Hello, YoloMc8562! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Comr Melody Idoghor(talk)22:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that you tried to protect the page SummerSlam (2023) by adding the page protection template. However, only admins can add the template as that template does nothing without admin approval. If you feel a page needs protected, you have to request it at WP:RFPP. JDC808♫01:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! I understand that some group timelines include title reigns, but most groups do not and, in my opinion, should only be included if it’s necessary/notable. We should stick to one style for timelines, and since most do not include title reigns, it is best to omit them. See WP:PW/SG for our style guide, in which we don’t mention title reigns in timelines, but that doesn’t stop from discussing it at WT:PW. As for the colors, it is best to make sure the colors are visible. I changed the “leader” color to yellow so that it is visible compared to the dark purple (this is the same reason why we refrain from using both red and green colors for colorblindness). Thanks! Sekyaw(talk)16:17, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Sekyaw Hi, thanks for taking the time to write a message here, I do see your point, but I do feel that listing the title reigns on the timeline is important, due to the fact the page has a section about the group's championship pursuits. Also about the leader colour, in my opinion, I think it should stay as purple due to the fact thats the colour that many people identify them with, as it is also the groups signature colour (i.e. their lighting is purple, their titantrons are purple, even most of their attires/JD merch has some element of purple). Because of this, I have reverted the Judgment Day article back to my edit of it. However if you do believe your changes should stay in effect, I would be willing to hear any further reasons as to why.
Jesus, chill out. Anyway it seems WWE are split on this whole thing, because there's sources that suggest he isn't in the group and obviously sources such as that one that do consider him in the group. I think for now just leave it as it is until they out right confirm on TV that he is part of the group. YoloMc8562 (talk) 05:10, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you telling me to chill out? I'm not being argumentative, just doing what you asked and providing a source. If WWE themselves say he's in, than he's in as at the end of the day it is their group, so their word is law. Outside sources can't dictate how WWE defines their groups, because they're not theirs to do so. Vjmlhds(talk)05:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, just seen on WWE's official website they just posted about the Men's War Games match (https://www.wwe.com/survivor-series-2023/mens-wargames-match) and as @StrangerMan123 said on the SS 2023 wiki page, on the fourth paragraph, it states "The Judgment Day will be joined by JD McDonagh, who hopes to officially join the group after helping them week after week but also hindering them on occasions, too.", which means that he's not an official member of the group as of yet. YoloMc8562 (talk) 05:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, sorry if I told you to chill out earlier, yeah WWE are kinda weird when it comes to this stuff, they will suggest both sides of something then take ages to confirm which one it is haha. Anyway, hope you have a great rest of your day, no hard feelings from me either! YoloMc8562 (talk) 05:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like with Drew McIntyre, he isn't joining the group outright so much as it is an "I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine" deal...he helped them retain the tag straps, and in return, they'll help him win the World title from Seth Rollins when the rematch comes around. Completely different situation than with JD. JD was straight up trying to join the group, while Drew is just making the proverbial "deal with the devil". Vjmlhds(talk)18:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah JD was just the Sami Zayn of the Judgment Day except without the comedy, like he just kinda stuck around until they eventually welcomed in (yes ik Sami never officially joined the Bloodline but u get my point), also yeah with Drew either he will join the group or he's just around for the WarGames match, either way, Drew's my favourite wrestler so I'm happy with both. YoloMc8562 (talk) 20:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop reverting the colours on timelines. As explained to you, there [a consensus not to do that], the colours introduce accessibility issues for those who are colour blind, and what other articles do is irrelevant - them being wrong doesn't mean the Judgement Day doesn't need to be wrong, too. Please stop edit warring. — Czello(music)08:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mean they're not "wrong", there's no source which dictates how group timelines should be. The link you've given is just a discussion on what you and a few others think how group timelines should be done, it's not an actual source that says how you should do things. it's just a case of we both think different things, also, this colour blind thing, with all due respect, isn't exactly accurate as there's a key on every group timeline for what the colour means, so the colour blind thing isn't an issue. Also, on the discussion, colours that should be used can't even be decided, with some users suggesting black, blue and yellow and you using black, red and green.
Consensus is decided by group discussion - "just a discussion" is what leads to consensus, especially given that it's at the Wikiproject. Ultimately, there's no good reason why we should theme timelines around in-universe things. And yes, colour blind people can find it difficult to make out the difference between certain colours, even with a key (especially on the Judgement Day article where there's lots of dark colours). — Czello(music)08:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Czello my point is I could just go and voice why I think the colours should stay, also if you're really bothered about changing it then go ahead and do it on every group, they're either all okay or none of them are okay. YoloMc8562 (talk) 09:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I already have changed it for other groups. And again, other groups being wrong doesn't mean they all should be wrong - we fix them where we find them. And yes, if you want to make a case for why we should have themed colour schemes you will need to actually get a consensus saying so. — Czello(music)09:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Czello I mean I'm okay with it if all the groups are changed, that was my point, if you want them to be changed, you gotta change all of them because they've either all gotta change or leave all of them. YoloMc8562 (talk) 09:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 10:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 10:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
You continued to blatantly violate WP:NOTWEBHOST. You even agreed not to do so: "I mean since I'm clearly not gonna be able to put it back on Wikipedia then I guess lol". --Yamla (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You were very clearly told this content would not be appropriate on a subpage. You are blocked indefinitely because you promised not to put this content back on Wikipedia and then blatantly violated your promise. You will be unblocked if you can convince a reviewing administrator that you won't and, unlike the previous time you said you wouldn't, you clearly understand and mean it this time. WP:GAB explains how to contest your block. --Yamla (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I understand it and that Wikipedia isn't supposed to be used as a blog or social media etc. It's meant to be used as encyclopedia, well your user page anyway. YoloMc8562 (talk) 20:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you are saying we cannot trust you to do what you say, that's fine. It significantly hurts any possibility of a future unblock, though. --Yamla (talk) 17:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the late response, but what? I just looked back to the original discussion, and the phrase you quoted has nothing to do with me promising anything, its in response to @Waggers comment about how discussing another website (Miraheze) is bad, he then asks if we can close this thread to which is where I reply with said phrase. Either way, is there any way I can appeal for an unblock, or get unblocked? I want to continue to edit on here and I promise to not use my user page as a personal blog or website, and not violate Wikipedia:NOTWEBHOST. YoloMc8562 (talk) 23:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was blocked because I was using my userpage as a personal blog/website, I honestly did not know that it was against the rules, as I just thought you could do pretty much whatever on your user page. But I was wrong and didn't read the rules, which was my mistake. I am requesting an unblock because I am now familiar with the rules and I can absolutely promise it will never happen again.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Rumble (2025), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBD. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bash in Berlin announcement poster.jpeg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Bash in Berlin announcement poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Orphaned non-free image File:NXT Stand and Deliver 2024 logo.png
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:NXT Stand and Deliver 2024 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
