User talk:Wiki brah

For past messages check in This Archive (covering 14 August 2005 to 03 September 2005) Obrigads, W.Brah.

Another Archive from 03 September 2005 to 28 December 2005 Thank youl, Wiki_brah 05:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

Glad you're back.  :) I had to work today! Normally I don't work Saturdays, let alone a holiday weekend. Trouble is, the guy who works weekends over here is on vacation, so here I am. Off tomorrow, though. Had to work Christmas Eve as well! I'm getting two free days off in exchange. My choice of days, so it isn't all bad. - Lucky 6.9 19:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Tip Jar

It's nice to know that someone else noticed that, however I will not condone personal attacks on my talk page or anywhere else. Please comment on contributions and actions, not on users themselves. WP:CIVIL. WAvegetarian ^(talk) (email) ^(contribs) 06:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for arbitration

We have a strict policy against personal attacks. On carefully viewing your request for arbitration, I came to the conclusion that this was in the nature of a personal attack on the user in question, and an abuse of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration. I have blocked you for one week but I think that possibly a longer block an indefinite block would be in order if you seriously intend to continue like this. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 12:36, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanmk you ok sir no problem I understand and I will chill out on the political aspects on wikipedia and gett back to doing article edits when my term expires but anyway I dont eddit that much on here anymore since I actually have a new gf and she's 21 and pretty hot and Castillian so you got to enjoy that! Anyway, I'll leave it up to Maoririder for now, all thedits and what not thank you obrigao!Wiki_brah 15:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Enjoy being with your sexy new girlfriend--I'm sure she's much, much more fun than trolling Wikipedia. I've discussed your case with other administrators on WP:AN and we agreed on reviewing your history that it's time to let you go. You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia indefinitely.

Adeus, aprecíe sua mulher espanhola nova quente. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 20:35, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki brah. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans will be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rschen7754 09:52, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki brah, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SummerPhD (talk) 23:42, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]