User talk:Wrh2

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Wrh2, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alphax τεχ 06:09, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article JAMWiki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The articles gives no references to reliable sources, thus notability is not established. If such sources exist for this article, please remember to remove this template after adding them.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 09:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

I appreciate your participating in the discussion about the proposed Wikimedia travel guide at meta:Talk:Requests for comment/Travel Guide. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I'm excited by the possibility that the community behind Wikitravel could get a second chance to achieve the goal of creating a free, complete, up-to-date and reliable worldwide travel guide. Your efforts in helping to summarize comments in the RFC was much appreciated and (IMHO) very fair-minded. -- Wrh2 (talk) 08:33, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi from felix

Hi Ryan, I just went to your WT Talk page to try and make contact before the decks slipped beneath the waves. I found the link to your talk page here. All became apparent when I examined your recent edit history. I assume the usual suspects will start turning up here at WP fairly soon. cheers -- Felix (talk) 19:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is an effort underway to begin using Wikivoyage for collaboration now that IB is actively working to block mirroring of Wikitravel content - see [1]; note that collaboration efforts at Wikivoyage are still in the early stages. With respect to Wikitravel, while it is possible to modify the spider to backup Wikitravel content without use of the Mediawiki API, if Internet Brands is going to restrict efforts to mirror content, as they've done by refusing to even enable the Mediawiki API in read-only mode, then I'm no longer willing to make any contribution there, and I think many others feel similarly. -- Wrh2 (talk) 21:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikitravel back-up

I keep a close eye on the articles for Minneapolis and Saint Paul; I've only made a few minor edits to them since August 2. I've also made some very minor edits to other articles (mostly routebox stuff), but it's not too big of a deal if it gets lost and I have to redo it. I've been refraining from making any edits to WT since you informed me about WT content no longer being backed up. I've also alerted Sumone10154 on his/her Wikipedia talk page about the WikiVoyage proposal; (s)he has already expressed support for the WMF Travel Guide (#502 on the RFC), but has made recent edits to Wikitravel and might be unaware of the backup issues. Currently looking to see if any other active non-admin WT users (that aren't spam accounts) have WP accounts. Eco84 | Talk 19:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pressing this

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
AWARDED
For rejecting the idea that Wiki users are property of the site owner


After reading the New York Times article, I realize that the present lawsuit claim of tortious interference against you is based on the basic notion that we, as Wiki users - whether on Wikitravel, WikiHow, Encyclopedia Dramatica, countless other Wikis, or even here on Wikipedia - are in fact an asset, i.e. property, of the owners of the site, who can demand that we not be talked to, not told alternative outlets for our publication of material we choose to release under a CC license. For everyone on every Wiki in the world, we owe you a debt of gratitude for standing up to this unreasonable legal claim, in defense of our right to be free and unowned people. We did not join the free content movement to be somebody's property or to have our conversations subjected to somebody's censorship. Wnt (talk) 22:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm very grateful for the community support and most especially for the support that the WMF has provided, and hopefully after the litigation has run its course I'll be able to speak freely about this case. -- Wrh2 (talk) 23:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have just been reading up on the case, and wanted to drop by to offer my support, for what it's worth.
It appears to be a bullying attempt to prevent people from actually using the CC license. If content cannot be forked, the CC license would lose a lot of its value. I know that it's not fun being in the middle of a legal battle, but thank you persisting with this. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Hello Ryan, I just wanted to make contact and say hello. I have the same user name on Wikipedia that I do on Wikitravel. Gamweb (talk) 06:09, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitravel request for deletion immage

Hello, you are also a WikiTravel administrator? I uploaded an image of a coat of arms without license to Wikitravel not to Wikipedia. Sorry but I was a new User Wikitravel and I was inexpert. Would you please be so kind as to delete it for me please? Thank you very much!!! The URL is: http://wikitravel.org/it/File:ProvinciaMonza-Stemma.gif --Simonemb (talk) 10:27, 18 October 2012 (CEST)

Nomination of JAMWiki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JAMWiki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JAMWiki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Your Helpful Edits

Just wanted to thank you for your helpful little edits, like the one for San Juan. Including an edit summary would keep them from being tagged as possible vandalism and disruption. Yours are too important to be left out. Thanks :) Caballero/Historiador (talk) 12:54, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll be sure to include a pointer to WP:Sister in all future edit summaries. -- Ryan • (talk) • 16:50, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Wrh2!

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Reversion on Tulum

Also I forgot to mention that Wikipedia can't be a reference for Wikipedia articles. Senor Cuete (talk) 02:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't added any Wikivoyage links as references. I would ask that you please read WP:Sister, as removing Wikivoyage sister project links while citing them as promotional is counter to the advice given in that Wikipedia guideline. -- Ryan • (talk) • 02:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arenas del Rey

Hi Wrh2, I just opened an account specifically to address your account of Arenas del Rey which I see was edited 19 days ago. I live here as an ex pat Brit and I wonder whether your description of flourishing bars in the village (particularly the one that plays reggae music nights is eentirely accurate, ditto cafe' lining the shoreline (definitely not). Granted, it is currently winter and I understand it is all a bit more lively in the summer when the population expands slightly, but this village like many others in Spain is dying. It is populated by the elderly, and a few transient migrant workers from South America plus a few retired people like me from other European states - young people when they are old enough go to Granada or abroad to work, with quite a few going to the Balaeric isles to work for the summer season. The current population is around 600 whereas in the 1970's it was apparently about 3,000. I rather wonder when you visited Arenas del Rey last - should we revise the entry?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackrbt (talkcontribs) 08:41, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackrbt: I haven't made any edits to Arenas del Rey and don't know anything about that city, so I think you may have the wrong user. -- Ryan • (talk) • 10:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Financial District, Boston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Financial District, Boston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Financial District, Boston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tylr00 (talkcontribs) 19:34, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wrh2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year Wrh2!

--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 12:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wrh2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Wrh2!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.