User talk:XYZ 250706

January 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Draft:P. Shanmugam (CPIM)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 14:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@XYZ 250706 you know how to request a draft. Creating it without attribution is disruptive. Given the concerns raised at ANI and at the AfD, I have partially blocked you from this article. You remain free to edit elsewhere, but if you continue to be disruptive you'll lose further access. Star Mississippi 14:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XYZ 250706 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:36, 31 January 2025 (UTC) I did not know about the rule stating that a draft cannot be created without attribution. I may have made mistakes during AfDs but I didn't vandalise the article and made any disruptive edits in the article. Therefore I am requesting to be unblocked.[reply]

Decline reason:

You know perfectly well that this was not the only concern. You know because you were told so here on this page and you deleted that comment. I have to assume this unblock request was therefore made in bad faith. Stay away from P. Shanmugam. Don't make another unblock request until you have a substantial history of trouble-free edits in unrelated subject areas. Yamla (talk) 11:39, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2025 Bihar Legislative Assembly election

Hi, INC may have lost two MLAs, but they still have 17 MLAs, whereas the Left Front has only 15 MLAs. Please check the current seats of the parties in Bihar Legislative Assembly page. Also, INC contested 70 seats, while the Left Front contested only 29 seats in the 2020 Assembly election. It is most likely that the INC will contest more seats than the Left Front in the 2025 Bihar Assembly election as well. Therefore, INC remains the second largest party in the Mahagathbandhan alliance. I don't see any logic behind the Left Front being considered the second largest alliance (not even a single party) within the Mahagathbandhan alliance. Please refrain from making edits without any logical basis. Thank you. Sachin126 (talk) 06:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sachin126 Actually just after 2020 election, it was opined by many people that if left fron and congress were given 50-50 seats, MGB would have won. After this, INC has lost 2 more MLAs. So I edited that. XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]