|
User talk:X-Editor/Archive 1
Speedy deletion nomination of Concert PropertiesHello X-Editor, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Concert Properties for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dom from Paris (talk) 23:28, 29 April 2018 (UTC) An extended welcomeHi X-Editor. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily. Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages. If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines. I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 16:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 12Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Concert Properties, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Development (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Stub tagsPlease note that {{stub}} goes right at the end of an article -see WP:ORDER. Putting it anywhere else makes life harder for stub-sorters. Thanks. PamD 23:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC) A page you started (Mount Dennis (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Mount Dennis (disambiguation), X-Editor! Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page. Learn more about page curation. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Mount Dennis (disambiguation) A tag has been placed on Mount Dennis (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Why Revert a valid edit on LoTT page?Dear X-Editor I see you reverted a valid edit I just completed - reorganizing content based on flow and structure as well as adding a comment to editors that the "teachers were fired" statement is dangerous and should be either fully verified using a reliable source, or removed. Just because there's a media article saying that someone says that someone was fired because of this account's posting, doesn't make it true. Yes, it's true that someone said someone said someone got fired.... but unless there is proof, it does not belong in an encyclopedic article. I'm curious as to your rationale for reverting the edit since you did not list one in your edit summary. I did not remove the statement but added an editor-only invisible comment so someone with actual verifiable content could add it..... why revert this non-controversial edit? Addressing it would improve the article. Best, The Real Serena JoyTalk 23:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Sunnybrook Stable Fire for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunnybrook Stable Fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunnybrook Stable Fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Quek157 (talk) 11:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Fatblogging (May 26)
Pole PositionYou don't need to put MAME or other emulators under ports, per this edit. Practically every arcade game can be played in MAME, so we don't need to mention it. Namcokid47 (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 3)
HEYListen, I understand your saying, but honestly. Your making it very difficult for me to enjoy Wikipedia now. I hope your satisfied with the deletion, but know that people who word comments so rudely that it puts a bad rep on the wiki. I don't even like the game! It was just fun to make an article that was a W.I.P!!!! So thanks, also real original name :( Timwardo (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
I strongly believe that article satisfies the minimum criteria of notability and should not be abruptly deleted. Instead, an improvement is needed. Please do take part in AfD. AchaksurvisayaUdvejin (talk) 18:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Parascenium (June 21)
Apple Watch Series 4 listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Apple Watch Series 4. Since you had some involvement with the Apple Watch Series 4 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:24, 30 June 2018 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Ping-O-Tronic has been accepted The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! (t) Josve05a (c) 02:46, 15 July 2018 (UTC)John Francis Fortescue HornerLast month you added a "Context" banner to the article on John Francis Fortescue Horner. I have just got around to looking at this and wondered if you could explain a little more (perhaps on the article talk page) about what you think is needed?— Rod talk 17:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Parascenium (July 28)
Special measures apply to cryptocurrency related pages Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here. General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.MER-C 11:37, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to WikiProject YouTube
September 2018
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nintendo Switch Pro Controller (September 17)
September 2018
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nintendo Switch Pro Controller (October 8)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nintendo Switch Pro Controller (October 9)
AfC notification: Draft:Fitness Boxing has a new commentYour submission at Articles for creation: Fitness Boxing has been acceptedThe article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! JDoorjam JDiscourse 20:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: VideoSport MK2 has been acceptedThe article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:38, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Shooters Network (November 3)
The USA Today source is reliable but not independent as it contains material from a interview that Buzzfeed did with the creators of Shooter's Network. See WP:RS for more help. Need more than primary or press releases sources. JC7V-talk 05:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC) AfC notification: Draft:Shooters Network has a new commentAfC notification: Draft:Shooters Network has a new commentFitness Boxing.I suggest leaving the stuff by the commas like other Wikipedia articles have them sorted. It baffles me how people use their own Wikipedia pages to look indifferent from others, when that is not the case. Administrators need to check it first. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 07:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message Hello, X-Editor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, X-Editor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Fatblogging Hello, X-Editor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fatblogging". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:59, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hello (company) has been acceptedThe article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Legacypac (talk) 04:20, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Your draft article, Draft:Jack Rat TerrierHello, X-Editor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jack Rat Terrier". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: GigLocator (December 20)
You support Nintendo?You support Nintendo for takedown good fangames or not? 178.121.221.177 (talk) 21:33, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
San Ignacio Town Airstrip ref improveHi X-Editor. I've pulled the refimprove tag from San Ignacio Town Airstrip. It has two stub tags on it already. Shortage of refs is kind of implied by the stub tags. I've searched for refs and there isn't much to find, so if you come up with any on this airport, please add them in. Thanks Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 05:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
January 2019
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Softlavender (talk) 18:28, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
WishHello. Help improve, expand and copy edit for article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you. Tauthanhhuyen34 (talk) 04:05, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Countesswells) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Countesswells. I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 17:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Advice at reverting vandalismNext time you see someone else editing people's comments to alter its meaning, make sure to revert in whole, not just your own comments. Thanks. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 22:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Do you have a conflict of interest?Hi, X. Are you personally, or financially related to Gab, or Andrew Torba in any way? If so, you must declare it. Undisclosed paid editing is a serious violation of our policies. It looks like you must respond to COI inquiries and cease editing immediatly until you have done so. Sorry for the confusion. I'll leave the detailed notice below. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 08:19, 2 March 2019 (UTC) Hello X-Editor. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Gab (social network), but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:X-Editor. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:
Apple TVApple TV, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 22:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC) April 2019You reached 3RR with this edit. Please do remember to follow WP:BRD make good use of talk page. I believe this has been discussed before. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 20:53, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Gay Frogs listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gay Frogs. Since you had some involvement with the Gay Frogs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 23:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC) May 2019
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Softlavender (talk) 03:52, 22 May 2019 (UTC) Using edit summariesIt's generally a good practice to fill in edit summaries for every single edit, so please consider doing so. Even simple ones like "ce" (copyedit) or "expand from XX source", etc, will help. It'd be a courtesy for other editors as well. And also please make sure edit summaries are accurate for the nature of the edit. Details may be found here. Thanks. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 17:37, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Final warning on Gab (social network)Even after May 26 warning to you about your longterm disruptive editing on Gab [1], you are still quoting Torba [2], still adding misinformation [3], still removing or changing sources without explanation [4], [5], still adding unnecessary clutter to the article [6], [7], [8], still editing promotionally [9], still edit-warring [10], and still failing to use edit summaries [11], [12]. Every single edit you make has to be carefully checked by an experienced editor, and is usually reverted or massively corrected. This is your final warning. I advise you to voluntarily absent yourself from Gab (social network) before you are officially topic banned from it. Softlavender (talk) 06:15, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
The next controversyDid you remember I told you there was going to be another controversy? QuackGuru (talk) 03:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC) See "My opinion is that there is a controversy taking place on Wikipedia. It could spill over to Wales' talk page and so on. It may be two years before something like this happens again. Will you be around two years from now?"[13] QuackGuru (talk) 17:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:GigLocatorHello, X-Editor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "GigLocator". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 06:38, 7 July 2019 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:List of mergers and acquisitions by FitbitHello, X-Editor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of mergers and acquisitions by Fitbit". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 11:18, 10 July 2019 (UTC) A survey to improve the community consultation outreach processHello! The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of. Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes. The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic. Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter message
ds alertThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. —valereee (talk) 13:27, 29 December 2020 (UTC) Nomination of Aderonke Apata for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aderonke Apata until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Patriot Party (political party) for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patriot Party (political party) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Seagull123 Φ 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)  The article Galipeau Island has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Speedy deletion nomination of Greg KouriHello, X-Editor, Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions. I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Greg Kouri, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator. For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. John B123 (talk) 17:40, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
please help me to get my first article publishedHello hope you are doing good , i'm new here on wikepedia i don't have too much knowledge about the rules of wikipedia , i have just started contributing on wikipedia as someday's before i went through a Draft:Junaid Bhat which was declined because it was totally incomplete and there were not enough supportive url's in the draft , so while checking this draft i went through internet and collected the information regarding the mentioned person and took this draft as my first contribution on wikipedia so i started recreating this draft which is complete now and has been sent for submission : please i request you to help me to get my first work published thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prakrutiprajapanti (talk • contribs) 20:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
FARI have nominated The Million Dollar Homepage for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 19Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rumble (website), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortune. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC) February 2021Please stop adding things some random wacko on Parler or Gab posted. I find some twitter or even wikipedia user who did bad things. Even Parler and Gab deserve fair treatment. No online service can be held responsible for everything their users do. If we had a source saying that the behavior was reported and the service chose to allow it that would be a different story. --Guy Macon (talk) 08:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC) Nomination of Greg Kouri for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Kouri (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 15:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC) ApologyMy apologies, I accidentally undid your edit rather than the one before yours, which is now moot without the background section. Natureium (talk) 21:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC) No problem. X-Editor (talk) 22:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC) March 2021
Nomination of Nathalie Van Raemdonck for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathalie Van Raemdonck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC) Standard Noticification
Mitch mcconnellDo you like Mitch McConnell, just like fellow editor Baane247? Warrior4565666666 (talk) 03:58, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Why geometry?Why geometry? Geometry is one of the most elegant fields in mathematics. It deals with visual shapes that we know from everyday life. Queen Animie (talk) 09:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Disability in Canada tagging for updateHi, you place a tag on the article requesting that it be updated. Such a tag is fairly useless without accompanying explanation. Please post some detail on the article talk page about which content you believe is outdated. If you are aware of better or more recent sources please mention that too. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC) Heads UpAn article you initiated, Balaji Srinivasan, is on the chopping block. Chisme (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve In Defense of LootingHello, X-Editor, Thank you for creating In Defense of Looting. I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Whiteguru (talk) 05:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC) Corrected edits on Unite the Right rallyX-Editor, letting you know I made a few corrections to your recent edit of Unite the Right rally. Specifically, I made the following corrections:
Kimdorris (talk) 08:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Conspirituality for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conspirituality (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 18:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC) Thanks for the help :)Just wanted to say thanks for visually improving the information I added. I only seriously got into editing about a month ago and I literally just today got a decent understanding of the web link citations (I used to just copy-paste links into articles). So I really appreciate it :) Updatewithfacts (talk) 00:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 21An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC) Thanks for fixing my poor editting!I really appreciate you coming behind me at times and fixing some of the poor tag and formatting that I've written. Thank you! Squatch347 (talk) 17:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Patriot Party (political party)
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Palmer ReportI've somewhat IAR in removing your comment on Talk:Palmer Report, so if you restore it I understand (and won't remove it again). However, the Palmer Report's Twitter account (and followers) are watching that talk page and would probably love to go into a protracted discussion around whether Wikipedia and its editors can be sued (both have been in the past, by the way), and I really think it's best we keep that talk page focused on improving the article rather than feeding the Twitter chaos. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:19, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Is this a bot?Not to be rude but, your username got my attention and made me assume you are a bot.CycoMa (talk) 17:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Megan Ming Francis moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Megan Ming Francis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It does not show notability according to WP:PROF. One book is not enough for notability. If there are other publications, please add them. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "
What I suggest is that you add the 2 Most cited journal articles -- this one and Black politics and the neoliberal racial order, add a book review or two for the book, and let me know on my user talk p. and I'll take care of it as an admin DGG ( talk ) 19:47, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Wii TFA rerunHey, X-Editor. As a top contributor to the Wii article, I'm here to tell you that I'm making plans to rerun the Wii this November. If you are interested in writing a blurb or helping in another way, I can keep you updated. Panini!🥪 12:10, 18 August 2021 (UTC)\
Concern regarding Draft:Aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC) Copying within Wikipedia
PewDiePie and pescetarianismHi, I'm just wondering what source you would consider as reliable? I'm a bit confused as to how Dexerto isn't reliable as they have a sizable online following, even surpassing some sources on the article in Twitter followers (i.e the Humanist). I know having a superior Twitter following isn't a guaranteed source for reliability, but I certainly don't think Dexerto is unreliable. Thanks PokeFan10025 (talk)
References
September 2021
Disambiguation link notification for September 13An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 13 September 2021 (UTC) September 2021 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 08:25, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). X-Editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I literally said on the talk page that I would be fine with linking to the political term instead. I apologize for the misunderstanding and will not be involved in the discussion anymore, nor will I be involved in editing her article. Instead of blocking me from editing the entire site, maybe you could just block me from editing the article in question? All of my other edits have been good faith and productive. X-Editor (talk) 19:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC) Decline reason: You are not presently blocked. Closing request. SQLQuery Me! 04:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution – second warningYou acknowledged here that you were aware of this. You did it again at the article Theresa Tam. You risk being blocked again if you continue to do this; attribution is a copyright requirement, as discussed at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 00:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC) Jihan Abass moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Jihan Abass, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "
AfC notification: Draft:Jihan Abass has a new commentYour submission at Articles for creation: Jihan Abass has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)GabDear X-Editor, I’m not sure if you are responsible for the Gab Wiki. You are the reason free speech is dying. How can Gab be responsible for anything it’s users post? That is ridiculous. Gab is a platform, not big brother or almighty god. Users post at their own risk. Saying that they were responsible for that capital crap, or for anything else is 100% insane. Read the 1st amendment one of these days. It’s the only reason you get to do what you do, regardless of how you feel. Next time you want to edit anything on here please leave your personal feelings out of it. This site should only be facts, not human misinterpretation.
Hello. Help copy edit for the article. Thanks you. Omomp (talk) 02:13, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Babylon BeeYou beat me to it, I was drafting up a series of "most shared headlines." Good job. Squatch347 (talk) 02:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021Hi X-Editor, I am writing to follow up on my removal of your addition of content to Kelli Stavast, because there is a pending RfC on the Article Talk page about whether to include it. Per the responding to an RfC section of WP:RfC, please note it includes,
WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge fifth anniversary
Improper Citations on Capitol Riot ArticleSorry to bother you, but I saw that you thanked me for my edit adding information to the Capitol riot article. I added an additional citation in a separate edit, one with many authors, and I had to write it myself, but it looks like I made a mistake. Could you fix the error? Bill Williams 00:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
FalseStop putting down conservatives just because they believe in stuff you don't this man literally has more support then your liberal arts friends either put the correct information on here or it will be hacked and fixed and you will be locked out 2600:1004:B150:7D6A:4992:2B59:AD65:B4B2 (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Edit summary is important
Level three warning for removal of contentFor some reason twinkle isn't working so I'm giving you this by hand. We use opinionated material frequently and I note that this is attributed. And why aren't you using the talk page? Doug Weller talk 21:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Important NoticeThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Doug Weller talk 21:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Disambiguation link notification for November 23An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moms for Liberty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Williamson County. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Mass Killings AFDSaw your entry there. I agree with your assessment. This feels like a habitual white wash attempt by a few motivated editors. It does seem to have hit mainstream consciousness though so I expect it to be very busy. PS, I loled about the comment earlier about your political bias. Squatch347 (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Moms for Liberty On 19 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Moms for Liberty, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the conservative organization Moms for Liberty wants a book about Galileo Galilei to be taught in a way that is more positive towards the Catholic Church, for balance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Moms for Liberty. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Moms for Liberty), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
12,000Hey, congrats! This makes 12,000 edits exactly!! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 01:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
MKuCRPlease, self-revert this. First, "repressions" (with a reference to Wheatcroft) is not in the article anymore, and it contradicts to Weathcroft's own opinion:
Second, noone called MKuCR "Holocaust", but many people raise a concern that comparing Communist mass killings with the Holocaust is the Holocaust obfuscation. Please, remove this b/s from the lead, I would like to avoid conflicts. Paul Siebert (talk) 03:27, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
In regards to this, the problem is that the article is supposed to be a general discussion of Communism as a whole a la The Black Book of Communism, which is why Paul Siebert's calls to rely on country experts, the only way to fix the NPOV issue about the events and their summaries, has been rejected but the problem is not Siebert or anyone else but the article's structure that is wrong in reverse. This [the article's structure] is, in itself, a NPOV problem because majority of scholarly sources discuss each country separately.
It is not sufficient that the country was nominally a Communist state. If they are discussed together, there must be a clear connection. According to Dallin (the father of modern Sovietology), not a random Wikipedian editor like me, even the authors of The Black Book of Communism did not provide a connection or explanation to lump them together. Yet, that is exactly what we do too in that article. The only possible topic is discussing not the events, for which we already have plenty of articles about them not individually but also in each country's history pages, but the theories about them as a grouping. Since some theories do the grouping, that is acceptable. Davide King (talk) 13:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 3An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 United States Capitol attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MSM. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for January 14An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Megan Ming Francis
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC) Merge proposalPlease see Talk:Employee monitoring software § Proposed merge of Bossware into Employee monitoring software. Thanks. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 06:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Duplicated infoboxesIt seems like you're accidentally duplicating infoboxes as part of unrelated edits. Any idea what could be causing the issue? Firefangledfeathers 20:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions noticeThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Firefangledfeathers 01:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC) This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Firefangledfeathers 05:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright problem (2nd notice)
A barnstar for you
Your lack of edit summariesI've noticed that you almost never include an edit summary. You really should be writing them, especially on highly contentious pages. Not doing so, aside from being rude and unhelpful to your fellow editors, can give the impression that you're trying to hide the nature of your edits and raises the probability of reverts. Please see WP:ES for guidelines. GordonGlottal (talk) 04:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 13An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of lawsuits involving Tesla, Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC) thanks! Thanks for the edit on the Project Information Literacy page! Margymaclibrary (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for your efforts
Florida 1557Seems to relate to all grades.[19] Doug Weller talk 18:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Kashmir Files - Bhupesh Baghel's claimed "support" misread?I reverted your edit because it seemed you misread the NDTV report. His response to the BJP members demanding tax breaks was to say - go ask the center to do it. Can hardly be seen as support, especially on such a controversial film If you have better sources, please add back. Hemantha (talk) 04:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
This person is not a woman. He has male genitalia and you need to include that in the description. 204.195.112.250 (talk) 21:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
COVID-19 pandemic in SvalbardHello X-Editor, The number was correct for the Svalbard, as we could see on the official website of Longyearbyen before an update of the site https://web.archive.org/web/20220308064341/https://www.lokalstyre.no/korona.525097.no.html. The hospital in Longyearbyen even stopped recording the positive tests https://www.lokalstyre.no/status-covid-19-paa-svalbard-uke-8.6510890-545533.html. A report (still online) shows 278 cases as of February 21 https://www.lokalstyre.no/status-covid-19-paa-svalbard-uke-7.6509534.html. Sami270 (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Joseph Kramer (doctor)Hello, X-Editor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph Kramer". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC) Content mirroringHowdy! Thanks for your help working on Libs of TikTok and Taylor Lorenz. One thing I'll note is to be wary of mirroring content directly between the two articles as there is content in Libs of TikTok that is not suitable for the Lorenz bio. Cheers, SiliconRed (he/him) (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Us-Mexico borderJohn Stossel made a video about Wikipedia and in it he added a factual edit, which was removed then seems to have been brought back by you, but then removed by that same guy again a few day later. Just thought you might want to look into it or fix it and lock that page for awhile due to the video. Thanks 96.3.233.66 (talk) 00:22, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Close paraphrasingHello X-Editor. Are you familiar with the page Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing? It might be worth a read, if you have not taken a look already. I bring this up, not because I'm some expert in copyright myself, but I saw this edit you made and saw how similar it looked to the source text. Thanks. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
April 2022
Copyright violation (3rd notice)
2022 monkeypox outbreak task force invitationHello! I know you have an interest in the ongoing 2022 monkeypox outbreak, so I wanted to invite you to the new monkeypox outbreak task force, which I started from the WikiProject of current events. The task force’s goal is to improve any and all articles relating the the new outbreak. I hope you consider joining! Elijahandskip (talk) 21:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC) WP:VOICEIf someone claimed Clinton did this, you need to make that clear especially if its a controversial claim involving a living person, per WP:VOICE. As discussed in the source, an official claimed that Clinton signed off not that Clinton had signed off. You've written the latter as if it were fact, when the source clearly states that the official contends Clinton signed off. I've since reverted your additions across multiple articles. —MelbourneStar☆talk 05:45, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Serious errorX-Editor, it appears that in this edit [20], you have severely misread the ABC News source [21] you provided. You wrote that local police announced that they would stop cooperating with investigations. In fact, ABC News says that the claim of non-cooperation came from unnamed
Undid revision 1093521865 by Pdogtreefrog (talk) Did you read my edit reverting the content? Only one review really expresses this view and goes way off topic from the docMy apologies I didn't realize there had been a review after I published and did miss the initial note. I would have definitely not republished the same version without some discussion - though I don't think there is a set of references available so far for me to add that here as a reaction or as a controversy section (which would be a more appropriate place anyway). I agree only Jason Whitlock's review called out the disconnect directly or in a similar fashion as the additional context and reference I used to supplement that critique. However, The Catholic World Report and The Catholic Weekly reviews make a similar critique of the documentary lacking a Christian perspective on the gender identity question. Essentially references 29-32 along with Whitlock's all offer praise before making a critique of it's lack of a christian-based framing or in some way missing an opportunity to approach the topic in a way that is more aligned or beneficial to some Christian ideology. Ironically The Christian Post where he gave the interview I cited where he was admonishing the adoption of secular and academic positions over that of their faith is the only religious organizations review that didn't articulate some level of criticism due to a lack of Christian connotation - which should be a reliability issue were it not a reaction reference. I'll take a look to see if there are any credible articles that connect the contradiction in any way that would be appropriate in an encyclopedic context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdogtreefrog (talk • contribs) 06:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
The article YouTube Vanced has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Just a commentX-Editor, I've been meaning to mention this to you for a while. I really appreciate that you take criticism/challenges to your edits so well. I know a few times I've reverted an edit you made and I've seen when other editors have done the same. You always seem to take it in good stride and are willing to open a talk page discussion instead of edit warring when you disagree. You are clearly willing to listen/be persuaded by the arguments made by others. Anyway, I just wanted to let you know. Happy editing! Springee (talk) 03:28, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Planned Parenthood v. CaseyWhat is your "not necessary" logic on the deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avica1998 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Reverse racismGreetings. I've removed the text you added to Reverse racism citing Dictionary.com. A dictionary like this is not an especially valuable source in an article that isn't specifically about a word or phrase. Thank you. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 04:17, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Honorable mentionSee https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Davide_King#Planned_Parenthood_v_Casey and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey#Supreme_Court's_holdings_overturned https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey&oldid=1095538521#See_also https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey&oldid=1095355418#See_also — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avica1998 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Changes to Lede at Michael ShellenbergerHi, Look, I'm not going to revert the changes to the lede again because this is quickly becoming an edit war. I'm not objecting to your sourced additions to the page, and I'm not claiming WP:Ownership. All that I am asking you to do is follow WP:BRD when it comes to the language in the article's lede. The language there has been discussed many times by multiple editors, and the language was agreed upon previously. Thus, it makes sense to discuss there before drastically changing specifically agreed upon language, especially once you've been reverted multiple times, again, per WP:BRD. If you'd like to go to WP:NPOV/V, then be my guest, but I'm not asking you to remove sourced content, and I'm not reverting your sourced additions to the body of the article. I simply stated that these sections are ballooning quickly; however, that's not really the crux of the issue and the wording can be revised and edited at a later date, either by other users or through productive conversations on the article's talk page. Right now, I'm simply asking you to follow WP:BRD policy when it comes to the lede, rather than hashing out disagreements via editing diffs. --Hobomok (talk) 01:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
BLPsTrust me. It's a frustrating process to bring NPOV to the Donald Trump page. GoodDay (talk) 17:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:COVID-19 Immunity passport
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 3RRIf I'm counting right, you just passed 3RR at the Lorenz article. I recommend a self-revert. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Removal of content at List of people killed for being transgenderI disagree with your removal of cited content, and your subsequent reversion to remove it a second time. I have started a WP:BRD discussion at Talk:List of people killed for being transgender. I have pinged you in that discussion. This is a courtesy note in case you miss, or do not accept, pings. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:42, 4 July 2022 (UTC) Gamergate is under 1RRYou've reverted more than once. - ForbiddenRocky (talk) 23:48, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Your edit at What Is a Woman? looks like |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
