Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ceraurus

Gee, Pete Peters (registered June 28, 2006), it's after 6 p.m. Surely it's time to make another check user request -- your third this week. You'll just have to deal with the fact I'm not Ceraurus and deal with the substance of my edits, rather than make personal attacks and allegations. Arthur Ellis 22:18, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it is clear that no proof at all has been found that Arthur Ellis is Mark Bourrie and/or Ceraurus and that the abuse of checkuser stops.209.217.93.40 11:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The letter is written by Kinsella. It does not prove anything, except that he and Pete Peters sing from the same hymn book.209.217.93.40 11:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

For the fifth time in a little more than a month, I've restored this archived page. There may very well be an issue here; however, as noted in the recent edit sumary - and those before - editing an archived page is not the correct process through which to deal with the issue. As to the issue itself, I'm afraid I cannot comment; no information has been provided regarding the repeated claim of a privacy breach. Victoriagirl 19:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]