Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Mill pond. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Frost04:41, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mill pond. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automaticallyreverted.
If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mill pond was changed by 199.192.122.199(u)(t) ANN scored at 0.96482 on 2024-12-02T21:48:58+00:00
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Elephant (1989 film), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CR (talk) 21:54, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Snatch theft. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Avoid editoiralising in articles - for relevant policy see MOS:NOTETHATCR (talk) 22:06, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chicago and North Western E-4 Class have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
Hello. The reason I reverted your edit is that it was non-constructive. I gave you only one warning because you were performing unconstructive edits after getting off a block. Thanks, Ghent123 (talk) 00:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While the first part of the caption was fine, you didn't need to put that you hope it isn't vandalism in parenthesis in the caption. Ghent123 (talk) 00:23, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And now ClueBotNG is bashing me for adding stuff to a banana sprite challenge thingy on the list of internet challenges page. I AIN’T VANDALIZING ANYTHING!!!!!! 199.192.122.199 (talk) 03:27, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Internet challenges have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
If you want to re-add that information, go ahead, but I would advise that you provide a source, preferably a reliable one, to back up the information. I think I see that you clearly have good intentions for Wikipedia. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 19:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
@199.192.122.199 Seeing as your block is, at the time of this message being sent, nearly over, if you intend to edit Wikipedia again, I strongly advise you read up on some of Wikipedia's policies first, especially the manual of style and the guide of edit summaries.
I can’t go one day without the entirety of Wikipedia coming after me just for adding something. There are users doing far worse out there and yet I get in trouble just for adding something to a caption about Reading 2102 dressing up as a D&H K-62!!! 199.192.122.199 (talk) 03:23, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
January 2025
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Electrical injury. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Coming back from your block and immediately returning to nonconstructive edits on the same article is a really bad idea.Meters (talk) 21:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Stop adding commentaries to articles or image descriptions. Don't come back from your second block and immediately pick up where you left off. Don't add comments about other users to articles. Don't troll us by stating on your talk page that you will stop doing something, and then immediately do it again. Meters (talk) 01:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have recently been banned from editing Wikipedia for a month because I kept on “vandalizing” a page. The page in question is about electric shock. I kept editing a caption under an image of an electric chair, first saying it was extremely common. Next thing I know, Jpgordon deleted it! I bashed him and BOOM! Queen of Hearts (I think that’s their username) kicked me off of editing for a month. This comment is not to bash anyone, but come on! LET ME EDIT!!! 199.192.122.199 (talk) 03:29, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Have you read Wikipedia's manual of style? I advise that you please read that before doing more editing. I also advise that you maybe stay away from adding image captions for now. If you wanna experiment, use the sandbox. I'm on your side and I see that you have good intentions but people who edit Wikipedia need to follow the editing guidelines and such. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 21:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As I said when I restored the image: "OK with the original caption". You then restored your incorrect caption. The sketch is clearly not of anyone doing a superman. The rider is just leaning forward while still seated. He is not lying on the seat with his legs out behind him. I removed your caption again. Meters (talk) 07:16, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to help you get acquainted with Wikipedia's policies so you don't get accused of vandalism and I can't help you if I don't know the answer to the question. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please do. Getting familiar with the MOS reduces the risk of you making an edit that doesn't conform to Wikipedia's guidelines, or in other words, reduces the risk of you being further accused of vandalism. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 18:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I vandalized the caption under the photo, and I was giving a link to said photo. The image is of Sing Sing’s electric chair looking at the front. The image used to be in color but is now in black and white. 199.192.122.199 (talk) 18:25, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
