I noticed you created {{coor dms2}} and have started to migrate the airport infobx to using it - any reason why? I cannot see any visual problem when using {{coor dms}} in the infobox. Additionally this template uses an embedded template - something frowned upon for performance reasons. Thanks/wangi11:46, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Can you stop with the coor dms2 for a while as they don't work as well as the original. Here's the map as provided for Castlegar Airport under coor dms and this is the map from coor dms2. The picture in the second is clearer but where's the airport. By the time you zoom in it's still fuzzy. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather(Talk)11:53, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Many of the airport infoboxes currently use the "coor dms" template to display the coordinates with a link to the "map sources" page. The problem with "coor dms" when used in the airport infobox is that some browsers wrap the text onto a second line creating something which looks like this:
35°41′21″N, 51°
18′49″E
The point of creating "coor dms2" was to have it wrap in a more logical point, between the latitude and longitude:
35° 41′ 21″ N
51° 18′ 49″ E
I also added spaces between the degrees, minutes and seconds to make it easier to read. The only difference between "coor dms" and "coor dms2" is how the text is displayed. Both templates should generate the same URL for the Map Sources page, assuming they are given the same coordinates. The reason for the change in the Castlegar Airport page is because besides changing from "coor dms" to "coor dms2", I also added "type:airport":
Thanks for the response, could you give an example of this happening? I tried looking at Louisville International Airport before your change since it was the first you changed but It looked all right to me. With the existing coor dms template the only place the browser should be breaking the line is at the space between the E/W and N/S, and certainly that's what's happening here for me. Actually I've now just tested this with IE (I normally use Firefox) and it is showing the way you describe. However, new templates aren't really the way to solve a browser bug/issue. Let me think about this one... Thanks/wangi14:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've just edited coor dms2[1] to make use of the nowrap CSS property - this now displays properly on IE and I think this version should be used in the standard {{coor dms}}. What do you think? Thanks/wangi14:57, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I like the nowrap approach, but with the version of Template:Coor dms2 as you have it, there is still the issue of the little arrow symbol that appears with external links not displaying properly when the text wraps to a second line (for an example, see the airport infobox at Template talk:Coor dms2). I would suggest one of the following solutions: (1) apply nowrap to the entire text that is displayed, forcing the latitude and longitude to be displayed on a single line, or (2) allow the latitude and longitude to be displayed on separate lines but remove the arrow symbol by using class=plainlinksneverexpand as I had done in my version of "coor dms2" [2]Zyxw18:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved out to work and am now editing from there. Using the same browser as at home and a smaller monitor there is now no difference between either "Coor dms2" or "coor dms". It's not breaking over two lines like the template shows and there are no spaces between degrees, minutes and seconds. The little arrow is right over and blocking the W. Just tried a different browser and it's the same. Also I just noticed that Castlegar is coming in at the right height. CambridgeBayWeather(Talk)07:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, you haven't fixed what I was trying to fix, at all. I wanted "Brisbane" to link to "Brisbane", "Queensland" to link to "Queensland", and "Australia" to link to "Australia", the way things used to be, before the info box format was changed, and the way it should be. I did not want "Brisbane, Queensland, Australia" to link to "Brisbane", which is how you have left it. So the problem remains, unresolved. Figaro15:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I did notice that you were attempting to set up separate links in that Brisbane Airport article, but the current version of Template:Airport_infobox uses the entire text assigned to "closest town" as a link to a single article. Therefore I thought the next best solution was to create a redirect page named Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. If you don't care for that solution, please feel free to revert my edit. Better yet, post a suggestion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports/infobox requesting that the template not automatically link the "closest town" text, thereby allowing you to place the links yourself. Zyxw06:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Airports in Australia table
Hi I know that it takes a fair amount of effort to convert pages to tables. I just wanted to acknowledge it looks much better :-) Regards--A Y Arktos07:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering where you got your information to change the operator of Robertson Field to Tomasso Brothers Inc. They own the land that the airport is on but do not partake in the day to day operations of the airport. Interstate Aviation handles all operations as well as the flight school there. Jeb882811:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The fields in the airport infobox for U.S. airports are usually based on data published by the FAA. Although the box is labelled "operator", it is usually the name of the owner, which FAA records for Robertson Field show as "Tomasso Brothers Inc." (see references link in article). However, since the owner and operator are different here, please feel free to change it back to "Interstate Aviation". Zyxw11:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think that it makes more sense to have Interstate Aviation as the operator then? You definitely have more experience with the airport articles than I do so I'll let you decide which you feel shold be there. I just wanted to make sure you knew about it. Jeb882811:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since the article itself mentions the names of both the owner and the operator, I think it is fine to switch the infobox back to the operator name. In fact, I just made the edit while typing this response. Zyxw11:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I once saw an airport infobox where someone included fields for the runway width, which I thought it was a good idea. Since templates like the airport infobox ignore parameters they don't know about, it doesn't hurt anything for me to include fields which infobox doesn't currently display. If it is ever decided to display that information in the infobox, then the articles I have edited won't need to be updated again. Zyxw21:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Trivandrum International Airport
HI, I noticed that you moved the contents from Trivandrum International Airport to Thiruvananthapuram International Airport, and added a redirect in the former.
But, the airport name hasnt changed. It is still called as Trivandrum Airport. The city name is officially changed to Thiruvananthapuram in 1991. But the airport name is not changed. The code is still TRV and the name is Trivandrum International Airport itself.
See the official site of Airport Authority of India, which controls the airport : AAI official site.
Thanks for expanding the stubs I've been creating. I was planning on doing some of this, but there is so much I have been trying to do I keep falling further behind. I just spent a few hours finding and adding some additional airports to the Nevada list. - Vegaswikian03:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I received this from Xizes on 30 October 2006. If you click on the barnstar image you'll find the following description: The Oddball Barnstar may be awarded to an editor who creates a particularly fine article regarding a subject that is odd, whimsical, or is otherwise something that one wouldn't expect to find in more traditional encyclopedias. Not sure which article(s) this was for, but it was appreciated. - Zyxw
Thanks for uploading Image:LFLL logo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:BLV logo.png. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tireless Contributor Barnstar
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This Tireless Contributor Barnstar is rewarded to Zywx for all his/her help in helping to expand the airport articles I created as part of my WikiProject for defunct airlines. It is a combination of small acts like these that make Wikipedia a better place. We solute you! -Jondude1105:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
){kind=link}
