In The Meaning and End of Religion (1962), Smith critiqued the concept of "religion" as a systematic, identifiable entity. He argued that the term "religion" is a uniquely Western construct and not a universally valid category. Smith proposed replacing the static concept of religion with a dynamic dialectic between "cumulative tradition" (all historically observable rituals, art, music, theologies, etc.) and "personal faith".[29]
Analysis of Major Religions
Smith demonstrated that founders and followers of major religions did not see themselves as part of a defined system called religion, with Islam being a notable exception. In his chapter "The Special Case of Islam", Smith noted that the term Islam appears in the Qur'an, making it the only religion named by its own tradition. He also highlighted that the Arabic language does not have a word for religion equivalent to the European concept, detailing how din, usually translated as such, differs significantly.
Historical Evolution of the Term
Smith pointed out that terms for major world religions like Hinduism, Buddhism, and Shintoism did not exist until the 19th century. He suggested that practitioners historically did not view their practices as "religion" until cultural self-regard prompted them to see their practices as different from others. For Smith, the modern concept of religion emerged from identity politics and apologetics.
Etymological Study
Through an etymological study, Smith argued that "religion" originally denoted personal piety but evolved to mean a system of observances or beliefs, a shift institutionalized through reification. He traced this transformation from Lucretius and Cicero through Lactantius and Augustine, with the term "faith" predominating in the Middle Ages. The Renaissance revived "religio," which retained its personal practice emphasis. During the 17th-century Catholic-Protestant debates, religion began to refer to abstract systems of beliefs, a concept further reified during the Enlightenment, exemplified by G.W.F. Hegel's definition of religion as a self-subsisting transcendent idea.
Four Distinct Senses of "Religion"
Smith concluded that "religion" now has four distinct senses: personal piety, an overt system of beliefs, practices, and values as an ideal religion, an empirical phenomenon related to a particular community's historical and sociological manifestation, and a generic summation or universal category of religion in general.[30]
The Meaning and End of Religion remains Smith's most influential work. The anthropologist of religion and postcolonial scholar Talal Asad has called it a modern classic and a masterpiece.[31]
Modern Islam in India: A Social Analysis. London: Victor Gollancz. 1943. ISBN0-8364-1338-5.
The Muslim League, 1942–1945. Minerva Book Shop. 1945. p. 57.
Pakistan as an Islamic State: Preliminary Draft. Shaikh Muhammad Ashraf. 1954. p. 114.
Islam in Modern History: The Tension Between Faith and History in the Islamic World (1977 paperback ed.). Princeton University Press. 1957. ISBN0-691-01991-6.
The Meaning and End of Religion: A New Approach to the Religious Traditions of Mankind (1991 paperback ed.). Macmillan. 1962. ISBN0-8006-2475-0.
Michel Despland and Gerard Vallée, ed. (1992). "Religion in History: The Word, the Idea, the Reality". Wilfred Cantwell Smith. A Chronological Bibliography. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. pp. 243–252.
Aitken, Ellen Bradshaw; Sharma, Arvind (2017). "Introduction". In Aitken, Ellen Bradshaw; Sharma, Arvind (eds.). The Legacy of Wilfred Cantwell Smith. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press. pp. 1–19. ISBN978-1-4384-6469-5.
Eck, Diana L. (2017). "Religious Studies – The Academic and Moral Challenge: Personal Reflections on the Legacy of Wilfred Cantwell Smith". In Aitken, Ellen Bradshaw; Sharma, Arvind (eds.). The Legacy of Wilfred Cantwell Smith. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press. pp. 21–35. ISBN978-1-4384-6469-5.
Fallers, L. A. (1967). "Review of The Meaning and End of Religion: A New Approach to the Religious Traditions of Mankind by Wilfred Cantwell Smith". American Anthropologist. 2. 69 (1): 120–121. doi:10.1525/aa.1967.69.1.02a00590. ISSN1548-1433. JSTOR670539.
Graham, William A. (2017). "Wilfred Cantwell Smith and Orientalism". In Aitken, Ellen Bradshaw; Sharma, Arvind (eds.). The Legacy of Wilfred Cantwell Smith. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press. pp. 85–97. ISBN978-1-4384-6469-5.
Kessler, Gary E. (2012). Fifty Key Thinkers on Religion. Abingdon, England: Routledge. ISBN978-0-203-80747-7.
Shook, John R., ed. (2016). "Smith, Wilfred Cantwell". The Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Philosophers in America: From 1600 to the Present. London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 905ff. ISBN978-1-4725-7056-7.
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell (1991) [1962]. The Meaning and End of Religion. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Fortress Press. ISBN978-0-8006-2475-0.
Bae, Kuk-Won (2003). Homo Fidei: A Critical Understanding of Faith in the Writings of Wilfred Cantwell Smith and Its Implications for the Study of Religion. New York: Peter Lang. ISBN978-0-8204-5112-1.
Hughes, Edward J. (1986). Wilfred Cantwell Smith: A Theology for the World. London: SCM Press. ISBN978-0-334-02333-3.
Mæland, Bård (2003). Rewarding Encounters: Islam and the Comparative Theologies of Kenneth Cragg and Wilfred Cantwell Smith. London: Melisende. ISBN978-1-901764-24-6.