Twofish

Twofish
The Twofish algorithm
General
DesignersBruce Schneier
First published1998
Derived fromBlowfish, SAFER, Square
Related toThreefish
CertificationAES finalist
Cipher detail
Key sizes128, 192 or 256 bits
Block sizes128 bits
StructureFeistel network
Rounds16
Best public cryptanalysis
Truncated differential cryptanalysis requiring roughly 251 chosen plaintexts.[1] Impossible differential attack that breaks 6 rounds out of 16 of the 256-bit key version using 2256 steps.[2]

In cryptography, Twofish is a symmetric key block cipher with a block size of 128 bits and key sizes up to 256 bits. It was one of the five finalists of the Advanced Encryption Standard contest, but it was not selected for standardization. Twofish is related to the earlier block cipher Blowfish.

Twofish's distinctive features are the use of pre-computed key-dependent S-boxes, and a relatively complex key schedule. One half of an n-bit key is used as the actual encryption key and the other half of the n-bit key is used to modify the encryption algorithm (key-dependent S-boxes). Twofish borrows some elements from other designs; for example, the pseudo-Hadamard transform[3] (PHT) from the SAFER family of ciphers. Twofish has a Feistel structure like DES. Twofish also employs a Maximum Distance Separable matrix.

When it was introduced in 1998, Twofish was slightly slower than Rijndael (the chosen algorithm for Advanced Encryption Standard) for 128-bit keys, but somewhat faster for 256-bit keys. Since 2008, virtually all AMD and Intel processors have included hardware acceleration of the Rijndael algorithm via the AES instruction set; Rijndael implementations that use the instruction set are now orders of magnitude faster than (software) Twofish implementations.[4]

Twofish was designed by Bruce Schneier, John Kelsey, Doug Whiting, David Wagner, Chris Hall, and Niels Ferguson: the "extended Twofish team" met to perform further cryptanalysis of Twofish. Other AES contest entrants included Stefan Lucks, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Mike Stay.

The Twofish cipher has not been patented, and the reference implementation has been placed in the public domain. As a result, the Twofish algorithm is free for anyone to use without any restrictions whatsoever. It is one of a few ciphers included in the OpenPGP standard (RFC 9580). However, Twofish has seen less widespread usage than Blowfish, which has been available longer.

Performance

During the design of Twofish, performance was always an important factor. It was designed to allow for several layers of performance trade offs, depending on the importance of encryption speed, memory usage, hardware gate count, key setup and other parameters. This allows a highly flexible algorithm, which can be implemented in a variety of applications.

There are multiple space–time tradeoffs that can be made, in software as well as in hardware for Twofish. An example of such a tradeoff would be the precomputation of round subkeys or s-boxes, which can lead to speed increases of a factor of two or more. These come, however, at the cost of more RAM needed to store them.

The estimates in the table below are all based on existing 0.35 μm CMOS technology.

Hardware trade offs (128-bit key)[5]
Gate counts h blocks Clocks
per block 		Pipeline
levels 		Clock speed Throughput
(Mbit/s) 		Startup
clocks 		Comments
14000 1 64 1 40 MHz 80 4 subkeys on the fly
19000 1 32 1 40 MHz 160 40
23000 2 16 1 40 MHz 320 20
26000 2 32 2 80 MHz 640 20
28000 2 48 3 120 MHz 960 20
30000 2 64 4 150 MHz 1200 20
80000 2 16 1 80 MHz 640 300 S-box RAMs

Cryptanalysis

In 1999, Niels Ferguson published an impossible differential attack that breaks 6 rounds out of 16 of the 256-bit key version using 2256 steps.[2]

As of 2000, the best published cryptanalysis of the Twofish block cipher is a truncated differential cryptanalysis of the full 16-round version. The paper claims that the probability of truncated differentials is 2−57.3 per block and that it will take roughly 251 chosen plaintexts (32 petabytes worth of data) to find a good pair of truncated differentials.[6]

Bruce Schneier responded in a 2005 blog entry that this paper did not present a full cryptanalytic attack, but only some hypothesized differential characteristics: "But even from a theoretical perspective, Twofish isn't even remotely broken. There have been no extensions to these results since they were published in 2000."[7]

See also

References

  1. ^ Ship Moriai; Yiqun Lisa Yin (2000). "Cryptanalysis of Twofish (II)" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-01-14. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  2. ^ a b Niels Ferguson (1999-10-05). "Impossible differentials in Twofish" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-01-14. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. ^ "Team Men In Black Presents: TwoFish" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 September 2017. Retrieved 26 September 2017.
  4. ^ Bruce Schneier; Doug Whiting (2000-04-07). "A Performance Comparison of the Five AES Finalists" (PDF/PostScript). Retrieved 2013-01-14. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  5. ^ Schneier, Bruce (15 June 1998). "Twofish: A 128-Bit Block Cipher" (PDF). Counterpane: 68.
  6. ^ Shiho Moriai; Yiqun Lisa Yin (2000). "Cryptanalysis of Twofish (II)" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-01-14. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  7. ^ Schneier, Bruce (2005-11-23). "Twofish Cryptanalysis Rumors". Schneier on Security blog. Retrieved 2013-01-14.

Articles