User talk:13ab37Welcome!
Please join WikiProject Women artists!
SarahStierch (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC) Some baklava for you!
A kitten for you!More kittens! Gretchenmcc (talk) 17:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
The article Ruth Phillips has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 20:15, 7 March 2015 (UTC) A kitten for you!Sending you lots of WikiLove. Thanks for today! It was great meeting you :) Thekidpossum (talk) 01:23, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
at the EV buildingI'll see you there on Saturday. Clandestine Secondary Account (talk) 20:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC) This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Let Down Reflex, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://nyevents.us/new-york-the-let-down-reflex/271199. It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues. If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of The Let Down Reflex
A tag has been placed on The Let Down Reflex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://nyevents.us/new-york-the-let-down-reflex/271199. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 20:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for responding. If you look at the article, you will see that the entire thing is not a quote, but rather there are two very short quotes. There is duplicate text because both pages list all of the artists in the show, but that is not plagiarism as there is no other way to list them. Please advise how to move forward. Thanks. 13ab37 ( talk ) 8:55, 5 March 2016 (EST) AfC notification: Draft:Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen has a new comment
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen (March 6) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen (March 12) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
The comment they left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen (April 2) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
The comment they left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen (November 17) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Event pageHello, thanks for creating this page! I hope this event goes well. Just a recommendation - when you create an event like this, it's best to add categories for the event so it can be tracked (I've done this), and add it to the calendar and template. This allows people to find and track it, and also will likely increase the likelihood of remote support from experienced contributors who can correct mistakes on pages created and give feedback to new contributors. Hope this is helpful to you, let me know if any thoughts or questions. Blythwood (talk) 00:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC) Account creator grantedAfter reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:
If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal talk 03:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Julie Tremble
A tag has been placed on Julie Tremble requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zazzysa (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2017 (UTC) Nomination of Julie Tremble for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julie Tremble is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Tremble until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zazzysa (talk) 11:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Ipigott, I appreciate it! --13ab37 (talk) 19:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC) Ways to improve Elise GravelHi, I'm Mduvekot. 13ab37, thanks for creating Elise Gravel! I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please review WP:EL and trim the list of External links. The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mduvekot (talk) 21:22, 12 March 2017 (UTC) DiscussionHello! Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen has finally been published, after this discussion. If you're creating articles on women artists, the WIR talk page is an excellent place for supportive discussions, as evidenced by that link. 104.163.144.60 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Ser Amantio di Nicolao, I appreciate it! --13ab37 (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Women in RedHi there, 13ab37. It's great to see you've become a member of Women in Red, especially as you are intimately involved in Art+Feminism. It's good to have your user name right at the top of our list of members. If you are helping to arrange the Canadian editathons this month, you might be interested in our Ten Simple Rules for Creating Women's Biographies. I also look forward to your creating more women's biographies yourself. Let me know if ever you need any help or experience any problems. You are of course always welcome to contribute to the WiR talk page. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:11, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red
--Ipigott (talk) 08:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Women in Focus Society (March 18) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Discretionary sanctions notificationThis message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.TonyBallioni (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, TonyBallioni I appreciate your feedback. There is not just the one CBC article. Please see: https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/transcona-bred-prof-under-investigation-475620603.html http://theconcordian.com/2018/03/complaints-filed-two-creative-writing-professors/ http://theconcordian.com/2018/03/complaints-filed-two-creative-writing-professors/ Moreover, I believe that it is our role to challenge guidelines and policies, on and off of Wikipedia, which uphold the patriarchy and which make permissible the type of silencing of voices that has allowed perpetrators of sexual violence to continue unimpeded for so long. --13ab37 (talk) 19:10, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
How is a public intellectual a private individual, especially when considering that the allegations were made by his students? I understand the BLP policy and who it wants to protect and I urge you to understand how that same policy upholds implicit and explicit bias on this site and in society. --13ab37 (talk) 20:27, 22 March 2018 (UTC) April 2018 at Women in Red
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyHello! Sorry for writing in English. The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list. Thank you! --WMF Surveys (talk) 01:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC) Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia surveyEvery response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 26% of Wikimramedia contributors who Wikimedia programs like the Education program, editathons, or image contests. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now. If you are not fluent in English, I apologize again for posting in English. If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone.If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thank you! —WMF Surveys (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC) Reminder: Wikimedia survey (corrected link)Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 26% of Wikimramedia contributors who Wikimedia programs like the Education program, editathons, or image contests. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed.Take the survey now. If you are not fluent in English, I apologize for posting in English. If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! —WMF Surveys (talk) 17:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC) Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyHello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now. If you are not a native speaker of English, I apologize for writing in English. If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thank you!! --WMF Surveys (talk) 05:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC) May 2018 at Women in Red
Your submission at Articles for creation: Women in Focus Society has been accepted Women in Focus Society, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Legacypac (talk) 10:50, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Women in Red June Editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging July 2018 at Women in Red
August 2018 at Women in Red
The article Siân Evans (librarian) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing September 2018 at Women in Red
October 2018 at Women in Red
Results from global Wikimedia survey 2018 are publishedHello! A few months ago the Wikimedia Foundation invited you to take a survey about your experiences on Wikipedia. You signed up to receive the results. The report is now published on Meta-Wiki! We asked contributors 170 questions across many different topics like diversity, harassment, paid editing, Wikimedia events and many others. Read the report or watch the presentation, which is available only in English.
Add your thoughts and comments to the report talk page.
Feel free to share the report on Wikipedia/Wikimedia or on your favorite social media. Thanks! 19:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC) Get ready for November with Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging December 2018 at Women in Red
January 2019 at Women in Red
February 2019 at Women in Red
This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. This is a reminder to acknowledge and sign the new Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. As you know, your volunteer role in Wikimedia projects gives you access to secure and sensitive information. The new version includes one major change.
There are also some wording changes that were made to more closely align the language with evolving industry norms, best practices and laws. The most notable of these has been the change of the term "nonpublic information" to "nonpublic personal data". None of these changes are intended to make fundamental changes to the scope or practice of the policy but we know they could appear as such, hence wanted to flag them. The aforementioned changes require users that have already signed the previous version of the policy to sign the new version as well. We therefore ask that you to sign the updated version. Signing the agreement is tracked on Phabricator's Legalpad. An online guide is available to help you with signing the agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign. If you wish you can sign it directly at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/L37. The exact policy is located here: Access to nonpublic personal data policy. The text of the confidentiality agreement is located here: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information If you have already received this message and signed the updated agreement, you need not sign it again. Once is sufficient. In this case, we ask that you respond to Samuel (WMF) letting him know when (date) and how (method/process of signing) you have signed it so that we can update our own records. Note: please bear in mind that if you still haven’t signed the updated version of the Confidentiality Agreement by February 13, 2019 your rights will be removed. Thank you for your understanding, Samuel Guebo (User:Samuel (WMF)), Wikimedia Foundation Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 17:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)' March 2019 at Women in Red
April 2019 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging June events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging August 2019 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging September 2019 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging Wikimedia and the Global Education Goals
November 2019 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging WikiProject Women Notice
Please Add the New User Box and send the Invite to your Friends to Contribute to Wikipedia:WikiProject Women. Regards. Stalin Sunny Talk2Me 09:05, 8 December 2019 (UTC) January 2020 at Women in Red
Recent account creationsHi 13ab37, I notice that you've created a lot of new accounts today. I've also noticed that for two of them, you entered an email address in the "reason" field, which is publicly logged, as such I've had to suppress those log entries. I must ask you to take much more care when creating accounts. On that note, I notice that you've created all of them today by specifying a password, which means you technically have knowledge of that password and thus the accounts you've created could be classed as compromised and blocked. I assume that this is for an outreach event, and as such you should be checking the "Use a temporary random password and send it to the specified email address" box when you create the account, which emails a temporary password to the user for their first login. I believe the outreach dashboard can also handle this for you, but I'm unfamiliar with it. I get notified of every single account which is created by a user holding +accountcreator without using this checkbox, so naturally today you've popped up no fewer than 21 times with a notification I rarely see. As a final point, I don't know why you've been granted the more sensitive +accountcreator right, when you asked for +eventcoordinator. I presume your work with outreach is planned to continue, so I hope you don't mind if I switch you over to the event coordinator right? Thanks! stwalkerster (talk) 22:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC) Hi Stwalkerster - yup please switch me to Event coordinator! The accounts were created for a class context in which students were asked to create accounts at home and NONE did so. I didn't use the Outreach Dashboard, which I normally use to authorize accounts, because the work of creating an account was supposed to be done in advance and I follishly thought it would be. Thanks for checking in and sorry about the confusion! --13ab37 (talk) 21:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC) February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging Project Planning for Wikimedia Education
April 2020 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging Evaluation and Storytelling for Wikimedia Education Projects
May 2020 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging June 2020 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging July 2020 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Siân Evans (librarian) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siân Evans (librarian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siân Evans (librarian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 23:31, 14 July 2020 (UTC) August 2020 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging October editathons from Women in Red
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging Come edit with Black Lunch Table!
A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging February 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging March 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging April editathons from Women in Red
May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging Come edit with Black Lunch Table at MoMA!
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia