Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Ehud Lesar/Workshop

Content disputes

Arbcom cases are not for arguing content unless it's a matter specific to the case. Stick to the issues of the arb case. If not, I may remove their posting(s). — Rlevse • Talk • 17:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:POINT and reverting edits

1) User:KC109 You don't remove others comments on the page, esp an arb case page, unless grossly uncivil (personal attack etc or "just nasty for the hell of it"), which this isn't. 2) User:Atabek, You don't argue by making a provocative point WP:POINT, you speak directly. In this case "You could say the same by saying 'Often people use similar speech patterns for example [DIFF][DIFF], so you must be careful when alleging puppetry ".

Both actions are disruptive. Points are best expressed directly in discussion, without irony or subterfuge. Direct statements are the best way to garner respect.

I am reinstating this, and as a clerk stating also to both of you - KC109 do not delete others comments, and Atabek do not argue via pardoy or contrariiness--and please reform your edit. Both of these are disruptive in the context of the kinds of heated concerns that come up at RFAR. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, I modified it. Atabek (talk) 01:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]