User talk:220.255.180.65

March 2024

Hello, I'm Picard's Facepalm. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Boeing C-17 Globemaster III, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Picard's Facepalm • ^Made It So _Engage! • 14:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Picard's Facepalm Please search about the miniature replica of the C-17. This is proof that I have provided the reliable source. Thanks~ 220.255.180.65 (talk) 03:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yet you have failed to cite any of your reliable sources in the article. See WP:RS. --Picard's Facepalm • ^Made It So _Engage! • 16:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Picard's Facepalm I beg your pardon, but yet, Fnlayson has deleted the accurate information, insisting that it is not true despite having a citation. 220.255.180.65 (talk) 00:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Picard's Facepalm And now I have decided to give it another try. 220.255.180.65 (talk) 14:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Boeing C-17 Globemaster III, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Picard's Facepalm • ^Made It So _Engage! • 13:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

220.255.180.65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was not vandalizing the pages. I am doing what I am supposed to do and trying not to lose my job. I was asked to do this. 220.255.180.65 (talk) 01:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for vandalism, you are blocked for block evasion. Please request unblock on your account's talk page. --jpgordon^𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As an aside - your job is not to edit WP articles. If it is, and/or if someone is asking/telling you to make edits to articles - then that is a conflict of interest. See WP:COI. --Picard's Facepalm • ^Made It So _Engage! • 16:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown previous block

I do not know why I was blocked twice. I only remember the time I had evaded the block because it was not correct. 220.255.180.65 (talk) 04:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This IP has not been blocked twice. You can see this in the talk page history for this IP. If you were blocked twice in total and one of them was for block evasion (which this IP was) - then you would need to look at the talk page for the account or IP that was originally blocked and read the reason there. If I recall correctly - it was for not citing your sources multiple times and/or creating pages without sources.--Picard's Facepalm • ^Made It So _Engage! • 14:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abusive Wikipedian Administrators

I am writing this because some administrators, such as Bbb23, turned out to be abusive to me, such as blocking me from evading a block when I did not even. Please stop. I hope you look through this matter and take necessary action, and I look forward to your reply. Thank you. 220.255.180.65 • ^Wikipedia Wonder _{What shall I do?} ^Feel free. •(talk) 13:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the correct venue to raise your concern. This is the talk page for the IP user(s) - and has almost zero active visibility other than by those who have recently contributed to it and/or have it on their watchlist. The proper venue would be over at WP:ANI.

That being said - I saw the actions taken against this IP and the registered account User talk:AirbusA350500 after also witnessing the edits conducted by both, and it was quite apparent that while User:AirbusA350500 is indefinitely blocked - the same user has tried to make the same edits and page creations from this anonymous IP. That is literally the textbook example of block evasion. Admins have the ability to cross reference IPs used by registered accounts - and note if those same IPs or IP ranges are then used anonymously or with other registered accounts to conduct further edits. As such - Bbb23 is right on the money there, and well within their admin rights to issue a block to this or any other IP or registered account that tries to circumvent the block like you did.

If you wish to appeal the indefinite block for the registered account - please see the bottom of the talk page for that account above, and follow the instructions on it. Please note the appeal needs to come from the registered account itself - not an anonIP - so you will need to login to that account in order to appeal. All that being said - you face an uphill challenge there - in light of what has transpired since that indefinite block for your registered account. The burden will be on you to convince the admins that you understand what you did wrong, why you were blocked and that you will not continue to try to circumvent administrative actions in the future. Being truthful & accurate in the representation of what has transpired & what you have done will go a long way there - perhaps. --Picard's Facepalm • ^Made It So _Engage! • 14:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Picard's Facepalm: Please disengage from any further discussion with the IP. I don't think it's productive or helpful. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 And you, what is the reason you deleted my message to you on my colleague’s talk page? 220.255.180.65 • ^Wikipedia Wonder _{What shall I do?} ^Feel free. • 220.255.180.65 (talk) 04:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@220.255.180.65Hello, and this is a message notifying you that your colleague (AirbusA350500) has accidentally pulled a block evasion and is being dealt with. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sure, I will discuss with them later 220.255.180.65 (talk) 02:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? 220.255.180.65 • ^Wikipedia Wonder _{What shall I do?} ^Feel free. • 220.255.180.65 220.255.180.65 (talk) 11:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I will appeal the block for my colleague only, because I am going to get unblocked soon. AirbusA350500 is actually my colleague and we share the same IP address. 220.255.180.65 • ^Wikipedia Wonder _{What shall I do?} ^Feel free. •

April 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Bbb23 (talk) 03:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yokohama Minatomirai Railway Y000 series (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yokohama Minatomirai Railway Y000 series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 220.255.180.65! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Keikyu N1000 series. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not add tags requesting citations immediately after the ref tag which provides the requested citation. This is disruptive in nature and gives the appearance that you are simply being disruptive. --Picard's Facepalm • ^Made It So _Engage! • 16:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

From the edits, this seems to be the same blocked user that you've repeatedly temporarily blocked, Bbb23, for block evasion as part of the whole AirbusA350500/JacobChoi sockpuppetry kerfuffle, back for another go-around. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 18:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah pretty sure they are trying to make a WP:POINT by now tagging stuff with CNs (nevermind unnecessarily) as a result of their being repeatedly noticed & warned for lacking cites. --Picard's Facepalm • ^Made It So _Engage! • 18:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 02:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

220.255.180.65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand your insistence that I were here to be disruptive to Wikipedia. That is not true. I do not understand how you wanted to suddenly block me for asking for citations, literally after you did not provide a reliable source. And on the other hand, no one will tolerate such behavior done by an administrator like you. If you would like to know how I started with this wind-from-the-landscape, you can look at your life and think about the mistakes and problems you came up with, and I am as known as Jacob, not “JacobChoi” like you insisted. I do not tolerate such behavior from a Wikipedian administrator, who suddenly tries to argue with someone else - I am not mentioning anyone else here. You cannot just do something to someone’s colleague and say that they did something that they did not actually do. As an administrator, you should be resilient. I do not want my CEO to fire me. If you try something like this, you may be in big trouble and suddenly get blocked indefinitely with your adminship removed. If you would also like to know how much pressure you put on me to torture me, please step into my shoe and know what you have done wrong. 220.255.180.65 (talk) 03:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What a truly bizarre and rambling attempt at an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.