|
User talk:Wiki Raja/Archive 4
I have updated the article as best as I can for the time being but it can use some WP:RS sources that say that Dravidians are a race or genetics prove it to make it more neutral. Also look at the discussion page regarding your questionsRaveenS 17:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
3rrYou're not new at this [1]. And you got it right last time. Think about it: how exactly is anyone to know that the first revert *is* a revert. What to? The prev version, of course William M. Connolley 21:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC) Civility on 3RRMy comments on civility were directed not at you, but at the administrator who was out of line with his harshness; "what part of _____ don't you understand?" --Descendall 00:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
MistakesIf I make typing mistake in a message I assume Adam Carr and I having a conversation about something - how come youre in there correcting my bad spelling? I find it somewhat perplexing if you are not party to the general flow of the conversation as to why I find you are editing my messages. I would appreciate in good faith a reasonable explanation as to what you might be doing? SatuSuro 04:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Vedda.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Vedda.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Khoikhoi 06:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC) Template:Dravidian topicshi, All these art forms, Yakshagana, Kuchipudi, Mohiniatta, Bharatanatya etc., are all neither purely 'Dravidian' nor purely 'Indo-Aryan'. Speakers of both language groups have contributed in equal measure to the birth and development of these arts. The Maratha(Indo Aryan) rulers of Tanjore who patronised the great trinity(Dravidians) who in turn composed in Sanskrit(an Indo-Aryan tongue) is a classic example how both language groups have contributed. Almost every single treatise and text of Carnatic music is written in Sanskrit(an Indo-Aryan language). Bharata Muni who wrote the Natya Shastra which is considered the greatest treatise on arts written in India is in Sanskrit(Indo-Aryan). Even the very term 'Natya' is Sanskrit(Indo-Aryan). Indo-Aryan languages and speakers of Indo Aryan languages have contributed handsomely to the development of all of these arts. It is purely an accident of history that these arts are today being practised mostly in South India where majority of the people belong to the Dravidian group of languages. Just because this is the situation prevailing today, we cannot reinvent history to suit our convenience. What if, say, after 200 years or 500 years, if Dravidian groups stop practising Bharatanatya and speakers of Indo Aryan languages take it up. Will the art become 'Indo Aryan' then? Neither Dravidian groups nor Indo-Aryan groups can claim sole ownership or even credit for 'inventing' any of these traditions. If anything, these can only be classified as Indian traditions. Nothing else. Sarvagnya 16:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC) GlitchesBtw, <!-- --> is not a 'glitch'. It was just used to hide the disputed portions instead of deleting it. Read |this page. Sarvagnya 16:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC) thanx...damn I's & E's, Greengiraffe 08:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank You!
Dear Wiki Raja: I have the Evo Morales article on my watchlist, and noticed that you edit that page. Which is how I found your userpage and it is interesting to note that you are a Tamilian. I wondered if you would be interested in taking a look at the Ilaiyaraaja article here on Wikipedia, sometime. We need people who are knowledgeable about the subject to help add a little more content to it (please see the talkpage of the article). If you are able to contribute (or even if you let us know what you think of the article or provide some constructive comments in the talkpage), we would be very delighted! Looking forward to hear from you. With regards, AppleJuggler 12:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Asian2duracell reportHello. There's a template under the "current requests" section which you can copy for the standard formatting. (You'll need to click "edit", and the template will be in hidden comments indicated by MisspellingWhedon misspelled "consistant" in his blog entry. Hence the usage of sic after the word (read the article if you're not aware what it means). Quotes are not supposed to be altered. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Evanescence
problem with sysop es.wikipediaproblem abuse power from user airump, deleting historys in spanish wiki please check —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.45.120.174 (talk) 17:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC). Thank YouFor correcting the spelling on the Garfield Hts article. Anything that can be done to raise awarness of this situation would be appreciated. Do you live here to?... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.244.31.190 (talk) 01:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC).
AsianduracellI am happy to hear this, where can i go to assist?--HalaTruth(ሐላቃህ) 01:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Fixed spelling after vandalism?I've run across a number of your "fixed spelling" edits immediately after an article has been vandalized [2] [3] [4] [5], where you change the spelling of a word in what is obviously vandalism. Please be more careful with your edits. Thanks. --Ronz 17:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Your recent request for CheckuserYou recently compiled and listed a case at requests for checkuser. A checkuser or clerk has requested you supply one or more diffs to justify the use of the checkuser procedure in the case, in accordance with the procedures listed in the table at the top of the requests for checkuser page. For an outcome to be achieved, we require that you provide these diffs as soon as possible. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. Daniel.Bryant 08:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC), checkuser clerk. Re:Carnatic MusicHi, my concern is just that it's better to come to a consent in the talk page before adding anything new to that article. Thanks for your clarification.Gnanapiti 15:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
A warning.Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ok! I've had enough. You not only seem to be tied up in knots with your understanding of the Dravidian issue, you also seem to be ignorant of some of the most basic rules of WP. First of all, realise that what is going on in the "Dravidian" related pages between you, me, that ip user and other users is a 'content dispute'. I dont know if you've noticed, but everyone there is against your views. Even Bakaman with whom I dont share a very cordial wiki-relation seconded my stance. As for you, I dont see any support forthcoming. I started reverting only after I explained on various talk pages at length. Calling my edits vandalism is most uncouth of you and filing a frivolous checkuser just because you cant address the issue to convince others on the talk page is juvenile. Anyway, you seem to be new here(you atleast act like one). As for me, I've been there, done that. As you can see on the checkuser page itself, you arent the first one to try the vengeful tactic on me. Each time I've come out clean. Go ahead and do your worst. Or better still, ping your frnd Parthi for pointers. He'll probably tell you not to get your 'knickers in a knot' on this. Happy trolling. Sarvagnya 16:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
