This is an archive of past discussions with User:WOSlinker. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
(talk page stalker)BeenAroundAWhile: Every opening tag requires a closing tag. When unclosed tags sometimes happen to render the way you want them to render, the software is compensating for an editing error by guessing where the closing tag should go. There is no guarantee that the software will continue to do so; many similar errors have stopped being worked around by the rendering software.
Thank you. Another case of software being as dumb as a brick. But I shall cooperate. (Also I don't know what "lint" means except it's at the bottom of my clothes dryer quite often.) BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:32, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Find a Grave template
This template was discussed for deletion back in May 2016. After the latest RSN discussion in October 2016, WP:RSP lists Find a Grave as something that should almost never be used in EL, and practically never as a source. That said, I think this template is no longer needed.
I'd like to nominate it for deletion, but I can't because it's protected; and Twinkle suggests I contact the protecting admin first. Could you temporarily unprotect it so I can nominate it, or can you submit a deletion nomination? Graywalls (talk) 10:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
WOSlinker, Thanks for fixing my many typos in the coordinates for the Iowa townships. Sorry about that. You were kind to clean it up. GeorgeofOrange (talk) 02:06, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for catching the lower-case params issue - I'm still learning Lua and how it's implemented here, so I'd worried about it in the context of finding a project that had an upper-case character (tbh, I'm wanting to test for non-existance and throw an error instead anyway), but I didn't realise it caused problems otherwise. Is there anywhere you can recommend that details known issues and gotchas? — Sasuke Sarutobi (push to talk) 12:43, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The project and the category names don't always match exactly, so sometimes you can end up with two parameters. One for the project and an optional one for the category names (which if left blank could use the projcect params value anyway). As you'll see at Category:B-Class articles for example, some of the names start with an upper case letter and some with a lower case letter. -- WOSlinker (talk) 13:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
There is a weird font appearing on this page. Could you please fix it? I'm trying to fix it myself, but I don't know what is causing that. NASCARfan0548↗03:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Stop editing my talk archives
I assume you've got some sort of bot that updates the style on announcements - it has twice edited a 2014 archive of my talk page. Please stop it from doing that; archived pages are historical records not only of what was said and done but how things looked. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 15:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
@DavidWBrooks: The edit was to make it look the same as it did before. The template {{border-radius}} has now been deleted, so some of the items on your archive page will no longer have the rounded corners if you rollback that edit. -- WOSlinker (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, an uninvolved editor named Buidhe closed Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_318#RfC:_Sherdog.com some time ago with the consensus for option 2 but somehow he used the explanation for option 3 in this [1]. That caused some confusion and then some editors in favour of option 1 complained about it here at User_talk:Buidhe/Archive_12#RFC_closure. Then Buidhe changed his closure 2 weeks later in this [2], again, and disregarded votes. He gave the explanation for why he changed the closure and disregarded votes 2 weeks later here at the complaint section User_talk:Buidhe/Archive_12#RFC_closure again. Apperantly he thought 5 options were confusing for editors who voted in the RfC and other editors perhaps voted for wrong options without knowing. So he didn't come to any straightforward conclusion and in the end the closure has become a mess that didn't close anything or reflect the consensus outcome of the RfC (or anything at all for one option or the other) although it was a pretty easy and short one with a rather clear rough consensus.
It would be far better if an experienced administrator like you closed the RfC once and for all, and erase this mess the closing editor caused because it affects a lot of articles in the Wiki and cause edit wars that rely on that RfC. Thanks in advance.78.190.169.97 (talk) 14:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
On that JCPC table. I knew the old tags were deprecated, but for some reason I couldn't make the new coding work on the last line. Appreciate it. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:18, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Could you look at Template:US Demographics/perlscript
I noticed that you template protected the Bookdecade template a few years ago, but it only has 99 transclusions, and template protection is usually only used for pages with thousands of transclusions. Could you please consider unprotecting the template or at least decreasing it to semi protection? There hasn't been much if any disruption. Jackattack1597 (talk) 20:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
It has been a week and he hasn't responded to me on his talk page. Should I wait another couple of weeks for him to respond?Jackattack1597 (talk) 19:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am wondering if you are willing to use your bot to fix some Lint errors due to substing of a welcome template? The template is already fixed but it was substed to 840 pages according to regex search.
The problematic code is <div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px darkred; background-color: #000080;">
<center><font size="+1" color="yellow">Hi, {{PAGENAME}}, <font color="white">[[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|Welcome]]</font> to Wikipedia! [[Image:Wikipedia-logo.png|50px]]</font></center></div></div>
This has 1 high priority and 4 low priority Lint errors. Replacing it will cleanup all 5. The replacement is <div style="text-align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px darkred; background-color: #000080; color:yellow; font-size:large;">Hi, {{PAGENAME}}, [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|<span style="color:white;">Welcome</span>]] to Wikipedia! [[Image:Wikipedia-logo.png|50px]]</div>
Thanks. I have just submitted BRFA for signature Lint fixes. The regex for this example is longer than the maximum limit so it may not be possible on AWB, that is why I did not submit this. However it can be done by other bots. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 08:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Hold on with the categories
I know they're not active, I'm in the middle of using Cat-A-Lot to remove them from a list based on the other category. Give me a minute. jp×g18:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Okay, I think I have removed all of the inactive pages from the active category. If you want to go through and check them now, go ahead. jp×g18:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. Even if you just create a bot account, get it approved at WP:BRFA (with the bot flag), and then run it using your existing tools that would be fine. But we should not be doing automated editing like this from a regular account, much less an admin account. – bradv🍁19:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your dedication to Wikipedia. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)
I nominate WOSlinker to be Editor of the Week for their tireless dedication to Wikipedia. With over 668k edits spread across 14 years, they have done a lot of behind the scenes gnomery across Wikipedia by improving templates and fixing broken markup in pages. When the Template Editor user group was introduced in October 2013, WOSlinker (in their role as an Administrator} played a significant role in the transition by lowering the protection level of over 3,700 templates. Since 2018, they have been one of the most active users involved in the tedious task of cleaning up Lint errors. Overall a head-down=get-things-done type of person who has been a long and valuable contributor to Wikipedia.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
A tireless contributor to Wikipedia. 668k edits across 14 years working at behind the scenes gnomery by improving templates and fixing broken markup. The Template Editor user group was introduced in October 2013 and WOSlinker and played a major role by lowering the protection level of over 3,700 templates. Since 2018, they have been involved in the tedious task of cleaning up Lint errors. A head-down get-things-done type of editor valuable to Wikipedia.
Your attempt to fix the div-span-flip lint error in 2016 Colchester Borough Council election did not work. It solved the lint error but messed up the display. I edited the version before your fix, and I expected that my save would cause your version to show up as reverted in the page history, but that did not happen. Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
I have seen the bot skip many full protected user talk archives while doing task 2. Those probably need to be handled by an adminbot after all the errors are fixed in unprotected pages. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 12:15, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
For those 4 I could remove the protection temporarily to allow your bot to fix them if you wanted. For other tasks where's there are more then yes, an adminbot would be needed. -- WOSlinker (talk) 12:27, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Coming back to full protected pages, there are a set of User talk archives that can be unprotected and left as it is. I have noticed that many Admins, especially from before 2010, had a practice of full protecting their own archives. Many of them have since been desysopped due to inactivity and haven't made any edits in years. I had seen one such user before and had their archives unprotected with an RFPP request. See the "User:Mdd4696's talk page archives" section here. There are many more such cases where protection can be removed uncontroversially per protection policy. If you are willing to handle them, I can get you a list of pages and more whenever I find. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!17:51, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I've seen you around on SqWiki helping with some linter errors in the past and I've seen your bot contributions around here. Would you be interested in helping with your bot fix some of our linter errors in your free time? We've got around 15k of them and we're trying to bring the number down to zero (and hopefully keep it there) but our working force is small (basically it's just me and maybe another user or two) so we're looking for all the help that we can get. You're already pretty good on Linter problems so I thought to ask you. I have crat privileges so I can see to make your bot flagged fast if you agree to help. Totally understandable if you can't though. :) - Klein Muçi (talk) 11:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
@Rummskartoffel, can you explain to me a bit more how WPCleaner works in regard to linter errors? And how does it differ from AWB? I've already read the manual but I want to be sure. - Klein Muçi (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
@Klein Muçi: I don't know any details, unfortunately. I know it can fix at least some linter errors, such as "missing-end-tag", which the bot does with task #7. I don't know how to actually set it up to work automatically, or how it differs from AWB, since I don't use AWB. – Rummskartoffel10:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
@NicoV, pretty interesting. Well, currently what we're doing is using w:sq:MediaWiki:Gadget-LintHint.js (I guess you'll know what that is, if not tell me) in identifying problems and if we see a recurring pattern we create a find and replace regex for it in WP:AWB and let one of our 2 bots run that regex throughout the whole namespaces to fix it. This is done over and over again. From what I see from your bot list WCB does that + more so we'd be interested in having as much of its functions approved. Basically everything code syntax related, even small things like extra spaces or other changes of the so-called sort of "cosmetic changes" would be a nice thing to have. Can you write me at my talk page to have a new section about this and guide me in the configuration? I believe it will take a bit because basically I just learned about the existence of this bot so I don't want to overflow WOSlinker's page with notifications. - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
If you need to modify an infobox template that does not have a |module= parameter yet, here's the basic idea. Drop a note here if you have any questions, or if you think of a better way to resolve any of this. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
I've fixed a few that way already but it does nome the content to a different area in the infobox. That should be ok for most things but just wondering about the native names if that's ok. -- WOSlinker (talk) 08:24, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
It's the least bad resolution that I have been able to come up with so far. The fundamental problem is that this template, which has unbalanced table tags in it, is being wrapped in span or div tags, which will never work, as far as I can tell. People should not be using {{infobox name module}} in places that do not support it, but that's a larger battle that I am not interested in fighting right now. Infoboxes that want to use a template like {{infobox name module}} to show multiple native names in the right part of the infobox could add a |native_name_template= parameter, or some other parameter with a better name than that, that is not wrapped in other tags. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
I got the stripped tags under 200, onto one screen, during a long video conference that I didn't have to pay complete attention to. There are still a few easy ones left, but they are getting more difficult. Drop me a note if you have any questions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
While checking the pages skipped by MalnadachBot, I found another signature with PUA character present in 244 pages. The replacement here is →  Can you use your bot to replace this similar to task 11 and 12? ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 13:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
It's used to link mobile friendly portals.... which are few and far between. They are being worked on with the intent to make everything mobile-friendly.... and thus a change to main portal box in time. That said in time I think all portals will be removed
The Portal Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who have made significant contributions to topic portals. Thank you so much for solving a longstanding problem with portal links being visible in mobile view. Moxy-13:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I have started an individual good article reassessment of Photovoltaic power station which was rated "good" in 2013 and I think it needs modernizing. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, could you please give me advice on a user conduct dispute (involving me)?
Hi. I've seen you on the list of active administrators. Presently, I am dealing with a user conduct dispute over at the article Talk:China–Lithuania relations. Evidently, the article is political by nature, so it's a controversial topic (it's especially controversial due to recent events that have occurred in the news). With that being said, the user conduct dispute that has occurred on this talk page, which involves multiple IP users harassing me with personal attacks, has nothing to do with the article itself. The initial cause of all of the disputes was an original edit made by me to the main article back in November, wherein I mass-deleted several edits by an IP user that were completely unsourced and seemed to push a certain bias. After this edit, multiple IP users began trying to force the unsourced edits back into the article, in turn accusing me myself of being biased (which I don't really care about). In fact, another registered user, Intforce, recently came over and reverted the edits of the various IP users; this user agreed with me, saying that unsourced edits that are reverted should stay reverted. It is also important to note that I opened up a talk segment in the corresponding talk page immediately upon performing my original mass revert, inviting discussion about the reverted edits (so, I evidently did not try to sweep my reversion under the rug). It was in this talk section that multiple users began personally harassing me, further accusing me of holding bias (against China, presumably). I don't really care about being accused of bias; this is a trivial matter to me. However, I believe that the line was crossed when one user began pulling material from my own user page in an attempt to incriminate me; I was not actually worried about being "incriminated" per se, but I was very concerned to see relatively sensitive information about me being posted on this public talk article. Originally, I did not intend to escalate the dispute (and I still don't, which is why I haven't taken this to the official channels yet), and I began conducting mild procedures in an attempt to resolve the dispute, such as removing the offending material and politely informing the users on their talk page that I believed that they were harassing me. Subsequently, a user has reverted my resolution edits at the talk page and is now attempting to edit war with me; obviously, I don't want to edit war, because that would incriminate me, so now this is my best option, it seems. I'm sorry for the long post, but I would really appreciate it if you could help me out here. By the way, I have a history of having been banned from Wikipedia once in the past, which is part of the reason that I don't want to escalate the dispute. Generally speaking, I'm a good editor with good intentions, and I can sometimes get a bit hot-headed, though I am definitely not a person who intentionally behave poorly. Thank you, and have a nice day/evening. Jargo Nautilus (talk) 13:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, WOSlinker. I contacted you because the dispute resolution article said that I should contact an administrator before opening up an official case regarding the dispute. I essentially just picked you at random from the list of active administrators. The dispute in question doesn't really fall into any of the listed categories. I've contacted a second administrator apart from you. This administrator actually reverted an edit made by the accused user on the article in question earlier today. I think I will first wait for the second administrator to respond to me before opening up an official case on the noticeboard. Thanks for your time. Jargo Nautilus (talk) 09:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Why is {{div col}} necessary? I don't want to pick a fight on the internet, but the list wasn't looking fine either way (yours or mine). My schedule is prohibiting me from finishing the fix. If I had my way, I would keep the two columns until I finish with my fix. Mandoli (talk)
Div col is more dynamic. You just set the width of a column and then the number of columns used depends on the width of your screen. The other method uses a fix number of columns, which can be ok sometimes as well, but can also lead to a lot of blank space if the screen is wider and can be rather squashed on a narrow screen. -- WOSlinker (talk) 10:14, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Technical Barnstar
Thanks for your work to improve recent portal matters, and in taking part to help enable billions of mobile readers per month to have viewable access to portal links. The collective efforts of all have enabled mobile readers to have a more complete and diversified reading experience. Thanks again! North America100015:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
From my perspective -- and unlike the previous examples -- it's setting the alternative text to be the same as the caption. That's good for a default, but it should be overrideable with the "alt" parameter. — Mudwater (Talk)22:40, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Which way do you prefer it, title={{{Img_alt|{{{alt|{{{Img_capt|{{{caption|}}}}}}}}}}}} or title={{{Img_capt|{{{caption|{{{Img_alt|{{{alt|}}}}}}}}}}}}? -- WOSlinker (talk) 23:06, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
I appreciate the question, but I'm not up to speed on how this works, so I don't understand the two coding options. And on top of that, I don't know what the "title" is either. — Mudwater (Talk)23:27, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
B, please! I've been thinking that the "alt", when specified, should be what's displayed in the tooltip, but perhaps this perspective is overly simplistic. — Mudwater (Talk)00:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi WOSlinker! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk ~~~~~
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
If you are looking for a potential bot task, it appears that some, most, or all of these pages are missing three closing div tags. I haven't done a full investigation to figure out what sort of pattern(s) to match, but all of the ones I have looked at appear to need three closing tags at the end of the page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
I had looked to do this a couple of months ago but remember there were some context issues that made this not suitable for a fully automated task with AWB. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 09:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Lint
No idea what you are fixing or why or what benefit we get from this (actually don’t care either) but its infuriating to have so many dead conversations appear on my watchlist. Either mark as minor or get a bot flag but don’t clog up watchlists as it is considered disruptive. SpartazHumbug!17:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
The context is that you were involved in the FAC 3 discussion for the article (which was not prompted) or you are an editor who made a recent edit to the nonmetal article.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!06:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!19:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!05:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!05:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!05:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
It seems as though my edit got rid of one lint error and just ended up replacing it with another. C'est la vie. :( -- WOSlinker (talk) 18:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!05:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!05:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!06:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!06:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!06:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!06:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!06:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!06:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!06:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg)
