If each of the bonding maps is an embedding of TVSs then the LB-space is called a strict LB-space. This means that the topology induced on by is identical to the original topology on [1]
Some authors (e.g. Schaefer) define the term "LB-space" to mean "strict LB-space."
Definition
The topology on can be described by specifying that an absolutely convex subset is a neighborhood of if and only if is an absolutely convex neighborhood of in for every
If is a locally compact topological space that is countable at infinity (that is, it is equal to a countable union of compact subspaces) then the space of all continuous, complex-valued functions on with compact support is a strict LB-space.[3] For any compact subset let denote the Banach space of complex-valued functions that are supported by with the uniform norm and order the family of compact subsets of by inclusion.[3]
Final topology on the direct limit of finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces
Endow the set with the final topology induced by the family of all canonical inclusions.
With this topology, becomes a completeHausdorfflocally convexsequentialtopological vector space that is not a Fréchet–Urysohn space.
The topology is strictly finer than the subspace topology induced on by where is endowed with its usual product topology.
Endow the image with the final topology induced on it by the bijection that is, it is endowed with the Euclidean topology transferred to it from via
This topology on is equal to the subspace topology induced on it by
A subset is open (resp. closed) in if and only if for every the set is an open (resp. closed) subset of
The topology is coherent with family of subspaces
This makes into an LB-space.
Consequently, if and is a sequence in then in if and only if there exists some such that both and are contained in and in
Often, for every the canonical inclusion is used to identify with its image in explicitly, the elements and are identified together.
Under this identification, becomes a direct limit of the direct system where for every the map is the canonical inclusion defined by where there are trailing zeros.
Counter-examples
There exists a bornological LB-space whose strong bidual is not bornological.[4]
There exists an LB-space that is not quasi-complete.[4]
See also
DF-space – class of special local-convex spacePages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback
Direct limit – Special case of colimit in category theory
Final topology – Finest topology making some functions continuous
F-space – Topological vector space with a complete translation-invariant metric
Adasch, Norbert; Ernst, Bruno; Keim, Dieter (1978). Topological Vector Spaces: The Theory Without Convexity Conditions. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 639. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN978-3-540-08662-8. OCLC297140003.
Edwards, Robert E. (1995). Functional Analysis: Theory and Applications. New York: Dover Publications. ISBN978-0-486-68143-6. OCLC30593138.
Grothendieck, Alexander (1955). "Produits Tensoriels Topologiques et Espaces Nucléaires" [Topological Tensor Products and Nuclear Spaces]. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society Series (in French). 16. Providence: American Mathematical Society. ISBN978-0-8218-1216-7. MR0075539. OCLC1315788.
Horváth, John (1966). Topological Vector Spaces and Distributions. Addison-Wesley series in mathematics. Vol. 1. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. ISBN978-0201029857.
Köthe, Gottfried (1983) [1969]. Topological Vector Spaces I. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 159. Translated by Garling, D.J.H. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN978-3-642-64988-2. MR0248498. OCLC840293704.