User talk:XavieromackMay 2008Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The CW Television Network, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The CW Television Network was changed by Xavieromack (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-05-18T14:50:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC) Your recent edit to User:FisherQueen (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 14:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to The CW Television Network, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
BlockedDue to your disruptive edits despite numerous warnings, you have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. Because your intentions remain unclear, the block is a relatively short 12 hours. Please use that time to read our editing guidelines and ask whatever questions you may have; you are still able to edit this talk page during the block. You may resume editing after the block expires, but please try to be more communicative - more disruption will lead to longer blocks, and ignoring other users won't make them go away. Kafziel Complaint Department 23:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC) Sanger-HarrisYour information on Sanger-Harris is incorrect. I have reverted your edits. The company was merged with Foley's in 1987, and consolidated with Robinsons-May in 1993. I was a former manager with May Company and worked for them during the Foley purchase and consolidation. Please verify your facts before making edits. Dma124 (talk) 00:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Vandalism You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Ian Cairns (talk) 14:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC) I'll block you back User: IcairnsIf you don't unblock me now I'll block you.
I apologizeI'm sorry for threatning you. If you read my user you'll see I have aspergers. That disease causes me to have a bad temper. I'll never threaten another user again. --Xavieromack BlockedThis account is a sockpuppet of Elladog and has been blocked indefinitely. Kafziel Complaint Department 02:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Xavieromack (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I'm not Elladog I've never even heard of Elladog before Decline reason: It isn't relevant; you're still vandalizing, no matter who you are, so a block is necessary. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Xavieromack (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I'll never vandalize again Decline reason: I find the sockpuppetry charge to be credible. — Sandstein 18:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia