User talk:Ytrottier/Archives/2008
HybridHi Ytrottier - I saw you moved Hybrid to Hybrid (biology) - fair enough in a way, but it should have been given more airing for discussion at WP:TOL before making this major move. The worst consequence is that there are nearly 2,000 animal and plant pages and several redirects which still link to [hybrid], and need disambiguation editing to change to a piped link [hybrid (biology)|hybrid]. I don't greatly feel like doing this tedious task. Do you? Personally, I'm strongly inclined to go back to how things were before, it would involve far less changing. - MPF (talk) 11:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that I think you are right about the ampco 18 C95400 thing. Based on the links you gave and a quick google search it seems pretty obvious to me that they are the same material. However, I didn't want to say that on the talk page because I feel that would have just made things worse. I hope that we all agree that just leaving it off the page is the best tack for now. --Wizard191 (talk) 03:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC) Talk:SiphonHi Yannick. Thanks for the invitation at Talk:Bernoulli's principle to participate in the debate at Talk:Siphon. I read the debate with interest and visited a couple of the external links. I have now added my thoughts to the debate. Dolphin51 (talk) 13:35, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Disambiguous Zoning (disambiguation)Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Zoning (disambiguation), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Zoning (disambiguation) is a disambiguation page that only points to a single article, or no articles at all. Wind power projectionHey, thanks for catching the problems with my graph of world wind installed capacity. I have cut the length of the projection in half, and corrected the units problem (turns out that I was fooled by the data source, which used European conventions for the decimal point). To emphasize that there is no crystal ball, I added error bars. The projection is now a simple exponential fit to the existing data; the error bars show the (asymmetric) 95% confidence intervals around the exponential trend. —Aetheling (talk) 01:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC). |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia