Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball/Assessment

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Baseball This page is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

WikiProject Baseball
Main project page + talk Special projects talk Resource Library talk Article Improvement Drive talk Requested articles and todo talk  → Articles needing attention talk  → Cleanup listing talk  → Nominations for deletion talk  → Article alerts talk Article assessment (Log) talk  → Featured articles (62) talk  → Featured lists (211) talk  → Good articles (558) talk Outreach talk  → Newsletter talk Portal talk Notability guidelines talk Style advice talk  → Naming conventions talk  → Player style advice talk  → Season article format talk Handling transactions talk Popular pages talk Active editors
Project organization Participants talk Large userbox talk Project userbox talk Project banner talk Project category talk
Major League Baseball Team specific Atlanta Braves talk Boston Red Sox talk Chicago Cubs talk Cincinnati Reds talk Los Angeles Angels talk Los Angeles Dodgers talk Minnesota Twins talk New York Mets talk New York Yankees talk Philadelphia Phillies talk San Diego Padres talk Seattle Mariners talk St. Louis Cardinals talk
General Subprojects Players talk College baseball talk Leagues and teams talk Little League talk Old-time Base Ball talk Negro league baseball talk Hall of Fame talk Umpires talk
Geographical Australia talk Japan talk Korea talk Taiwan talk
view · edit · changes

Requesting an assessment or reassessment

I see that the oldest one is from last August . . . does that mean there have been no reassessments since then? Sholom (talk) 03:56, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality grading scheme examples

I notice that in the quality grading scheme on this page, fair ball is listed as a stub-class article. The entry has a stub tag on it, but (right or wrong) the article has long been rated at Start. Also, I know that some projects link to specific versions of an article in their grading scheme examples. That prevents an example of the wrong class being displayed if someone decides to expand one of those articles without updating this grading scheme. I just wanted to discuss before making changes. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 02:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]