User talk:Zidonuke/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Zidonuke. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Re: I Fucking Hate You

Thank you for your notification. I have made use of the hangon tag. You can read further details at Talk:I Fucking Hate You. Joe routt (talk) 09:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Alright then no need for deletion. Sorry about that Sidonuke (talk) 15:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Congregation Beth Elohim

Why did you place a CSD tag on a featured article with the reason of "article tricked me, not protected etc."? DiverseMentality 08:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I have no clue I was talking to people in #wikipedia-en i feel i must of got tricked. Sidonuke (talk) 08:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

It does seem like it. I've left a note on Synergy's talk page for a little clarification of what went on. Don't stress too much over it. DiverseMentality 08:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Hmmmm I cant believe i fell for that i was looking up why it should of been nominated. I mean it shouldnt even come near any reasons to be so. But i had some trust i guess and went for it. Sigh.... Sidonuke (talk) 08:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Don't beat yourself up over it, Sidonuke. Sometimes these things happen through humor and sarcasm, which is harder to notice in text than through voice (you might want to check out Wikipedia:Don't delete the main page). You've made a mistake, now you can't learn from it. DiverseMentality 08:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Only warning

I have removed the copy of the log posted without permission. If you repost it once more, you will be blocked under the enforcement ruling specified at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Durova#Removal of private correspondence and Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Durova#Enforcement by block. Daniel (talk) 08:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Furthermore, if you use Twinkle in an abusive fashion again, that will be disabled also. Reverting Synergy's edit as "vandalism" using Twinkle is utterly unacceptable. Daniel (talk) 09:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Using IRC to officially warn me isn't acceptable ether. But since you contacted me here I understand what is happening. The logs will not be readded. Sidonuke (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I want to make it clear that I never thought you would request its deletion, or take it seriously. I thought you understood that since there was no real reason, that it was a joke. For what its worth, try to look past it and happy editing from Synergy 09:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I would like you to know that since you asked me to do that deletion you also made me believe you would get an admin to take action against me so just to protect myself I did post those logs in my defense since it would of been all I had. Anyways as i said before you reminded me to never trust anyone again. I thank you for that. Sidonuke (talk) 09:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Look. If you would have thought it through more you would have seen that a featured article is never speedy applicable. You're just being paranoid. I never said I would get an admin to block you. Thats just silly. Synergy 09:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/November 2008#Sidonuke. SoxBot X (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

you

i left a comment on the talk page. i DID NOT change the frank mir article. it's my understanding that the talk page is for discussing the person place or thing that the article is about. if you watch TUF, you would see that my opinion of mir is justified. i chose not to add it to the article, just the talk page. just because you don't like my opinion does not mean that i am not entitled to that opinion. example: you are a douchebag. that is my opinion, whether you like it or not. 72.241.143.189 (talk) 16:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)dude72.241.143.189 (talk) 16:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Talk pages are to be used for discussing an article and not to be used for Personal Attacks. Refer to Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 16:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Repoting to WP:AIV

Hey, just a friendly note: Make sure vandals have received at least four recent warnings (in today's date) before reporting them to AIV. Also you can't report them to AIV if they don't vandalize after final warning, as you did to 206.219.85.130;he has made just one edit today. I thought of dropping you a note because some of your reports are being commented as 'unblockable' by admins at AIV diff. Other than this, keep on reverting vandalism, Wikipedia always needs good vandal fighters :) --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 20:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Rollback request

I have 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 16:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your excellent work and dedication in keeping Wikipedia clean of vandalism. Keep up the great work! Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 17:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Dude...

I was using the sandbox for testing, and you said for me to do my test in the sandbox. I dont understand... I did nothing wrong. 209.129.155.253 (talk) 19:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry about your revert to the sandbox page and I have removed my warning. I didn't view that the page was the sandbox. So thanks for warning me of that and I'll be sure to watch out what I do. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 19:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Anderson Cooper edit

My edit to Anderson Cooper is not vandalism, it is true and has been proven many times even in the article. So many people know that he is gay, a lot of people who know him personally have seen him with his boyfriend. There is even a picture of the two of them. Please do not put frivolous warnings on my page. Thank you. JIM ME BOY (talk) 07:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

The edit was vandalism and will be reverted. Its a personal attack basicly. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 17:37, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Smile

JS (chat) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! Happy editing :-) JS (chat) 17:35, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

You welcome and I'm happy to help! --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 17:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

A very cheeky cookie ;-)

LOL - Keep up the good work! Cheers JS (chat) 17:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Talk page

Thanks for the reversion on my talk page. The number was valid so I deleted the last two revisions. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 18:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

And I just deleted and restored your talk page as well to remove the number. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 18:55, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Barn

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Speaks for itself, fantastic vandal work. :-) Andy (talk) 19:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

And while I am here, what do you mean about the misuse of talk pages? Andy (talk) 19:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry i had the wrong target user for that message. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 19:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

I tell you, I have done that and used warning templates on IP users, that were the wrong ones! I got a right backlash from some of them! Ha, ha. Anyway, don't worry about it. Andy (talk) 19:50, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

John B. Alexander

Would you please give me the reason why before you revert? Thanks - —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4freedom (talk • contribs) 19:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

please, take about only the part you think Vandalism, not all. it will be also appreciated, let me know what is Vandalism.thanks - I am kind of new here, I have a lot to learn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4freedom (talk • contribs) 19:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah i'm sorry for that revert and I'll fix it. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 19:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

To Sidonuke, since you know a lot of things here, if you can let me know how to link the image of john B. alexander, it will be really appreciated. Can I make a hyperlink from other site? please let me know. thanks -

Fuck you.

Fag, I'll kick your fucking teeth in if you revert my shit again.

I wrote that article you dick, check my IP address with the original poster, it comes from the same region where I live, because I MADE IT.

What a dick.

We cant check IPs without an admin with checkuser doing so. Anyways you "The IP" Blanked a "User Talk" so if anything it was vandalism to a talk page and has been reverted. Any other complaints then please do reply. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 23:33, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Wait...

You reverted my edit, then reverted your revert. So, I guess the temp doesn't apply anymore? --68.187.12.42 (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Oops yeah i pressed the wrong key and i reverted the edit so let me kill the warning. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 00:20, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. --68.187.12.42 (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Friendly Reminder

Deleting references to an article is vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.64.156 (talk) 03:36, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Friendly Reminder

You'll notice the issue in article discussion is the lack of references. The way to fix the article is add references. Stop deleting references so that the article might be fixed so that it does not qualify for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.64.156 (talk) 03:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Ignoring... I'll stop reverting but other users will keep on reverting intill your AIV is cleared. Just so you know. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 03:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Huggle

If you need to change configuration settings to test things, it's generally better to copy the configuration to the test wiki and change it there, or to override the settings in the code itself, than to change the "production environment", as it were, given that it may affect other users -- Gurch (talk) 14:04, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Alright I did implement in code system to modify variables as needed without editing the page so editing the configs on wiki wont be necessary. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 16:46, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Pathoschild's user page

You reverted an IP a few days ago that claimed to be his brother....as it turns out it really *is* his brother. Bizarre but true, haha.--§hanel 23:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah i talked to Pathoschild and i thought it was funny. Thanks. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 01:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Your talk page

Just to let you know that I deleted and restored your talk page to remove a phone number. Again. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 00:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

What was the user in question? --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 01:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

The Rebirth

Sorry, I needed to add additional information to the page for The Rebirth please do not delete. Thank you. Bmedick (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Rosie Live discussion page reversion

The only word on the Rosie Live discussion page is "Ouch!"

I didn't think it was productive to any discussion but I do concede to your expertise. I now understand that I should not have undone someone else's remark on that particular page. Astroboyretro (talk) 05:00, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Its a good idea not to remove comments on talk pages from other users unless its your user talk but I'm in no way an expert. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 05:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi - I've readded the flag. Any admin can revert the deletion ofyour pages if you like - just drop them a note or ask at WP:AN Pedro :  Chat  15:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the rollback again. Its great to return to global war on vandalism! --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 18:44, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Gumb

Re your message: No problem. The seven day protection should cover the length of the AfD if the AfD is not closed early. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:12, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Warning

Hello, why was I warned? My edit was informative. 24.147.72.221 (talk) 14:55, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Reviewed my revert and your recent contributions. The warning I served was called for. Thank you! --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 15:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Green Roofs Page

Sidonuke - Help ! :-) I noticed you have been editting the green roofs page. I have an image from the Green Roof referred to in the wikipedia text on Green Roofs in Greece and have been trying to upload it without success . Could you tell me how to do it - My email is [e-mail] My Facebook account is Andrew Michael Clements

Andrew —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Michael Clements (talk • contribs) 15:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry I wouldn't remember an exact process on how to do it at this time but when I get a chance I'll look it up. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 19:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Samba

This subject was written by a Brazilian who does not have a good command of English. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against Brazilians - my wife is Brazilian. However, the English is often ungrammatical and even incomprehensible. My wife and I are trying to clean up an article on a subject we both love - samba. We understand what the writer is attempting to say and want to clean up the article to make it not only authoritative but also well-written. This was acknowledged by an editor who deleted the second graf because its English was so jumbled. Please do not consider that clearly articulating the language, including using proper adjectives (i.e., "icon" for "symbol") constitutes vandalism. I would like to work on this article graf by graf, but if my work will be reverted, what's the point. See if my edits are not an improvement before you delete them. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.23.201 (talk) 17:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Your edits seemed unconstructive at the time. I suggest using edit summaries and adding a

{{inuse}}

tag to the page. Anyways sorry about interrupting your work. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 19:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Capitalism

If that IP does that again and I don't get it first, hit him with a level-four warning; that's probably Heyheymonkees (talk · contribs). HalfShadow (talk) 20:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

It seems that it may of been him but a level four warning should only be used on repeat vandals. For now I'll keep an eye on the IP and User. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 20:38, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

problem

read the casualties section. now its bullshit. i only did the same... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.192.127.100 (talk) 22:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Reviewed your edit and it still appears that it was unconstructive. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 22:56, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Stephen Gately

An admin reverted your revert of two of my edits, as said edits were an improvement. Gayness 1 (talk) 23:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification of that mistake. I have retracted the warning I placed on your page. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 23:51, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Uh...

You just reverted back to vandalism... Also, what version of Huggle are you using? I've never seen an edit summary like that from Huggle before... Until It Sleeps ^T • C 13:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Using a modified huggle to load a custom project configuration. I took the latest source from the google code page and recompiled a modded one. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 13:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

What kind of modifications have you made, exactly? Sounds rather interesting. Until It Sleeps ^T • C 13:56, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Its rather complex. I see your on IRC, talk to me there (Sidonuke). --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 13:58, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Racist edit/National Front Article

I'm well aware that what I wrote on the NF article is considered vandalism. It was however, in response to previous vandalism on that page which contained racist, homophobic and nationalist slurs in light of the recent events in Manchester.

80.177.28.111 (talk) 14:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Ok... --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 14:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

American Signal Corporation

I WANTED this article to be deleted, I cannot verify proper info, people keep pissing at ME about it, no one is fixing it, abusive users are making life hard for me, and I'm very sick and tired of it.--JustInn014 (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

If you would like the article American Signal Corporation deleted then tag it properly conforming to the policies on WP:DEL. Please don't change other things on the article while tagging. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 05:25, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for the help. --JustInn014 (talk) 05:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Is it possible for someone else to delete the page? I'm not understanding how the deletion policy works... --JustInn014 (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

The process works by tagging an article for deletion using the proper reason then an administrator will review the deletion request and act on it appropriated. (At least in a nutshell that is) --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 05:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

I do not think that this article will qualify for speedy deletion, thus it will not be an administrator’s decision. It could qualify for a deletion discussion, in which case, it would be the Wikipedia community that decides, with an administrator making the final decision as to deletion consensus. The process for starting a deletion discussion is outlined at WP:AFD. But, JustInn, I wouldn’t worry about it: Eventually some deletionist will come along and do it for you, if the article truly cries out for deletion. If you don’t want to edit it anymore, just take it off of your watchlist and stop editing it. By the way, I ended up here because I followed the Huggle trail to this discussion. — SpikeToronto 05:51, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Heh, I didn't bother explaining it in detail but thanks for that. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 05:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

I see now. I'll just wait for a more experienced deletionist to come by and delete it. Thanks for the help. --JustInn014 (talk) 07:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of David A. Kaiser

An article that you have been involved in editing, David A. Kaiser, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David A. Kaiser. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bfigura ^(talk) 16:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, I'll add comments when I gather them together. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 20:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Huggle

User Until It Sleeps told me that he got a modified version of Huggle from you which adds a Report Mistake to the edit summary. Is it possible for me to obtain the same? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Zidonuke. You have new messages at The Thing That Should Not Be's talk page.
Message added 22:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Thing // Talk // Contribs 22:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

American Signal Corp. page wasn't deleted.

It is still full of errors, and it won't let me rewrite the article.

--JustInn014 (talk) 05:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

capitalization

Check the Wikipedia manual of style: as the word "state" is not part of the name, it is not capitalized. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.162.43.187 (talk) 06:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

My mistake there. Thanks for the notification. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 06:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Huggle

Are you still using a custom version? It doesn't look like it :( The Thing // Talk // Contribs 07:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Reworked all my mods and even fixed a few null pointers! If you want one give me a Username and I'll hook you up again. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 10:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

That would be great. My pages are here, and here. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 12:49, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Also it should be noted that I had to change my edit summary to remove the "(Report Mistake)" due to a complaint by Gurch... The Thing // Talk // Contribs 12:54, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

So... is it ready yet? How about coming onto IRC for a while? The Thing // Talk // Contribs 13:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Zidonuke. You have new messages at The Thing That Should Not Be's talk page.
Message added 02:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 02:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm trying to legitimately edit the Cruise Control article. Step off.

See my talk page. I don't see why this is vandalism; these facts are perfectly true.

Hello, Zidonuke. You have new messages at [[User talk:67.60.4.100 (talk) 03:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)|User talk:67.60.4.100 (talk) 03:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Alright, I'll leave you to it. I reverted because in my personal opinion that it doesn't seem proper. Anyways I'm not reverting your stuff anymore for it. Thanks for the notification. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 03:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry!

Sorry, no one in my household made those vandalistic edits, this punk kid in the neighborhood named Tuan Le stole my IP address by accessing our router and made changes.

Well, thats nice and all but that IP is still vandalizing and has been warned. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 04:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

New IP Address?

If this kid keeps editing and causes vandalism, how do I reset my IP address so he can't access it and wikipedia?

Hello, Zidonuke. You have new messages at Sidonuke's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Unplug your internet for a while. :) --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 04:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback (User Page Affair)

Hello, Zidonuke. You have new messages at Deagle AP's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I'd like to give you this for your efforts to place on your user page. Thanks once again. Deagle_AP (talk) 14:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

FTA	This user is persistent in the fight against vandalism. Hence, the user has been entrusted with membership into Wikipedia's Fire Team Alpha.

Hi

Who gives the right to people that censor comments on destructive sects to have the last word?

Ok, no attacks, but why tolerate that users paid by the sects to keep negative comments out, to censor other comments? Do you reacted to that change?

Regards Wikipedia lover. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.203.189.130 (talk) 13:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

I just reverted what seems to of been a attack on the one editor. [this edit] Aside from that I don't support or censor anything if you have sources and references to back it up. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 13:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

OK, but you do not want that user to know that others do not share his opinions and censorship? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.203.189.130 (talk) 13:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

213.203.189.130 please read some wiki policies, start with WP:FIVE. I'm simply following policy. If you would like that category added please discuss it with pther editors on the talk page of the article.

Sidonuke, thanks for the revert but you didn't need to. Messages like that don't bother me. Sean.hoyland - talk 14:12, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Teleforce

In case you didn't get around to actually reading it, the page at Teleforce is a joke. The sources are questionable and half the links are dead, and the article is full of speculative, unverifiable claims and original research. I'm surprised that someone can get that sort of crap past the radar in the first place, let alone that editors will actually work to make sure it stays there. So what can I do to get rid of stagnant, rubbish articles short of dedicating myself to writing an equally expansive new article with which to replace it? The talk page is clearly useless, and cutting out large chunks of the article is branded vandalism regardless of how low the quality of the article is to begin with. I shouldn't have to wait for a power user with some sense to come along and remove content that obviously doesn't belong.--203.206.115.8 (talk) 15:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Ok well, I've looked over it and read it a few times. From what I can see is that your making legitimate edits. I'm sorry to of labeled you incorrectly in this case. I guess I should slow down a bit. Thank you for the notification. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 15:08, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me...

But i am not vandalizing. Merely leaving a message.--Banging pots and pans (talk) 20:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Writing pot pot bang bang or whatever it was on a page is considered vandalism. Please stop before you are blocked for vandalism. ToxicWasteGrounds 20:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

The user clearly didn't want you to leave that message on there page. Reverted and Warned. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 20:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

(Now blocked for 12 hours  Chzz  ►  21:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC))

Thanks

...for reverting my user-page when vandalized.  Chzz  ►  21:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

13 amend

ssry...i changed it again...ill change it bak to original form Davidking360 (talk) 00:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

No Problem. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 00:56, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: user:Rfhnrjftvjmv

I think user:Rfhnrjftvjmv might be a sockpuppet of the deletekey that we reverted on the delete key article. --Morenooso (talk) 02:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Been reported. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 02:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Also requested temp full protection. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 02:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

As a sockpuppet? I have your talkpage on Watch. You can respond here. --Morenooso (talk) 02:28, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Nah I didn't open a sockpuppet investigation. But clearly those 3 accounts where socks. They all got indef blocked and the page got protected. I think its fine now but take it how you like. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 02:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Megafauna

Thanks for the feedback. I've added a more friendly note[1], since my comment about megafauna was obviously lost in the templated message. First Light (talk) 02:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Left message on your page. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 02:59, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

And I over-used the vandalism template in that case, period, since they were possibly good faith edits, so thanks again. First Light (talk) 03:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Then again, I just went looking to see if there were other critters mis-categorized, and found User talk:125.164.2.93 (same IP range) has been down this road before. But still, better to err next time on the side of assuming good faith. First Light (talk)

Thanks!

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! Brambleclawx 20:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

No, Thank you! :D Userpaged! --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 00:12, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

I've just come here to say the same thing as the barnstar (actually my talk page) . Award seconded! Ty 10:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

PC power management - reverted changes

Hello. You revereted changes with the comment "seems like a link spam". I made contribution to a table with exatly same fields as other 6 or 7 references. If you consider that my contribution is a spam, why did you keep other contribution? Is a free encyclopedia or not? I just added information relevant to the topic using the same pattern as others. So it can't be considered as a spam.

I didn't see anything also a previous editor saw it was link spam so I joined in. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 15:31, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

False Positive =

Please be advised that you are enforcing a false positive which had already been reported to Cluebot. The changes I made improved the article significantly by removing out of topic information. Thank you. DrJenkinsPhd (talk) 22:41, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes, noticed your edit summary and reviewed what was going on. I took down my warnings and ClueBot's warning. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 22:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

University of North Dakota

Thank. I got your message in East Grand Forks Campbell Library I have been vandalizing in University of North Dakota. Thank for you revert or removed. It's me. My name is Ross Degenstein. I used the Wikipedia:Sandbox. How do I know about Wikipedia. My user got blocked 4 months ago. I am attending in Lake Region State College. Good Night! Typewriter #9535 Ross Degenstein (talk) 208.107.123.63 (talk) 03:00, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok...? --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 03:46, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Signature

Just a heads up, I corrected your signature on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tide rolls. The double colons at the beginning of the links to your user page, talk page, and contribs were causing the report to have trouble parsing who had posted it. Considering the double colons aren't even needed to make your signature work, you might want to remove them. (though, really, it doesn't matter)

Just thought I'd let ya know. EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:49, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. I decided to make a new sig! Sidonuke 18:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Are you still around?

Your thread on Wikipedia talk:Edit filter has been archived because no one edited it in 20 days. It looks like you haven't edited in about two weeks. If you're just taking a break, I hope you'll be back soon. —Soap— 13:11, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Custom Huggle

I grabbed the source, and changed what you said for TTTSNB, etc etc... But it crashes in Debug Mode, saying that the drawing of queues had an error. The thing is, I disabled my queues in my personal Huggle.css. Any ideas? Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 20:59, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Ummm that shouldn't happen. More details would be nice... Include the stack trace it gives or a link to a dump file.

OK, but first I'm trying literally copying and pasting your fake global & project config files. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 21:09, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Errr your using a custom config? Yeah.... that maybe the problem right there. Its very finicky... Sidonuke 21:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

OK, now it's saying I haven't enabled huggle in my user config file (I have :P). Here's my various config files. Let me know if you find any problems. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 21:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

After I stuff my face and do stuff with stuff and more stuff... Aka, lazy... I'll look into it soon. Sidonuke 21:55, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

No problem at all! Thanks for the future help when you have time :P! Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 22:07, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for editing the code of Huggle to prepare it for the new recent changes system, as well as any other improvements you've made. —Soap— 20:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

o.o... I'm just doing it because it's fun! XD Thank you soap. it means alot. Sidonuke 21:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: huggle

Also I would love to help out on huggle and keeping it maintained... If I could get commit access to the google code. I would push my fixes and updates throughout time. If not I can start a new competing huggle <.<. Sidonuke 16:10, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Huggle is hosted on Google's code hosting service. Committing requires a Google account; you will need to create one and tell me what it is, by email if you don't want to write it here.

I'm not sure what "custom features" you changed in your version, but don't commit them unless you're confident they work as intended Gurch (talk) 17:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Of course. Thats why I didn't put them out because of that. I'll be sure to only commit proper code. You can add [e-mail] as my google account. Sidonuke 20:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Instructions for accessing the repository can be found here Gurch (talk) 14:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks and the official huggle is updated now.

If you're going to start messing with the configuration, at least test your changes first. Gurch (talk) 11:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback: Huggle Feedback

Hello, Zidonuke. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Huggle/Feedback.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— SpikeToronto 17:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Christmas Card

File:Wikisanta-no motto.png

Merry Christmas

At this festive time, I would like to say a very special thank you to my fellow editors, and take the time to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. And, in case you can't wait until the big day, I've left you each three special presents, click to unwrap :) Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Green and Yellow Present.gif

File:Yellow and Red present.gif

File:Blue and Red Present.gif

Huggle Development

Hi Sidonuke! Are you no longer going to be developing Huggle? I thought you had kind of taken it over when Gurch abandoned it in November. Thanks! — SpikeToronto 03:04, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Zidonuke! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 14:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit

As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:50, 30 October 2011 (UTC). Redirected here from User talk:Sidonuke.

New Page Triage engagement strategy released

Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyeswikimedia.org.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Lowkey studies at Soas. He studies Arabic.

It's relevant to his Personal Life section. It's constructive to the page because he likes Palestinians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.230.133 (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Zidonuke can i have a talk? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.37.226.82 (talk) 00:01, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Zidonuke, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison to other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 05:03, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

STiki emergency

Hello! Due to a security update to the wiki software, older versions of STiki are no longer functional. You've been identified as a user of STiki, and are kindly asked to upgrade to the current version at Wikipedia:STiki#Download before continuing with use of the tool. Continuing to use older versions will be detrimental to the STiki project. Please see Wikipedia talk:STiki#Errors for a discussion of this issue or to respond to this message. Thank you! 04:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)