User talk:ZaphodsCatwalk

ZaphodsCatwalk, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi ZaphodsCatwalk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pam Tanowitz: Notability

Hello! Thank you for reviewing the article Pam Tanowitz. I have some questions about the tag you added and look forward to talking to you about it on the talk page. Thanks!Megs (talk) 20:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you removed the tag. Thanks so much! And, as before, I'm always open to advice about how to make content better.Megs (talk) 20:09, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Jeppe Kjær

Hello ZaphodsCatwalk. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Jeppe Kjær, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability (sports)

If you are trying to decide whether a professional athlete is notable or not, please refer to the guidelines at Wikipedia:Notability (sports). The soccer section of that page says:

Association football (soccer) figures are presumed notable if they meet the following:

1. Players who have played in, managers who have managed in, and referees who have officiated any FIFA sanctioned senior international match (including the Olympics) are notable. The notability of these is accepted as they would have received significant coverage as outlined above in the general notability criteria.
2. Players who have played, and managers who have managed in a fully professional league, will generally be regarded as notable. See a list of fully professional leagues kept by WikiProject Football.

Note: For the purposes of this guideline, a player has appeared in a match if he or she was in the starting line-up or came on as a substitute. Youth players are not notable unless they satisfy one of the statements above, or if they can be shown to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	thanks for reviewing injection mold construction PrabhakarPurushothaman (talk) 09:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

tags on article Guy Diehl

Hello, I'm writing in the spirit of WP:GF and as the principal author of the Guy Diehl page to which you recently added the tags: copy edit, coi, leader too long, and autobiography. I was hoping to clear up a few things.

I've shortened the introduction by moving the content that was there to a more appropriate section, so the leader too long tag should no longer be an issue.

Given that I am NOT the artist in question, I assure you this is not autobiographical, so the autobiography tag is also not applicable. I am a third party with many years worth of knowledge of the San Francisco Bay Area art world and a desire to see more of its brightest stars receive recognition. There was barely a page for Richard Misrach, a world-class photographer, before I rewrote it; there was no page at all for Mildred Howard. Guy Diehl has been showing regularly in the Bay Area since the early 1980s; he deserves an article with the degree of research and detail I have brought to bear.

I'm curious as to specifically what part(s) of the article you feel require copy editing. The tone is encyclopedic and I have cited essays and interviews by respected curators and publications. I'm amenable to suggestions. Please be as specific as possible.

Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you. Noel vs liam (talk) 02:37, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Google Maps Pin has been accepted

Google Maps Pin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lor^Chat 04:41, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Biblical manuscript

Some time ago you posted a template to the article AqBurkitt. I would like you to take a look at it.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]