Nice, that actually totally makes sense! lol, yeah I feel you on that one! Ughhh, tell me about it, I feel so gypped. Look at the timing, the second I got a few opposes, Sandy closed the FAC, even though I have 6 supports, not even giving me a second to fix or address them. Thats how she works, biased, unfair and total BS. As you see, editors bring up 3 little errors and stamp a big oppose on the FAC. Oh well, screw them!--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me18:38, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You still did not read what I wrote in my talk page Nathan? Then I believe you would have understood. Sandy herself pointed out obvious prose errors in the article, that too from the lead. Hence, from that POV, the previous 6 supports would of course appear as irrelevant and not worthy. Although I have strogly opposed that last user's comments. Remember, the final decision always lies in the hand of the delegates to understand the consensus and then promote/archive a nomination. It also doesnot help that you, Adabow, Candy, novice, XWomanizer etc go on doing the "review yours for one of me" in the GAC. That would clear the thought of any form of independent review. — Legolas(talk2me)06:48, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Let Me Be the Last to Know
Hey, Womanizer, can I ask you to do me a favor? I've already finished the Don't Let Me Be the Last to Know article, but I need to add the WP:ALT to the album art. I know how to do it, but I don't know what to add, and Novice7 said that you might know what to add... So... Please?? :) Oh, Merry Christmas! Sauloviegas (talk) 17:03, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Xwomanizerx, Britney Spears does not know you. Take your hands off your keyboard, go outside and try to find yourself a real woman! Britney already has enough fans chasing her - no wonder she started doing crazy things: getting married for 55 hours, driving a car with her son on her lap, shaving her head, getting tattoos, taking illicit substances, refusing to relinquish custody of her sons. Crikey - how many women are 29 years old and have mommy and daddy controlling her assets because she is not capable of doing so? Come on, do her and all her fans a favor - leave Britney and her wiki page alone. B. Fairbairn (talk) 10:12, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above comment was made because every time anyone makes a change to the Britney Spears wiki page, xwomaniserx steps in and undoes it. For some unknown reason he has made it his mission in life to control Britney's wiki page. In the last 9 months xwomanizerx has made over 80 edits on poor Britney's page. If that is not a major obsession then what is... Butt out and leave it to the moderators to monitor changes. B. Fairbairn (talk) 12:43, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear oh dear oh dear, you make me laugh xwomaniserx (sigh) - it is so typical of individuals with severe inferiority complexes to be so utterly and incredibly hung up on 'respect'. Please, try to be more mature. B. Fairbairn (talk) 13:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, considering that you can't negate whether your speaking to me or womanizer, I'll take it that you don't know. Well hear this. Go away, mind your own business and stop staking people's work. Your a jealous individual. --CallMeNathan • Talk2Me13:06, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmph! In the context above the term is "you're", not "your". It is a shame you never graduated from elementary school.
You and xwomanizerx sound so much the same it is easy to deduce you are one person using different accounts. If you are a different person why do you involve yourself in something on a talk page that has nothing to do with you. The comment I made is between xwomanizerx and I, not you. B. Fairbairn (talk) 12:31, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
LOL. It's good to find someone with a good sense of humor! It's taken a while but I realise we have over-reacted and am happy to call it quits and stay away from you and your friend... Unless you really want to carry it on? :-) B. Fairbairn (talk) 03:55, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well womanizer, in order to stop this kinda bot/script assisted edits whcih removes the italics from the work parameter, check out articles like "Like a Virgin" to see how you can avoid the script editing. You need to format the articles accordingly. Lol, at the section above. — Legolas(talk2me)14:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Me Against the Music, also introduced some extraneous text around some numerical characters. This may be due to a combination of your browser and Skype trying to identify and highlight telephone numbers. Please double-check any edits you may perform that include numbers, as this may introduce unnecessary characters into the page. Thank you. LoganTalkContributions23:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to say thank you soooo much for correcting the album sales. Her label has been underestimating for years, and even failed to note her Greatest Hits Collection (2005) on their latest press release for her new single (though they mentioned every other release). I have found multiple sources confirming that the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA, I'm sure you're familiar with) certified Britney's sales of 100 million albums (singles not included) in July of 2010: (I am not the best with computers, but these links should work or you can find multiple sources just searching Britney Spears 100 million records on google)
Billboard is most likely the best source and yours that you currently have cited is perfectly fine and reliable too. I hate people knocking her, and I just want the facts to be 100% true and representative of her work, which is 100 million albums alone, plus at least 40-50 million singles sold in her career. She is amazing!! I love her and cannot wait for "Hold it Against Me"!!!!! THANK YOU AGAIN!!
I LOVE it. I'm past the near-ecstasy fase now, lol. I think her next single will be better though. And Cprice1000, I'm working on the articles separately. Xwomanizerx (talk) 00:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Because I was never very fond of incubators, and they're often victims of vandalism. I'll just wait til we can create the actual articles, get them protected and then revamp the pages. Xwomanizerx (talk) 01:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
DANG IT!! I'm getting really pissed with these stupid people making articles at "Hold It Against Me", "Hold It Against Me (song)", and ""Hold It Against Me (Britney Spears song). I must have given out like 6 warnings. --Cprice1000talk2me03:05, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're right, but others would mess with it saying it's not notable because they think a song charting is the only thing that makes something notable. It is a long article. --Cprice1000talk2me03:42, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wow, it was recreated? I'm so slow! I love that song! You're HIAM article is awesome. That was a bad move getting it fully protected for as long as I did, though, how was I supposed to know she'd release it that early? I seriously think we could make it notable, especially after viewing that. --Cprice1000talk2me03:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OMG I told you before :P They won't do it if nothing has really happened to it. As soon as I see vandalism there, I'll get it protected. Besides, I can just rollback anything that happens. --Cprice1000talk2me03:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, now that we have Hold It Against Me, I want to compete with Born This Way and try and get her album page out there ASAP. Right now, all we seriously need is the album title. --ĈÞЯİŒ1ооо14:46, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but if we just keep on our toes and put everything in as soon as it comes out, I think we can have it ready in under a month. Besides, her album come sout in May, Brit's is March. --ĈÞЯİŒ1ооо20:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I like it! Its very different for her. Very hard and lots of heavy beats. I definately think their are going to be even better 2nd and 3rd singles ;)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me00:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Brit Brit Brit all the way!!!
Hi buddy. So, I uploaded a sample, but removed it as I felt it was too early. Is it okay to add it back? Would it fit in the Composition section? And, the song is soooo amazing that I can't stop listening to it!! What do you feel about the song? Novice7 | Talk13:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've compromised on the release history to prevent an edit war. Please be careful... you've logged quite a few reverts today. ([[WP:3RR]). Good job otherwise. :) -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1[talk]23:43, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Womanizer, I wanted to seek your guidance and suggestions for the "Unusual You" draft I've recently begun in one of my sandboxes. I've been able to write quite extensively on the critic response, but I've been running into some issues with finding reliable sourcing for whether, and if so, when "Unusual You" was released as a promotional single in Australia and New Zealand. If the song was not released as a promo single down under, I do believe this article has enough information for it to stand on its own. Please take a look at the draft [and please keep in mind that it is just that, an early draft] and share your thoughts and critique with me. Thanks again! --Caponer (talk) 23:17, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request and question - Britney sales
Hello, how are you.
I have a problem with the user Harout72.
He has deleted all the source of Britney sales, stating that LiveNation is not reliable and that you can't see the sales. I already told him he had to go to Overview to see the sales. He says it is not reliable. We have been used all that souces in Britney's page, her album sales, her discography page...he doesn't seem to care.
Can you help me?
Thanks.
--GenieOFbritney (talk) 13:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I know I make no sense, but congrats on Brit's number one single, lol. Anyway, I feel like its the second Oops!. And, do you think the Korean charts can be added? Novice7 | Talk16:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, sorry. Scratch that.. I meant the sound, and "charts". But, Womanizer was more successful. So, I fail :) And, I'll add the Korean charts. But, there are like three of them (they are on Talk:HIAM). Which all to add? Novice7 | Talk16:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
After seeing a page being created for almost every song from Beyonce albums, I've started making some for songs from Circus that should be able to meet notability. Shattered Glass is my first project. I'm going to die if you find info on it in a second, because I've been searching all morning. --ĈÞЯİŒ1ооо22:24, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
They are great additions to Wikipedia and have every right to be there to expand on standout tracks from the album. "Kill the Lights" being one that stood out more than most others. --ĈÞЯİŒ1ооо21:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
RE:
Oh X, gimme a break! lol It wasn't so much fan-made as not directly through Jive. It was sold and released through iTunes and was used as a real music video, I think I even saw it on MTV or VH1. --ĈÞЯİŒ1ооо02:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Womanizer, thanks again for taking "Unusual You" to the next level of Good Article status. In the future before I draft another, is there a list somewhere of prioritized non-single Britney Spears songs that you feel would merit having articles over others? Another solution to chronicling popular non-single songs would be to create articles entitled something like "Circus songs" or "Circus tracks" which would then give a brief overview of each song's critical receptions, airplay, etc. Again, thanks for all your assistance with the "Unusual You" article and for all the tremendous efforts you've undertaken in contributing to Wikipedia! --Caponer (talk) 13:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Womanizer, while your response on my wall was most certainly loud and clear, it could have been delivered in a more professional and tactful manner and tone. I've been an active participant on Wikipedia since 2005 and have written, edited, and improved upon hundreds of articles spanning all categories and topics, so I truly understand your legitimate concern about creating more articles when others go without improvement. My creation of "Unusual You" and my above message inquiring about ways in which I can help share information pertaining to Britney Spears songs in no way warranted the message you've just left on my wall. For the record, you are incorrect to state that I'm creating multiple "ridiculous, irrelevant and nonsensical" articles, when all I have created is ONE single article pertaining to Britney Spears, which with a few minor adjustments just became a Good Article thanks to the efforts of you and other editors. Instead of criticizing the contributions of others, try suggesting meaningful ways in which others can help soften the burden you're carrying. You're an amazing and valued member of the Wikipedia community and this is evident in your body of work. I'll do you a favor of removing myself from the WikiProject participant list. Thanks again for all you've done to add to and improve upon the quality of Wikipedia's articles. --Caponer (talk) 17:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Femme Fatale
Sad I wasn't here to make the page, but I was at school. Disappointed, but it's not the point of Wikipedia to create the most pages. Oh well. :P --ĈÞЯİŒ1ооо22:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, I saw the Toxic FA nomination. I don't know what's gotten into him. Anyways, we should delete the FA archive. We should try contacting an administrator. Novice7 | Talk04:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi womanizer! I have a question. Do you know if Brit's "Boys" was issued as a single in the US? I know it was released in UK and Australia, but US? Please reply on my talk page. Thank you. Novice7 (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No no, not you too. You're such an amazing editor, and I know there're problems and issues in real life. Hope you'll back soon. K, so Boys (Britney Spears song) has been fixed up a bit by User:Candyo32 (what do you think? Is it okay?). We searched everywhere for a US single, but couldn't find a reliable source. I looked at Allmusic, it charted on Pop songs chart, I guess. Novice7 (talk) 17:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Dream Within a Dream Tour Poster.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Dream Within a Dream Tour Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles04:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Oops World Tour Poster.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Oops World Tour Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles04:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, I don't want to make your life difficult :). I honestly haven't read the article in depth, but I don't think its necessary. I've promoted 5 album GAs, and I never did peer review. IMO, its only necessary for FA, when every little sentence can make a difference between oppose or support. Go for it, if I have time I'll review it myself, it looks like an interesting read :D. PS. you excited for the new single next weeek? :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me05:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, yes the V magazine cover looks so flawless, really beautfiul stuff. About BTW, lol, its very Gaga, but its too confident, it could have been better IMO, she was too bold and didn't think it through enough. But its still very good. Hmm, I don't agree, I'm pissed at Britney, she could have had such a good start with the Grammys, a better video and one on time! She released the video like 5 weeks later! How BS is that! Nope, poor guys got really hurt, I'm sad for him. I have not been able to get in touch with him as of late, but I will try through email. I'll let you know if I hear of anything :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me05:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Great work on the article womanizer! I was actually planning on expanding on it eventually, but I'm glad you did it now. :) If you need any help with it let me know. ℥nding·start12:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Till the World Ends
Hi! Thanks for letting me know that we need an official announcement for inclusion of this as a single. I was wondering, Amazon Germany lists it as an MP3 download on March 11, 2011. The song sample is also available. Isn't that enough? Please do correct me if I'm wrong. I make mistakes quite often :D — Novice7 (talk) 13:28, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. Thanks! Btw, there's too much going on on Femme Fatale. I suspect sockpuppetry :| I heard the snippet for "TTWE" on Amazon.de, and it seemed awesome! Oh, I found tracklisting source here. — Novice7 (talk) 14:42, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That sure makes sense. Oh, I didn't see that. I was so excited that I didn't read it at all :D And, I saw the V Magazine photoshoot pics. I must say, her best since 2005 :) — Novice7 (talk) 14:48, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! They just sent me the code to download since I preordered the premium Femme Fatale. It is an amazing song, much better than HIAM! This is gonna be a favorite!! --ĈÞЯİŒ1ооо15:48, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Xwomanizerx, I'm starting the article for "Till the World Ends". However, the song isn't notable enough to have an article (right now), so I'm collecting all the info that I can to edit the article later when the song enter on any chart... If you can help, I would be very grateful! Thanks! :) - Sauloviegas (talk) 02:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you always put "Someday (I Will Understand)" in "Other singles" line? It doesn't matter if "Someday (I Will Understand)" is the only single from "Britney & Kevin: Chaotic", because "Someday (I Will Understand)" isn't a promo - it's a regular single like, for example, "3". Well, based upon your opinion we should delete "The Singles Collection" line and add "3" to "Other singles". --Vinokurov Demis (talk) 18:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Some questions for you
1. Why "That's Where You Take Me" is marked as a single on Britney's third album article, but at her discography and her singles template there is nothing about "That's Where You Take Me"?
2. "B in the Mix: The Remixes" article contains info about pre-realise Key Cuts from Remixed promotional EP, but again, there is nothing about it at her discography and template. Why?
3. Britney Spears' discography page doesn't contain notes about release of non-worldwide singles. For example, "Anticipating" was realised only at France, "Born to make you happy" only in Europe and Australia, but there is nothing about it. Why?
4. "What's Going On" is in the Britney Spears singles template, but there is nothing about it at the her discography. Why? It's her featured single, isn't it?
Please refrain from posting unsubstantiated biased opinion on the My Prerogative article. Britney's version did NOT surpass Bobby Browns. I have removed your POV nonsense. If this edit war continues, I'll seek a peer review on the article with a view to having the page BLOCKED from you editing it with more POV vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.24.16 (talk) 12:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oops I did it again tour
I'm wondering why you reverted my edit where I added the initials so people would know where each city was. There were some obscure places there and I thought it would be more helpful if people saw the full name. 108.9.78.104 (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't start what again? Trying to condescend to me, because of me making a minor change to a conflicting recording date? You chase after the undo button every time a change is made by ME. Whether or not the change(s) I made is(are) correct. Lucky for you I have been too busy to care. There is NO possible way this song could have been recorded in October as the recording session took place in the New York City, which is hours away from California by plane. From October 8, 2000 to November 21, 2000, Spears was on the European leg of her Oops!...I Did It Again World Tour. Spears NEVER records on the same day of a concert, only on free days. The only dates free during that time period were October 9, 15-16, 21, 23, 27, & 31(Halloween) of 2000, which the latter date was spent partying in a German bar.[1] I doubt she would be commuting during such free days Trans-Atlantic in sparse amounts of constricted time. At the beginning of October 2000, the only date unaccounted for is October 1, 2000. In this video[2], at 02:05, the date of October 3, 2000 is given for the second full day of rehearsal for the "Stronger" at Millennium Studios in Los Angeles. At 2:15, Spears clearly states, "..and actually I learned all the choreography yesterday". Obviously "yesterday" would be October 2, 2000, a non-recording day for her to learn it. October 4, 2000 was a day of preparation for Stronger and recuperation. On October 5, 2000, at 10:13AM(@02:59)[3], Spears has been stated to arrive at Van Nuys Airport to shoot the "Stronger" music video. How would she record any song then? Spears is prominently featured on MTV's Making the Video until October 7, 2000 at 6:42 AM(@04:25)[4], when the video shoot wraps. Spears from there left of course for Birmingham, England on October 7, 2000 in preparation for her concert the next day. My point is that October was a busy month for Spears and she had no time to record, except on the first and fourth day of the month. Her last U.S. tour date was September 20, 2000 in Louisiana. Since the tour was 5 months and there was room from September 21 to October 1, 2000, it is very likely this song was recorded in late September. The sources provided from Forbes and Entertainment Weekly do not list anything concrete about the status of the song's completion. Had it been recorded or not. Very likely it had by October 12 and even October 5, 2000. Back then, most recording deadlines didn't make allowances for sessions that fall closer than 25 days near an album's release because of mastering & etc., so anything after the 3rd week of October is ruled out. Any extreme attempt to refute this clearly points out the obvious on your part and I will discuss it until we logically settle this.Carmaker1 (talk) 11:33, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Nathan! My favorite track is probably Criminal though, followed by I Wanna Go and Inside Out. I hope the first two become singles. :D Xwomanizerx (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I have to thank you for everything that I learned. You and Novice7 were my mentors in here, always telling what I should or should'nt do on articles. I'll be thankful forever. Seriously. :) - Sauloviegas (talk) 22:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there Womanizerx! I see that "Big Fat Bass" has been nominated for a GA. It looks good, but do you think it is ready for a GA now. It just charted (and that too in Korea), but if it's released as a single later.... I don't know, just wondering :) Novice7 (talk) 11:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'll surely talk to him. Many song articles (especially from Circus) are being created. I don't think it's a good idea. What do you think? And, I hope you'll return to wiki soon and present some amazing articles :) Novice7 (talk) 15:54, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah.. I agree, it's kinda dark too. And, "S&M" remix is super cool!!! But, Brit sounds as if she's suffering from a cold :( Novice7 (talk) 16:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! Less autotune. Is it a single? I mean, digital download?? And, if it is, I hope there's a music video... *Dreams of an awesome video* Novice7 (talk) 16:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WOW!!! I CAN'T WAIT!!! And, I'm guessing another #1 debut for Britney and first for Rihanna. Britney is always special to me. I don't know much about her life, but I've following her ever since I saw "Sometimes" music video. Also, I plan on working on "Oops!" sometime soon, and I hope I get enough material for that. Novice7 (talk) 16:26, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lace and Leather
Hey, Cprice1000 created an article for Lace and Leather, and has nominated it as a GA. Shouldn't he create a discussion on the project first? Even I had nominated Mmm Papi and removed the nomination, but someone undid the revision. This is what Cprice said: "Why? I do not to hold a discussion for an article that is sure to pass GA." Really??? Take a look at Lace and Leather, please, and talk to him. - Sauloviegas (talk) 17:47, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OMG I KNOW. So excited. So, to be blunt, Till The World Ends article is poo at its current state (because you havnt been very active on it lately and rabid fans have taken it over), im about to completely overhaul it if thats cool. :) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 00:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Do you even feel that this is remotely notable? Aren't we pushing the boundaries of notability too much with these inferior articles cropping up in the Wikiproject? — Legolas(talk2me)06:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) I totally agree, I thought "I've Just Begun Having My Fun" was just need for the GT or something, but the Britney articles are being created when the article basically comprises of recording details and a sentence of reception and a minor Pop 100 charting. But Mmm Papi isn't nothing compared to this one. Candyo3222:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm torn with "Mmm Papi". I'd probably lean towards keep, but I agree with Candy that "Lace and Leather" is definitely pushing the respected boundary.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me23:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Both are equally pathetic, "Mmm Papi" being the lesser evil. And Xwomanizer, don't stop your good work because of these crappy articles. — Legolas(talk2me)03:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So what do you propose, nominate both for deletion? Whether or not these are kept, there should definately be a lot higher bar set for future song articles. I mean, I thought originally we agreed songs need to chart on significant charts. I mean for example on "Oh Santa!" we didn't create it until it charted on the Hot 100, even though there was far more coverage than these two combined.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me08:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you Nathan, that we should stop this while the iron is hot. Otherwise this will be epidemic, imagine when Gaga's album is released. Obviously they will be charting somewhere or else and there will be mayhem with every damn fan trying to create every damn song article. WP:GNG is a dangerous thing imo. — Legolas(talk2me)14:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See, problem is that when artists like Britney, Gaga or at one point Swift release an album, due to the new digital outlets available, usually several (I believe Swift had 6 at one point) songs chart in the US Hot 100 just due to the album's release. Now, even though the rule would allow their creation, we really need to think this through and set a decent bar for future songs, unless Legolas, you would like to see every song from Born This Way with its own article. Should we bring it to a larger scale discussion? That seems pretty rational.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me20:54, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is why WP:NSONGS contains the language that says "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". I don't go around trying to get them deleted, but any time all you get is an infobox, a sample image from a video, and a chart table, I don't think that qualifies as a "reasonably detailed article". I don't think trying to get some charts declared more notable than others is the answer: it won't fix the problem, and it's apt to cause virtual nationalistic riots.—Kww(talk) 04:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I notice that you reverted one of my edits here accusing me of vandalism. Your next edit was to undo your own edit. You appear to have a habit of accusing people of "vandalism" when you disagree with their posts. Please can you read WP:Vandalism and understand what vandalism is, and when something is vandalism, and, while you are at it, perhaps a reading of WP:Civility wouldn't go amiss. Calling things vandalism when they are not is certainly uncivil. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 18:48, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you keep reverting? All 4 sources were IN ATTENDANCE at the dress rehearsal held for the tour last night, and all four are all reconfirming the majority of what the others have said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ColdAsFire Baby (talk • contribs) 21:42, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Radar (song)
Hi,
You reverted my editing of the link toward Pulse-Doppler radar instead of Doppler radar by saying that there is a source to backup. That was the point of my change, the source does not know a thing about radar :
Radar does not make any sound, they are using microwaves.
I've listen the song and as far as I can hear the only sound that can be associated is a pulsation which would be related to the impulses of a Pulsed radar. Nothing to do with the Doppler effect.
This whole description is just PR mumbo-jumbo and to my thinking, any link to radar should be removed.
Thanks for reviewing it. I thought I might respond to a query of yours in here. Well the Britney remix of the song did not have any background info regarding it, neither it had any recording info. I did a personal search for it and all I got were Rihanna and Britney's stupid tweets. I don't know how to warranty a separate section in this case, since the individual remixes also did not achieve any third party notability unlike TTWE and BTW. So, what do you think? — Legolas(talk2me)03:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the section should mostly be about the Britney remix, just like the section in TTWE is largely about the remix with Nicki and Kesha. But the other remixes should be mentioned imo, and I guess the J. Cole mix must've gotten attention from someone. Britney also talked about S&M in some interview so I'll look for that. Did you like TEOG video? Xwomanizerx (talk) 03:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Britney looks just "heaven;y" in her new video. "Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, you're cool, fuck you!!" its the coolest line I've ever heard in a video. This might be the best video I've seen in a while! — Legolas(talk2me)14:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks guys! I've been doing a search for free images almost everyday and couldn't find any, how weird. And IWG is definitely my favorite video from this era. Xwomanizerx (talk) 18:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! About this,[6] umm...not to mention Live performances is much more common header, Britney obviously has performed the song multiple times (Fatale has already had multiple gigs), so how can you say "Same performance"? -- Frous (talk) 00:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
GIMME GIMME MORE!!
OH MY GOD! That alternate video! I hope whoever leaked it has the other version as well (with the funeral scenes, etc. if there is indeed a cut of it). I would pay like $7647890987647890876 to see it! ℥nding·start04:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Suppossibly, the original video with those scenes leaked back in 2007, but was removed very quickly. This has to be one of Britney's biggest mysteries. That along with The Original Doll. ℥nding·start01:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
LMAOOOOO are you freaking kidding me? You're the one that does not want to discuss your additions. Girl, please. Stop acting like a child. Xwomanizerx (talk) 02:15, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are constantly reverting my additions, which by the way HAVE BEEN SOURCED, and you continue to remove them for no valid reason. Nickyp88 (talk) 02:32, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Xwomanizerx. I'm an Wikipedia user from Brazil and I want to congratulate your work on articles about Britney Spears. I plan to translate the ones you've created and evolved into Portuguese because they're very complete. I wish you good work! Lucas RdS (talk) 05:57, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, you re one step ahead! ;) Yes, that page is, well, not so good lol. You better be planning on getting to her older stuff :P Recent editors have nominated iconic songs like OIDIA is very weak conditions. You are needed there :D--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me23:24, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I can't stop them from nominating it lol. I'm actually working on Blackout atm, so I can nominate all the articles of the album for a good topic. I'm just waiting for The M+M's Tour to be a GA and I'm gonna continue working on the album page and in other Britney articles :P Xwomanizerx (talk) 23:31, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I recently had one of the articles I worked on pass the WP:GA reviw and I was asked that give back to the community by reviewing someone else's GA nomination. I looked through the list of nominations and this one caught my eye. If you like, I can review it but because this would be my first GA review, I wanted to run it past you first. If you would rather wait for a more experienced GA reviewer, I would understand. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For some reason, this excites me. xD I never really contributed to the article before, but it is indeed her best song EVER, just saying. ℥nding·start03:51, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Totally bumping the song now. I wish she'd release music like this again. Hard Candy and Confessions were good, but I like me some controversial Madonna. What are you thinking for a title? Like a Prayer (video)? ℥nding·start03:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm excited/scared about the new album because of the Gaga comparisons she'll get no matter what she releases. And I think that Like a Prayer (video) would be a better choice than Like a Prayer (music video). Seems too long. Xwomanizerx (talk) 04:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, yeah. Oh god, I swear to god if that happens... I won't be able to handle that. People comparing MADONNA to gaga, when Madonna was the original. Delusions... ℥nding·start04:04, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I love them both, but this comparisons are gonna be made until people realize that there can be more one successful female artist in music... Xwomanizerx (talk) 04:14, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You try your best? *punches you in the face* Everything you touch turns to gold GA. Oh and btw, I'm not 100% sure on Like a Prayer (video), as it does seem to be a part of titles of video albums. ℥nding·start06:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It depends on the reviewer, lol. I've had some prettyscary nominations. And yes, I assume I'll have to change it to (music video), but I'll wait for a few more comments. Bummer that Nathan opposed. Xwomanizerx (talk) 06:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For your dedication to the Project, articles and everything regarding Britney! You have been a wonderful editor since day one, and truly deserve an award for all you work! Enjoy it my friend :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me08:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
