User talk:116.231.75.71Welcome!Talk:Radiotelephone Re "tit" definition. - LuckyLouie (talk) 02:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC) March 2018Hello, I'm Hagennos. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Sting without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HagennosTalk 03:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Sting. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Travelbird (talk) 06:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Travelbird (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018Hello, I'm Bellezzasolo. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Arthur Foss— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 13:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC) TalkbackHello, 116.231.75.71. You have new messages at Bellezzasolo's talk page.
Message added 10:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 10:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Rifleman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 12:41, 16 April 2018 (UTC) May 2018Hello, I'm Cnbrb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Darth Vader have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Cnbrb (talk) 14:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marin County, California, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Correct grammer"Glass's" should be "glass' " 109.199.156.251 (talk) 18:05, 2 February 2023 (UTC) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia