This category is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
This page is the within the scope of WikiProject Edit requests, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's edit request process and reduce the number of edit requests in the edit request queue.Edit requestsWikipedia:WikiProject Edit requestsTemplate:WikiProject Edit requestsEdit requests
The closest thing to box art for this arcade game would probably be the cover of the flyer, but I can't tell if the US or Japan version was released first, or if they were released at exactly the same time. --tronvillain (talk) 12:56, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see an issue with using either; I'd tend towards the USA one. I personally believe arcade machines should have images of the arcade cabinet rather than promotional material. The article title doesn't fit the MOS, so I've updated it. Lee Vilenski(talk • contribs)13:01, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Seems reasonable. In some ways I think arcade articles could support two identifying images when one is a shot of a 3-dimension object, using something like:
Hi all, I'm going to update here reasons why I cannot find art for various articles. If anyone has these particular game boxes, or can find a version online, please upload/let me know, and remove from the list.
I suspect that it never came in a box and thus never had box art. It was distributed as shareware, and the documentation with the game says (about the full version of the game): "You will receive a disk with a copy of the game, which includes many additional features." I'll probably just add the title screen as the image. --tronvillain (talk) 15:54, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I confirmed with the developer that there wasn't a box, just a disk and a manual. Original research, but we probably don't need to keep looking. --tronvillain (talk) 22:28, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If anyone is in the mood to take requests for retro games, here are some games that I would like to see images for, if you feel like grabbing any to complete! :) 208.47.202.254 (talk) 20:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Is this different to the Operation Thunderbolt arcade game?
Yes, it's part of the Jaunt Trooper series which can help with searches. I've found the discs but following up a lead for the cover CrimsonFoxtalk10:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Couldn't find a cover for either the first or second games. I did add an infobox for the series. BTW, we wouldn't usually have an infobox for each individual game in a series article like this. Lee Vilenski(talk • contribs)16:14, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I found this which is a page from Adventure International (1981). The images they use tend to be close to or the actual cover art from the issues I've checked. CrimsonFoxtalk10:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
100% credit should be aimed towards Evad37, who has allowed us to make a dent in this.
I think it's important to list games that we have already attempted to find cover art for, and list reasons why this might be difficult - especially if the only image would be on the case itself. Lee Vilenski(talk • contribs)08:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've been thinking about this and thought that adding the information to the WPVG template might be a good solution. Currently it's got "cover=y" to indicate the need for a cover, to expand on this I'n thinking we add three things
cover=none to indicate no art can be found
cover=alt to indicate alternative identifying art has been used
A second option, "covernote=<short note>" which can be used to either indicate details about a search for the art or details about the alternative art
It means the information can be readily available for anyone looking at the talk page and we can have a couple of extra categories to better organise. Any opinions? CrimsonFoxtalk19:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there's nothing that states the image in the infobox has to be a cover art piece. Personally, if it can't be found, something pertinent should be placed instead. In these cases, we should remove the tag from the article. I suggest putting a message on the main WT:VG page about this suggestion. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(talk • contribs)19:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I will do, I just wanted to see if anyone here had an opinion as you've been working on this longer than I have, it's just what I've noticed over the short time doing it (I also didn't want to go in with a half baked suggestion which has an obvious problem I hadn't noticed!). I definitely agree on the fact it doesn't have to be cover art though I do believe for the sake of consistency that's what should be the first preference (as that's what seems to be the case already) and maybe MOS:VG needs to reflect or mention alternatives, order of preference and situations such as re-releases, 2nd editions etc. Thanks for the input, CrimsonFoxtalk20:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]