en User talk:Watchsmart

Sybille Bedford

You've done a very nice job of making Sybille Bedford more readable, and added some interesting information. There are only two things that I question. I know that it is standard to refer to the subject of a biographical article by their surname, but this is problematic when that surname changes over the course of a life. By doing so in this article, we wind up referring to Sybile as "Bedford" before she had that name, and wind up with absurdities such as "Bedford" marrying Terry Bedford (when in fact it was von Schoenebeck who married Bedford). Perhaps a way around this last could be found. As for the other: my impression was that "A Compass Error" was primarily about lesbian love; unless that's wrong, it seems odd not to mention it. But all in all, quite a nice improvement. - Nunh-huh 18:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response on user page. Watchsmart 03:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Progressive Bloggers

You have edited the article Progressive Bloggers. This article is currently being considered for deletion under the wp:afd process. You may contribute to this discussion by commenting here. Thank you.Edivorce 23:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Blogging Tories

You have edited the article Blogging Tories. This article is currently being considered for deletion under the wp:afd process. You may contribute to this discussion by commenting here. Thank you." Edivorce 01:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pet sitting

Great cleanup job on Pet sitting!--Hu12 05:21, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, man! Pet sitting is my new favorite article. Whenever I get bored, Pet Sitting will surely provide me with something to do... Watchsmart 05:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Hero

Thanks for the kind words. I might do a page on the Teknophage, as he seems interesting and I just bought a stack of his comics. -Armaced 04:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dion article

The state of this article has been a concern of mine for some time. I'm tempted to make significant adjustments in the near future. CJCurrie 23:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Letter To God Ltd. article

Hello Watchsmart,

I would like to say I didn't meant to vote twice, only to let the viewers know I altered the article so they will check it again. I removed the Keep from my comment so it will not be counted as a vote.

About the two links to the non-English web site, Ynetnews is the biggest newspaper in Israel, having a post regarding the company there is very notable.

I wrote the article with pure intentions, if you can give me some advice how to make the article better I would appreciate it allot.

Thanks, Koby --Gokoby (talk) 07:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Couple of points: you should find some English language coverage of the topic in order to make it easier for editors here to assess the notability. All we can tell about the articles linked to is that they seem to be on-line only press, written by the same reporter and sort of "light" in scope. To me, "biggest favorite websites of 2006" seems like a list, and not a claim to notability.

And I know that you own the copyright to the text on the Letter to God website, but it is still not acceptable to use it on Wikipedia. You have to change that section of the article. Watchsmart (talk) 00:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Fithian Article

Thank you for your help. I am new to this and trying to figure some parts out. I will try again with different sources.

Thanks Randy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ransdy (talk • contribs) 01:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response over here -Watchsmart (talk) 21:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WPFOOD

Please remove the tag from any animal related any article that does not include human foods. There have been some wired tags, for some reason carpentry is in the foods category. We tried to eliminate as much as possible, but are only human.

Sorry for the problem

--Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 06:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Issue with TinucherianBot in Project Banner Tagging for WP:FOOD

Thank you for expressing your concerns on the recent issue Issue with TinucherianBot in Project Banner Tagging for WP:FOOD . I have made some comments and explainations at Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval#TinucherianBot and I am leaving this note just for your information -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 09:41, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Watchsmart. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice catch on the Virtue Signalling article

Thanks for explaining your reasoning for deleting the Al Cowens info on the Virtue Signalling article. Your conclusions were correct. I have returned the page to where the info was deleted.

		The Detective Barnstar
		Awarded for being better at checking source dates than the Boston Globe. -Wowaconia (talk) 20:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Watchsmart. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Watchsmart. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Watchsmart