Template talk:Crytek

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crytek template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games This template is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks view watch edit history shell vg talk alerts purge AfDs Universe of Kingdom Hearts (0 participants) Clue (information) (2 participants) HaxeFlixel (1 participant) JakeFuture27 (6 participants) Gianmarco Tocco (2 participants) Yuri Sakazaki (4 participants) B1t (1 participant) Satandisk (4 participants) Rebecca Chambers (4 participants) Gameplay of Overwatch (13 participants) Hannah Telle (4 participants; relisted) MaxPlay Classic Games Volume 1 (5 participants; relisted) Merge discussions Evil Empire (company) (discussion) Console game (discussion) Pokémon Essentials (discussion) Input lag (discussion) Minecraft – Volume Beta (discussion) Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Kim Kitsuragi (nom) Lego Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures (nom) Ethan Winters (nom) Fallout: New Vegas (nom) The Legend of Dragoon (nom) Rockstar North (nom) Good article nominations Deathloop (start) Blast Wind (nom) Project Zero 2: Wii Edition (start) Pokémon Stadium (nom) Bit Pilot (start) Tom Clancy's The Division 2 (start) Berzerk (video game) (start) Frostpunk (nom) Cry of Fear (nom) The King of Fighters '97 (nom) F1 24 (start) Façade (video game) (start) Prey (2017 video game) (start) Transfer Pak (start) Star Wars Jedi: Survivor (start) Lost Sphear (start) Pocket Monsters Stadium (start) Oatchi (start) Necromorph (start) Aperture Hand Lab (start) Luis Sera (start) DYK nominations Sun Haven Reviews and reassessments The Legend of Dragoon (rev) Appy Awards Anarchy Online (nom) Deus Ex (video game) (nom) List of major Super Smash Bros. Ultimate tournaments Dynasty Warriors 4 (nom) Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga (nom) The Operative: No One Lives Forever (nom) Articles that need... assessment (2) (0) reassessment (0) cleanup (4) infoboxes (8) cover art (264) screenshots (9,072) photos (70) translation from japan (186) creation merging

Proposed new design

I propose this design for the template. I made the changes in the past but somebody told me it must be discussed first and its true ^.^

So, i want to know if its possible to put it this way,

Thanks--Hahc21 (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About 'Haze'

I need to know why Haze is on this template when, searching a little, i don't find any conection between the game, the developers, or Crytek, as of when the game was released. I mean, as of know, Free Radical Design os now Crytek UK, but that doesn't mean whe should include every game relased by Crytek's aquisitions before aquired on this template. --Hahc21 (talk) 19:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's the same with most of the games on here, Timesplitters, Second Sight. This is a Navbox for Crytek, but also Crytek UK, which made those games. They own the studio, they own the games, they own the IP. Why wouldn't you include those items? ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 23:51, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Far Cry 2+3

Far Cry 2+3 do not belong on this template as Crytek had no involvement with their production. As it stands the template is very misleading as it implies otherwise. They need to be removed. If anyone objects to this correction feel free to provide reasoning on this talk page. --67.20.248.170 (talk) 22:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, those games were not produced by Crytek or any of its divisions, and the IP is owned by Ubisoft, so the relation is less than marginal. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 00:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About the divisions

Hi! I'm a great fan of Crytek, as I believe you already know XD I want to know why, on the division group, Frankfurt, Ukraine, Hungary and Seoul were removed? Also i think the template needs revision. I'm not convinced on adding every Free Radical Design's games pre-Crytek, it misleads information and confuses the reader. We should only leave here games developed during Crytek ownership or Crytek's own development.

I propose this:

Thanks --Hahc21 (talk) 03:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]