed to the more general "mark" that the other person changed it to? 8.37.179.254 (talk) 18:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
January 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Jimmy Woo, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ExcutientTalk22:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome. Yes, the more articles I scan the more it becomes a herculean task. Just glancing at Fantastic Four shows what a mess it has become. The more recent and popular entries (eg. Guardians of the Galaxy) are becoming quite fannish. I'll check to see if the Manual of Style states anything, but I suspect it is open to interpretation.
An area I'd like to start on is the Cosmics, and apply some "logical pruning". If you have any suggestions I would welcome them (it's like looking out a huge flood plain full of ruins and wondering where to start!).
Regards Asgardian (talk) 15:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Could you create an account for yourself?
You've probably seen Wikipedia:Why create an account?, but everything it says is true. I wanted to thank you for creating Draft talk:Cthulhu for President , and now see you've really done a lot for RPGs on Wikipedia. Thanks! But when your name is just a string of numbers, that's harder to associate with you. If you made an account, youd get even more gratitude, you could make a user page showing your work, basically establish a persona here. And you'd keep that when your IP address changed. If you're worried about anonymity, you can be far more anonymous behind a user name than behind an IP address - a number of online services, like https://www.ipaddress.com/ will take your IP address and tell everyone your rough geographic location, which a user name would not. It's a good thing, really. --GRuban (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's up to you, but honestly, I came here intending to ask the same thing before I saw this section. You have a good, solid history of helpful edits. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:56, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Iceman has also power of thermokinesis and thermal vision and he can do anything with ice why you erased those abillities???? Giorcat (talk) 10:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, 8.37.179.254, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are interested in editing more often, I suggest you create an account to gain additional privileges. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Well, if he is on a list in another article, that's one thing, but note that list does not cite any sources. Note also that this is the text in the Hercules article: "When Hercules tried to track down his resurrected family, he instead was captured by them. He was freed by the reformed Guardians of the Galaxy. He aided the Guardians in stopping the mad gods, but at the cost of Star Lord's life. Following the battle with Gamora's West Spiral Arm Guardians, Hercules began a relationship with Marvel Boy (Noh-Varr)." Although clearly that spells out that he was an ally of the team, it does not actually say he joined and became a member. If he actually joined and became a member, then this text needs to be edited to reflect that, and if he didn't join the team and become a member then the team should not be included in the infobox. Do you see what I mean? Plenty of characters have been brief allies of superhero teams without actually joining the team and becoming a member; what is the case here, and is the story as written in the comics clear on that? If you like, we could have a wider discussion of this issue on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Marvel characters
1. You must create an account. On the contrary your'e not someone for revert editions.
2. By the previous reason I think you're not a Marvel fan.
Hi there, I noticed that you recently attempted to remove information regarding Rhys Ifans and Thomas Haden Church's returns as the Lizard and Sandman. Please note that this is based on the sources cited and there is consensus on Talk:Spider-Man: No Way Home to include this. Thanks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I noticed you requested a screenshot be added to the article for these games. I own the game and am able to provide a screenshot, however I would like to know what exactly you are looking for for the screenshot (i.e battle gameplay, overworld gameplay, grand underground gameplay). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654516:27, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, thanks for asking! Nothing specific, whichever of those you think best shows the most important, unique, or interesting aspect of the game. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 17:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright sounds good! Also, I removed the request for the box art since the box art is the same as what's on the page right now. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654517:52, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question, have you considered creating an account? I've started seeing you more in recent changes and i often forget that you're one of the "good" ips. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654521:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Accidentally hit submit without filling out the little explanation box. You at least deserve explanation, since it was your edit that was undone.
The demi-humans were not presented as their own classes until the Moldvay/Cook versions of the d&d basic line in 1981. In the original 1974 Men and Magic book, which is the "original" version of d&d, there are only 3 classes: Fighting-Man, Magic-User, and Cleric. The demi-humans are not presented as their own classes, with tables and the like.
From the elf description: "Elves can begin as either Fighting-Men or Magic-Users and freely switch class whenever they choose, from adventure to adventure, but not during the course of a single game." (Men & Magic, page 8). HopefulHyena (talk) 14:27, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Seckends. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dungeon crawl without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Seckends (talk) 03:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not likely to be worth including on the article then, we don't need to list every little easter egg and detail from movies and TV shows. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 21:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Brett Sperry External Link Revert
I again added Brett Sperry's new website in promotion of his upcoming art show. Please refrain from reverting the page back. There are tools such as whois and wayback machine if you are interested in vetting an external link in the future. Upsetcassette (talk) 22:51, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
November 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
I'm purposefully not tagging him here because he'll purposefully ignore WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL, and other rules to attack us for no reason, but I've already requested help from User:Materialscientist and User:Drmies for help in addressing the Hulk in the room, and I do mean Hulk. I can't promise they'll be able to do anything quickly since they do have lives outside of Wikipedia, but hopefully, this nonsense will be dealt with in the near future. Blazewing16 (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there Blazewing, I'll put it this way. Thanks for fighting the good fight, that's important. Some people will fight you over and over until either you give up or they get in trouble. Don't get yourself in trouble along the way, which is all too easy to do when you're trying to do the right thing and wind up going too far. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 15:08, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the advice. Honestly, as much as I like cleaning up IOM sections, I wouldn't fight back against being blocked myself if only so I can spend more time focusing on my non-Wikipedia life. Speaking of blocking, I'm happy to report that you know who has been blocked for two weeks as of today after starting a fight with a separate editor and that's all I'm going to say publicly on the matter. Blazewing16 (talk) 16:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, geez, wow. If he keeps that up, he's only going to make it worse and worse for himself. I'd prefer to see editors rehabilitated than getting themselves on a long-term block. But, in the end, you can't stop someone from doing things to themselves. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 22:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can we just part ways? I'm tired of fighting you over nonsense like one sentence. And stop saying i ATTACKED you which i did not. Hey buddy, there are tons of other pages which have the exactly same thing i'm fighting you over, and i dont see you rushing over like a cop to police them on their problems. JosephWC (talk) 04:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this IP address or network has been used to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse. If you are not the intended target of this block, please read the information below in order to receive assistance.
Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must blockIP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block.
IP users (without an account): If you do not have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. To request an account, simply click here and follow the directions provided on the page. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. When filling out the account request form, please refer to this block in the "comments" input field. If you've been instructed to request an account via email, please refer to this block in your message.
Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in, you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.
For the record, I wish to state that I believe I did not do anything wrong, or at least that I have done nothing so wrong as to deserve a highly punitive 3-year block to my IP. I feel that I have had my privileges to edit as an anonymous user eliminated as a matter of convenience. I will not fight it or continue to protest it though, as I do not expect to find any sympathetic ears, and so I merely wish to make this my final statement on the matter. I will find other ways to contribute, although I may fight vandalism less, and help less with minor mistakes and errors. Thank you to everyone here fighting the good fight. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 14:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
