Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animal anatomy

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Animal anatomy and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Animal anatomy This page is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject Animals

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 128 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Recent changes in WP:Animal anatomy

• In all project pages (+ talkpages)

List overview · Lists updated: 2015-07-15 · This box:

• v
• t

WikiProject Animal anatomy
Main project	talk
Assessment statistics
Traffic statistics
Resources	talk
Project subpages
Members
Requested animal anatomy articles	talk
Things you can do
To-do list
Assessment
Unassessed articles
Expand stub class articles
Other
Article alerts
Showcase
Categories
Subpages
Mindmap

Requested move at Talk:Kidney#Requested move 3 July 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Kidney#Requested move 3 July 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 21:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Determining the future of B-checklists

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council § Determining the future of B-class checklists. This project is being notified since it is one of the 82 WikiProjects that opted to support B-checklists (B1-B6) in your project banner. DFlhb (talk) 11:24, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can't believe this exists

I can't believe this exists.

I'm an autistic veterinarian opthamologist extremely frustrated with the lack of animal coverage in vision related articles.

Some articles like visible spectrum and night vision are great articles because they have a lot of animal coverage which I'm a supporter on.

Meanwhile underwater vision? This is an article we need to do our jobs on. Why on earth is an article that should be about how underwater vision works for marine life ends up being all about underwater vision in humans and underwater vision in animals is only in a paragraph on fish? This is just ridiculous.

So, happy to work with you all, and let's make animal coverage better! LoverOfAllAnimalsActivist (talk) 10:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

I have checked some of your edits (special:diff/1211008144, special:diff/1211006779). Take a look at Wikipedia:Notability. An article about a topic can be created if at least one review article about the topic exists. So each article has its own scope. You should determine the topic and edit the article in the scope of the topic. If an article is about humans, then it should describe the topic in context of humans (without any common definitions). If you transform the article about humans into an article about the topic in animals, it might be deleted if no review sources will be found that cover the topic in animals context.
Also please read the Wikipedia:Reliable sources guideline and Wikipedia:No original research policy. D6194c-1cc (talk) 09:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Brain

Brain has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Hippocampus

I have nominated Hippocampus for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 00:14, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]