Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Pasi a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Pasi (Settlement). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steel1943 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Surly I will follow your instruction. (It is requested that Please don't forget to sign your posts next time). WOWIndianTalk17:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mughal travelers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Dear,
Thanks for helping me. Will you please help me further in improving the article including the portions you named, I am in such a tough family disaster that getting new things on my mind is too hard and it is a shame to make a low quality article. If you do, I shall be very grateful.
Shoovrow (talk) 14:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Add more contents to the article with reliable references. You may take help of search engines such as bing and Google for finding more information. But one thing you should keep in mind that your article should not violate the Wikipedia policy. WOWIndianTalk14:44, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I shall be very grateful if you carry on seeing and upgrading it. Now a days I have a bleeding piles among different other bigger problems. So I need people by my side, at least during this tough period.Shoovrow (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
I don't have sufficient information about this article, and I won't be able to bring much contribution to this although I will try.
This is an archive of past discussions with User:WOWIndian. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hello, WOWIndian/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there! Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui雲水11:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Hello WOWIndian, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Miss India Worldwide 1991, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This page is about the 1991 event, the page you are saying it is a duplicate of is about the contest as a whole. If you think this should be deleted you will have eto do it via WP:PROD or WP:AFD. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:35, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
I have removed the maintenance template you placed at J.H. Williams Tool Group. The article does not appear to have any of the problems that you have suggested. Please do not replace without discussion on the articles talk page. Theroadislong (talk) 12:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Miss India Worldwide 1991 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are right but this should be ignored that the same contributor had already created numerous articles such as Mister World 2013, World Miss University India, Miss India Worldwide 2003 with similar content that was earlier deleted by some or the other admins. You are requested please do not remove the deletion template until and unless some outcomes come of the discussion WOWIndianTalk11:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
You are using incorrect deletion rationale, saying the article is eligible under A10 means the article must be about the same subject with no relevant page history. The article is not about the same subject (as I explained above). If you think that the articles should be deleted, than you are going to need to nominate them at AfD, because being a worldwide beauty pageant is enough of an indication of importance to not be eligible for speedy deletion under A7.--kelapstick(bainuu) 11:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
You seem to misunderstand the process of speedy deletion. I do not have to discuss the removal of the tag on the article talk page. Any user except the article creator can remove the tag if they feel the criteria does not apply. The process of speedy deletion can take anywhere from two minuted to two days, there is often not enough time to have a discussion, that is why it is called speedy deletion, because discussion is not necessary. --kelapstick(bainuu) 12:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
It maybe possible I am wrong but you have not even seen the concern about the article nor you have crossed verified with the existing article that it was a split from Miss India Worldwide. I am shocked to hear from you that these two are not of the same subject. WOWIndianTalk12:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes I understand your concern, however you are wrong. Why do you think that I didn't do research before removing the speedy deletion tag? Look at this report that was automatically attached to the tag you added. Do the two pages look the same? I am going to explain this one more time:
They are not the same thing, they are not the same topic, and it is not eligible for speedy deletion under A10. Look at for example Miss America and Miss America 2008, do you think the 2008 edition should be deleted because it is the same subject as Miss America? That is effectively what you are saying with regards to MIW. --kelapstick(bainuu) 12:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Please note that G4 deletion is only appropriate if the article has previously been the subject of a deletion discussion (i.e. has been discussed and deleted at Articles for deletion). Previous deletion for any other reason negates the use of the G4 tag. In this case, the previous deletions were for copyright violations, but the current text appears to be original, so deletion is not warranted. It could use some clean-up, though, if you fancy the challenge. Yunshui雲水10:00, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
You removed the speedy deletion tag from Mugaiyur Magimai Madha Church, and posted the note on the talk page claiming the article should be kept because it could be improved with the addition of reliable sources. Are you aware of the presence of any such sources? If so, please do feel free to add them. Otherwise I'll take the article through AFD. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!!11:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello WOWIndian. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Zaher kadour, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I do not see why this user page is promotional - it only contains userboxes. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 18:09, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Please try to avoid leaving inappropriate templates on experienced users' talk pages
Sitush, for example, has been around a lot longer than you, has made more than 300 times as many edits as you have, and knows what he is doing. Rather than presuming to tell him what he should do in order not to get blocked, you'd be better served asking him what you should do in order not to get blocked.
In general, when you join a new community, like Wikipedia, it is much better to start out slow, and watch, and ask, rather than charge ahead like a bull in a china shop. The long list of warnings on your talk page is not a good thing; it is something you should be trying to prevent. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Is it anywhere Written on Wikipedia, that a user editing articles since a long span, can't make the wrong decisions? WOWॐIndianTalk19:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
No. However, it is common sense that the likelihood of him being wrong, compared to the likelihood of you being wrong, is much smaller. For example, he is right and you are wrong in this case. What I'm saying is, for the last week you've been getting all sorts of warnings on your talk page, telling you you're making mistakes, but you don't seem to be slowing down and trying to make fewer mistakes. It is common courtesy, when you join a new community, to at least try not to cause trouble all the time. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
I pray that you started that ANI thread before you saw this note, because this is getting close to being the last straw. If you cause any further disruption, I am likely to block you from editing. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict) That's not what Floquenbeam wrote. I'll repeat it here in bold: "In general, when you join a new community, like Wikipedia, it is much better to start out slow, and watch, and ask, rather than charge ahead like a bull in a china shop.". You only diminish your credibility when you make a frivolous WP:ANI report asking for blocks. --NeilNtalk to me20:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Did you say that to stop everybody talking? You realize it's impossible to understand? If you have something to ask Theroadislong, please try again. Bishonen | talk21:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC).
You think they're assuming the article has to have some templates..? Fine by me, never mind. WOWIndian, have you heard the one about the panda and the comma ?[1]Bishonen | talk21:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC).
WOWIndian, I realise that you intended no harm with the ANI report etc. I've also got the impression that you are not just new to Wikipedia but perhaps also quite young (don't tell me whether I am right or not, please). How does it sound if perhaps you slowed down a bit and discuss with an experienced contributor any edits that you want to make before you actually make them? Lots of people have used various forms of mentoring on Wikipedia and many of them have become good contributors through such arrangements. I, for one, do not mind helping you out in this way and I've done it before with Rayabhari (talk·contribs). Ok, Rayabhari was not in quite the same position as you but they're generally doing their own thing now: they've learned to fly here.
I am on Wikipedia quite a lot but the gaps that will inevitably happen in any communication will actually help you because they'll give you room to think. I really do think that you mean well but I also think that you could use some help/ - Sitush (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)Is it anywhere Written on Wikipedia, that a user editing articles since a long span..... - Please stop telling this words. Be polite. You are although a very new user with only 360+ edits. Please don't jump everywhere and teach others before you yourself learn properly. User:Sitush has lots more experience than you. You must learn how they work here. BTW I have seen that you have tagged someones userpage as promotional, but it only contain some userboxes. Please consider discussing before performing any such type of actions. As User:NeilN said keep it slow. Observe how experienced user works; Obey what they says and please don't jump. I prefer you should attempt some small edits first or create some articles which will help you gain some experience.
Please don't think that we are attacking you. We are just making you understand what you should not do. Please obey what experience users say because they are just trying to help you. If you continue what you should not do, then I'm afraid (after seeing User:Floquenbeam comment) that you might lose your editing privileges. Ask us freely if you have queries; Follow the guidelines. We are here to help you, not to bite. Thank you for your understanding. JimCarter (talk) 22:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
It is very delighting to hear that all of you are willing to help & guide me on Wikipedia, I wish if could have one in real life. Thank you. WOWॐIndianTalk06:06, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
I am not sure why you thought you needed to nominate a new page for deletion, I hope you don't do this sort of things to newbies, it would seem to be a great way to drive people away. --Tony Wills (talk) 08:52, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Please do not review any new pages. I had seen that you have frequently tagged new pages for deletion. You are new here and it is not appropriate for you to review pages at this stage. You are not yet experienced to do this. Gain experience as I told earlier. Leave this works to other experienced users. I don't think that article is making any sense.- It is not upto you to judge a article if it makes any sense or not. Anyways I think you have understand what I meant. If you need any sort of help then please consider to ask any experienced user, they will help you. Regards. JimCarter (talk) 10:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Jump on vandalism straight away, but it's not our job to prevent changes and additions. If material is obviously wrong then correct it, if it doesn't make sense then talk to the editor. Adding templates is a very blunt way of communicating and an extremely good way of chasing away potential editors. Yes, the original article page wasn't up to much (and somewhat wrong ;-), but then few things are born perfect, they need room to grow. I hope the page now makes a little more sense, and I welcome additions or suggestions :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 12:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing me, well one thing I would like to know User:Jim Cartar that how many pages I have nominated under WP:CSD for speedy deletion and from those nominations how many were deleted and defended against WP:CSD? As per as my knowledge on Wikipedia no where it is specified that a new/user cannot nominated a page under WP:CSD or propose a article for deletion. If someone really have problem with my nomination then they should contest it as WP:CSD meant for. WOWॐIndianTalk12:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Of all of the articles you have nominated for speedy deletion, about 25 have actually been deleted. I don't know how many you have nominated. --kelapstick(bainuu) 12:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
No need to use {{talkback}}, your talkpage is on my watchlist. As to what you said As per as my knowledge on Wikipedia no where it is specified that a new/user cannot nominated a page under WP:CSD or propose a articlte for deletion. please stop telling, there is nowhere written; there is nowhere mentioned etc. It is common sense that a new user should not review new pages. And putting CSD tags are not appropriate for new users. Although you are allowed to review pages and you can tag CSD but we not consider you eligible for this type of works yet (Most of the reviewers have more than 2000+ edits but you have less than 200 edits on mainspace which is not enough to become a new page patroller). You must listen to what experienced users say. You may find it easy to put a CSD on a article but you are unaware of the fact that you might cost your editing privileges, ending up as a banned user. Your contributions are very much welcomed but I prefer you should stop doing this till you gain some good experience. If you continue then I'm afraid that I have to take this issue onto a community discussion which may result bad for you. Please don't be upset I'm just like your friend trying to help. You might not like my comments but I can't do anything I'm just warning you so that your account can be saved from a future block. What you did are not violations but yet it is not appropriate. Please see WP:CONTEMPT; What experienced users say or advice are equivalent to guidelines so you must obey them instead of telling were it is written etc.
Q-So what can I do?
You can edit existing pages, I have seen that you have made some constructive edits on existing articles and I prefer you must continue editing existing pages and leave tagging deletion templates. Thank you for understanding. JimCarter (talk) 16:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Regarding article on 'Keshav Singh'
Dude.. What?
Not only did you remove a deletion tag by yourself but also supported the unwanted content.
The last thing Wikipedia needs is articles of 15 year olds all around talking about themselves.
Are you serious?
Anyway, you might as well be receiving a notice from an admin anytime now.
I have not removed speedy deletion template, I just revised the WP:CSP since it was not specified in the template provided by you. WOWॐIndianTalk19:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
