Is not a very good source for Wikipedia because one cannot link to a specific version of Uptodate. Better to use review articles or statements published by major medical organizations. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1. Advertising or other spam without any relevant or encyclopedic content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject) 2. Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories, and conclusions. 3. Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline. 4. Articles that breach Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Chang_Yi_(Taiwanese_director). Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afoot post hoc (talk • contribs) 17:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It seems that you know a lot about Chang Yi as you added a lot of their work without foreknowledge from published references.
@Afoot post hoc:. The article is not about me, my family, friends, company... There is no conflict of interest between me and this article. Except expanding the article without references, is there any data to support that I and Chang Yi have conflict of interest?--Wolfch (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Chang_Yi_(Taiwanese_director)#Director, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Hi Wolfch! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Issue about COI, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at article, you may be blocked from editing. North-South divide in Taiwan
You removed an incredible size of the article in just a short period of time with just a few words mentioning the title of the Wikipedia's policy is WP:Game:Playing games with policies and guidelines in order to avoid the spirit of consensus, or thwart the intent and spirit of policy, is strictly forbidden. I don't believe that you dare to do the same to any other article on Wikipedia. Anti-crackdown (talk) 20:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SPI formatting
In this SPI report you filed last year, the month name in the header was given as "Jul" instead of "July". It only matters because we've got scripts which parse these files and it couldn't parse that. It's not a big deal, just noting it for your future reference. In any case, thanks for filing the report. -- RoySmith(talk)13:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
