The article creator indicated he made a duplicate entry (per log on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk). He was trying to get one of them deleted, and thus blanked it. --Cahk (talk) 10:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do you find it odd the nominator of the RfC has an edit history that looks like this? Not typical newbie. Also mention the policy and guideline issues raised were never addressed by the spliters. IMO this was at best a NC when you weigh the strength of arguments based in policy and guideline. -- GreenC21:25, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't mind, would you revert and wait for a more experienced editor or admin to close? The nature of the topic is difficult, the RfC nom is an SPA, and the policy and guidelines raised in the RfC need to be addressed either by the other participants or the closer. -- GreenC15:59, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:
Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! Swarm {talk} 02:46, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Antivandal Tools
Hi there, I saw your post on Swarm's page, In addition to Huggle, you can also try WP:Stiki that is another tool that uses a different algorithm. Who knows it might be more suitable to your liking. Thanks for your good work. cheers. --DBigXrayᗙ17:02, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, User:DBigXray. Thank you very much for your suggestion. I found that STiki was providing me with a much better queue. I'm going to try and see if there are any settings on Huggle that might be able to make it suit my uses better, and if not I will most likely use STiki full time. Thanks, again for your suggestions. CarelessWombatLet's Talk!03:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On STiki, I believe you can change the Queue and decide which one works best. (Same with Huggle), Basic principle is Most blatant vandalism will be on top of the queue and will be shown first, as you make your way by processing the queue, the vandalism will be less obvious and more like good faith edits, which should not be reverted and left for page watchers who are better expert on the content to decide. Glad to hear that my comment helped you in some way. cheers. --DBigXrayᗙ09:54, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, CarelessWombat, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name. Orphan Wiki10:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
